Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-22 Thread Michal Skrivanek
On Feb 21, 2013, at 21:11 , Jaco ubuntumu...@gmail.com wrote: http://cloudiad.com/analysis/doc1 it looks noVNC would be easier to integrate with. Thanks for the link - did not know that. I think noVNC has a bit more traction in the industry (with good reason), since is does seem to be

Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-22 Thread noc
On 22-2-2013 12:04, Michal Skrivanek wrote: well, there is HTML5 SPICE client we have in mind for some time as well….it's a different project, but since the integration is as easy as (well, relatively:) adding the right web page with client I think it's still a better choice for initial

Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-22 Thread Michal Skrivanek
On Feb 22, 2013, at 14:17 , noc n...@nieuwland.nl wrote: On 22-2-2013 12:04, Michal Skrivanek wrote: well, there is HTML5 SPICE client we have in mind for some time as well….it's a different project, but since the integration is as easy as (well, relatively:) adding the right web page with

Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-21 Thread Michal Skrivanek
On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:10 , Jaco ubuntumu...@gmail.com wrote: I've seen this in the list archives, but not sure how much traction it's gained in the intervening period (or ). Hi, still pending, but we're getting there:-) I've fiddled with, and had some pretty decent experiences with

Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-21 Thread Dead Horse
My 2 cents here. I think what he masses would like to ultimately see here is a pure web based SPICE/VNC client nicely integrated into the user/admin portals. In this regard the console becomes truly portable across operating systems and browsers. The biggest win here is no longer having to be

Re: [Users] VNC web console

2013-02-21 Thread Jaco
http://cloudiad.com/analysis/doc1 it looks noVNC would be easier to integrate with. Thanks for the link - did not know that. I think noVNC has a bit more traction in the industry (with good reason), since is does seem to be a fairly simple straight-forward client, whereas Guagamole is