Hello,
Under my environment, clients must go through a proxy to reach the oVirt
cluster(physical nodes), so that I applied DNAT rules for engine and VM IPs to
clients.
but there were still some issues like VNC console(+browser) don't work, and I'm
not sure other features work well.
so, I'm
Thanks~!
for sure, that's the simple and perfect reason.
Sincerely,
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
Thanks for the reply!
Do you know why oVirt doesn't support such basic(at least to me) features like
NAT, dhcp server, ...?
it seems somewhat harsh to the users. just curious
Sincerely,
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an
Thanks, Strahil
You mean I should define hook scripts for such network setting?
and in case of using OVN, can I use direct ovn commands or related
(neutron)rest API calls for it instead of vdsm hooks?
last one, could you please explain in more detail about floating IP..
I couldn't understand
Hello everyone!
I'm wondering there is any feature like applying routing rules for VM to reach
the external network (and vice versa).
and I guess it's different according to using external provider(OVN).
if not, how to users usually assign floating IP to VM??
Thanks
Sincerely,
thank you Gianluca for the good link.
it was really helpful and, they are really different considering the notion.
but as "OpenStack" implements many features not only for cloud but also for
traditional workload, I guess it's also good fit for traditional workload.
So, I'm wondering whether
thanks, Luca
As you said, I thought they have different use cases like pets vs cattle.
but as OpenStack supports many features(like live migration, snapshot, vm HA,
...), it "I guess" seems to encompass what oVirt can do.
so is there any specific use case oVirt only covers??
Hi guys,
I'm wondering why people say oVirt is better suited for traditional workloads
like long-lived VMs than OpenStack.
does oVirt have some additional features for it?
Of course, VMs in OpenStack might be intentionally killed according to resource
pressure if auto-scaling is used.
but
Hello,
I'm wondering why the cgroup for the VM is generated, because I thought VM and
cgroup are not related.
does qemu/KVM use (memory) cgroup to handle memory resources or something else?
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send
Thanks for being soo helpful!!
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
Hello,
I heard some say SPM disappeared since 3.6.
nevertheless, SPM still exists in oVirt admin portal or even in RHV's manual.
So, I am wondering whether SPM still exists now.
And could I know how to get more detailed information for oVirt internals??
is the code review the best way?
oh, sorry It seems that hard link is generated
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
Hello,
I want to know whether a base disk image is physically copied whenever the VM
is created from a template.
I've just created a VM based on template with 1 disk and checked VM's virtual
disk images.
there were (1)base image copied? from the template, (2)new delta image.
Here, (1) image
Hello,
I thought memory overcommit feature in oVirt utilizes host's overcommit
features by manipulating kernel variables like vm.overcommit_ratio,
vm_overcommit_memory.
but, I've just confirmed that those variables didn't change at all.
I wonder if oVirt's overcommit really has nothing to do
Thanks David,
I've just checked it and that's what I want.
an engine seems quite enough in the usual case.
Best regards,
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement:
As you said, adding a separate engine seems to be far far better.
And I've just checked 'Supported Limits for Red Hat Virtualization' which
describes spec as you said.
thanks!! :)
Best Regards,
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe
thanks for your reply! :)
I was skeptical because only an engine should handle "many requests" toward it
as front-end, periodic communication to each VDSM, VM scheduling and so on.
but, as you said, highly specced bare-metal is enough to cover that, right??
Hello,
given massive oVirt environment, I think single engine looks too small to deal
with all workloads.
so, I want to make active-active engine cluster for distributing workloads.
is it possible for an oVirt environment to be made up of multiple engines & DBs
for load balancing?
Hi everyone!
I want to know clear strength of oVirt compared to openstack and kubevirt(VM
add-on for k8s).
compared OpenStack, I heard oVirt is specialized in long-lasting traditional
apps requiring robust and resilient infra while OpenStack is cloud solution.
so, backend is suited for oVirt
isn't it SPM's job?
and is the "use host" required only for setup?
thanks for quick replying.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
20 matches
Mail list logo
