On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
I have 3 storage domains created (iso, data and export) all
connected to the DC with DC status as Up and
1 host with status as Up and the same (only) host
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
Thank you,
Laszlo
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Some comments:
1. I think the amount of time between tests should be configurable.
2. I guess some of the actions done by the autorecovery process should be
monitored, so take a look at
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/TaskManagerDetailed#Job_for_System_Monitors;
in order to monitor this
On 02/13/2012 01:31 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
Some comments:
1. I think the amount of time between tests should be configurable.
2. I guess some of the actions done by the autorecovery process should be
monitored, so take a look at
On 02/13/2012 03:16 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
I have 3 storage domains created (iso, data and export) all
connected to the DC with DC status as Up and
1 host
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 07:39 -0800, Li, David wrote:
Mike,
Tried the new ssh patch and the problem still there. Both options were used
BOOTIF and ssh_pwauth
When I logged in first time and changed pwd, any subsequent logins were
rejected. Again I couldn't capture the error message.
On 02/13/2012 08:33 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:16 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
I have 3 storage domains created (iso, data and export) all
The problem is that you are installing fedora packages into SL. They
were
really built for Fedora. They may actually work, but I believe that
their
are some packages missing from base repos for RHEL, SL, and CentOS.
On
RHEL, you would get those packages when you added RHEV. I don't
think
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:57:23AM -0500, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:33 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:16 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
On 02/12/2012 10:28 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
I have 3 storage domains created (iso, data and export) all connected
to the DC with DC status as Up and
1 host with status as Up and the same (only) host acting as SPM.
I
Mike,
Ran into a problem at make ovirt-node-image.iso:
)
./node-creator ovirt-node-image.ks
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/livecd-creator, line 210, in module
sys.exit(main())
File /usr/bin/livecd-creator, line 167, in main
ks =
On 02/13/2012 08:57 AM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:33 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:16 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried this multiple times and i hit the same error.
I have 3 storage
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 11:13 -0800, Li, David wrote:
Mike,
Root pwd worked. Ssh is still broken.
Haven't looked at ssh yet, but I will.
su - admin produced an error message - too fast to be caputured with my eyes.
It seemed simiar to the one before.
ssh admin@ip also failed:
ssh
On 02/10/2012 03:28 AM, Douglas Landgraf wrote:
Hi Dominic,
On 02/09/2012 01:49 PM, Dominic Kaiser wrote:
So I have fixed it! Thanks Itamar! It was chown -R 36:36 /path to
my shared folder. I should have looked at the ovirt wiki also:
On 02/13/2012 08:10 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:57:23AM -0500, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:33 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:16 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:58:05PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
Hi,
I have tried
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
preferred behavior?
I think that
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like
17 matches
Mail list logo