On 03/02/2012 05:02 PM, Li, David wrote:
> I see the Feb 19 SDK dn CLI tar balls.
those aren't latest, you should wait for the next drop or build new ones by
yourself (see how in wiki)
> I already have an engine up and running. Do I need to install both SDK and
> CLI to use the cli?
yes
> A
On 03/03/12 02:39, Patrick Landry wrote:
> I was successful in setting up Ovirt engine
> (ovirt-engine-3.0.0_0001-1.6.fc16.x86_64) on Fedora 16.
> When executing engine-setup I did set up an ISO domain. The installation
> went fine and I was able
> to add a host (Fedora 16 with VDSM (vdsm-4.9.3.3-0
i've already found the info on the list about the "global name 'disk'
not defined" error and i've tried both an iso from the jenkins url
listed, as well as creating my own git area using the 2.2.3 tagged code
and making the one line change to fix that python error. but neither of
those images
>> I've cc'd Ryan O'Hara who wrote fence_scsi and knows a fair bit about
>> SCSI III PR. If oVirt is interested in pursuing this, perhaps he can
>> be
>> of assistance.
>
> There's also sanlock which plays a role here. In the past we required some
> form of fencing action but once sanlock is int
- Original Message -
> From: "Perry Myers"
> To: "xrx" , "Ryan O'Hara" , "Andrew
> Beekhof"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 3:16:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt/RHEV fencing; a single point of failure
>
> On 03/03/2012 11:52 AM, xrx wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
On 03/03/2012 11:52 AM, xrx wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was worried about the high availability approach taken by RHEV/oVirt.
> I had read the thread titled "Some thoughts on enhancing High
> Availability in oVirt" but couldn't help but feel that oVirt is missing
> basic HA while it's developers are con
Hello,
I was worried about the high availability approach taken by RHEV/oVirt.
I had read the thread titled "Some thoughts on enhancing High
Availability in oVirt" but couldn't help but feel that oVirt is missing
basic HA while it's developers are considering adding (and in my opinion
unneede
Running both CentosOS 5.x and RHEL 5.x with all te latest patches gives
a rather high CPU-load on the KVM-host, even when the machine is doing
nothing. On the virtual server CPU-load is almost 0%.
Installingen ktune and chaning the I/O scheduler to cfq gives a small
change, CPU-load drops from
Hi Vang and All.
I build this rpm's for testing oVirt in CentOS 6.2, and it's working in my
test environment.
Today, I checked engine installation on fresh (but updated) CentOs 6.2
without problem.
You can try to cleanup ovirt (engine-cleanup) remove all ovirt, vdsm and
jboss packages (yum remo
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew James Dunlop"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, 6 February, 2012 11:45:20 PM
> Subject: [Users] Network configuration
>
>
> I feel like I have been bombarding this list the last few days,
> sorry!
> I have been looking at the different possible
10 matches
Mail list logo