ginal Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek" <michal.skriva...@redhat.com>
> To: "Karli Sjöberg" <karli.sjob...@slu.se>, "Demeter Tibor"
> <tdeme...@itsmart.hu>
> Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8,
ob...@slu.se>, "Demeter Tibor"
<tdeme...@itsmart.hu>
Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 10:18:54 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] strange iscsi issue
On 8 Sep 2015, at 07:45, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> tis 2015-09-08 klockan 06:59 +0200 sk
Are we talking about a single ssd or an array of them? VMs are usually large
continuous image files. SSDs are faster delivering many small files over large
continuous file.
I believe ovirt forces sync writes by default, but I'm not sure as I'm using
NFS. The best thing to do is figure out
tis 2015-09-08 klockan 06:59 +0200 skrev Demeter Tibor:
> Hi,
> Thank you for your reply.
> I'm sorry but I don't think so. This storage is fast, because it is a SSD
> based storage, and I can read/write to it with fast performance.
> I know, in virtual environment the I/O always slowest than on
On 8 Sep 2015, at 07:45, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> tis 2015-09-08 klockan 06:59 +0200 skrev Demeter Tibor:
>> Hi,
>> Thank you for your reply.
>> I'm sorry but I don't think so. This storage is fast, because it is a SSD
>> based storage, and I can read/write to it with fast performance.
>> I know,
On 08/09/15 09:05, Alex McWhirter wrote:
> Are we talking about a single ssd or an array of them? VMs are usually large
> continuous image files. SSDs are faster delivering many small files over
> large continuous file.
>
> I believe ovirt forces sync writes by default, but I'm not sure as I'm
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
I'm sorry but I don't think so. This storage is fast, because it is a SSD based
storage, and I can read/write to it with fast performance.
I know, in virtual environment the I/O always slowest than on physical, but
here I have a very large difference.
Also, I use
Unless you're using a caching filesystem like zfs, then you're going to be
limited by how fast your storage back end can actually right to disk. Unless
you have a quite large storage back end, 10gbe is probably faster than your
disks can read and write.
On Sep 7, 2015 4:26 PM, Demeter Tibor
Hi All,
I have to create a test environment for testing purposes, because we need to
testing our new 10gbe infrastructure.
One server that have a 10gbe nic - this is the vdsm host and ovirt portal.
One server that have a 10gbe nic - this is the storage.
Its connected to each other throught
9 matches
Mail list logo