Hello everybody,
using ovirt node many of the drivers to access storage are not in the
kernel drivers (anymore).
For example I have a bunch of (old) hypervisors (50+), with infiniband
nics, used to access storage. For all those hypervisors I abandoned
ovirt node, in favor of a base CentOS stream distro, with ovirt repo and
using kernel-plus repo (conatining all the needed stuff).
Obviously this is not a step I liked, I definitely prefer ovirt node.

Now my proposal: why don't include kernel-plus in ovirt-node, instead of
traditional kernel?

I know this would be a big change, and maybe @Sandro and all RH guys
(they have a more general perspective) can see some drawback I don't,
but... hey, I just tried! :-)

Thank you in advance,
Giulio
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/SR7QFMWOKCCTQO5OB6L4DSAT7IIFAANG/

Reply via email to