On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:04 PM, plysan wrote:
> Solved by the additional configuration in
> https://github.com/Seitanas/kvm-vdi/blob/master/guest_agent/README.md
>
> It seems that ovirt-guest-tools-iso-4.1-3.fc24.noarch doesn't provide any
> credential providers dll, is there any reason why it's n
Took me a few other 'self inflicted' configuration issues and reloads.
Though, as soon as I added the extra Storage Domains, sure enough, the
hosted_engine domain (as well as the Hosted Engine) showed up. Thank you!
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:
Solved by the additional configuration in
https://github.com/Seitanas/kvm-vdi/blob/master/guest_agent/README.md
It seems that ovirt-guest-tools-iso-4.1-3.fc24.noarch doesn't provide any
credential providers dll, is there any reason why it's not included in the
upstream ?
thanks
2017-05-07 21:47
Hi Michal,
Michal Skrivanek writes:
>> On 5 May 2017, at 16:42, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>> Kai,
>>
>> Kai Wagner writes:
>>
>>> Just click twice on the "shutdown" button -> this will kill the VM process
>>> immediately
>>
>> Is this documented somewhere? In googling various terms like "pow
Thx a lot!
Von: Eduardo Mayoral [mailto:emayo...@arsys.es]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Mai 2017 12:22
An: Oliver Dietzel ; 'users@ovirt.org'
Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt Installation on Centos 7.3 1704 is broken
Quoted from https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.1/#fedora--centos--rhel
EPEL
TL;DR D
On 05/07/2017 04:48 PM, Mike DePaulo wrote:
Hi. I am trying to follow this guide. Is it possible to use part of my
OS disk /dev/sda for the bricks?
https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-1-and-gluster-storage/
I am using oVirt Node 4.1.1.1. I am aware of the manual partit
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Eduardo Mayoral wrote:
> Quoted from https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.1/#fedora--centos--rhel
>
>
> EPEL
>
> TL;DR Don't enable all of EPEL on oVirt machines.
>
> The ovirt-release package enables the epel repositories and includes several
> specific packages that
Quoted from https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.1/#fedora--centos--rhel
> EPEL
>
> TL;DR Don't enable all of EPEL on oVirt machines.
>
> The ovirt-release package enables the epel repositories and includes
> several specific packages that are required from there. It also
> enables and uses th
Collectd-disk and -write_http require an older version of collectd than offered
by the repos (7.2.0-2 instead of 7.2.1-2 as offered by repo).
Will there be updated versions of collectd-disk and -write_http?
To reproduce try # yum -y install ovirt-engine
on a fully updated Centos 7.3 1704
https:
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stefano Bovina wrote:
> Yes,
> this configuration is the one suggested by EMC for EL7.
>
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/139193 suggest that for alua, the patch
checker needs to be different.
Anyway, it is very likely that you have storage issues - they need
Yes,
this configuration is the one suggested by EMC for EL7.
By the way,
"The parameters rr_min_io vs. rr_min_io_rq mean the same thing but are used
for device-mapper-multipath on differing kernel versions." and rr_min_io_rq
default value is 1, rr_min_io default value is 1000, so it should be fine
Hi,
Ok, ignore what I said regards step 2. The volume exists.
2017-05-07 20:27 GMT+02:00 Stefano Bovina :
> Hi,
> 1)
> What do you need exactly? Shutdown VM, edit disk, "extend size by" --->
> error
>
> 2)
> storage domain is up and running, but with lvm command, vg exists, lv does
> not exist
>
Hi,
1)
What do you need exactly? Shutdown VM, edit disk, "extend size by" --->
error
2)
storage domain is up and running, but with lvm command, vg exists, lv does
not exist
Powering up a machine, I also saw these lines in vdsm log:
Thread-22::DEBUG::2017-05-07 18:59:54,115::blockSD::596::
Stora
Hi,
thanks for the advice. The upgrade is already scheduled, but I would like
to fix this issue before proceeding with a big upgrade (unless an upgrade
will fixes the problem).
The problem is on all hypervisors.
We have 2 cluster (both connected to the same storage system):
- the old one with F
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Stefano Bovina wrote:
> Sense data are 0x0/0x0/0x0
Interesting - first time I'm seeing 0/0/0. The 1st is usually 0x2 (see
[1]), and then the rest [2], [3] make sense.
A google search found another user with Clarion with the exact same
error[4], so I'm leaning to
15 matches
Mail list logo