On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Scott wrote:
> Hi Sandvik,
>
> I believe this ultimately is what the self hosted engine is planned to
> solve. It's up to you as to whether you feel comfortable with that idea
> currently.
>
Indeed. And many in the community are using it.
> Outside of that, I w
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the quick reply, "self hosted engine" are you talking about the
hosted-engine? I tried hosted-engine, I think twice, and I'm having problem
with VLAN(s), I can't manipulate the NIC of the hosted engine.
I think I need to read more about this "self hosted engine".
TIA
Sandvik
My mistake. Needed NM_CONTROLLED=no added.
On 08/19/2016 12:58 PM, Hanson wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have edited /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 &1 for the
various subnets we needed.
Somewhere along the line, when the hosted-engine boots, eth1 comes up
but eth0 does not. If I login using
Hi Sandvik,
I believe this ultimately is what the self hosted engine is planned to
solve. It's up to you as to whether you feel comfortable with that idea
currently.
Outside of that, I would point you to the Red Hat Cluster Suite in a
RHEV/RHEL environment. The high availability component of that
Hi Guys,
I have edited /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 &1 for the
various subnets we needed.
Somewhere along the line, when the hosted-engine boots, eth1 comes up
but eth0 does not. If I login using the upped interface and do an ifup
eth0 it comes up.
it is set to ONBOOT=yes in t
Hi Ovirt Users,
Do you have any documentation, tutorial, howto or workaround to perform or
to have an ovirt-engine HA? Iv'e tried to google about this but I can't
find any.
let's say I want to have two engine, engine1 is currently managing two
hypervisor, then engin2 is my reserved engine, so I c
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1 has been tagged for testing for CentOS Virt
SIG and is already in testing repositories.
It's now available for x86_64, ppc64le and aarch64.
Please help testing and providing feedback, thanks.
We plan to move to stable repo around Wednesday next week.
ChangeLog since
Erik,
Awesome!
Regards,
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuen...@txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016, at 08:22 PM, Erik Brakke wrote:
> Fernando, thanks! That did it!
> - added the ovirt 3.6 repo to the host
> - tried to update vdsm but had complaints about no glusterfs >= 3.7.x
>
Hi Guys,
Is it an idea to have an option, not the first boot option, to set a
prefered host for a VM to start on ?
If you remove this host that it also does not complain about a pinned
VM as it should faillback on "any host in cluster" in that way ?
It's nice for static VM's on hosts that might
As I have an oob network I change my routing to see if it wanted to
upgrade packages, it seemed that I already was on 4.0.2 when this
occured.
The HE started in some strange way on one host, that host was even Non
Operational but had at least the ovirtmgmt network, I changed
something there earlie
Le 19/08/2016 à 13:43, Sahina Bose a écrit :
Or are you adding the 3 nodes to your existing cluster? If so, I
suggest you try adding this to a new cluster
OK, I tried and succeed to create a new cluster.
In this new cluster, I was ABLE to add the first new host, using
its m
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot
wrote:
> Le 19/08/2016 à 09:55, Sahina Bose a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm digging out this thread because I now had the time to work on this
>> subject, and I'm stuck.
>>
>> This
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 12:24 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Carlos Rodrigues
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:47 +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:36 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:47 +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:36 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Carlos Rodrigues > > m>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > After night,
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:47 +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:36 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Carlos Rodrigues > m>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After night, the OVF_STORE it was created:
> > >
> >
> > It's quite strange
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:36 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Carlos Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > After night, the OVF_STORE it was created:
> >
>
> It's quite strange that it got so long but now it looks fine.
>
> If the ISO_DOMAIN that I see in your screensho
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> After night, the OVF_STORE it was created:
>
It's quite strange that it got so long but now it looks fine.
If the ISO_DOMAIN that I see in your screenshot is served by the engine VM
itself, I suggest to remove it and export from an ext
After night, the OVF_STORE it was created:
Regards,
Carlos Rodrigues
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 08:29 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Carlos Rodrigues
wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 17:45 +0200, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016
The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of an oVirt 4.0.2
post release update, as of August 19th, 2016.
This update includes a new build of oVirt Engine fixing:
Bug 1367483 - Installing a 3.6 host to rhev-m 4.0 results in 'ovirtmgmt'
network as out of sync
See the release notes
Gluster hyperconverged will be integrated and fully supported in 4.1 - but
already available as preview from 3.6.8.
I think there are couple of trackers around this. One of which you can look
at for list of upcoming features/fixes -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1277939&hid
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm digging out this thread because I now had the time to work on this
> subject, and I'm stuck.
>
> This oVirt setup has a standalone engine, and 3 hosts.
> These 3 hosts are hypervisors and gluster nodes, each using one NIC f
Hello,
I'm digging out this thread because I now had the time to work on this
subject, and I'm stuck.
This oVirt setup has a standalone engine, and 3 hosts.
These 3 hosts are hypervisors and gluster nodes, each using one NIC for
all the traffic, that is a very bad idea. (Well, it's working, b
22 matches
Mail list logo