Re: [ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Nir Soffer
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:39 PM Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Gianluca Cecchi < > gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3 disks for a total >> of about 200Gb to copy >> The

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 28.09.2017 um 12:44 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:03 PM Gianluca Cecchi > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3 disks for a total > > of about 200Gb to copy > > The target I choose is on a different

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 28.09.2017 um 12:44 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:03 PM Gianluca Cecchi < > gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Nir Soffer
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:03 PM Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Hello, > I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3 disks for a total > of about 200Gb to copy > The target I choose is on a different domain than the source one. > They are both FC storage domains,

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Hello, > I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3 disks for a total > of about 200Gb to copy > The target I choose is on a different domain than the source one. > They are both FC storage

[ovirt-users] Performance of cloning

2017-09-28 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Hello, I'm on 4.1.5 and I'm cloning a snapshot of a VM with 3 disks for a total of about 200Gb to copy The target I choose is on a different domain than the source one. They are both FC storage domains, with the source on SSD disks and the target on SAS disks. The disks are preallocated Now I