On 22/02, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 13:02 Alan G wrote:
> >
> > I'm not really concerned about the reporting aspect, I can look in the
> > storage vendor UI to see that. My concern is: will oVirt stop provisioning
> > storage in the domain because it *thinks* the domain is full.
we use the stats API in the engine, currently only to check if the
backend is accessible, we have plans to use it for monitoring and
validations but it is not implemented yet
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:35 PM Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:03 PM Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> >
> > On 22
Thanks for the clarification on this. I've realised my mistake now - I need to
configure the storage array to report the LUNs as larger than they physically
are (to account for the expected de-dup ratio). I was expecting oVirt to
magaically know about this, which when thinking it through is not
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:03 PM Gorka Eguileor wrote:
>
> On 22/02, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 13:02 Alan G wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not really concerned about the reporting aspect, I can look in the
> > > storage vendor UI to see that. My concern is: will oVirt stop
> > > provis
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 13:02 Alan G wrote:
>
> I'm not really concerned about the reporting aspect, I can look in the
> storage vendor UI to see that. My concern is: will oVirt stop provisioning
> storage in the domain because it *thinks* the domain is full. De-dup is
> currently running at abou
I'm not really concerned about the reporting aspect, I can look in the storage
vendor UI to see that. My concern is: will oVirt stop provisioning storage in
the domain because it *thinks* the domain is full. De-dup is currently running
at about 2.5:1 so I'm concerned that oVirt will think the do
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 17:14 Alan G wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an oVirt cluster with a storage domain hosted on a FC storage array
> that utilises block de-duplication technology. oVirt reports the capacity
> of the domain as though the de-duplication factor was 1:1, which of course
> is not the case
7 matches
Mail list logo