Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with Power Management

Hi, I also raised a bug with power management, but I have issues with Cisco UCS! There is a bug starting with ovirt engine 4.0.5, where the "Options" field only allows integers anymore! I was told, they want to fix this in 4.0.7 ->

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt installs 3.6 repos for 4.0 compat cluster

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:00 AM, James wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm trying to servers to a new oVirt 4.0 cluster. I've upgraded the > engine (not hosted, standalone) to version 4.0.6.3 and run engine-setup > and everything seemed to go fine. > > When reinstalling oVirt on a host after

Re: [ovirt-users] 4.0 x 4.1

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote: > I am deploying a oVirt environment which will not get production data > immediately. > > Obviously I would rather use 4.1 RC due the many changes and fixes present. > Later when 4.1 becomes stable then

[ovirt-users] oVirt installs 3.6 repos for 4.0 compat cluster

Hi guys, I'm trying to servers to a new oVirt 4.0 cluster. I've upgraded the engine (not hosted, standalone) to version 4.0.6.3 and run engine-setup and everything seemed to go fine. When reinstalling oVirt on a host after removing it from the 3.6 compat cluster into a 4.0 compat cluster causes

Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with Power Management

I was able to solve the issue by using the API. The api accepted the input and the Power Management is working now. I am still not sure why the Web Ui is not working but atleast i can move on now. Thank you for all your help! Thanks, Bradley Bishop On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Torsten

Re: [ovirt-users] Cannot move pointer to top of console view in noVNC

It looks like is a HTML/CSS issue. The status div "overhangs" the canvas and prevents the pointer from interacting with the canvas. I have made the following change to /usr/share/ovirt-engine/files/novnc/include/base.css and it resolves the issue. --- files/novnc/include/base.css.orig

Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with Power Management

Hello Bradley, beats me - I tried to replicate your situation but was unable to reach that error. My setup seems identical to yours (Centos 7.3 / oVirt Engine 4.0.2.7-1). Is it possible that this error is related to some totally different field? Out of ideas, Torsten On 23.01.2017 23:08,

Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with Power Management

Hello Torsten, Thank you for replying! I read that somewhere else also. The issue is web ui does not allow me to enter those options. I get an error that states "The field must contain an integer number between -2147483648 <(214)%20748-3648> and 2147483648 <(214)%20748-3648>." Thank you, Bradley

Re: [ovirt-users] Issues with Power Management

Hello Bradley, I am successfully managing an R710 drac6 controller using the following parameters: Type: drac5 Options: cmd_prompt=/admin1->,login_timeout=60 Hope this helps, Torsten On 23.01.2017 22:43, Bradley Bishop wrote: Hello all, I am new to ovirt and having issues setting up

[ovirt-users] Use of Direct Attached Storage as Storage Type

I am trying to use a DAC (Direct Attached Storage) in a Hardware which has it as the only option (DELL VRTX) but I see no matching option at Storage Type. It has there: NFS, POSIX compliant FS, GlusterFS, iSCSI and Fiber Channel. The two closest are iSCSI and Fiberchannel as they use CLVM in

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Jan 23, 2017 3:20 PM, "Nathanaël Blanchet"

[ovirt-users] 4.0 x 4.1

I am deploying a oVirt environment which will not get production data immediately. Obviously I would rather use 4.1 RC due the many changes and fixes present. Later when 4.1 becomes stable then upgrade to it. Does anyone see any problem in doing that way or would it be more advisable to start

Re: [ovirt-users] Host Device Mapping

Ennableing IOMMU fixed it. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Polednik To: Bryan Sockel Cc: "users@ovirt.org" Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:51:52 +0100 Subject: Re: Host Device Mapping On 20/01/17 14:38 -0600, Bryan

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 23, 2017 3:20 PM, "Nathanaël Blanchet" wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 23/01/2017 à 13:08, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > >

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage Domain sizing

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Marina Kalinin wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Indeed, lvm adds some overhead when scanning the domains, so there is a > limit around 300 lvs per domain, where each snapshot of each disk counts as > a new lv. We are testing currently 1000 lvs per

Re: [ovirt-users] Update NFS storage of the HE server

Simone, thanks for replying, According to the documentation, global mode seems to be a superset of local mode. Does setting to local mode maintenance on all hosts in the cluster really bring any benefits? * |global| - All high-availability agents in the cluster are disabled from

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage Domain sizing

Hi Christian, Indeed, lvm adds some overhead when scanning the domains, so there is a limit around 300 lvs per domain, where each snapshot of each disk counts as a new lv. On the other hand, having too many domains can also affect on overall performance required for oVirt to manage all of them. I

Re: [ovirt-users] Update NFS storage of the HE server

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Claude Duropcher < claude.duroc...@cptaq.gouv.qc.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > We need to update/reboot the NFS server on wich the hosted engine is > installed. This server also hosts a couple of extra storage domains (ISO, > Export and a iScsi domain). I'm wondering if

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Jan 23, 2017 3:20 PM, "Nathanaël Blanchet" wrote: > > > > Le 23/01/2017 à 13:08, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet > wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [ovirt-users] Rearrange View of VMs

On Monday, January 23, 2017 8:57:02 AM EST Sven Achtelik wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > thank you, I'm running a very old engine version (3.5) and it seems that > this is something in the newer versions. It's not working in 3.5. We're > going to upgrade as soon as 4.1 is available. Is there any other

Re: [ovirt-users] Gluster storage expansion

Hi, Thanks for the answer! Adding nodes per 3 makes sense. The disadvantage is having multiple storage domains when you do that. Or is it possible to combine them? Regards, Bertjan On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:27:28AM +0530, knarra wrote: > On 01/19/2017 09:15 PM, Goorkate, B.J. wrote: > > Hi

[ovirt-users] Update NFS storage of the HE server

Hi, We need to update/reboot the NFS server on wich the hosted engine is installed. This server also hosts a couple of extra storage domains (ISO, Export and a iScsi domain). I'm wondering if this procedure is complete for an oVirt 4.0 installation : 1-set the environment to global

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

Le 23/01/2017 à 15:11, Juan Hernández a écrit : On 01/23/2017 03:05 PM, Ondra Machacek wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: Le 23/01/2017 à 13:38, Ondra Machacek a écrit : On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot

Re: [ovirt-users] Rearrange View of VMs

Hi Alexander, thank you, I'm running a very old engine version (3.5) and it seems that this is something in the newer versions. It's not working in 3.5. We're going to upgrade as soon as 4.1 is available. Is there any other way to do this in 3.5 ? Thank you, Sven -Ursprüngliche

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage Domain sizing

I know that there is a monitoring process which monitors each Storage Domain, so I guess that if you will have multiple storage domains this will make the monitor runs every time multiple times, but I think that the affect is insignificant on the Host or the Storage Domain. You should also

Re: [ovirt-users] Rearrange View of VMs

On Monday, January 23, 2017 8:00:58 AM EST Sven Achtelik wrote: > Hi List, > > > > does anyone know if it's possible the rearange the colums in the VMs view ? > > Yes, if you right click the header, you will get a popup with all the names of the columns and a checkbox, you can

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage Domain sizing

Hi, thx for you input both aren’t problems for me, all domains are from the same storage and so can’t be maintained independently. Are there performance problems with only one Domain (like waiting for locks etc.) which I don’t have that much with multiple? Thx Christian Von: Maor

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage Domain sizing

There are many factors that can be discussed on this issue, two things that pop up on my mind are that many storage domains will make your Data Center be more robust and flexible, since you can maintain part of the storage domains which could help with upgrading your storage server in the future

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

Le 23/01/2017 à 15:05, Ondra Machacek a écrit : Alas, though we already have one DC in V4, most of our production DCs are still in V3 for one year, and I have to maintain them. So far, I have no clue how to add ovirtsdk v3 to my Ubuntu. You just need to specify which version you would like to

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

On 01/23/2017 03:05 PM, Ondra Machacek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: >> Le 23/01/2017 à 13:38, Ondra Machacek a écrit : >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot >>> wrote: Hello, I'm

[ovirt-users] Rearrange View of VMs

Hi List, does anyone know if it's possible the rearange the colums in the VMs view ? I would like to have the Desciption directly next to Name and IP Address before Host. Thank you, Sven smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: > Le 23/01/2017 à 13:38, Ondra Machacek a écrit : >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm trying to follow >>> >>>

[ovirt-users] blog post: virtio-blk vs virtio-scsi

Hi! It's time for another blog post -- virtio-blk VS virtio-scsi. The topic isn't chosen at random, master branch of oVirt now uses virito-scsi as the default interface for drives instead of virtio-blk. The decision to do so wasn't just about flipping a code-switch -- get reading to see why. :)

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

On Jan 23, 2017 3:20 PM, "Nathanaël Blanchet" wrote: Le 23/01/2017 à 13:08, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet < blanc...@abes.fr> wrote: > Hi > > The update notifier in the webadmin was originally designed to alert

[ovirt-users] Power Management on Dell 1955 Bladecenter

I wonder if someone has got Powermanagement on a Dell 1955 Bladecenter working ? If someone is able to share some ideas would be nice. Thanks! Matt ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

Le 23/01/2017 à 13:08, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet > wrote: Hi The update notifier in the webadmin was originally designed to alert for new vdsm* packages. Now, I noticed that available

Re: [ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Matt . wrote: > OK will do! > > No!!, Puppet with Foreman is great, as Foreman is in the same pool as > oVirt I think you need to bring those guys some beers to keep them as > friends :P and 2015 was a great year of wine ;) > As both

Re: [ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

OK will do! No!!, Puppet with Foreman is great, as Foreman is in the same pool as oVirt I think you need to bring those guys some beers to keep them as friends :P and 2015 was a great year of wine ;) I prefer to do all from the GUI so all in would be best as I described but we can test out if on

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to follow > http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/infra/python-sdk/ > and I'm successfully discovering Python + oVirt SDK on CentOS. > > I'd like to do the same on Ubuntu, but

[ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 4.1.0 First Release Candidate is now available

The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the First Release candidate of oVirt 4.1.0 for testing, as of January 23rd, 2016 This is pre-release software. Please take a look at our community page[1] to know how to ask questions and interact with developers and users. All issues

Re: [ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Matt . wrote: > HI Yaniv, > > Nice to hear, I will update the other ticket OK ? > Sure. > > I use puppet but can I kick and wait for maintenance mode from the > commandline ? I doubt if this works > Puppet is so 2015... ;-) If you

Re: [ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

HI Yaniv, Nice to hear, I will update the other ticket OK ? I use puppet but can I kick and wait for maintenance mode from the commandline ? I doubt if this works Thanks! Matt 2017-01-23 13:13 GMT+01:00 Yaniv Kaul : > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Matt .

[ovirt-users] oVirt Python SDK on Ubuntu

Hello, I'm trying to follow http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/infra/python-sdk/ and I'm successfully discovering Python + oVirt SDK on CentOS. I'd like to do the same on Ubuntu, but the instructions seem incomplete : " easy_install ovirt-engine-sdk-python " is

Re: [ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Matt . wrote: > Hi All, > > Would it not be nice to have the following upgrade options ? > > - Only oVirt packages > This is the default. > or > - Yum update all packages > > And this is requested in

Re: [ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote: > Hi > > The update notifier in the webadmin was originally designed to alert for > new vdsm* packages. Now, I noticed that available update of virt packages > and more are notified. I know that hot updating qemu-kvm

[ovirt-users] Updated Invitation: DeepDive: VM to host affinity @ Tue Jan 24, 2017 4pm - 4:50pm (IST) (users@ovirt.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20170124T14Z DTEND:20170124T145000Z DTSTAMP:20170123T115254Z ORGANIZER;CN=yanir quinn:mailto:yani...@gmail.com UID:rh3ink2nbv41t4qi9gok4ta...@google.com

[ovirt-users] More advanced update options for Hosts

Hi All, Would it not be nice to have the following upgrade options ? - Only oVirt packages or - Yum update all packages Selectbox: - Reboot when upgrade finished This with the maintenance mode will save a lot of time. I hope this is possible. Thanks Matt!

Re: [ovirt-users] Failed to attach a disk

I send you a private mail. > Le 22 janv. 2017 à 13:52, Maor Lipchuk a écrit : > > Hi Fabrice, > > Can you please attach the VDSM and engine logs > > Thanks, > Maor > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Fabrice Bacchella >

[ovirt-users] packages that can be updated without maintening hosts

Hi The update notifier in the webadmin was originally designed to alert for new vdsm* packages. Now, I noticed that available update of virt packages and more are notified. I know that hot updating qemu-kvm package does break vms that are running on concerned hosts, but what about other one

Re: [ovirt-users] Fail to setup network just after host setup via python SDK

Hi, I able to solve this issue. I first added host in ovirt and then added netwrok VLANs in cluster. And after that I tried to call setupNetwork. With this my problem is solved. It look my sequece was wrong [adding network in cluster and then adding host and then setup network] Thanks, ~Rohit