[ovirt-users] Re: Best arquitecture for 2 location

2019-05-08 Thread raul . caballero . girol
Perfect, I think this is the best solution, very simple and clear. Thank you for your help ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/

[ovirt-users] Re: Best arquitecture for 2 location

2019-05-08 Thread Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto
Hello Raul, i think the best solution is this to put engine on one site, managing both. I'd put to an external vm, not self hosted engine, for better flexibility in this kind of scenario. Once done, move a copy of the data frequently to the remote site (copy the vm via storage replication or

[ovirt-users] Re: Best arquitecture for 2 location

2019-05-08 Thread raul . caballero . girol
Hi Luca, thank you for your reply, The idea is that the 2 sites will be up. I have read a disaster recovery guide, but I dont need a disaster recovery, I need that, when a site with my manager down, I can have visibility of the situation. And for this I need my manager. And, when I recover my

[ovirt-users] Re: Best arquitecture for 2 location

2019-05-07 Thread Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto
Hello, do you want to have both sites up and running? If not, try looking at oVirt Disaster Recovery: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-ansible-disaster-recovery On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 5:16 PM wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I have 2 location separate geographically. I want to deploy an ovirt >

[ovirt-users] Re: Best arquitecture for 2 location

2019-05-06 Thread Strahil
You may use gluster with geo-replucation, but that doesn't support gluster updates from remote to local side, so the second location is your DR site and nothing else should be running. Maybe Simone/Sahina can clarify the ovirt part of the setup. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn May 6, 2019