Hi,
I believe we do not support this, but there is something similar in
the VDSM configuration (/etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf). There are two options:
host_mem_reserve and extra_mem_reserve that allow you to reserve
memory for the OS and your application.
You should be aware of features like fencing
Hi all,
I am thinking to setup an environment with oVirt and centralized storage using
a NAS that supports NFS and iSCSI.
The setup will be used to host approx 20 VMs. The VMs will be running critical
services and not for testing. I have seen several from QNAP, iXsystems (freenas
mini), ...
So, what do you guys suggest? isn't there a hint or a way to fix this issue?
thanks for your help,
JP
2016-12-20 13:35 GMT-03:00 Juan Pablo :
> Andrea, thanks for your reply, I already tried that , but unfortunately, a
> restart of the engine VM did not solve the
What operating system do you use? And what versions of RPM dependencies of
SDK do you have?
On Dec 22, 2016 12:34 PM, "TranceWorldLogic ."
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting below error logs
> ---
> [INFO] ERROR org.ovirt.api.metamodel.tool.Main - Error while
Hello,
in June 2016 oVirt 4.0.0 GA was released and I in-place upgraded from an
existing 3.6.5 to it.
In 4.0.0 release notes it was described as the method to use.
I see that it still remains the same for 4.0.5:
http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.0.5/
and also for upcoming 4.0.6 (RC5 at least) there
I've got a similar setup, FC Compellent for primary storage and a Synology
Rack NAS for testing.
Synology with 4 bonded ports is plenty fast enough for my needs.
On 23 December 2016 at 13:20, Andrea Ghelardi
wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> Specs you provided are a little
Hi, it mainly depends on the budget. I can give you some advice from my own experience: SMB systems from QNAP or any other vendor don't cope well with the load that OVirt generates (simultaneous access), because they are usually built on slow drives.Using 15K drives helps a bit. I have a Centos
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> in June 2016 oVirt 4.0.0 GA was released and I in-place upgraded from an
> existing 3.6.5 to it.
> In 4.0.0 release notes it was described as the method to use.
> I see that it still remains the same
On 23 December 2016 at 18:10, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> Is there any particular technical reason for this substantial difference?
> Clearly they are not the same sw but it seems strange to me this
> discrepancy.
This is because RHEV 3.6 engine was only supported on
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
>
>
> Having said the above, I know vaguely that Red Hat has some
> all-on-nothing rules when it comes to licensing, so a mixed RHV/oVirt
> environment may not meet the RHEL/RHV licensing terms... Then again,
> I'm not a
Hello Alex,
Specs you provided are a little bit vague. You don’t specify storage space.
Our main storage here is a SAN Compellent, but we do have also Synology and we
are quite happy with it
You can start searching this or comparable product
https://www.synology.com/en-global/products/RS2416+
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade to 4.0 from 3.6. I dutify checked that my clusters
were set to 3.6 compatibility and started the engine upgrade. unfortunately
I forgot to check the unused Default cluser. :-/
So the upgrade failed, but the 4.0 rpms were installed, so the engine won't
start. How can
Hi Andrea,
The storage would be 6 TB.
I will have a look on the options from Synology.
Thank you.
Alex
On December 23, 2016 3:20:59 PM EET, Andrea Ghelardi
wrote:
>Hello Alex,
>Specs you provided are a little bit vague. You don’t specify storage
>space.
>Our main
Hi Mikhail,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Have you had any performance issues with freenas? It has been mentioned on some
blogs that freenas might have performance issues. Not sure why.
A clean Centos with NFS sounds ok also. What do you do if you need snapshots of
data? Lvm snapshots?
Alex
14 matches
Mail list logo