Re: [ovirt-users] Proper way to change and persist vdsm configuration options
It seems that you should be able to change it: http://www.supermicro.com/support/faqs/faq.cfm?faq=15869 Did not try that myself. Not sure it's better than simply managing vdsm.id manually. -- Didi - Original Message - From: Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com To: Joop jvdw...@xs4all.nl Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 10:17:06 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Proper way to change and persist vdsm configuration options Yep, these are Supermicro servers. # facter serialnumber 1234567890 On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Joop jvdw...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 5-8-2014 20:54, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: * ensure vdsm.conf exists * Populates /etc/vdsm/vdsm.id (IIRC a bug in previous ovirt required this) why? you machine should have valid bios uuid. There are manufactures that don't set a unique bios uuid. Supermicro is one of them. I had a RFE but that has been closed but I feel that it should be reopened and implemented. The change is minimal and guarantees that there is a unique uuid. Regards, Joop ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Guest VM Console Creation/Access using REST API and noVNC
Well if you would really read your mail carfully enough you should already know that this does work, as I pointed out here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-July/026026.html Again, I have a working setup like you want it but I can't share any code or further advice than I have already done. Am 06.08.2014 05:30, schrieb Punit Dambiwal: I am still waiting for the updatesis there any one in the community who can help me to resolve this issueor the Ovirt lacking this feature.that means we can not integrate VM console to our own portal through API ??? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION NEEDED] oVirt 3.4.4 RC status
Hi, We're going to start composing oVirt 3.4.4 RC on *2014-09-09 08:00 UTC* from 3.4 branch. Maintainers: - Please be sure that 3.4 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-09-08 15:00 UTC* - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release before *2014-09-08 15:00 UTC* - If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as possible. A bug tracker [1] has been opened and shows no open blockers. There are still 13 bugs [2] targeted to 3.4.4. Excluding node and documentation bugs we still have 7 bugs [3] targeted to 3.4.4. Whiteboard Bug ID Status Summary network 1112688 NEW [Neutron integration] Log collection is missing for Neutron appliance network 1048880 NEW [vdsm][openstacknet] Migration fails for vNIC using OVS + security groups network 1001186 NEW With AIO installer and NetworkManager enabled, the ovirtmgmt bridge is not properly configured node1097735 NEW Reboot button failed to work in progress_page with serial console to install ovirt-node iso. node988341 NEW Should not create bond when report an error in configuration process node1023481 ASSIGNEDSane and working default libvirt config node753306 NEW SR-IOV support node995321 NEW remove existing efi entries oVirt Node Hypervisor in UEFI menu failed node969340 NEW Migrate ovirt-node-installer backend and ovirt-auto-install backend to new code base sla 1059309 NEW [events] 'Available memory of host $host (...) under defined threshold...' is logged only once storage 655 NEW Disks imported from Export Domain to Data Domain are converted to Preallocated after upgrade ... virt1070890 POSTRun vm with odd number of cores drop libvirt error virt1126887 NEW recovery of VMs after VDSM restart doesn't work on PPC Maintainers / Assignee: - Please add the bugs to the tracker if you think that 3.4.4 should not be released without them fixed. - Please update the target to 3.5.1 or later for bugs that won't be in 3.4.4: it will ease gathering the blocking bugs for next releases. - Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [4] Community: - If you're testing oVirt 3.4 nightly snapshot, please add yourself to the test page [5] [1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1118689 [2] http://red.ht/1qwhPXB [3] http://red.ht/1sQDLwg [4] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4.4_Release_Notes [5] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/oVirt_3.4.4_Testing -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC status
Hi, since we had still one blocker on oVirt 3.5.0 RC1 release, we'll need a second RC build. Suggested date is Mon 2014-08-11. Maintainers: - Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-08-10 15:00 UTC* - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release before *2014-08-10 15:00 UTC* - If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as possible. The bug tracker [1] shows the following proposed blockers to be reviewed: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1124099 storage POSTLive Merge: Limit merge operations based on hosts' capabilities 1126800 virtPOSTAdding hosts to oVirt results in error message Feature freeze is now effective, and branch has been created. All new patches must be backported to 3.5 branch too. Features completed are marked in green on Features Status Table [2] There are still 412 bugs [3] targeted to 3.5.0. Excluding node and documentation bugs we still have 364 bugs [4] targeted to 3.5.0. We still have issues also with package building and dependencies: https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/242 - vdsm_3.5_create-rpms_merged broken on EL7 slave package: ovirt-optimizer-0.2-2.el6.noarch from check-custom-el6 unresolved deps: protobuf-java = 0:2.5 package: ovirt-optimizer-jetty-0.2-2.el6.noarch from check-custom-el6 unresolved deps: resteasy jetty = 0:9 cdi-api Maintainers / Assignee: - Please check ensure that completed features are marked in green on Features Status Table [2] - Please remember to rebuild your packages before *2014-08-10 15:00* if needed, otherwise nightly snapshot will be taken. - If you find a blocker bug please remember to add it to the tracker [1] - Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [5] - Please review and add test cases to oVirt 3.5 Third Test Day [6] - Please update the target to 3.5.1 or later for bugs that won't be in 3.5.0: it will ease gathering the blocking bugs for next releases. Community: - save the date for third test day scheduled on 2014-08-12! - You're welcome to join us testing next beta release and getting involved in oVirt Quality Assurance[7] [1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1073943 [2] http://bit.ly/17qBn6F [3] http://red.ht/1pVEk7H [4] http://red.ht/1zT2mSq [5] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5_Release_Notes [6] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5_TestDay [7] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_Quality_Assurance Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network Question
On 08/06/2014 06:36 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But Ovirt panel doesn't allow me to add with FQDN...it just display the ip address of the hosts... Inline image 1 Hi Punit, The above happens only when ip address of the host is given in the Address field of New host dialog box, i.e while adding hosts to ovirt. As sahina suggested, if you would have provided the FQDN in the address filed while adding hosts to ovirt, you should have seen FQDN's of the hosts being displayed in the Host field of 'Add Bricks' Dialog. In case you would have not provided FQDN of the host in the address filed while adding hosts, please remove the hosts and add it again by giving FQDN of the host in the address field in the New Host dialog box. Hope this helps :-) Thanks kasturi. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com mailto:sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/04/2014 09:06 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But when i try to add the gluster Hosts from Ovirtit doesn't display the FQDN to add the bricks...it display the ip address only...i will try to use the work around When you add the gluster host to oVirt, you should have provided the FQDN in the host address field. It uses this to display the list of hosts from which you can add the bricks Another question is what will be the drawbacks if i use ovirtmgmt and storage on the same network (i will use 10GB network here with bonding) ?? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com mailto:sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 02:51 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:43:07AM +0800, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi All, Is there any update on this ?? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Punit Dambiwal hypu...@gmail.com mailto:hypu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Antoni, But all the bricks and gluster in the another subnet...I am using the Compute and gluster storage combined on the same host Ovirtmgmt :- 43.25.76.0/24 http://43.25.76.0/24 Gluster Storage :- 10.10.10.0/24 http://10.10.10.0/24 Did you try to follow Sahina's advice? qemu-to-gluster communication goes on top the IP that you mount. However, without hacks, inter-gluster communication uses FQDN of hosts, which most commonly resolves to the management network. From the output of your gluster volume info , it looks like you have used IP address (43.25...) to peer probe the hosts? If you add the host from oVirt, for gluster to be able to use separate network for glusterd-glusterd communication, you will need to use FQDN while adding the host, and workaround as mentioned in http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-February/020894.html ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Not able to set Hostname for guest OS from cloud init using API
Dear All, We are not able Set Hostname to guest OS through API using cloud init. Other information like IP, Subnet, Gateway is working. Kindly help. Regards, Chandrahasa S Tata Consultancy Services Data Center- ( Non STPI) 2nd Pokharan Road, Subash Nagar , Mumbai - 400601,Maharashtra India Ph:- +91 22 677-81825 Buzz:- 4221825 Mailto: chandrahas...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Consulting =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Not able to set Hostname for guest OS from cloud init using API
- Original Message - From: Chandrahasa S chandrahas...@tcs.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:14:16 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Not able to set Hostname for guest OS from cloud init using API Dear All, We are not able Set Hostname to guest OS through API using cloud init. Other information like IP, Subnet, Gateway is working. Hi, See Juan's explanation regarding the Host address in cloud-init context at: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-July/026190.html Kindly help. Regards, Chandrahasa S Tata Consultancy Services Data Center- ( Non STPI) 2nd Pokharan Road, Subash Nagar , Mumbai - 400601,Maharashtra India Ph:- +91 22 677-81825 Buzz:- 4221825 Mailto: chandrahas...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Consulting =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] assign hostname to vm using REST API
I am using REST API to integrate rhev with java(not SDK) I am trying to assign hostname to vm but showing some bad request error. I have created template from vm which have cloud init package in it also m using rhev 3.4. Do i need to use payload method if so please provide me the proper code for both -for passing payload through code in url and the payload file sample can anyone plz tell me how to do it? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Kernel panic for live images
Il 03/08/2014 22:45, Jaco ha scritto: I've (tentatively) confirmed this as an issue with the CentOS IRC channel - that images need to be dd'd not written with tools, meaning that this portion of the wiki is irrelevant: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_Live#USB Can you please update the wiki? On 02/08/14 09:50, Jaco wrote: update: It seems that there's a bug in the implementation of UNetBootIn and/or liveusb-creator that's causing identical kernel panics to what I'm experiencing. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6865#c20214 (I'm in the process of migrating off Ubuntu/Debian/.deb for my desktop/infrastructure to RPM's - oVirt being a crucial 1st step) Initially I suspected fault RAM (since it;s the only aspect of kernel panics I can actually do something about without chucking out my whole box), but new RAM a new host makes no difference. The resolution seems to be to do it by hand - dd. Will try this report back. - J On 01/08/14 07:28, Jaco wrote: Hi folks, I get kernel panics when booting the live images: * ovirt-live-3.4.0.el6ev.iso (MD5: 01a83d96a9650dd3da19cc37edaa7b19) * ovirt-live-el6-3.4.3-1.iso (MD5: 816fd6b1294f4619e205f2efd92f0f2f) I've run Memtest86 (v2.01) it checks out OK, the current CentOS 6.5 on the host runs OK live-booting other images (either LiveUSB or PXE, CentOS, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu other) works fine. Has anyone else gotten this? Just seeking confirmation that it's not just me before filing a bug. I believe a new images may become available after the testing this week. Will try earlier images to compare. - J ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Is there a plan to allow VM migration?
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, John Gardeniers wrote: Could it be that you're over-thinking this? Why can't Ovirt simply export VMs to a standard format, preferably of course one already used elsewhere, such as ovf? That way it's a straight one-to-one. Life is not so neat not a thought experiment here, but rather a summary of real life, in practice issues hit in working toward a generally applicable, FOSS based solution The testing grid, to make it interesting is to be able to gobble in and use [examples still in production for ome reason or another]: RHL 5.2 RHL 7.2 Windows 95 Windows NT 3.51 Windows 2000 Windows XP --- all above this line are legacy and out of support -- we know this, but our customers are indifferent to such, so long as it does not 'see' the internet at large -- RHEL / CentOS 5 (Xen hooks) RHEL / CentOS 6 (KVM hooks, with grub) RHEL / CentOS 6 (KVM hooks, with grub2) assorted Fedora assorted (but largely recent) Ubuntu Assorted Debian Testing and Stable OpenBSD -- various NetBSD -- various We have automation for parts, but not all of that grid -- Russ herrold ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-06-25
Minutes:http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.log.html = #ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync = Meeting started by doron at 14:04:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 14:04:50) * infra update (doron, 14:04:51) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:04:53) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:04:54) * conferences and workshops (doron, 14:04:56) * other topics (doron, 14:04:57) * infra update (doron, 14:05:54) * phx lab in final step. Initial Jenkins slaves expected this Friday. More details will be published in the list. (doron, 14:11:30) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:12:00) * infra tickets solved last week http://goo.gl/6o62T6 (eedri, 14:12:07) * 3.4.z updates: GA date postponed by one week, 7 bugs still to be addressed, no current blockers. Full info available in: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/026543.html (doron, 14:14:39) * relevant bugs: http://red.ht/1sQDLwg (doron, 14:15:25) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:15:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124099 (sbonazzo, 14:16:25) * ACTION: ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. (doron, 14:25:00) * version tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1073943hide_resolved=1 (doron, 14:28:39) * 3.5.0 has ~2 real blockers, will track it next week. RC2 expected on time. (doron, 14:39:26) * 3.5.0 post RC2 teams should start retarget 3.5.0 bugs. (doron, 14:39:59) * conferences and workshops (doron, 14:42:24) * LinuxCon NA added an Infrastructure.Next track; 2-3 ovirt related sesions expected. (doron, 14:44:34) * kvm forum status: 15 Red Hat staffers who have submitted talks, only 2 directly related to ovirt. (doron, 14:45:33) * other topics (doron, 14:48:01) * bkp will be in PTO next week (doron, 14:48:50) Meeting ended at 14:56:23 UTC. Action Items * ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. People Present (lines said) --- * doron (96) * sbonazzo (33) * bkp (23) * alitke (22) * danken (22) * apuimedo (15) * eedri (12) * gpadgett (5) * dcaro (5) * awels (3) * lvernia (2) * ovirtbot (2) * mlipchuk (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2014-08-06
Minutes:http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.log.html = #ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync = Meeting started by doron at 14:04:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-08-06-14.04.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 14:04:50) * infra update (doron, 14:04:51) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:04:53) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:04:54) * conferences and workshops (doron, 14:04:56) * other topics (doron, 14:04:57) * infra update (doron, 14:05:54) * phx lab in final step. Initial Jenkins slaves expected this Friday. More details will be published in the list. (doron, 14:11:30) * 3.4.z updates (doron, 14:12:00) * infra tickets solved last week http://goo.gl/6o62T6 (eedri, 14:12:07) * 3.4.z updates: GA date postponed by one week, 7 bugs still to be addressed, no current blockers. Full info available in: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/026543.html (doron, 14:14:39) * relevant bugs: http://red.ht/1sQDLwg (doron, 14:15:25) * 3.5 status (doron, 14:15:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124099 (sbonazzo, 14:16:25) * ACTION: ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. (doron, 14:25:00) * version tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1073943hide_resolved=1 (doron, 14:28:39) * 3.5.0 has ~2 real blockers, will track it next week. RC2 expected on time. (doron, 14:39:26) * 3.5.0 post RC2 teams should start retarget 3.5.0 bugs. (doron, 14:39:59) * conferences and workshops (doron, 14:42:24) * LinuxCon NA added an Infrastructure.Next track; 2-3 ovirt related sesions expected. (doron, 14:44:34) * kvm forum status: 15 Red Hat staffers who have submitted talks, only 2 directly related to ovirt. (doron, 14:45:33) * other topics (doron, 14:48:01) * bkp will be in PTO next week (doron, 14:48:50) Meeting ended at 14:56:23 UTC. Action Items * ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * ybronheim to make sure we have http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:vdsm+branch:ovirt-3.5+topic:livemerge-3.5,n,z ready for Aug 11. People Present (lines said) --- * doron (96) * sbonazzo (33) * bkp (23) * alitke (22) * danken (22) * apuimedo (15) * eedri (12) * gpadgett (5) * dcaro (5) * awels (3) * lvernia (2) * ovirtbot (2) * mlipchuk (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
the URL structure has changed from 3.3 to 3.4; maybe the problem is in the URL within the UI Plugin json file? url: /webadmin/webadmin/plugin/ShellBoxPlugin/start.html (I copied it from [1], not sure what exists in the repo) maybe @Daniel would know better. [1] http://derezvir.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/ovirt-webadmin-shellinabox-ui-plugin.html - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:45:35 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
the url should be plugin/ShellInABoxPlugin/start.html in shellinabox.json Thanks, Kanagaraj - Original Message - From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com To: lofyer lof...@gmail.com, Daniel Erez de...@redhat.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:32:57 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 the URL structure has changed from 3.3 to 3.4; maybe the problem is in the URL within the UI Plugin json file? url: /webadmin/webadmin/plugin/ShellBoxPlugin/start.html (I copied it from [1], not sure what exists in the repo) maybe @Daniel would know better. [1] http://derezvir.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/ovirt-webadmin-shellinabox-ui-plugin.html - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:45:35 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] User Portal Open in Full Screen
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:37 +0200, Michal Skrivanek wrote: On Jul 28, 2014, at 12:33 , Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, In version 3.3 the Open in Full Screen under Spice Console Options in the User Portal was not enabled by default. In version 3.4 the Open in Full Screen is now enabled by default. Is it possible to manage the default behaviour of this setting? I would like it *not* to be enabled by default. Not yet. It's fixed in 3.4 to match the previous 3.3 behavior I wonder at what level such an option should be. We can make it global..but currently we have a different behavior in webadminpower user portal vs user portal. Per user global might make sense too thoughts? What is the difference between the power user portal and the user portal with regards to the default of Open in Full Screen? A global setting configured by ovirt-config/rhevm-config for the User Portal would be fine. Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Spice / VNC / noVNC : browser side default config
Hi, I guess I'm not far from truth when saying that some settings (VNC + noVNC for example) are only stored on the browser client side. Is there a way to choose (server side) those settings so as they get applied the same way amongst our team member's browsers. -- Nicolas Ecarnot ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3
I've changed that, but nothing happend. 在 14-8-7 上午12:51, Kanagaraj Mayilsamy 写道: the url should be plugin/ShellInABoxPlugin/start.html in shellinabox.json Thanks, Kanagaraj - Original Message - From: Einav Cohen eco...@redhat.com To: lofyer lof...@gmail.com, Daniel Erez de...@redhat.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:32:57 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 the URL structure has changed from 3.3 to 3.4; maybe the problem is in the URL within the UI Plugin json file? url: /webadmin/webadmin/plugin/ShellBoxPlugin/start.html (I copied it from [1], not sure what exists in the repo) maybe @Daniel would know better. [1] http://derezvir.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/ovirt-webadmin-shellinabox-ui-plugin.html - Original Message - From: lofyer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:45:35 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] UI Plugin: shellinabox did not work in ovirt-3.4.3 My OS is CentOS-6.5. I'd cloned samples from gerrit, but it did not work as it used to be. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network Question
Hi Kasturi, Thanks for the help...it's ok...that means first i need to change the host with FQDNbut still the same question :- 1. Suppose i will add the host with FQDN and the FQDN has public ip address(202.151.100.X)... (When ovirt add the host...it will create ovirtmgmt network by default on the basis of this network connection) 2. And my storage network work on private network (10.10.10.0).. 3. If i add the Host with FQDN...seems still the gluster traffic route through ovirtmgmt network interface ?? 4. Or do i need to follow this for the modifications ( http://www.ovirt.org/oVirt_Wiki:How_to_change_Gluster%27s_network_interface) 5. What about if i add new host later on ?? Thanks, Punit D On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:10 PM, knarra kna...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/06/2014 06:36 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But Ovirt panel doesn't allow me to add with FQDN...it just display the ip address of the hosts... [image: Inline image 1] Hi Punit, The above happens only when ip address of the host is given in the Address field of New host dialog box, i.e while adding hosts to ovirt. As sahina suggested, if you would have provided the FQDN in the address filed while adding hosts to ovirt, you should have seen FQDN's of the hosts being displayed in the Host field of 'Add Bricks' Dialog. In case you would have not provided FQDN of the host in the address filed while adding hosts, please remove the hosts and add it again by giving FQDN of the host in the address field in the New Host dialog box. Hope this helps :-) Thanks kasturi. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/04/2014 09:06 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But when i try to add the gluster Hosts from Ovirtit doesn't display the FQDN to add the bricks...it display the ip address only...i will try to use the work around When you add the gluster host to oVirt, you should have provided the FQDN in the host address field. It uses this to display the list of hosts from which you can add the bricks Another question is what will be the drawbacks if i use ovirtmgmt and storage on the same network (i will use 10GB network here with bonding) ?? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 02:51 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:43:07AM +0800, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi All, Is there any update on this ?? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Punit Dambiwal hypu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Antoni, But all the bricks and gluster in the another subnet...I am using the Compute and gluster storage combined on the same host Ovirtmgmt :- 43.25.76.0/24 Gluster Storage :- 10.10.10.0/24 Did you try to follow Sahina's advice? qemu-to-gluster communication goes on top the IP that you mount. However, without hacks, inter-gluster communication uses FQDN of hosts, which most commonly resolves to the management network. From the output of your gluster volume info , it looks like you have used IP address (43.25...) to peer probe the hosts? If you add the host from oVirt, for gluster to be able to use separate network for glusterd-glusterd communication, you will need to use FQDN while adding the host, and workaround as mentioned in http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-February/020894.html ___ Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network Question
On 08/07/2014 08:50 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Kasturi, Thanks for the help...it's ok...that means first i need to change the host with FQDNbut still the same question :- 1. Suppose i will add the host with FQDN and the FQDN has public ip address(202.151.100.X)... (When ovirt add the host...it will create ovirtmgmt network by default on the basis of this network connection) 2. And my storage network work on private network (10.10.10.0).. 3. If i add the Host with FQDN...seems still the gluster traffic route through ovirtmgmt network interface ?? 4. Or do i need to follow this for the modifications (http://www.ovirt.org/oVirt_Wiki:How_to_change_Gluster%27s_network_interface) Yes to all of above. So you would add the host using FQDN and then follow the workaround to make sure gluster communicates using storage network. 5. What about if i add new host later on ?? Whenever you add a new host, the host is added to the gluster trusted pool, by invoking gluster peer probe host address provided So, if FQDN is used and the ipaddress mappings are setup appropriately, then gluster communication will continue on the private network. Thanks, Punit D On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:10 PM, knarra kna...@redhat.com mailto:kna...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/06/2014 06:36 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But Ovirt panel doesn't allow me to add with FQDN...it just display the ip address of the hosts... Inline image 1 Hi Punit, The above happens only when ip address of the host is given in the Address field of New host dialog box, i.e while adding hosts to ovirt. As sahina suggested, if you would have provided the FQDN in the address filed while adding hosts to ovirt, you should have seen FQDN's of the hosts being displayed in the Host field of 'Add Bricks' Dialog. In case you would have not provided FQDN of the host in the address filed while adding hosts, please remove the hosts and add it again by giving FQDN of the host in the address field in the New Host dialog box. Hope this helps :-) Thanks kasturi. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com mailto:sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/04/2014 09:06 AM, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi Sahina, But when i try to add the gluster Hosts from Ovirtit doesn't display the FQDN to add the bricks...it display the ip address only...i will try to use the work around When you add the gluster host to oVirt, you should have provided the FQDN in the host address field. It uses this to display the list of hosts from which you can add the bricks Another question is what will be the drawbacks if i use ovirtmgmt and storage on the same network (i will use 10GB network here with bonding) ?? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Sahina Bose sab...@redhat.com mailto:sab...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 02:51 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:43:07AM +0800, Punit Dambiwal wrote: Hi All, Is there any update on this ?? On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Punit Dambiwal hypu...@gmail.com mailto:hypu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Antoni, But all the bricks and gluster in the another subnet...I am using the Compute and gluster storage combined on the same host Ovirtmgmt :- 43.25.76.0/24 http://43.25.76.0/24 Gluster Storage :- 10.10.10.0/24 http://10.10.10.0/24 Did you try to follow Sahina's advice? qemu-to-gluster communication goes on top the IP that you mount. However, without hacks, inter-gluster communication uses FQDN of hosts, which most commonly resolves to the management network. From the output of your gluster volume info , it looks like you have used IP address (43.25...) to peer probe the hosts? If you add the host from oVirt, for gluster to be able to use separate network for glusterd-glusterd communication, you will need to use FQDN while adding the host, and workaround as mentioned in http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-February/020894.html ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org mailto:Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
