Re: [ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-10 Thread Itamar Heim
On 04/09/2014 11:01 PM, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: I'm assuming the answer is no. But for some reason I seem to be the answer is yes actually. if you want a host you can change, use plain fedora/rhel/centos as the host. Fabian can reply to the rest. getting LVM volume group UUID overruns. I'm

Re: [ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-10 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 09:19 +0300 schrieb Itamar Heim: On 04/09/2014 11:01 PM, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: I'm assuming the answer is no. But for some reason I seem to be the answer is yes actually. if you want a host you can change, use plain fedora/rhel/centos as the host. Fabian can

Re: [ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-10 Thread Jeremiah Jahn
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Fabian Deutsch fabi...@redhat.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 09:19 +0300 schrieb Itamar Heim: On 04/09/2014 11:01 PM, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: I'm assuming the answer is no. But for some reason I seem to be the answer is yes actually. if you want a

Re: [ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-10 Thread Jorick Astrego
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 08:02 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Fabian Deutsch fabi...@redhat.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 09:19 +0300 schrieb Itamar Heim: On 04/09/2014 11:01 PM, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: I'm assuming the answer is no. But for some

Re: [ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-10 Thread Jeremiah Jahn
awesome thanks! On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jorick Astrego j.astr...@netbulae.eu wrote: On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 08:02 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Fabian Deutsch fabi...@redhat.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 09:19 +0300 schrieb Itamar Heim: On

[ovirt-users] is ovirt-node.iso supposed to create a readonly filesystem?

2014-04-09 Thread Jeremiah Jahn
I'm assuming the answer is no. But for some reason I seem to be getting LVM volume group UUID overruns. I'm using direct attach fiber channel, and everything looks good, but there appears to be some UUID or Volume group name in my list of LUNs that matches some sort of lvm key from the node root