BTW - this is why i had to change that setting... if i left it hashed out vdsmd
exits
Feb 3 05:26:30 r5a101 systemd-vdsmd[5213]: Starting libvirtd (via systemctl): [
OK ]
Feb 3 05:26:31 r5a101 systemd-vdsmd[5213]: conflicting vdsm and libvirt tls
configuration.
Feb 3 05:26:31 r5a101 systemd-
:( no dice again...
same message as below..
in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf i had to set
auth_tcp="none"
as VDSM didnt seem to start cleanly when i disabled SSL as per the wiki link in
this thread
I wonder if thats maybe the cause...
- Original Message -
From: "Spyro Polymiadis"
hrmm after some digging i came across this on the hypervisor when i try and
launch spicec...
/var/log/libvirt/qemu/vm1.log
reds_handle_read_link_done: Peer doesn't support AUTH selection
maybe ill blow that VM away and create a new one...see if that helps
- Original Message -
From
Yeah :( The vm was off after processing all the changes (i rebooted the whole
cluster and engine server)
How do it set a "ticket"?
I can connect to the spice interface using IE (windows) via the ovirt ui just
fine (although the mouse is completely unreliable)
Further question - if i end up c
On 02/03/2012 08:08 AM, Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
Hi Mate,
no unfortunately i couldnt update it as i wasnt able to find any newer
XPI's that would work on centos5.7 (centos 6.0 version required a
stack of new packages)
I had just tried going through all that...
the errors i was getting after
damn...
after disabling all that - still get the same error as trying the secure way
$ /usr/bin/spicec --host 192.168.112.21 --port 5900
Warning: connect failed 7
the spicec.log shows
1328250353 INFO [16635:16637] RedPeer::connect_unsecure: Connected to
192.168.112.21 5900
1328250353 WAR
Hi Mate,
no unfortunately i couldnt update it as i wasnt able to find any newer XPI's
that would work on centos5.7 (centos 6.0 version required a stack of new
packages)
I had just tried going through all that...
the errors i was getting after using the SUBJECT and ca file was:
$ /usr/bin
On 02/03/2012 02:54 AM, Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
Howdy
Ive just installed an updated version of spice client on my linux box:
spice-client-0.8.2-1.el5
spice-0.8.2-1.el5
and still the firefox xpi crashes with the version mismatch error below
And the XPI? Was it updated?
but if i try to run
Howdy
Ive just installed an updated version of spice client on my linux box:
spice-client-0.8.2-1.el5
spice-0.8.2-1.el5
and still the firefox xpi crashes with the version mismatch error below
but if i try to run it manually from the command line like so :
/usr/bin/spicec --host 192.168.11
Hans,
Here are the results of testing I did with and without usbtablet. No usbtablet
assumes spice defaults EG: PS2 mouse
BTW for now I am using a VDSM hook script to enable usbtablet and workaround
the issues. (TY Andy C.)
Spice defaults:
- Red Hat 7.3 --> Mouse unusable
- Red Hat 9 --> Mous
Andy,
Many thanks!
That got me going the right direction.
I did some extensive testing of with this. Here are the changes I made but
basically what I do is:
- If the user specifies a custom property of usbtablet, just rewrite the input
tag with:
This will of course rewrite the existing
But in t
Easiest way to go about this, at least the way I go about it... Manually
place your iso images on the NFS ISO share.
This can be accomplished two ways:
Example 1: If you have direct access to your fileserver EG: NAS/etc and
it is linux based.
Simply login and sftp/scp/NFS/CIFS retrieve and/or copy
I have been trying to upload ISOs onto my ISO Storage Domain, set up
when I ran engine-setup.
I can run the command and the .iso file is correctly put in place,
however this never appears in the available images for this domain on
the web-admin.
I notice that there are no file entries in
https://xx
- Original Message -
> From: "Ayal Baron"
> To: "Livnat Peer"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org, "Laszlo Hornyak"
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 12:54:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Power Management question
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 02/02/12 13:41, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > >
On 02/02/2012 01:48 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi All,
I have few naive Qs for getting some understanding on how things
are not working in my setup.
I have a very very basic/simple setup.. 1 box hosting ovirt-engine and
1 host running f16,
which is discovered and being managed by the ovir
it is purely the annoyance of it being there :)
maybe a bit of ocd - id like to see a nice clean setup
Admittently - i *could* have just renamed the "default" cluster to what i
created my new cluster and not worried about creating the new cluster..
Might have to revert to doing that as it see
On 02/02/2012 03:56 PM, Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
hrmm.. looks like removing the default cluster is blocked because the
blank template is still assigned to it... however i cant edit/remove
or change it to the new cluster...
VMT_CANNOT_REMOVE_VDS_GROUP_VMTS_DETECTED
Except for the annoyance of
hrmm.. looks like removing the default cluster is blocked because the blank
template is still assigned to it... however i cant edit/remove or change it to
the new cluster...
VMT_CANNOT_REMOVE_VDS_GROUP_VMTS_DETECTED
- Original Message -
From: "Spyro Polymiadis"
To: "Spyro Polymiadi
also - on removing "default" things - the "blank" template...
Ive created a second template - yet it still wont let me remove the blank one
:(
- Original Message -
From: "Spyro Polymiadis"
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, 3 February, 2012 12:21:42 AM
Subject: [Users] Removing the
Hiya,
Can it be done?
Ive created a new cluster, and moved/removed everything i can see that is
"attached" to the default cluster - yet it still tells me
"Error: Cannot remove default Host Cluster."
The only thing that im not sure about, is the ovirtmgmt network - it wont let
me "detach
Error is:
2012-02-02 06:54:49,760 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.AddImageFromScratchCommand]
(http--0.0.0.0-8080-1) AddDiskImageToDB::Failed adding new created
snapshot into the db: org.springframework.jdbc.BadSqlGrammarException:
PreparedStatementCallback; bad SQL grammar [select * from
g
On 02/02/2012 03:30 PM, Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
Hi Haim,
Using Firefox 9, and Centos 5.7
$ rpm -qa | grep spice
qspice-client-0.3.0-4.el5_5
spice-xpi-2.2-2.3.el5_6.1
qspice-libs-devel-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
qspice-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
qspice-libs-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
the spiceXPI is in /usr/lib64/mozilla/p
Hi Haim,
Using Firefox 9, and Centos 5.7
$ rpm -qa | grep spice
qspice-client-0.3.0-4.el5_5
spice-xpi-2.2-2.3.el5_6.1
qspice-libs-devel-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
qspice-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
qspice-libs-0.3.0-54.el5_5.2
the spiceXPI is in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins
and spicec is in /usr/libexec
Ch
Hi.
I installed the rpm package -
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/vdsm
-4.9-112.4.el6_2.src.rpm and
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/vhos
tmd-0.4-2.4.el6.src.rpm operating system will detect true.
Thank you.
A new pro
- Original Message -
> On 02/02/12 13:41, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 02/02/12 10:57, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, the ovirt backend does not shut down or power up any hosts
> >>> directly, it can work only through vdsm. Therefo
Hi All,
I have few naive Qs for getting some understanding on how things
are not working in my setup.
I have a very very basic/simple setup.. 1 box hosting ovirt-engine and 1
host running f16,
which is discovered and being managed by the ovirt. I don't have the
luxury (atleast currently)
On 02/02/12 13:41, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 02/02/12 10:57, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes, the ovirt backend does not shut down or power up any hosts
>>> directly, it can work only through vdsm. Therefore you need one
>>> running host per datacenter t
- Original Message -
> On 02/02/12 10:57, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, the ovirt backend does not shut down or power up any hosts
> > directly, it can work only through vdsm. Therefore you need one
> > running host per datacenter to be able to manage the rest of the
> > hos
On 02/02/2012 12:39 PM, Spyro Polymiadis wrote:
adding Alon & Arnon.
Howdy again
Has anyone managed to get the spice plugin working for firefox under
linux?
When ever i click on the console icon, i see a popup quickly appear
then crash
what client (o.s) do you use ? do you have spice-xpi and
On 02/02/12 10:57, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, the ovirt backend does not shut down or power up any hosts directly, it
> can work only through vdsm. Therefore you need one running host per
> datacenter to be able to manage the rest of the hosts.
>
> I understand the motivation, but for
On 02/01/2012 10:34 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/01/2012 06:10 PM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
We're re-targeting oVirt's first release to February 9th.
An official go/no-go meeting will take place in #ovirt irc channel, at
15:00UTC, February 7th.
maybe detail location of current rpms and list of i
Howdy again
Has anyone managed to get the spice plugin working for firefox under linux?
When ever i click on the console icon, i see a popup quickly appear then crash
In the spice logs it says
2012-02-02 16:14:47,006 INFO [20889:20891] RedPeer::connect: Connecting
192.168.112.2 5901
2012-02
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:58:32AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 07:04 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> >Not a problem I am happy to help in any way that I can.
> >To Clarify I executed the same tests with the same results using both RHEV
> >and ovirt.
> >I am using:
> >RHEV 3
perfect - confirmed that adding the 2nd host to the cluster enabled me to
configure the power management options :) thanks a bunch
- Original Message -
From: "Perry Myers"
To: "Spyro Polymiadis"
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, 2 February, 2012 1:46:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Power
On 02/01/2012 07:04 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote:
Not a problem I am happy to help in any way that I can.
To Clarify I executed the same tests with the same results using both RHEV and
ovirt.
I am using:
RHEV 3.0.1
oVirt (FC16 + oVirt Nightly builds)
Hans - is there any downside/conf
Hi,
Yes, the ovirt backend does not shut down or power up any hosts directly, it
can work only through vdsm. Therefore you need one running host per datacenter
to be able to manage the rest of the hosts.
I understand the motivation, but for smaller installations I believe it would
be so great
36 matches
Mail list logo
