__________
> Da: Alex K
> Inviato: giovedì 28 giugno 2018 21:34
> A: Stefano Zappa
> Cc: Yaniv Kaul; devel; users@ovirt.org
> Oggetto: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-devel] Re: oVirt HCI point-to-point
> interconnection
>
> Hi,
>
> Network virtualization is already
:34
A: Stefano Zappa
Cc: Yaniv Kaul; devel; users@ovirt.org
Oggetto: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-devel] Re: oVirt HCI point-to-point
interconnection
Hi,
Network virtualization is already here and widely used. I am still not sure
what is the gain of this approach. You can do the same with VxLANs
Hi,
Network virtualization is already here and widely used. I am still not sure
what is the gain of this approach. You can do the same with VxLANs or
Geneve. And how do you scale this? Is it only for 3 node clusters?
Alex
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 11:47 Stefano Zappa wrote:
> Hi Yaniv,
> no, the f
Hi Yaniv,
no, the final purpose is not to save a couple of ports.
The benefit is the trend to convergence and consolidation of the networking, as
already done for the storage.
The external interconnection is a critical element of the HCI solution, a
configuration without switches would give more
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Zappa
wrote:
> The final purpose is strictly targeted to your HCI solution with 3-node
> gluster replication.
>
Can you explain to me what the benefit is? You need a switch anyway (for
uplink), so the 'cost saving' is that you can use a 4 port (?) switch
5 matches
Mail list logo
