On Jun 14, 2016 5:37 PM, "Fernando Frediani"
wrote:
>
> Hi Nir,
>
> I wouldn't say that the performance coming from LVM is significantly
better than from a filesystem if the last is well built. In VMware the
performance from a VMDK running on the top of VMFS5 and from a RDM has no
significant gain
Hi Nir,
I wouldn't say that the performance coming from LVM is significantly
better than from a filesystem if the last is well built. In VMware the
performance from a VMDK running on the top of VMFS5 and from a RDM has
no significant gain one over another. I've always preferred to have
machin
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> Hi Nir,
> Thanks for clarification.
>
> Answering your questions: The intent was to use a Posix like filesystem
> similar to VMFS5 (GFS2, OCFS2, or other) where you have no choice for how
> the block storage is presented to multiple serv
Hi Nir,
Thanks for clarification.
Answering your questions: The intent was to use a Posix like filesystem
similar to VMFS5 (GFS2, OCFS2, or other) where you have no choice for
how the block storage is presented to multiple servers. Yes I heard
about GFS2 escalation issues in the past, but thou
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I see that supported storage types in oVirt are: iSCSI, FCoE NFS, Local and
> Gluster.
We support iSCSI, FC, FCoE, NFS, Gluster, Ceph, Local and any posix like
shared file system.
> Specifically speaking about iSCSI and FC
Hi there,
I see that supported storage types in oVirt are: iSCSI, FCoE NFS, Local
and Gluster.
Specifically speaking about iSCSI and FCoE I see they use LVM on the
block storage level to store the Virtual Machines.
I just wanted to understand why the choice was to have LVM and if that
is the
6 matches
Mail list logo