[ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.1 RC status

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Hi,
We're going to start composing oVirt 3.5.1 RC on *2014-12-02 08:00 UTC* from 
3.5 branch.
In order to stabilize the release a new branch ovirt-engine-3.5.1 will be 
created from the same git hash used for composing the RC.

The bug tracker [1] shows 3 open blocker:
Bug ID  Whiteboard  Status  Summary
1162640 gluster POSTsupervdsm segfault in libgfapi while querying 
volume status detail
1160846 sla NEW Can't add disk to VM without specifying disk 
profile when the storage domain has more than one disk profile
1159839 storage POSTNew FC LUNs are not detected on hypervisor 
without a reboot


The following bugs have been keyworded as Regression and not marked as blockers:

Bug ID  Whiteboard  Status  Target  Summary
1160846 sla NEW --- Can't add disk to VM without specifying 
disk profile when the storage domain has more than one disk profile
1118349 storage NEW 3.5.1   [vdsm] Creating DataCenter 3.5 using 
master domain V1 fails with InquireNotSupportedError


In order to stabilize the release a new branch ovirt-engine-3.5.1 will be 
created from the same git hash used for composing the RC.

Maintainers:
- Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-12-01 15:00 
UTC*
- Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release before 
*2014-12-01 15:00 UTC*
- If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as 
possible.
- Please provide an ETA for the pending blockers as soon as possible.

Infra:
- Please check Jenkins status for 3.5 jobs and sync with relevant maintainers 
if there are issues.

There are still 98 bugs [2] targeted to 3.5.1.
Excluding node and documentation bugs we still have 71 bugs [3] targeted to 
3.5.1.

Maintainers / Assignee:
- Please review bugs marked as Regression and add to blocker if they're real 
regressions.
- Please add the bugs to the tracker if you think that 3.5.1 should not be 
released without them fixed.
- Please update the target to 3.5.2 or later for bugs that won't be in 3.5.1:
  it will ease gathering the blocking bugs for next releases.
- Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [4]

Community:
- If you're testing oVirt 3.5 nightly snapshot, please add yourself to the test 
page [5]


[1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1155170
[2] http://goo.gl/7G0PDV
[3] http://goo.gl/6gUbVr
[4] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5.1_Release_Notes
[5] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/oVirt_3.5.1_Testing


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] DataCenters/QoS/CPU

[Artyom Lukianov]

You need to specify limit for host cpu loading in %, so if you want that your 
vm will not utilize more than 30% of host cpu you need to put this value to 30.
Thanks

- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Giacchetta" 
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 5:47:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] DataCenters/QoS/CPU

Hello, 

I want to implement a new CPU QoS but i don't know what data needs in "Limit: 
field. 
I saw this page, http://www.ovirt.org/Features/CPU_SLA but as i can see it only 
reference to http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPUTuning 

Does Limit field need to be filled with some options from ? 
Is there some related information? 

Ovirt: 3.5.1 
Centos: 6.6 

Regards, 

-- 
Luciano Giacchetta | Tecnología Informática 
+Linea: +54 (11) 6091 7601 +iNum: +883 510 009 903 145 
+eMail: luciano.giacche...@osit.com.ar +Site: http://www.osit.com.ar 

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Hi,

Release criteria discussion started on 2014-10-22 and will end today 2014-11-26 
as discussed in last oVirt sync meeting [1].

If no objections will be raised, the proposed changes [2] will be accepted.

Release management for 3.6.0 has been created [3]
The key milestones for this release must be scheduled:

Key Milestones
Release criteria discussion start: 2014-10-22
Release criteria ready: 2014-11-26
Feature freeze: 60 Days before release
First Test Day: 45 days before release
Release Candidate: 30 days before release
Release: 6 months after oVirt 3.5.0 release

External Project Schedules
Fedora 21: 2014-12-09
Fedora 22: 2015-XX-XX
GlusterFS 3.7: 2015-04-29
OpenStack Kilo: 2015-04-30


Two different proposals have been made about above scheduling [4]:
1) extend the cycle to 10 months for allowing to include a large feature set
2) reduce the cycle to less than 6 months and split features over 3.6 and 3.7

Feature proposed for 3.6.0 must now be collected in the 3.6 google doc [8]
and reviewed by maintainers.

A tracker bug for 3.6.0 has been created [5] and currently shows no blockers.

There are 439 bugs [6] targeted to 3.6.0.
Excluding node and documentation bugs we have 419 bugs [7] targeted to 3.6.0.


[1] 
http://resources.ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-11-19-15.01.log.html
[2] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008695.html
[3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Release_Management
[4] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/028875.html
[5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155425
[6] http://goo.gl/zwkF3r
[7] http://goo.gl/ZbUiMc
[8] http://goo.gl/9X3G49


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status

[Sven Kieske]

On 26/11/14 09:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> If no objections will be raised, the proposed changes [2] will be accepted.

I fear I got an objection:

quote:
>> * Alpha release should come after feature freeze
> Nothing more to say about it

I really think you are twisting the way what is commonly known as an
"alpha":

from wikipedia:
"[..]The alpha phase usually **ends** with a feature freeze[..]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_software#Alpha
emphasis added by me.

you are doing it the wrong way: first release an alpha, than
make a feature freeze. _After_ feature freeze you can release
a beta.

I really like this terminology and think it is commonly known
and accepted and it works very well.

thoughts?

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Failed Glance Image Import Task Cannot Be Removed

[Federico Simoncelli]

Hi Chris, can you share the link/code of the task removal script that
you used?

Thanks,
-- 
Federico

- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Routh" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:25:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Failed Glance Image Import Task Cannot Be Removed
> 
> No ideas from anyone?
> 
> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 08:13 -0500, Chris Routh wrote:
> > Greetings fellow mailing listers,
> > 
> > I've been using oVirt since September now, and using version 3.5
> > currently. When I first setup my small cluster I decided to import a
> > CentOS image from the glance image repository. However the first time
> > I tried it the import failed to complete. The problem is that oVirt
> > has not clued in that this import failed even 2 months and several
> > reboots of the entire cluster later. I ended up re-attempting the
> > import a day later (this is back in September) and it worked, however
> > this invalid task is still in my task list.
> > 
> > I tried using a few tricks from this mailing list when I encountered
> > this, one was to run a task removal script on the hosted-engine.
> > However while that removed other stale tasks like drive copying.. it
> > never seems to work for this import task. This task disappears when I
> > run the script, but reappears once the hosted-engine is restarted.
> > It's stuck.. somewhere. I had settled on giving up on cleaning up this
> > nuisance a month ago, and had planned to forget about it; until today.
> > 
> > Today I am upgrading my storage pool from a simple NFS share on an old
> > linux server to a proper NFS volume on a new FreeNAS device.
> > Everything was smooth until I moved everything off the old NFS share
> > and wanted to put it into maintenance mode so I could cleanly remove
> > it from the datacenter. I cannot remove it. Attempting to remove it
> > produces the error:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Operation Canceled
> > Error while executing action: Cannot deactivate Data Domain while
> > there are running tasks on this data domain.
> > -Please wait until tasks will finish and try again.
> > 
> > So now I am forced to find the solution to removing this task. I know
> > the task's ID is 765780ce but how do I rid myself of this ghost once
> > and for all? Also important to mention I have noticed there is a
> > 'Locked' disk associated with this task.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > 
> > Chris Routh
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Master Storage Domain fails to activate

[Liron Aravot]

- Original Message -
> From: "Eli Mesika" 
> To: "Nathan Llaneza" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:48:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Master Storage Domain fails to activate
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nathan Llaneza" 
> > To: "users" 
> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:18:48 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] Master Storage Domain fails to activate
> > 
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > I am running oVirt 3.4.4 in my datacenter. Over the weekend the datacenter
> > completely lost power. I have brought all the hypervisor back online;
> > however it will not bring the Master storage domain back online. Just to
> > rule out a few issues I have
> > 
> > * stopped iptables on the storage domains
> > * verified that each hypervisor has mounted all of the storage domains
> > (using the mount command from a ssh session)
> > * mounted the storage domains individually from the engine
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't think that it is a connection issue, but rather a data corruption
> > issue. I could use a little help interpreting the log files. Thank you.
> 
> From the engine log it really seems that master SD is corrupted , CC'ing
> Allon M who is in charge of the storage team in order to get more direction
> how to recover from that ...

Hi Nathan,
please attach also the vdsm logs from the hosts.
also, please check the storage access from the hosts and what's under the 
domain dirs - for example the domain under 172.16.241.98:/mnt/storage
(1c4abda0-906b-4faf-a2e3-b6683729cc2f)
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 26/11/2014 09:50, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
> 
> 
> On 26/11/14 09:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> If no objections will be raised, the proposed changes [2] will be accepted.
> 
> I fear I got an objection:
> 
> quote:
>>> * Alpha release should come after feature freeze
>> Nothing more to say about it
> 
> I really think you are twisting the way what is commonly known as an
> "alpha":
> 
> from wikipedia:
> "[..]The alpha phase usually **ends** with a feature freeze[..]"
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_software#Alpha
> emphasis added by me.
> 
> you are doing it the wrong way: first release an alpha, than
> make a feature freeze. _After_ feature freeze you can release
> a beta.

"The alpha phase usually ends with a feature freeze, indicating that no more 
features will be added to the software. At this time, the software is
said to be **feature complete**."

So if you mean alpha release requirements are:

substantially complete and in a testable state
enabled by default -- if so specified by the change

And for feature freeze you mean: "no more changes in the feature because the 
feature is complete" I agree with you, feature freeze must be after alpha.

what I was trying to describe with having feature freeze before alpha is that 
we must not have features included in the alpha release which are:
- not substantially complete
- not in a testable state

such kind of features must not be in alpha release.



> 
> I really like this terminology and think it is commonly known
> and accepted and it works very well.
> 
> thoughts?
> 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Frantisek Kobzik]

Hello,

- Firstly, I don't know how this setup could have worked before 3.5 :) Could 
you try two tests?
 1, Can you ping the kvm04... machine from your clients machine (in one of 
these vlans)?
 2, Can you telnet to spice server on kvm04? (start spice console on some VM on 
kvm04, download console.vv file, telnet to host:port from the console.vv file). 
Does this work?

I don't think 2, will work because spice server listens on the display network 
interface (which is unaccessible from clients), but let's try it anyway.

- Also, are you sure your firewall is set up correctly and doesn't block spice 
ports?
- Another thing: didn't you use spice proxy in your previous setup?

Thanks,
F.


- Original Message -
From: "PaulCheung" 
To: "Frantisek Kobzik" 
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:53:33 AM
Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!

It solved the host=kvm0x..com   problem,   But my guest still can't 
open the VM!!!
  

User from  D& E,   can't start the VM, except ovirt managerment network 
 


  

What should I do ?












Sincerely yours,
PaulCheung


 tel: 180-8882-7173


> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:26:06 -0500
> From: fkob...@redhat.com
> To: eq2...@msn.com
> CC: users@ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> 
> I'm not really sure if this the intended way to achieve customer separation. 
> I don't know this field well, so I need to talk about it with my colleagues 
> from networking team.
> 
> Meanwhile you can try overriding your display address on host level like this:
> 1, In hosts subtab, edit host.
> 2, In the dialog select console.
> 3, Check 'Override display address', fill in corresponding host name (in your 
> case kvm01.allwinnertech.com for host kvm01, kvm02.allwinnertech.com for 
> kvm02 host etc) - do this for every host in the cluster.
> 
> This should force returning hostnames in the .vv file.
> 
> Cheers,
> Franta.
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "LazyPaul" 
> To: "Frantisek Kobzik" 
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:51:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> 
> My network is look like this:
> 
> 
> 3 vlan, they can’t visit each other,  so I have 3 dns server,   
> 
> The console.vv file in the ovirt 3.4  the host =  kvm01.allwinnertech.com
> 
> after update to 3.5   the host = 172.16.1.115,   this cause the VLAN 101 
> & vlan 102 user can’t   open 172.16.1.115,
> 
> It should be :host =kvm01.allwinnertech.com
> 
> ---
> 
> Server management network:   VLAN 100
> 
>   kvm01.allwinnertech.com   172.16.1.115   
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com  172.16.1.116  kvm03 
> 1.117kvm04 1.120
> DNS server:  172.16.1.2
> ---
> 
> Company  A user:  VLAN 101
> 
> kvm01.allwinertech.com    192.168.200.1  
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com  192.168.200.2   
> kvm02  200.3   kvm04…   200.4
> DNS Server  192.168.200.254 
> 
> ---
> 
> Company B user:  VLAN 102
> 
> kvm01.allwinnertech.com   192.168. 100.1   
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com  192.168.100.2 
> kvm02…  100.3  kvm04 100.4
> DNS Server 192.168.100.254
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> 
> > 在 2014年11月25日，下午10:08，Frantisek Kobzik  写道：
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'd like to ask you about two things:
> > 1, Do you have display address overriden on cluster level? (clusters 
> > maintab)
> > 2, Do you have display network defined on your hosts? or are you using 
> > management network for everything?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Franta.
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "PaulCheung" 
> > To: "Frantisek Kobzik" 
> > Cc: users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:55:03 AM
> > Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> > 
> > Dear all ,
> > 
> > I am very thank you for your job!150 users from China waiting for your 
> > good news!  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sincerely yours,
> > PaulCheung
> > 
> > 
> > tel: 180-8882-7173
> > 
> > 
> >> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:46:01 -0500
> >> From: fkob...@redhat.com
> >> To: eq2...@msn.com
> >> CC: users@ovirt.org
> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users

Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Frantisek Kobzik]

Hi,

I don't think multiple display network is possible within single cluster. How 
would engine know which is the correct one for given client? Also that would 
mean vdsm would have to start spice server on multiple interfaces and I believe 
it's not capable of this. But maybe I'm missing something. I'll try adding Lior 
from networking team.

Lior, can you take a quick glance on this thread?

Thanks!
Franta.

- Original Message -
From: "PaulCheung" 
To: "Chao Xie" 
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 6:19:43 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复:  Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!

JUST PS. What I mean is if they make it into checkbox, it would sloved my 
problem. Sorry for my poor English! 



Sincerely yours, 
PaulCheung 


tel: 180-8882-7173 



From: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com 
To: eq2...@msn.com 
Subject: 答复: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:15:22 + 



Hi, Paul 

Did you change the code and let the “Migration Display” to checkbox ?Or just 
use PS to change the photo? 




发件人 : users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] 代表 PaulCheung 
发送时间 : 2014 年 11 月 26 日 11:27 
收件人 : Frantisek Kobzik 
抄送 : users@ovirt.org 
主题 : Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 





Dear ALL, 










Can this turn into a multichoose box ? I need to display in all network 
interface!!! 





This can solve my problem now. Thank you very much! 



















Sincerely yours, 
PaulCheung 


tel: 180-8882-7173 






From: eq2...@msn.com 
To: fkob...@redhat.com 
CC: users@ovirt.org 
Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:55:44 +0800 


Is there because the Display Network problem cause other network can not 
display ? 








How to enable all network's Display ? 










Sincerely yours, 
PaulCheung 


tel: 180-8882-7173 






From: eq2...@msn.com 
To: fkob...@redhat.com 
CC: users@ovirt.org 
Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:53:33 +0800 


It solved the host=kvm0x..com problem, But my guest still can't open 
the VM!!! 




















User from D& E, can't start the VM, except ovirt managerment network 



































What should I do ? 































Sincerely yours, 
PaulCheung 


tel: 180-8882-7173 





> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:26:06 -0500 
> From: fkob...@redhat.com 
> To: eq2...@msn.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> I'm not really sure if this the intended way to achieve customer separation. 
> I don't know this field well, so I need to talk about it with my colleagues 
> from networking team. 
> 
> Meanwhile you can try overriding your display address on host level like 
> this: 
> 1, In hosts subtab, edit host. 
> 2, In the dialog select console. 
> 3, Check 'Override display address', fill in corresponding host name (in your 
> case kvm01.allwinnertech.com for host kvm01, kvm02.allwinnertech.com for 
> kvm02 host etc) - do this for every host in the cluster. 
> 
> This should force returning hostnames in the .vv file. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> Franta. 
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "LazyPaul" < eq2...@msn.com > 
> To: "Frantisek Kobzik" < fkob...@redhat.com > 
> Cc: users@ovirt.org 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:51:27 PM 
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> My network is look like this: 
> 
> 
> 3 vlan, they can ’ t visit each other, so I have 3 dns server, 
> 
> The console.vv file in the ovirt 3.4 the host = kvm01.allwinnertech.com 
> 
> after update to 3.5 the host = 172.16.1.115, this cause the VLAN 101 & vlan 
> 102 user can ’ t open 172.16.1.115, 
> 
> It should be : host =kvm01.allwinnertech.com 
> 
> ---
>  
> 
> Server management network: VLAN 100 
> 
> kvm01.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm01.allwinnertech.com/ > 172.16.1.115 
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm02.allwinnertech.com/ > 172.16.1.116 
> kvm03 1.117 kvm04 1.120 
> DNS server: 172.16.1.2 
> ---
>  
> 
> Company A user: VLAN 101 
> 
> kvm01.allwinertech.com < http://kvm01.allwinertech.com/ > 192.168.200.1 
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm02.allwinnertech.com/ > 192.168.200.2 
> kvm02 200.3 kvm04 … 200.4 
> DNS Server 192.168.200.254 
> 
> ---
>  
> 
> Company B user: VLAN 102 
> 
> kvm01.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm01.allwinnertech.com/ > 192.168. 100.1 
> kvm02.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm02.allwinnertech.com/ > 19

[ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Arman Khalatyan]

Hello,
I was playing with custom iptables rules and  something went wrong.
Now my *engine-config -g IPTablesConfig* is empty.

Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)

Thanks,
Arman.

***

Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany

***
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[PaulCheung]

Except the display network, other network user can't telnet the 59xx  spice 
port. I guess because the spice portonly listening in this display network. 
But, all spice port  can  listening in all network interface in 0virt 3.4,   
why Ovirt 3.5 not provide this ?

If I can't choose more than one network to display the spice port oVirt 3.5 , 
is there a way for me  to down grade to oVirt 3.4?




Sincerely yours,
PaulCheung


 tel: 180-8882-7173


> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 04:37:39 -0500
> From: fkob...@redhat.com
> To: eq2...@msn.com
> CC: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com; users@ovirt.org; lver...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复:  Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't think multiple display network is possible within single cluster. How 
> would engine know which is the correct one for given client? Also that would 
> mean vdsm would have to start spice server on multiple interfaces and I 
> believe it's not capable of this. But maybe I'm missing something. I'll try 
> adding Lior from networking team.
> 
> Lior, can you take a quick glance on this thread?
> 
> Thanks!
> Franta.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "PaulCheung" 
> To: "Chao Xie" 
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 6:19:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复:  Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> 
> JUST PS. What I mean is if they make it into checkbox, it would sloved my 
> problem. Sorry for my poor English! 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> From: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com 
> To: eq2...@msn.com 
> Subject: 答复: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:15:22 + 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Paul 
> 
> Did you change the code and let the “Migration Display” to checkbox ?Or just 
> use PS to change the photo? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 发件人 : users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] 代表 PaulCheung 
> 发送时间 : 2014 年 11 月 26 日 11:27 
> 收件人 : Frantisek Kobzik 
> 抄送 : users@ovirt.org 
> 主题 : Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear ALL, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Can this turn into a multichoose box ? I need to display in all network 
> interface!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This can solve my problem now. Thank you very much! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:55:44 +0800 
> 
> 
> Is there because the Display Network problem cause other network can not 
> display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How to enable all network's Display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:53:33 +0800 
> 
> 
> It solved the host=kvm0x..com problem, But my guest still can't open 
> the VM!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> User from D& E, can't start the VM, except ovirt managerment network 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What should I do ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:26:06 -0500 
> > From: fkob...@redhat.com 
> > To: eq2...@msn.com 
> > CC: users@ovirt.org 
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> > 
> > I'm not really sure if this the intended way to achieve customer 
> > separation. I don't know this field well, so I need to talk about it with 
> > my colleagues from networking team. 
> > 
> > Meanwhile you can try overriding your display address on host level like 
> > this: 
> > 1, In hosts subtab, edit host. 
> > 2, In the dialog select console. 
> > 3, Check 'Override display address', fill in corresponding host name (in 
> > your case kvm01.allwinnertech.com for host kvm01, kvm02.allwinnertech.com 
> > for kvm02 host etc) - do this for every host in the cluster. 
> > 
> > This should force returning hostnames in the .vv file. 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > Franta. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message - 
> > From: "LazyPaul" < eq2...@msn.com > 
> > To: "Frantisek Kobzik" < fkob...@redhat.com > 
> > Cc: users@ovirt.org 
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:51:27 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> > 
> > My network is look like this: 
> > 
> > 
> > 3 vlan, they can ’ t visit each other, so I have 3 dns server, 
> > 
> > The console.vv file in the ovirt 3.4 the host = kvm01.allwinnertech.com 
> > 
> > after update to 3.5 the host = 172.16.1.115, this cause the VLAN 1

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Alon Bar-Lev]

What version do you use?

- Original Message -
> From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> To: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables  
> rules?
> 
> Hello,
> I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went wrong.
> Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> 
> Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> 
> Thanks,
> Arman.
> 
> ***
> Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik
> Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> ***
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Arman Khalatyan]

Sorry forgot to mention:
Centos 6.6 ovirt 3.5.x, glusterfs 3.6.x, Storage type is  iscsi

***

Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany

***


On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:

>
> What version do you use?
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > To: "users" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> iptables  rules?
> >
> > Hello,
> > I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went wrong.
> > Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> >
> > Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Arman.
> >
> > ***
> > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> Astrophysik
> > Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > ***
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Alon Bar-Lev]

‏You can look within 
/usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/upgrade/pre_upgrade/_config.sql for last 
instance of the value you seek (in most cases).

IPTablesConfig:
---
# oVirt default firewall configuration. Automatically generated by vdsm 
bootstrap script.
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
# vdsm
-A INPUT -p tcp --dport @VDSM_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
# SSH
-A INPUT -p tcp --dport @SSH_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
# snmp
-A INPUT -p udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT

@CUSTOM_RULES@

# Reject any other input traffic
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT --reject-with 
icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
---

- Original Message -
> From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:17:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables 
> rules?
> 
> Sorry forgot to mention:
> Centos 6.6 ovirt 3.5.x, glusterfs 3.6.x, Storage type is  iscsi
> 
> ***
> 
> Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> 
> ***
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:
> 
> >
> > What version do you use?
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > To: "users" 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> > > Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > iptables  rules?
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went wrong.
> > > Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> > >
> > > Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arman.
> > >
> > > ***
> > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > Astrophysik
> > > Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > > ***
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Gluster command [] failed on server...

[Punit Dambiwal]

Is there any one can help on this ??

Thanks,
punit

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Punit Dambiwal  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My Glusterfs version is :- glusterfs-3.6.1-1.el7
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Kanagaraj Mayilsamy 
> wrote:
>
>> [+gluster-us...@gluster.org]
>>
>> "Initialization of volume 'management' failed, review your volfile
>> again", glusterd throws this error when the service is started
>> automatically after the reboot. But the service is successfully started
>> later manually by the user.
>>
>> can somebody from gluster-users please help on this?
>>
>> glusterfs version: 3.5.1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kanagaraj
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Punit Dambiwal" 
>> > To: "Kanagaraj" 
>> > Cc: users@ovirt.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:24:45 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Gluster command [] failed on
>> server...
>> >
>> > Hi Kanagraj,
>> >
>> > Please check the attached log filesi didn't find any thing
>> special
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kanagaraj 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >  Do you see any errors in
>> > > /var/log/glusterfs/etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log or vdsm.log when the
>> > > service is trying to start automatically after the reboot?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Kanagaraj
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 11/24/2014 08:13 PM, Punit Dambiwal wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Kanagaraj,
>> > >
>> > >  Yes...once i will start the gluster service and then vdsmd ...the
>> host
>> > > can connect to cluster...but the question is why it's not started
>> even it
>> > > has chkconfig enabled...
>> > >
>> > >  I have tested it in two host cluster environment...(Centos 6.6 and
>> > > centos 7.0) on both hypervisior cluster..it's failed to reconnect in
>> to
>> > > cluster after reboot
>> > >
>> > >  In both the environment glusterd enabled for next bootbut it's
>> > > failed with the same errorseems it's bug in either gluster or
>> Ovirt ??
>> > >
>> > >  Please help me to find the workaround here if can not resolve it...as
>> > > without this the Host machine can not connect after rebootthat
>> means
>> > > engine will consider it as down and every time need to manually start
>> the
>> > > gluster service and vdsmd... ??
>> > >
>> > >  Thanks,
>> > > Punit
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kanagaraj 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>  From vdsm.log "error: Connection failed. Please check if gluster
>> daemon
>> > >> is operational."
>> > >>
>> > >> Starting glusterd service should fix this issue. 'service glusterd
>> start'
>> > >> But i am wondering why the glusterd was not started automatically
>> after
>> > >> the reboot.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Kanagaraj
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 11/24/2014 07:18 PM, Punit Dambiwal wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Kanagaraj,
>> > >>
>> > >>  Please find the attached VDSM logs :-
>> > >>
>> > >>  
>> > >>  Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >>
>> 21:41:17,182::resourceManager::977::Storage.ResourceManager.Owner::(cancelAll)
>> > >> Owner.cancelAll requests {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:17,182::task::993::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(_decref)
>> > >> Task=`1691d409-9b27-4585-8281-5ec26154367a`::ref 0 aborting False
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,393::task::595::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
>> > >> Task=`994c7bc3-a236-4d03-a732-e068c7ed9ed4`::moving from state init
>> ->
>> > >> state preparing
>> > >> Thread-13::INFO::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,393::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and protect:
>> > >> repoStats(options=None)
>> > >> Thread-13::INFO::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,393::logUtils::47::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and protect:
>> > >> repoStats, Return response: {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,393::task::1191::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(prepare)
>> > >> Task=`994c7bc3-a236-4d03-a732-e068c7ed9ed4`::finished: {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,394::task::595::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
>> > >> Task=`994c7bc3-a236-4d03-a732-e068c7ed9ed4`::moving from state
>> preparing
>> > >> ->
>> > >> state finished
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >>
>> 21:41:32,394::resourceManager::940::Storage.ResourceManager.Owner::(releaseAll)
>> > >> Owner.releaseAll requests {} resources {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >>
>> 21:41:32,394::resourceManager::977::Storage.ResourceManager.Owner::(cancelAll)
>> > >> Owner.cancelAll requests {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:32,394::task::993::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(_decref)
>> > >> Task=`994c7bc3-a236-4d03-a732-e068c7ed9ed4`::ref 0 aborting False
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> > >> 21:41:41,550::BindingXMLRPC::1132::vds::(wrapper) client
>> > >> [10.10.10.2]::call
>> > >> getCapabilities with () {}
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> 21:41:41,553::utils::738::root::(execCmd)
>> > >> /sbin/ip route show to 0.0.0.0/0 table all (cwd None)
>> > >> Thread-13::DEBUG::2014-11-24
>> 2

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status

[Sven Kieske]

I'm not 100% sure if I understand your definitions:

On 26/11/14 10:26, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> "The alpha phase usually ends with a feature freeze, indicating that no more 
> features will be added to the software. At this time, the software is
> said to be **feature complete**."
> 
> So if you mean alpha release requirements are:
> 
> substantially complete and in a testable state
> enabled by default -- if so specified by the change

???

I define an alpha release as the following:
features may get added or removed during alpha cycle, of course you can
add your own policy about which features you accept.

> 
> And for feature freeze you mean: "no more changes in the feature because the 
> feature is complete" I agree with you, feature freeze must be after alpha.

no. feature freeze means exactly that:

no more new features are accepted, after feature freeze.
after feature freeze the accepted features stabilize in the beta phase,
you just fix bugs.

> what I was trying to describe with having feature freeze before alpha is that 
> we must not have features included in the alpha release which are:
> - not substantially complete
> - not in a testable state

you should not call this "feature freeze" as this is not what is
commonly understood (imho) when you talk about feature freeze
(see my explanation above).

You might want to call this "feature acceptance criteria" or something
like that, at least it would be more clear (to me) what you mean.

HTH

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.6.0 status

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 26/11/2014 11:45, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
> I'm not 100% sure if I understand your definitions:
> 
> On 26/11/14 10:26, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> "The alpha phase usually ends with a feature freeze, indicating that no more 
>> features will be added to the software. At this time, the software is
>> said to be **feature complete**."
>>
>> So if you mean alpha release requirements are:
>>
>> substantially complete and in a testable state
>> enabled by default -- if so specified by the change
> 
> ???
> 
> I define an alpha release as the following:
> features may get added or removed during alpha cycle, of course you can
> add your own policy about which features you accept.
> 
>>
>> And for feature freeze you mean: "no more changes in the feature because the 
>> feature is complete" I agree with you, feature freeze must be after alpha.
> 
> no. feature freeze means exactly that:
> 
> no more new features are accepted, after feature freeze.
> after feature freeze the accepted features stabilize in the beta phase,
> you just fix bugs.
> 
>> what I was trying to describe with having feature freeze before alpha is 
>> that we must not have features included in the alpha release which are:
>> - not substantially complete
>> - not in a testable state
> 
> you should not call this "feature freeze" as this is not what is
> commonly understood (imho) when you talk about feature freeze
> (see my explanation above).
> 
> You might want to call this "feature acceptance criteria" or something
> like that, at least it would be more clear (to me) what you mean.

make sense, well, since it's a milestone, maybe better something like "feature 
acceptance review"

> 
> HTH
> 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Arman Khalatyan]

Thanks!
So As I undertand it correctly the @CUSTOM_RULES@ will be overridden by
engine-config --set IPTablesConfigSiteCustom=""?

***

Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany

***


On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:

> ‏You can look within
> /usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/upgrade/pre_upgrade/_config.sql for
> last instance of the value you seek (in most cases).
>
> IPTablesConfig:
> ---
> # oVirt default firewall configuration. Automatically generated by vdsm
> bootstrap script.
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> # vdsm
> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @VDSM_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> # SSH
> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @SSH_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> # snmp
> -A INPUT -p udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT
>
> @CUSTOM_RULES@
>
> # Reject any other input traffic
> -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
> -A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT --reject-with
> icmp-host-prohibited
> COMMIT
> ---
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> > Cc: "users" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:17:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> iptables rules?
> >
> > Sorry forgot to mention:
> > Centos 6.6 ovirt 3.5.x, glusterfs 3.6.x, Storage type is  iscsi
> >
> > ***
> >
> > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> >
> > ***
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Alon Bar-Lev 
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > What version do you use?
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > > To: "users" 
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> > > > Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > > iptables  rules?
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went wrong.
> > > > Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> > > >
> > > > Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Arman.
> > > >
> > > > ***
> > > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > > Astrophysik
> > > > Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > > > ***
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Users mailing list
> > > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue

[Yair Zaslavsky]

- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Jose" 
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Ondra Machacek" 
> , alo...@redhat.com,
> users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:01:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I will try to configure ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap package as Alon
> says.

+1 please do.

> 
> By other side, I have executed the command kinit and the response is:
> 
> kinit: Client not found in Kerberos database while getting initial
> credentials

I am sure you did tht, but just to be on the safe side - did u perform kinit 
principal@REALM?

> 
> My /etc/krb5.conf files is (adserver.siee.local is my AD server based in
> Samba 4), I have modified this file to exchange EXAMPLE.COM by siee.local
> and adserver.siee.local:
> 
> /etc/krb5.conf:
> [logging]
>  default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
>  kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
>  admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
> 
> [libdefaults]
>  default_realm = SIEE.LOCAL
>  dns_lookup_realm = false
>  dns_lookup_kdc = false
>  ticket_lifetime = 24h
>  renew_lifetime = 7d
>  forwardable = true
> 
> [realms]
>  SIEE.LOCAL = {
>   kdc = adserver.siee.local
>   admin_server = adserver.siee.local
>  }
> 
> [domain_realm]
>  .siee.local = SIEE.LOCAL
>  siee.local = SIEE.LOCAL
> 
> 
> My /etc/ovirt-engine/krb5.conf:
> 
> [libdefaults]
> 
> default_realm = SIEE.LOCAL
> dns_lookup_realm = true
> dns_lookup_kdc = true
> ticket_lifetime = 24h
> renew_lifetime = 7d
> forwardable = no
> default_tkt_enctypes = arcfour-hmac-md5
> udp_preference_limit = 1
> 
> #realms
> 
> #domain_realm
> 
> This last file is the same that I had before my upgrade to oVirt 3.5.
> 
> Many thanks again,
> 
> Juanjo.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Yair Zaslavsky  wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Juan Jose" 
> > > To: "Ondra Machacek" , "Yair Zaslavsky" <
> > yzasl...@redhat.com>, alo...@redhat.com,
> > > users@ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 6:09:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue
> > >
> > > Hello again,
> > >
> > > Yes the password is correct, I can login in a Windows machine to my
> > domain
> > > siee.local with the user Juanjo. Moreover I have chanbged this user
> > > password to simpler one and the result is the same.
> > >
> > > I have logged in administration portal with internal admin user and I try
> > > to navigate through the domain to find user to assign some user in a VM
> > but
> > > nothing is showed as you can see in the attached screen  image and any
> > > error is faced in administration portal, but the
> > > /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log show this:
> > >
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,355 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.GSSAPIDirContextAuthenticationStrategy]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Kerberos error: Pre-authentication information
> > was
> > > invalid (24)
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,356 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.GSSAPIDirContextAuthenticationStrategy]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Authentication Failed. Please verify the username
> > > and password.
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,357 ERROR
> > > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.DirectorySearcher]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Failed ldap search server
> > > ldap://adserver.siee.local:389 using user juanjo@SIEE.LOCAL due to
> > > Authentication Failed. Please verify the username and password.. We
> > should
> > > not try the next server
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,359 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.LdapBrokerCommandBase]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Failed to run command
> > LdapSearchUserByQueryCommand.
> > > Domain is siee.local. User is juanjo@SIEE.LOCAL.
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,402 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.GSSAPIDirContextAuthenticationStrategy]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Kerberos error: Pre-authentication information
> > was
> > > invalid (24)
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,404 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.GSSAPIDirContextAuthenticationStrategy]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Authentication Failed. Please verify the username
> > > and password.
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,406 ERROR
> > > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.DirectorySearcher]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Failed ldap search server
> > > ldap://adserver.siee.local:389 using user juanjo@SIEE.LOCAL due to
> > > Authentication Failed. Please verify the username and password.. We
> > should
> > > not try the next server
> > > 2014-11-25 17:02:05,408 ERROR
> > >
> > [org.ovirt.engine.extensions.aaa.builtin.kerberosldap.LdapBrokerCommandBase]
> > > (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-5) Failed to run command
> > > LdapSearchGroupsByQueryCommand. Domain is siee.local. User is
> > > juanjo@SIEE.LOCAL.
> > >
> > > every time I click "Go" button. Moreover I haven't changed

Re: [ovirt-users] USB redirect

[Uri Lublin]

On 11/23/2014 10:42 AM, Lev Veyde wrote:

Hi Michal,

As far as I know there is no need to install something inside VM for the Native 
USB redirection to function properly, thus nothing related is included on the 
oVirt WGT ISO.


Hi,

Lev, you are correct; there is nothing to install on the guest for Spice 
Native USB.


On the client side there is a need for remote-viewer to be configured 
with USB redir enabled,

and having access to the device (via libusb).
On a Windows client currently we use WinUSB driver to enable access to 
the USB device.
The driver can be installed using the usbclerk service or manually (e.g. 
with Zadig).

It must be installed for each device to be redirected.

On Ovirt, as mentioned, Native Spice USB option has to be enabled.
(This would also add the virtual usb devices needed on the 
qemu-kvm/spice-server side).


Hope that helps,
   Uri.



The user/admin only needs to properly configure the VM for Native USB 
redirection and install the Spice client.

I forwarded the issue to the Spice team, they could properly point to the issue.

Thanks in advance,
Lev Veyde.

- Original Message -
From: "Michal Skrivanek" 
To: "Juan Jose" , "Lev Veyde" 
Cc: "users@ovirt.org List" 
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:07:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] USB redirect


On Nov 13, 2014, at 12:00 , Juan Jose  wrote:


Hello Michal and everybody,

I'm sorry but I have downloaded ovirt-guest-tools from URL you gave me but the 
driver usbredir is not there. Is it normal or maybe it is in another resource?

As the oVirt documentation says, when this driver is installed a new USB 
windows service will be started in the client, but after execute the 
ovirt-guest-tool setup and finish the installation there is not any USB new 
service in my Windows client.

Is it possible that this usbredir driver is not in this ISO?

adding Lev who builds the ISO…can you please check?

Thanks,
michal


Many thanks in advanced,

Juanjo.

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Juan Jose  wrote:
Many thanks Michal,

I will try it and I will try to upgrade my oVirt 3.4.

Thanks again and best regards,

Juanjo.

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Michal Skrivanek  
wrote:

On Nov 12, 2014, at 16:39 , Juan Jose  wrote:


Hello Michal or everybody,

Could you tell me where can I get or download ovirt-guest-tool.iso?

Hi,
it's a regular part of the 3.5 release...
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/iso/ovirt-guest-tools/
enjoy!:)

Thanks,
michal


Many thanks in advanced,

Juanjo.


On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Michal Skrivanek 
 wrote:

On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:08 , Juan Jose  wrote:


Thank you very much Michal, If I have checked Device administrator in my Windows 7 VM and as you 
can see in the attached image, the USB device is correctly installed. But when I click 
"File" in remote-viewer "USB device selection" appears in grey and I can't 
select any USB device.

Is there any other requirement to be able redirect USB devices?, Is it 
necessary to install usbclerk in Windows clients to redirect USB to the Windows 
guest?

usbredir drivers yes, you need them, they should be on the guest tools iso

Thanks,
michal


Many thanks in advanced,

Juanjo.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Michal Skrivanek  
wrote:

On Nov 10, 2014, at 17:54 , Juan Jose  wrote:


Hello everybody,

I have  an oVirt 3.4 deployment and I have some Windows 7 Enterprise 32 bits 
guests. I can't redirect USB from a Windows 7 client. I'm using remote - viewer 
as console. Also I have observed something wrong in my administration portal. 
The oVirt documentation says that I have to select Native USB mode in console 
properties in VM configuration

yes, that's the only supported way
you should see the USB controller in devices


but after select this mode, it doesn't remain. If I check this  value in 
console configuration again I can see disabled, native mode value have been 
changed.

there used to be such issue in 3.4..it is fixed in 3.5 already.
It should be a UI problem only…

Thanks,
michal


Is there someone have had this problem?, and how I can solve it?, is it 
necessary to install in Windows clients us clerk software?

Many thanks in advanced.

Juanjo.


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue

[Juan Jose]

Hello Alon,

I have tried to find this package:

yum list ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap or yum list
"ovirt-engine-extension-*

and always I receive: Error: No matching Packages to list

Is it possible that I need some special repository?

Many thanks again,

Juanjo.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:

> Hello Juan,
>
> Do you want to give a chance to the new provider? In this provider I can
> help?
>
> Package is ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap.
> Documentation is available here[1].
>
> The chances to make it work are higher, and this is the future of LDAP
> support.
>
> Alon
>
> [1]
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=HEAD
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] USB redirect

[Juan Jose]

Thank you very much Uri and everybody,

Best regards,

Juanjo.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Uri Lublin  wrote:

> On 11/23/2014 10:42 AM, Lev Veyde wrote:
>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> As far as I know there is no need to install something inside VM for the
>> Native USB redirection to function properly, thus nothing related is
>> included on the oVirt WGT ISO.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Lev, you are correct; there is nothing to install on the guest for Spice
> Native USB.
>
> On the client side there is a need for remote-viewer to be configured with
> USB redir enabled,
> and having access to the device (via libusb).
> On a Windows client currently we use WinUSB driver to enable access to the
> USB device.
> The driver can be installed using the usbclerk service or manually (e.g.
> with Zadig).
> It must be installed for each device to be redirected.
>
> On Ovirt, as mentioned, Native Spice USB option has to be enabled.
> (This would also add the virtual usb devices needed on the
> qemu-kvm/spice-server side).
>
> Hope that helps,
>Uri.
>
>
>
>> The user/admin only needs to properly configure the VM for Native USB
>> redirection and install the Spice client.
>>
>> I forwarded the issue to the Spice team, they could properly point to the
>> issue.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Lev Veyde.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michal Skrivanek" 
>> To: "Juan Jose" , "Lev Veyde" 
>> Cc: "users@ovirt.org List" 
>> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:07:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] USB redirect
>>
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 12:00 , Juan Jose  wrote:
>>
>>  Hello Michal and everybody,
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I have downloaded ovirt-guest-tools from URL you gave me
>>> but the driver usbredir is not there. Is it normal or maybe it is in
>>> another resource?
>>>
>>> As the oVirt documentation says, when this driver is installed a new USB
>>> windows service will be started in the client, but after execute the
>>> ovirt-guest-tool setup and finish the installation there is not any USB new
>>> service in my Windows client.
>>>
>>> Is it possible that this usbredir driver is not in this ISO?
>>>
>> adding Lev who builds the ISO…can you please check?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> michal
>>
>>  Many thanks in advanced,
>>>
>>> Juanjo.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Juan Jose  wrote:
>>> Many thanks Michal,
>>>
>>> I will try it and I will try to upgrade my oVirt 3.4.
>>>
>>> Thanks again and best regards,
>>>
>>> Juanjo.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Michal Skrivanek <
>>> michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 16:39 , Juan Jose  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello Michal or everybody,

 Could you tell me where can I get or download ovirt-guest-tool.iso?

>>> Hi,
>>> it's a regular part of the 3.5 release...
>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/iso/ovirt-guest-tools/
>>> enjoy!:)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> michal
>>>
>>>  Many thanks in advanced,

 Juanjo.


 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Michal Skrivanek <
 michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:

 On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:08 , Juan Jose  wrote:

  Thank you very much Michal, If I have checked Device administrator in
> my Windows 7 VM and as you can see in the attached image, the USB device 
> is
> correctly installed. But when I click "File" in remote-viewer "USB device
> selection" appears in grey and I can't select any USB device.
>
> Is there any other requirement to be able redirect USB devices?, Is it
> necessary to install usbclerk in Windows clients to redirect USB to the
> Windows guest?
>
 usbredir drivers yes, you need them, they should be on the guest tools
 iso

 Thanks,
 michal

  Many thanks in advanced,
>
> Juanjo.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
> michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 17:54 , Juan Jose  wrote:
>
>  Hello everybody,
>>
>> I have  an oVirt 3.4 deployment and I have some Windows 7 Enterprise
>> 32 bits guests. I can't redirect USB from a Windows 7 client. I'm using
>> remote - viewer as console. Also I have observed something wrong in my
>> administration portal. The oVirt documentation says that I have to select
>> Native USB mode in console properties in VM configuration
>>
> yes, that's the only supported way
> you should see the USB controller in devices
>
>  but after select this mode, it doesn't remain. If I check this  value
>> in console configuration again I can see disabled, native mode value have
>> been changed.
>>
> there used to be such issue in 3.4..it is fixed in 3.5 already.
> It should be a UI problem only…
>
> Thanks,
> michal
>
>  Is there someone have had this problem?, and how I can solve it?, is
>> it necessary to install in Windows clients us clerk software?
>>
>> Many thanks in advanced.
>>
>> Juanjo.

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue

[Juan Jose]

Hello Alon and everybody,

Check in my ovirt-engine machine for ovirt-engine-aaa-ldap package and it
is not available:

yum list "ovirt-engine*"
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: ftp.udl.es
 * epel: mirror.uv.es
 * extras: ftp.udl.es
 * ovirt-3.5: ftp.nluug.nl
 * ovirt-3.5-epel: mirror.uv.es
 * ovirt-3.5-jpackage-6.0-generic: mirror.ibcp.fr
 * ovirt-epel: mirror.uv.es
 * ovirt-jpackage-6.0-generic: mirror.ibcp.fr
 * updates: ftp.udl.es
Installed Packages
ovirt-engine.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-backend.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-cli.noarch
3.3.0.6-1.el6 @ovirt-3.3.3
ovirt-engine-dbscripts.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-extensions-api-impl.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-jboss-as.x86_64
7.1.1-1.el6   @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-lib.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-restapi.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-sdk-python.noarch
3.5.0.8-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup-base.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-tools.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-userportal.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
Available Packages
ovirt-engine-cli.noarch
3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch
3.5.0-1.el6   ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-dwh-setup.noarch
3.5.0-1.el6   ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-extensions-api-impl-javadoc.noarch
3.5.0.1-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-reports.noarch
3.5.1-0.1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-reports-setup.noarch
3.5.1-0.1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-sdk-java.noarch
3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-sdk-java-javadoc.noarch
3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone.noarch

How can I get this package?

Many thanks in advanced,

Juanjo.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:

> Hello Juan,
>
> Do you want to give a chance to the new provider? In this provider I can
> help?
>
> Package is ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap.
> Documentation is available here[1].
>
> The chances to make it work are higher, and this is the future of LDAP
> support.
>
> Alon
>
> [1]
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-ldap.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=HEAD
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Frantisek Kobzik]

Hi, 

But the 3.5 behavior is correct IMO. 

I think there are two possible solutions: 
1, Create a brand new display network on the cluster (it'll be ONLY for 
displays) and make sure it's accessible by all clients. 

, or 

2, Write a firewall rule or a VDSM hook that translates the spice/vnc traffic 
from vlans to the management network. 

(3, there is also a possibility to set 'display' attribute of your management 
network to false in the database. But I highly don't recommend this as the 
results aren't guaranteed.). 

Toni, could you check my suggestions, whether they are correct? Thanks! 

F. 


- Original Message -

From: "PaulCheung"  
To: "Frantisek Kobzik"  
Cc: "Chao Xie" , users@ovirt.org, "Lior Vernia" 
 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:05:21 AM 
Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 

Except the display network, other network user can't telnet the 59xx spice 
port. I guess because the spice port 
only listening in this display network. 

But, all spice port can listening in all network interface in 0virt 3.4, why 
Ovirt 3.5 not provide this ? 


If I can't choose more than one network to display the spice port oVirt 3.5 , 
is there a way for me to down grade to oVirt 3.4? 




Sincerely yours, 
PaulCheung 


tel: 180-8882-7173 


> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 04:37:39 -0500 
> From: fkob...@redhat.com 
> To: eq2...@msn.com 
> CC: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com; users@ovirt.org; lver...@redhat.com 
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I don't think multiple display network is possible within single cluster. How 
> would engine know which is the correct one for given client? Also that would 
> mean vdsm would have to start spice server on multiple interfaces and I 
> believe it's not capable of this. But maybe I'm missing something. I'll try 
> adding Lior from networking team. 
> 
> Lior, can you take a quick glance on this thread? 
> 
> Thanks! 
> Franta. 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "PaulCheung"  
> To: "Chao Xie"  
> Cc: users@ovirt.org 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 6:19:43 AM 
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> JUST PS. What I mean is if they make it into checkbox, it would sloved my 
> problem. Sorry for my poor English! 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> From: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com 
> To: eq2...@msn.com 
> Subject: 答复: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:15:22 + 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Paul 
> 
> Did you change the code and let the “Migration Display” to checkbox ?Or just 
> use PS to change the photo? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 发件人 : users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] 代表 PaulCheung 
> 发送时间 : 2014 年 11 月 26 日 11:27 
> 收件人 : Frantisek Kobzik 
> 抄送 : users@ovirt.org 
> 主题 : Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear ALL, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Can this turn into a multichoose box ? I need to display in all network 
> interface!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This can solve my problem now. Thank you very much! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:55:44 +0800 
> 
> 
> Is there because the Display Network problem cause other network can not 
> display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How to enable all network's Display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:53:33 +0800 
> 
> 
> It solved the host=kvm0x..com problem, But my guest still can't open 
> the VM!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> User from D& E, can't start the VM, except ovirt managerment network 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What should I do ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:26:06 -0500 
> > From: fkob...@redhat.com 
> > To: eq2...@msn.com 
> > CC: users@ovirt.org 
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> > 
> > I'm not really sure if this the intended way to achieve customer 
> > separation. I don't know this field well, so I need to talk about it with 
> > my colleagues from networking team. 
> > 
> > Meanwhile you can try overriding your display address on host level like 
> > this: 
> > 1, In hosts subtab, edit host. 
> > 2, In the dialog select console. 
> > 3,

[ovirt-users] ovirt italian translation and jenkins

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Hello,
Amedeo Salvati has begun working on it (we are now at 40% on master).
Is it possible to include him in destination list for these e-mails?

Address amedeo.salv...@gmail.com is ok

BTW: is there any way to concentrate and work only master and then quickly
dump to 3.5 eventually?

Thanks in advance,

Gianluca
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jenkins ci oVirt Server 
Date: Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:37 PM
Subject: [oVirt Jenkins]
ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation » fc20 - Build #
118 - Failure!
To: de...@redhat.com, sbona...@redhat.com, gianluca.cec...@gmail.com,
giorgio.bers...@gmail.com


Project:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation/label=fc20/
Build:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation/label=fc20/118/
Build Number: 118
Build Status:  Failure
Triggered By: Started by upstream project
"ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation" build number
118

-
Changes Since Last Success:
-
Changes for Build #118
[Daniel Erez] core: tpgt should not be sent when empty




-
Failed Tests:
-
No tests ran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue

[Alon Bar-Lev]

- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Jose" 
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> Cc: "Ondra Machacek" , "Yair Zaslavsky" 
> , users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 3:04:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue
> 
> Hello Alon and everybody,
> 
> Check in my ovirt-engine machine for ovirt-engine-aaa-ldap package and it
> is not available:
> 
> yum list "ovirt-engine*"
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security, versionlock
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>  * base: ftp.udl.es
>  * epel: mirror.uv.es
>  * extras: ftp.udl.es
>  * ovirt-3.5: ftp.nluug.nl
>  * ovirt-3.5-epel: mirror.uv.es
>  * ovirt-3.5-jpackage-6.0-generic: mirror.ibcp.fr
>  * ovirt-epel: mirror.uv.es
>  * ovirt-jpackage-6.0-generic: mirror.ibcp.fr
>  * updates: ftp.udl.es
> Installed Packages
> ovirt-engine.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-backend.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-cli.noarch
> 3.3.0.6-1.el6 @ovirt-3.3.3
> ovirt-engine-dbscripts.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-extensions-api-impl.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-jboss-as.x86_64
> 7.1.1-1.el6   @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-lib.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-restapi.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-sdk-python.noarch
> 3.5.0.8-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup-base.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-tools.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-userportal.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 @ovirt-3.5
> Available Packages
> ovirt-engine-cli.noarch
> 3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch
> 3.5.0-1.el6   ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-dwh-setup.noarch
> 3.5.0-1.el6   ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-extensions-api-impl-javadoc.noarch
> 3.5.0.1-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-reports.noarch
> 3.5.1-0.1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-reports-setup.noarch
> 3.5.1-0.1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-sdk-java.noarch
> 3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-sdk-java-javadoc.noarch
> 3.5.0.5-1.el6 ovirt-3.5
> ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone.noarch
> 
> How can I get this package?


Thanks for trying!

Package is available at ovirt-3.5-snapshot[1].

[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-snapshot/
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Alon Bar-Lev]

- Original Message -
> From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:50:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables 
> rules?
> 
> Thanks!
> So As I undertand it correctly the @CUSTOM_RULES@ will be overridden by
> engine-config --set IPTablesConfigSiteCustom=""?

yes, and also th virt and gluster hanks.

> 
> ***
> 
> Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> 
> ***
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:
> 
> > ‏You can look within
> > /usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/upgrade/pre_upgrade/_config.sql for
> > last instance of the value you seek (in most cases).
> >
> > IPTablesConfig:
> > ---
> > # oVirt default firewall configuration. Automatically generated by vdsm
> > bootstrap script.
> > *filter
> > :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> > :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> > -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
> > -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > # vdsm
> > -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @VDSM_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> > # SSH
> > -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @SSH_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> > # snmp
> > -A INPUT -p udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT
> >
> > @CUSTOM_RULES@
> >
> > # Reject any other input traffic
> > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
> > -A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT --reject-with
> > icmp-host-prohibited
> > COMMIT
> > ---
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> > > Cc: "users" 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:17:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > iptables rules?
> > >
> > > Sorry forgot to mention:
> > > Centos 6.6 ovirt 3.5.x, glusterfs 3.6.x, Storage type is  iscsi
> > >
> > > ***
> > >
> > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > > Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > >
> > > ***
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Alon Bar-Lev 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What version do you use?
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > > > To: "users" 
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> > > > > Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > > > iptables  rules?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went wrong.
> > > > > Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Arman.
> > > > >
> > > > > ***
> > > > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > > > Astrophysik
> > > > > Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > > > > ***
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Users mailing list
> > > > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default iptables rules?

[Arman Khalatyan]

Thank you everything is green after re-install.

***

Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany

***


On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev  wrote:

>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> > Cc: "users" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:50:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> iptables rules?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > So As I undertand it correctly the @CUSTOM_RULES@ will be overridden by
> > engine-config --set IPTablesConfigSiteCustom=""?
>
> yes, and also th virt and gluster hanks.
>
> >
> > ***
> >
> > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> >
> > ***
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alon Bar-Lev 
> wrote:
> >
> > > ‏You can look within
> > > /usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/upgrade/pre_upgrade/_config.sql
> for
> > > last instance of the value you seek (in most cases).
> > >
> > > IPTablesConfig:
> > > ---
> > > # oVirt default firewall configuration. Automatically generated by vdsm
> > > bootstrap script.
> > > *filter
> > > :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> > > :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> > > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> > > -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > > -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
> > > -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> > > # vdsm
> > > -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @VDSM_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> > > # SSH
> > > -A INPUT -p tcp --dport @SSH_PORT@ -j ACCEPT
> > > # snmp
> > > -A INPUT -p udp --dport 161 -j ACCEPT
> > >
> > > @CUSTOM_RULES@
> > >
> > > # Reject any other input traffic
> > > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
> > > -A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT --reject-with
> > > icmp-host-prohibited
> > > COMMIT
> > > ---
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" 
> > > > Cc: "users" 
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:17:18 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > > iptables rules?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry forgot to mention:
> > > > Centos 6.6 ovirt 3.5.x, glusterfs 3.6.x, Storage type is  iscsi
> > > >
> > > > ***
> > > >
> > > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > > > Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam,
> Germany
> > > >
> > > > ***
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Alon Bar-Lev 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What version do you use?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > > From: "Arman Khalatyan" 
> > > > > > To: "users" 
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:00:10 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [ovirt-users] what should be the output of the default
> > > > > iptables  rules?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > I was playing with custom iptables rules and something went
> wrong.
> > > > > > Now my engine-config -g IPTablesConfig is empty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can some one please give a hint what should be there??:)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Arman.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ***
> > > > > > Dr. Arman Khalatyan eScience -SuperComputing Leibniz-Institut für
> > > > > Astrophysik
> > > > > > Potsdam (AIP) An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
> > > > > > ***
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ___
> > > > > > Users mailing list
> > > > > > Users@ovirt.org
> > > > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] 答复: Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Lior Vernia]

On 26/11/14 11:37, Frantisek Kobzik wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't think multiple display network is possible within single cluster. How 
> would engine know which is the correct one for given client? Also that would 
> mean vdsm would have to start spice server on multiple interfaces and I 
> believe it's not capable of this. But maybe I'm missing something. I'll try 
> adding Lior from networking team.
> 
> Lior, can you take a quick glance on this thread?
> 

Hi! :)

Indeed, this doesn't make much sense to me. I mean, I can understand
what Paul would like to achieve, but from an implementation perspective
it would be difficult as you described.

> Thanks!
> Franta.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "PaulCheung" 
> To: "Chao Xie" 
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 6:19:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 答复:  Ovirt 3.5 Bug !!
> 
> JUST PS. What I mean is if they make it into checkbox, it would sloved my 
> problem. Sorry for my poor English! 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> From: xiec.f...@cn.fujitsu.com 
> To: eq2...@msn.com 
> Subject: 答复: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:15:22 + 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Paul 
> 
> Did you change the code and let the “Migration Display” to checkbox ?Or just 
> use PS to change the photo? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 发件人 : users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] 代表 PaulCheung 
> 发送时间 : 2014 年 11 月 26 日 11:27 
> 收件人 : Frantisek Kobzik 
> 抄送 : users@ovirt.org 
> 主题 : Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear ALL, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Can this turn into a multichoose box ? I need to display in all network 
> interface!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This can solve my problem now. Thank you very much! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:55:44 +0800 
> 
> 
> Is there because the Display Network problem cause other network can not 
> display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How to enable all network's Display ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: eq2...@msn.com 
> To: fkob...@redhat.com 
> CC: users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:53:33 +0800 
> 
> 
> It solved the host=kvm0x..com problem, But my guest still can't open 
> the VM!!! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> User from D& E, can't start the VM, except ovirt managerment network 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What should I do ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, 
> PaulCheung 
> 
> 
> tel: 180-8882-7173 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:26:06 -0500 
>> From: fkob...@redhat.com 
>> To: eq2...@msn.com 
>> CC: users@ovirt.org 
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
>>
>> I'm not really sure if this the intended way to achieve customer separation. 
>> I don't know this field well, so I need to talk about it with my colleagues 
>> from networking team. 
>>
>> Meanwhile you can try overriding your display address on host level like 
>> this: 
>> 1, In hosts subtab, edit host. 
>> 2, In the dialog select console. 
>> 3, Check 'Override display address', fill in corresponding host name (in 
>> your case kvm01.allwinnertech.com for host kvm01, kvm02.allwinnertech.com 
>> for kvm02 host etc) - do this for every host in the cluster. 
>>
>> This should force returning hostnames in the .vv file. 
>>
>> Cheers, 
>> Franta. 
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - 
>> From: "LazyPaul" < eq2...@msn.com > 
>> To: "Frantisek Kobzik" < fkob...@redhat.com > 
>> Cc: users@ovirt.org 
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:51:27 PM 
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt 3.5 Bug !! 
>>
>> My network is look like this: 
>>
>>
>> 3 vlan, they can ’ t visit each other, so I have 3 dns server, 
>>
>> The console.vv file in the ovirt 3.4 the host = kvm01.allwinnertech.com 
>>
>> after update to 3.5 the host = 172.16.1.115, this cause the VLAN 101 & vlan 
>> 102 user can ’ t open 172.16.1.115, 
>>
>> It should be : host =kvm01.allwinnertech.com 
>>
>> ---
>>  
>>
>> Server management network: VLAN 100 
>>
>> kvm01.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm01.allwinnertech.com/ > 172.16.1.115 
>> kvm02.allwinnertech.com < http://kvm02.allwinnertech.com/ > 172.16.1.116 
>> kvm03 1.117 kvm04 1.1

Re: [ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.1 RC status

[Allon Mureinik]

- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" 
> To: nsof...@redhat.com, "Darshan Narayana Murthy" , 
> Users@ovirt.org, de...@ovirt.org, "infra"
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:15:11 AM
> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.1 RC status
> 
> Hi,
> We're going to start composing oVirt 3.5.1 RC on *2014-12-02 08:00 UTC* from
> 3.5 branch.
> In order to stabilize the release a new branch ovirt-engine-3.5.1 will be
> created from the same git hash used for composing the RC.
> 
> The bug tracker [1] shows 3 open blocker:
> Bug IDWhiteboard  Status  Summary
> 1162640   gluster POSTsupervdsm segfault in libgfapi while 
> querying volume
> status detail
> 1160846   sla NEW Can't add disk to VM without specifying 
> disk profile when
> the storage domain has more than one disk profile
> 1159839   storage POSTNew FC LUNs are not detected on 
> hypervisor without a
> reboot
Patch was merged on master - just needs backporting and merging there too.
Seems simple enough.
Nir - ETA on this pleaes?

> 
> 
> The following bugs have been keyworded as Regression and not marked as
> blockers:
> 
> Bug IDWhiteboard  Status  Target  Summary
> 1160846   sla NEW --- Can't add disk to VM without 
> specifying disk profile
> when the storage domain has more than one disk profile
> 1118349   storage NEW 3.5.1   [vdsm] Creating DataCenter 3.5 
> using master domain
> V1 fails with InquireNotSupportedError
Not interesting - this is indeed not a blocker.

> 
> 
> In order to stabilize the release a new branch ovirt-engine-3.5.1 will be
> created from the same git hash used for composing the RC.
> 
> Maintainers:
> - Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-12-01
> 15:00 UTC*
> - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release
> before *2014-12-01 15:00 UTC*
> - If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as
> possible.
> - Please provide an ETA for the pending blockers as soon as possible.
> 
> Infra:
> - Please check Jenkins status for 3.5 jobs and sync with relevant maintainers
> if there are issues.
> 
> There are still 98 bugs [2] targeted to 3.5.1.
> Excluding node and documentation bugs we still have 71 bugs [3] targeted to
> 3.5.1.
> 
> Maintainers / Assignee:
> - Please review bugs marked as Regression and add to blocker if they're real
> regressions.
> - Please add the bugs to the tracker if you think that 3.5.1 should not be
> released without them fixed.
> - Please update the target to 3.5.2 or later for bugs that won't be in 3.5.1:
>   it will ease gathering the blocking bugs for next releases.
> - Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [4]
> 
> Community:
> - If you're testing oVirt 3.5 nightly snapshot, please add yourself to the
> test page [5]
> 
> 
> [1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1155170
> [2] http://goo.gl/7G0PDV
> [3] http://goo.gl/6gUbVr
> [4] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5.1_Release_Notes
> [5] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/oVirt_3.5.1_Testing
> 
> 
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> de...@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014

[Brian Proffitt]

Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-11-26-15.07.html 
Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-11-26-15.07.txt
Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-11-26-15.07.log.html

=
#ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync
=


Meeting started by bkp at 15:07:14 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-11-26-15.07.log.html .



Meeting summary
---
* Agenda and roll Call  (bkp, 15:07:31)
  * infra update  (bkp, 15:07:31)
  * 3.5.z updates  (bkp, 15:07:31)
  * 3.6.0 status  (bkp, 15:07:31)
  * conferences and workshops  (bkp, 15:07:31)
  * other topics  (bkp, 15:07:33)

* infra update  (bkp, 15:09:33)
  * infra We had an outage last week, while upgrading vdsm to 3.5 on the
hosts, that left us with some hosts with vdsm 3.4 and some with 3.5,
will have to plan the upgrade more carefully.  (bkp, 15:24:45)
  * infra An issue with the mock cleanup that rendered the slaves
unusable, that is solved, but there's a new issue that I'm
investigating that forced us to take them out of the pool  (bkp,
15:24:49)
  * infra We also made some progress on getting vdsm unit tests inside
mock running. Two tests are failing, including the partition check
test. sbonazzo suggested nested VM approach. Will need another host
updated to F20 to enable such an approach.  (bkp, 15:24:53)
  * infra Engine and jenkins upgraded (to 3.5 and 1.583, respectively)
(bkp, 15:24:57)
  * infra Nesting problems in PHX update:  dcaro has to update on host
so we can test, but dima said that it's working well  (bkp,
15:24:59)
  * infra Issues are being collected for the Infra Day Hackathon (date
TBD), here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E8e88Nb_OcT7BQprVF7ER6R8--T8mzgc_uHo3i3zeeA/edit#gid=0
(bkp, 15:25:02)

* 3.5.z updates  (bkp, 15:25:05)
  * 3.5.z updates Full status here:
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/029543.html
(bkp, 15:31:29)
  * 3.5.z updates Three blockers (1162640, 1160846, and 1159839) in
place for 3.5.1 RC, no ETA set on fixes.  (bkp, 15:31:32)
  * 3.5.z updates RC will need to be postponed one week to accomodate
blockers, but that date is even risky.  (bkp, 15:31:38)
  * 3.5.z updates Almost all jenkins jobs for 3.5 are now green (except
one for node, fabiand team is already on it) (fabiand needs nesting
to get them green, see infra note above)  (bkp, 15:31:41)

* 3.6 status  (bkp, 15:31:45)
  * 3.5.z updates addendum: Two regressions (1160846 and 1118349) are
tagged for 3.5.1 and need to be evaluated.  (bkp, 15:33:01)
  * 3.6 status Full status here:
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/029545.html
(bkp, 15:51:13)
  * 3.6 status No blockers (as expected). Bug count on the rise.  (bkp,
15:51:16)
  * 3.6 status An earlier repoclosure error on missing mom-0.4.3 was
repaired and released today by alitke (just needed verification and
karma on Fedora systems)  (bkp, 15:51:19)
  * 3.6 status Today is last day for release criteria/process
discussion. skieske made a rephrase suggestion, about "feature
acceptance review", which was accepted.  (bkp, 15:51:22)
  * 3.6 status Updated release criteria/process at
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/028875.html
will be posted on wiki and then announced soon.  (bkp, 15:51:25)
  * ACTION: bkp to set up new release process page on wiki  (bkp,
15:51:28)
  * 3.6 status Still gathering 3.6 features at http://goo.gl/9X3G49, no
feature deadline set yet.  (bkp, 15:51:30)
  * 3.6 status Length of release cycle still not confirmed, but
gathering all features anyway to have them in one place.  (bkp,
15:51:33)

* conferences and workshops  (bkp, 15:51:39)
  * Conferences Notification on FOSDEM stands is on Dec. 15. Still time
to get your devroom submittals in for the virt and IaaS devrooms.
(bkp, 15:53:13)
  * Conferences I am in discussions with FOSSAsia (http://fossasia.org/)
to see about an oVirt workshop at that event in mid-March. This is a
Singapore venue, so if anyone from east Asia is interested in
speaking/attending, let bkp know.  (bkp, 15:53:16)
  * Conferences If anyone wants to submit a quick report on DevOpsDays
TLV for the Community blog, that would be welcome!  (bkp, 15:53:20)

* other topics  (bkp, 15:54:31)
  * Other A reminder that the U.S. will be offline tomorrow and Friday
for Thanksgiving holiday.  (bkp, 15:55:02)
  * Other bkp will be recording demo videos of oVirt beginning after the
holidays. If anyone wants to help/suggest topics, ping me.  (bkp,
15:55:05)

Meeting ended at 15:58:02 UTC.




Action Items

* bkp to set up new release process page on wiki




Action Items, by person
---
* bkp
  * bkp to set up new release process page on wiki
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 3.5 rc2 unable to mount cd on running VM

[Omer Frenkel]

- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" 
> To: "Omer Frenkel" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:13:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 3.5 rc2 unable to mount cd on running VM
> 
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Omer Frenkel  wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > There is an open bug on that
> > Bug 1145728 - change cd fail on 'Drive is not a vdsm image'
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145728
> >
> 
> Hello,
> on final 3.5 (ovirt-engine-3.5.0.1-1.el6.noarch) I still have this problem
> attaching CD:
> 
> Error while executing action Change CD: Drive image file could not be found
> 
> How can I test the fix that makes the bugzilla entry in VERIFIED status now?
> Is the status to be considered for 3.5.1 or can we have the fix in 3.5 too?
> 
> Gianluca
> 

looking at git log the fix should be in the 3.5.0 GA
so maybe its something else.. can you share the engine.log and vdsm.log for the 
time of the failure?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 3.5 rc2 unable to mount cd on running VM

[Gianluca Cecchi]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Omer Frenkel  wrote:

>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Gianluca Cecchi" 
> > To: "Omer Frenkel" 
> > Cc: "users" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:13:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 3.5 rc2 unable to mount cd on running VM
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Omer Frenkel 
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > There is an open bug on that
> > > Bug 1145728 - change cd fail on 'Drive is not a vdsm image'
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145728
> > >
> >
> > Hello,
> > on final 3.5 (ovirt-engine-3.5.0.1-1.el6.noarch) I still have this
> problem
> > attaching CD:
> >
> > Error while executing action Change CD: Drive image file could not be
> found
> >
> > How can I test the fix that makes the bugzilla entry in VERIFIED status
> now?
> > Is the status to be considered for 3.5.1 or can we have the fix in 3.5
> too?
> >
> > Gianluca
> >
>
> looking at git log the fix should be in the 3.5.0 GA
> so maybe its something else.. can you share the engine.log and vdsm.log
> for the time of the failure?



Created a new CentOS 7 VM and indeed it doesn't show the problem at first
sight.
You are right that there was a problem with the ISO Domain going up and
down (for the moment I stopped iptales on engine and this fixed the
problem... going to check further)

The pre-existing one instead (c65new) is ok too now.
I presume there is nothing to run against db or similar to fix the problem
for pre-existing VMs, correct?
Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] [Gluster-users] Gluster command [] failed on server...

[Kaushal M]

Based on the logs I can guess that glusterd is being started before
the network has come up and that the addresses given to bricks do not
directly match the addresses used in during peer probe.

The gluster_after_reboot log has the line "[2014-11-25
06:46:09.972113] E [glusterd-store.c:2632:glusterd_resolve_all_bricks]
0-glusterd: resolve brick failed in restore".

Brick resolution fails when glusterd cannot match the address for the
brick, with one of the peers. Brick resolution happens in two phases,
1. We first try to identify the peer by performing string comparisions
with the brick address and the peer addresses (The peer names will be
the names/addresses that were given when the peer was probed).
2. If we don't find a match from step 1, we will then resolve all the
brick address and the peer addresses into addrinfo structs, and then
compare these structs to find a match. This process should generally
find a match if available. This will fail only if the network is not
up yet as we cannot resolve addresses.

The above steps are applicable only to glusterfs versions >=3.6. They
were introduced to reduce problems with peer identification, like the
one you encountered

Since both of the steps failed to find a match in one run, but
succeeded later, we can come to the conclusion that,
a) the bricks don't have the exact same string used in peer probe for
their addresses as step 1 failed, and
b) the network was not up in the initial run, as step 2 failed during
the initial run, but passed in the second run.

Please let me know if my conclusion is correct.

If it is, you can solve your problem in two ways.
1. Use the same string for doing the peer probe and for the brick
address during volume create/add-brick. Ideally, we suggest you use
properly resolvable FQDNs everywhere. If that is not possible, then
use only IP addresses. Try to avoid short names.
2. During boot up, make sure to launch glusterd only after the network
is up. This will allow the new peer identification mechanism to do its
job correctly.


If you have already followed these steps and yet still hit the
problem, then please provide more information (setup, logs, etc.). It
could be much different problem that you are facing.

~kaushal

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Punit Dambiwal  wrote:
> Is there any one can help on this ??
>
> Thanks,
> punit
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Punit Dambiwal  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My Glusterfs version is :- glusterfs-3.6.1-1.el7
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Kanagaraj Mayilsamy 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [+gluster-us...@gluster.org]
>>>
>>> "Initialization of volume 'management' failed, review your volfile
>>> again", glusterd throws this error when the service is started automatically
>>> after the reboot. But the service is successfully started later manually by
>>> the user.
>>>
>>> can somebody from gluster-users please help on this?
>>>
>>> glusterfs version: 3.5.1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kanagaraj
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Punit Dambiwal" 
>>> > To: "Kanagaraj" 
>>> > Cc: users@ovirt.org
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:24:45 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Gluster command [] failed on
>>> > server...
>>> >
>>> > Hi Kanagraj,
>>> >
>>> > Please check the attached log filesi didn't find any thing
>>> > special
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kanagaraj 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >  Do you see any errors in
>>> > > /var/log/glusterfs/etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log or vdsm.log when
>>> > > the
>>> > > service is trying to start automatically after the reboot?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Kanagaraj
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 11/24/2014 08:13 PM, Punit Dambiwal wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi Kanagaraj,
>>> > >
>>> > >  Yes...once i will start the gluster service and then vdsmd ...the
>>> > > host
>>> > > can connect to cluster...but the question is why it's not started
>>> > > even it
>>> > > has chkconfig enabled...
>>> > >
>>> > >  I have tested it in two host cluster environment...(Centos 6.6 and
>>> > > centos 7.0) on both hypervisior cluster..it's failed to reconnect in
>>> > > to
>>> > > cluster after reboot
>>> > >
>>> > >  In both the environment glusterd enabled for next bootbut it's
>>> > > failed with the same errorseems it's bug in either gluster or
>>> > > Ovirt ??
>>> > >
>>> > >  Please help me to find the workaround here if can not resolve
>>> > > it...as
>>> > > without this the Host machine can not connect after rebootthat
>>> > > means
>>> > > engine will consider it as down and every time need to manually start
>>> > > the
>>> > > gluster service and vdsmd... ??
>>> > >
>>> > >  Thanks,
>>> > > Punit
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Kanagaraj 
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>  From vdsm.log "error: Connection failed. Please check if gluster
>>> > >> daemon
>>> > >> is operational."
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Starting glusterd service should fix this issue. 'service glusterd
>>> > >> start'
>>> > >> But i am 

[ovirt-users] oVirt device-mapper: table: 253:3: multipath: error getting device

[Sandvik Agustin]

Hi users,


I'm using CentOS 6.6 as a host, when I start Installing the host to my
ovirt-engine webamin, I starting to have this error message in my host1.

Nov 27 10:15:32 host1 kernel: device-mapper: table: 253:3: multipath: error
getting device
Nov 27 10:15:32 host1 kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to
table
Nov 27 10:22:11 host1 multipathd: force queue_without_daemon (operator)
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 multipathd: 360030480190c68001be31b9a1587e30a:
ignoring map
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 kernel: device-mapper: table: 253:3: multipath: error
getting device
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to
table
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 kernel: device-mapper: table: 253:3: multipath: error
getting device
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to
table
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 multipathd: 360030480190c68001be3224d189b03e5:
ignoring map
Nov 27 10:22:12 host1 multipathd: path checkers start up


When I try to reboot it it will only stuck on a screen saying.

device-mapper: error getting device continuously, how can I fix it? Hope
someone can Help me.

TIA

Sandvik
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014

[Markus Stockhausen]

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von 
> "Brian Proffitt [bprof...@redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 17:01
> An: users
> Cc: board
> Betreff: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014
> ...
>   * 3.6 status Still gathering 3.6 features at http://goo.gl/9X3G49, no
> feature deadline set yet.  (bkp, 15:51:30)

Thanks for the update Brian.

Regarding FC21 support (BZ1163062): Do we speak of engine or nodes?
Hopefully nodes can be installed already with 3.5.x (thumbs up for x<=2).

Markus

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.

Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.

Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln

Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva

Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.

Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln

executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach

President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva

Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt italian translation and jenkins

[Einav Cohen]

> - Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 9:03:35 AM
> 
> Hello,
> Amedeo Salvati has begun working on it (we are now at 40% on master).
> Is it possible to include him in destination list for these e-mails?
> 
> Address amedeo.salv...@gmail.com is ok
> 
> BTW: is there any way to concentrate and work only master and then quickly
> dump to 3.5 eventually?

actually, yes - a similar translation effort is starting right about now 
for German in 'master', and we will most likely "backport" these translations 
to 3.5 eventually using a script or similar. So we may be able to run that 
same script for Italian as well. 
so feel free to concentrate your efforts from now on only on 'master', and 
once the translation completion on 'master' will be sufficient - we can 
"backport" the translations to 3.5 for you. 

> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Gianluca
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jenkins ci oVirt Server < jenk...@ovirt.org >
> Date: Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:37 PM
> Subject: [oVirt Jenkins]
> ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation » fc20 - Build #
> 118 - Failure!
> To: de...@redhat.com , sbona...@redhat.com , gianluca.cec...@gmail.com ,
> giorgio.bers...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> Project:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation/label=fc20/
> Build:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation/label=fc20/118/
> Build Number: 118
> Build Status: Failure
> Triggered By: Started by upstream project
> "ovirt-engine_master_create-rpms_merged_italian_translation" build number
> 118
> 
> -
> Changes Since Last Success:
> -
> Changes for Build #118
> [Daniel Erez] core: tpgt should not be sent when empty
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Failed Tests:
> -
> No tests ran.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt italian translation and jenkins

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Il 26/Nov/2014 20:59 "Einav Cohen"  ha scritto:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Gianluca Cecchi" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 9:03:35 AM
> >
> > Hello,
> > Amedeo Salvati has begun working on it (we are now at 40% on master).
> > Is it possible to include him in destination list for these e-mails?
> >
> > Address amedeo.salv...@gmail.com is ok
> >
> > BTW: is there any way to concentrate and work only master and then
quickly
> > dump to 3.5 eventually?
>
> actually, yes - a similar translation effort is starting right about now
> for German in 'master', and we will most likely "backport" these
translations
> to 3.5 eventually using a script or similar. So we may be able to run that
> same script for Italian as well.
> so feel free to concentrate your efforts from now on only on 'master', and
> once the translation completion on 'master' will be sufficient - we can
> "backport" the translations to 3.5 for you.
>

Great!
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] Add a disk to a VM

[James James]

HI,

I was stuck with a problem when I wanted to add
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] Fwd: Add a disk to a VM

[James James]

HI,

I was stuck with a problem when I wanted to add a disk to a VM in oVirt
3.5. I forgot to fill the "profile" field but I haven't got any warnign
form the UI. Is it possible to add a red highlight when you forgot the to
fill the profile filed ?

Regards.

James
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] DataCenters/QoS/CPU

[Luciano Giacchetta]

Ohh i see.. thank you.

--
*Luciano Giacchetta | Tecnología Informática*

*+Linea: +54 (11) 6091 7601 +iNum: +883 510 009 903 145+eMail:
luciano.giacche...@osit.com.ar+Site:
http://www.osit.com.ar *

2014-11-26 5:28 GMT-03:00 Artyom Lukianov :

> You need to specify limit for host cpu loading in %, so if you want that
> your vm will not utilize more than 30% of host cpu you need to put this
> value to 30.
> Thanks
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Luciano Giacchetta" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 5:47:17 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] DataCenters/QoS/CPU
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to implement a new CPU QoS but i don't know what data needs in
> "Limit: field.
> I saw this page, http://www.ovirt.org/Features/CPU_SLA but as i can see
> it only reference to
> http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPUTuning
>
> Does Limit field need to be filled with some options from ?
> Is there some related information?
>
> Ovirt: 3.5.1
> Centos: 6.6
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Luciano Giacchetta | Tecnología Informática
> +Linea: +54 (11) 6091 7601 +iNum: +883 510 009 903 145
> +eMail: luciano.giacche...@osit.com.ar +Site: http://www.osit.com.ar
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] [Gluster-users] Gluster command [] failed on server...

[Punit Dambiwal]

Hi Kaushal,

Thanks for the detailed replylet me explain my setup first :-

1. Ovirt Engine
2. 4* host as well as storage machine (Host and gluster combined)
3. Every host has 24 bricks...

Now whenever the host machine reboot...it can come up but can not join the
cluster again and through the following error "Gluster command []
failed on server.."

Please check my comment in line :-

1. Use the same string for doing the peer probe and for the brick address
during volume create/add-brick. Ideally, we suggest you use properly
resolvable FQDNs everywhere. If that is not possible, then use only IP
addresses. Try to avoid short names.
---
[root@cpu05 ~]# gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 3

Hostname: cpu03.stack.com
Uuid: 5729b8c4-e80d-4353-b456-6f467bddbdfb
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

Hostname: cpu04.stack.com
Uuid: d272b790-c4b2-4bed-ba68-793656e6d7b0
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Other names:
10.10.0.8

Hostname: cpu02.stack.com
Uuid: 8d8a7041-950e-40d0-85f9-58d14340ca25
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
[root@cpu05 ~]#

2. During boot up, make sure to launch glusterd only after the network is
up. This will allow the new peer identification mechanism to do its
job correctly.
>> I think the service itself doing the same job

[root@cpu05 ~]# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/glusterd.service
[Unit]
Description=GlusterFS, a clustered file-system server
After=network.target rpcbind.service
Before=network-online.target

[Service]
Type=forking
PIDFile=/var/run/glusterd.pid
LimitNOFILE=65536
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/glusterd -p /var/run/glusterd.pid
KillMode=process

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
[root@cpu05 ~]#


gluster logs :-

[2014-11-24 09:22:22.147471] I [MSGID: 100030] [glusterfsd.c:2018:main]
0-/usr/sbin/glusterd: Started running /usr/sbin/glusterd version 3.6.1
(args: /usr/sbin/glusterd -p /var/run/glusterd.pid)
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.151565] I [glusterd.c:1214:init] 0-management: Maximum
allowed open file descriptors set to 65536
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.151599] I [glusterd.c:1259:init] 0-management: Using
/var/lib/glusterd as working directory
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.155216] W [rdma.c:4195:__gf_rdma_ctx_create]
0-rpc-transport/rdma: rdma_cm event channel creation failed (No such device)
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.155264] E [rdma.c:4483:init] 0-rdma.management: Failed
to initialize IB Device
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.155285] E [rpc-transport.c:333:rpc_transport_load]
0-rpc-transport: 'rdma' initialization failed
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.155354] W [rpcsvc.c:1524:rpcsvc_transport_create]
0-rpc-service: cannot create listener, initing the transport failed
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.156290] I
[glusterd.c:413:glusterd_check_gsync_present] 0-glusterd: geo-replication
module not installed in the system
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.161318] I
[glusterd-store.c:2043:glusterd_restore_op_version] 0-glusterd: retrieved
op-version: 30600
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.821800] I
[glusterd-handler.c:3146:glusterd_friend_add_from_peerinfo] 0-management:
connect returned 0
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.825810] I
[glusterd-handler.c:3146:glusterd_friend_add_from_peerinfo] 0-management:
connect returned 0
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.828705] I
[glusterd-handler.c:3146:glusterd_friend_add_from_peerinfo] 0-management:
connect returned 0
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.828771] I [rpc-clnt.c:969:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.832670] I [rpc-clnt.c:969:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.835919] I [rpc-clnt.c:969:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.840209] E
[glusterd-store.c:4248:glusterd_resolve_all_bricks] 0-glusterd: resolve
brick failed in restore
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.840233] E [xlator.c:425:xlator_init] 0-management:
Initialization of volume 'management' failed, review your volfile again
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.840245] E [graph.c:322:glusterfs_graph_init]
0-management: initializing translator failed
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.840264] E [graph.c:525:glusterfs_graph_activate]
0-graph: init failed
[2014-11-24 09:22:22.840754] W [glusterfsd.c:1194:cleanup_and_exit] (-->
0-: received signum (0), shutting down

Thanks,
Punit




On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Kaushal M  wrote:

> Based on the logs I can guess that glusterd is being started before
> the network has come up and that the addresses given to bricks do not
> directly match the addresses used in during peer probe.
>
> The gluster_after_reboot log has the line "[2014-11-25
> 06:46:09.972113] E [glusterd-store.c:2632:glusterd_resolve_all_bricks]
> 0-glusterd: resolve brick failed in restore".
>
> Brick resolution fails when glusterd cannot match the address for the
> brick, with one of the peers. Brick resolution happens in two phases,
> 1. We first try to identify the peer by performing string comparisions
> with the brick address and the peer addresses (The peer names will be
> the names/addresses that were given when

[ovirt-users] Issues with vm start up

[Shanil S]

Hi All,


I am using the ovirt version 3.5 and having some issues with the vm startup
with cloud-init using api in run-once mode.

Below is the steps i follow :-

1. Create the VM by API from precreated Template..
2. Start the VM in run-once mode and push the cloud-init data from API..
3. VM stuck and from console it display the following :-
Booting from DVD/CD.. ...
Boot failed : could not read from CDROM (code 004)

I am using the following xml for this operation :-



 
  
 
 
  
   
test
   
   

 
  virtIO
  eth0
  static
  
  
   
  
  true
 
 
  virtIO
  eth1
  static
  
  
   
  
  true
 

   
   

 /ignored
 plaintext

   
  
 

   

I am also attaching the screen shot to this.



-- 
Regards
Shanil
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with vm start up

[Omer Frenkel]

- Original Message -
> From: "Shanil S" 
> To: users@ovirt.org, "Juan Hernandez" , "Omer Frenkel" 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:33:04 AM
> Subject: Issues with vm start up
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> 
> I am using the ovirt version 3.5 and having some issues with the vm startup
> with cloud-init using api in run-once mode.
> 
> Below is the steps i follow :-
> 
> 1. Create the VM by API from precreated Template..
> 2. Start the VM in run-once mode and push the cloud-init data from API..
> 3. VM stuck and from console it display the following :-
> Booting from DVD/CD.. ...
> Boot failed : could not read from CDROM (code 004)
> 
> I am using the following xml for this operation :-
> 
> 
> 
>  
>   
>  
>  
>   
>
> test
>
>
> 
>  
>   virtIO
>   eth0
>   static
>   
>   
>
>   
>   true
>  
>  
>   virtIO
>   eth1
>   static
>   
>   
>
>   
>   true
>  
> 
>
>
> 
>  /ignored
>  plaintext
> 
>
>   
>  
> 
>
> 
> I am also attaching the screen shot to this.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Regards
> Shanil
> 


can you please attach engine.log and vdsm.log (of the host that runs the vm)
for the time you tried to run the vm?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users