On 21/01, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:50 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> >
> > I understood, more than the code that works with qemu already exists for
> > openstack integration
>
> We have code on vdsm and engine to support librbd, but using in cinderlib
> based volume is not a
On 28/12, Benny Zlotnik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:33 PM Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> >
> > Sandro, FYI we are not against cinderlib integration, more than we are
> > upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 due movement to cinderlib.
> >
> > But (!) current Managed Storage Block realization support only krbd
On 22/02, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 13:02 Alan G wrote:
> >
> > I'm not really concerned about the reporting aspect, I can look in the
> > storage vendor UI to see that. My concern is: will oVirt stop provisioning
> > storage in the domain because it *thinks* the domain is full.
3 matches
Mail list logo
