[ovirt-users] Re: Issues with resizing Gluster Volumes with sharding and lookup-optimize enabled

ere would be how to achieve this, we do not have any hooks in place for upgrade neither in ovirt nor in gluster. @Gobinda Das Do you see any way to achieve this ? Thanks, Satheesaran Sundaramoorthi ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe

[ovirt-users] Re: Import Ge0-Replicated Storage Domain fails

read-only on the slave volume. # gluster volume set features.read-only off I do not think the documentation details available upstream. @Ritesh Chikatwar Could you check, whether the documentation is available upstream. Thanks, Satheesaran Sundaramoorthi > On 28 May 2021, at 08:01, Simon

[ovirt-users] Re: Fwd: Unable to Upgrade

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:09 PM Jayme wrote: > Hello, > > I am running oVirt 4.3.6 and glusterd service and peers on all HCI nodes > are connected and working properly after updating. I'm not sure if I > understand what your question or issue is. It definitely should be safe to > update your

[ovirt-users] Re: Fwd: Unable to Upgrade

6, your peers are in disconnected state, could you confirm that glusterd service is up and running on all HCI nodes ( # systemctl status glusterd ). Meanwhile, I can also try for the quick update from gluster-5.6 to 6.5 and update the results here. -- Satheesaran S ( sas ) _

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.6 is now generally available

ster is not yet validated thoroughly. Based on the above items, it would be better you have emulate512=on or delay your production setup ( if possible, till above both items are addressed ) to make use of 4K VDO volume. @Sahina Bose Do you have any other suggestions ? -- Satheesaran S (sas) >

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.6 is now generally available

I could enable the emulate512 flag on VDO but I >> can not find how to do this on an existing VDO volume. Is this possible? >> > As state above, this is not possible. Once VDO volume is created, its block size can't be changed dynamically. -- Satheesaran S ( sas ) ___

[ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-announce] Re: Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.4 First Release Candidate is now available

d the storage domain in ovirt now. >> >> I see network.remote-dio=enable is part of the gluster virt group, so >> apparently it’s not getting set by ovirt duding the volume creation/optimze >> for storage? >> > > I'm not sure who is responsible for changing these se

[ovirt-users] VMs going in to non-responding state

up in non-reponding state after sometime. I have raised bug[1] for this issue. Request for help with this issue [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488863 Advance Thanks. -- Satheesaran S ( sas ) ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt split brain resolution

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Abi Askushi wrote: > Hi all, > > For the records, I had to remove manually the conflicting directory and ts > respective gfid from the arbiter volume: > > getfattr -m . -d -e hex e1c80750-b880-495e-9609-b8bc7760d101/ha_agent > > That

Re: [ovirt-users] VMs running in DB, but not in VDS

On 06/20/2016 05:33 PM, Arik Hadas wrote: Hi Satheesaran, Could you please add the full engine.log? It would be best to open a bug and attach the log to it Thanks, Arik Arik, Thanks for your suggestion. I have raised a bug[1] which has the attached full engine.log VM names are appvm03

[ovirt-users] VMs running in DB, but not in VDS

:: java.lang.ClassCastException Any help ? Thanks, Satheesaran S ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] VMs seems to be slow, while snapshot delete is happening

On 05/14/2016 02:38 AM, Greg Padgett wrote: On 05/12/2016 03:46 AM, SATHEESARAN wrote: Hi All, I have created a VM with 60GB of disk space. I have started I/O inside the VM, after sometime when the disk was 4GB full, I took a snapshot of the disk from UI. I/O kept continuing and the new

[ovirt-users] VMs seems to be slow, while snapshot delete is happening

this would initiate block-merges. During this time, my I/O was were slower, till the snapshot delete is completed. Its not very slow, but slow. Is this a known behavior ? Advance thanks, Satheesaran S ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http

[ovirt-users] Issue while importing the existing storage domain

2] - https://paste.fedoraproject.org/357701/11448771/ Thanks, Satheesaran S BindingXMLRPC::INFO::2016-04-20 10:42:10,604::xmlrpc::73::vds.XMLRPCServer::(handle_request) Starting request handler for 127.0.0.1:37704 Thread-4816::INFO::2016-04-20 10:42:10,605::xmlrpc::84::vds.XMLRPCServer::(_process_request

[ovirt-users] Issue while importing the existing storage domain

2] - https://paste.fedoraproject.org/357701/11448771/ Thanks, Satheesaran S BindingXMLRPC::INFO::2016-04-20 10:42:10,604::xmlrpc::73::vds.XMLRPCServer::(handle_request) Starting request handler for 127.0.0.1:37704 Thread-4816::INFO::2016-04-20 10:42:10,605::xmlrpc::84::vds.XMLRPCServer::(_process_request

[ovirt-users] Importing data domain

there any better way to import the existing data domain ? -- Satheesaran ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Cannot activate storage domain

cli. ( # gluster volume reset vol-name quorum-type ) Hope that helps. -- Satheesaran S On 12/19/2014 01:09 PM, Sahina Bose wrote: [+Sas - thanks for the link to virt-store usecase article inline] On 12/18/2014 06:56 PM, Brent Hartzell wrote: Hello, I had actually gotten this sorted out