Re: [ovirt-users] Error migrating VM with direct LUN disk

2016-01-07 Thread Yaniv Dary 
Can you please add logs?

Yaniv Dary
Technical Product Manager
Red Hat Israel Ltd.
34 Jerusalem Road
Building A, 4th floor
Ra'anana, Israel 4350109

Tel : +972 (9) 7692306
8272306
Email: yd...@redhat.com
IRC : ydary


On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Chris Adams  wrote:

> Once upon a time, Chris Adams  said:
> > I have a VM with a virtio-scsi disk that is a direct-mapped iSCSI LUN.
> > I'm trying to migrate it from one node to another (in the process of
> > updating my system from 3.5.3 to 3.5.5), and it fails migration with:
> >
> > Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06
> 10:31:17,657::migration::161::vm.Vm::(_recover)
> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::unsupported configuration:
> scsi-block 'lun' devices do not support the serial property
> > Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06
> 10:31:17,693::migration::260::vm.Vm::(run)
> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::Failed to migrate
> >   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 246, in run
> > self._startUnderlyingMigration(time.time())
> >   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 335, in
> _startUnderlyingMigration
> >   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1701, in
> migrateToURI2
> > if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainMigrateToURI2() failed',
> dom=self)
> > Thread-1886279::DEBUG::2016-01-06
> 10:31:18,539::__init__::481::jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer::(_serveRequest) Calling
> 'VM.getMigrationStatus' in bridge with {u'vmID':
> u'606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43'}
> >
> > Is this a known bug (maybe fixed in a newer version), something
> > unexpected, etc.?  Is there a way around it (other than shutting down
> > the VM)?
>
> So, this isn't just a bug with migration; I powered off the VM and then
> tried to start it on a host that had been updated to 3.5.5 and it would
> not start (same error).
>
> This is a pretty significant regression IMHO - I can't start this VM on
> any 3.5.5 host.
> --
> Chris Adams 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Error migrating VM with direct LUN disk

2016-01-07 Thread Yedidyah Bar David 
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Chris Adams  wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Adams  said:
>> I have a VM with a virtio-scsi disk that is a direct-mapped iSCSI LUN.
>> I'm trying to migrate it from one node to another (in the process of
>> updating my system from 3.5.3 to 3.5.5), and it fails migration with:
>>
>> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 
>> 10:31:17,657::migration::161::vm.Vm::(_recover) 
>> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::unsupported configuration: 
>> scsi-block 'lun' devices do not support the serial property
>> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 10:31:17,693::migration::260::vm.Vm::(run) 
>> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::Failed to migrate
>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 246, in run
>> self._startUnderlyingMigration(time.time())
>>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 335, in 
>> _startUnderlyingMigration
>>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1701, in 
>> migrateToURI2
>> if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainMigrateToURI2() failed', 
>> dom=self)
>> Thread-1886279::DEBUG::2016-01-06 
>> 10:31:18,539::__init__::481::jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer::(_serveRequest) Calling 
>> 'VM.getMigrationStatus' in bridge with {u'vmID': 
>> u'606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43'}
>>
>> Is this a known bug (maybe fixed in a newer version), something
>> unexpected, etc.?  Is there a way around it (other than shutting down
>> the VM)?
>
> So, this isn't just a bug with migration; I powered off the VM and then
> tried to start it on a host that had been updated to 3.5.5 and it would
> not start (same error).
>
> This is a pretty significant regression IMHO - I can't start this VM on
> any 3.5.5 host.

Seems like a result of the fix for [1].

Please check/post vdsm/libvirt/qemu versions and logs.

Do you have any vdsm hooks installed?

Was this system upgraded from a previous version? Please
state the upgrade history.

Thanks.

Adding Allon.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021480

> --
> Chris Adams 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Didi
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] python floppy in RunOnce mode

2016-01-07 Thread Giulio Casella 

Il 07/01/2016 11:25, Juan Hernández wrote:

[...]

The sysprep logic is only triggered once, the first time you start the
VM. So you will need to create it again, set the initialization data and
start it, basically repeat the steps that I suggested.


Yes, but the VMs belongs to a freshly created pool, never started before.


There were some bugs around this behaviour, some still not fixed in 3.5,
and it wasn't clear when the VM will use or not use sysprep, so we have
introduced a flag to explicitly force use of sysprep.

Please try to use this flag:

action = params.Action(use_sysprep=True)
vm.start(action)



Nice, use_sysprep=True did the trick!
I noticed also the flag use_cloud_init, I guess with same logic. I have 
to update my code accordingly.


Thank you again,
Giulio Casella


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Cluster

2016-01-07 Thread Budur Nagaraju 
My Setup looks like this ,

*Hosted Engine1* : Installed with  centos 6.7 64Bit CPU sandy Bridge and
Default  cluster is  in oVirt engine Belongs to  sandy bridge.
*Hosted Engine2* : Installed with  centos 6.7 64Bit CPU sandy Bridge and
Default  cluster is  in oVirt engine Belongs to  sandy bridge.

*oVirt Engine* : Installed with Centos 6.7 64 Bit , its hosted in the
hosted engine1 or 2.

*oVirt node*: Installed with the version oVirt Node Hypervisor release 3.5
(0.999.201509102313.el7.centos) belongs to  Intel Nehalem Family

so as per your update we can't migrate the oVirt Engine to the node which
has the version installed 3.5 (0.999.201509102313.el7.centos ?




On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 07 Jan 2016, at 10:06, Budur Nagaraju  wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update .
>
> Is there a way to migrate the oVirt Engine  to the oVirt node ? as My
> setup has two hosted engine when I try to migrate Engine  to the ovirt
> node  which is  in different cluster am not able to succeed.
>
>
> for normal VMs - as long as the cluster compatibility is the same you can
> migrate a VM from your el6-only cluster to a new el7-only cluster - from
> el6 host to el7 host (using the special cross-cluster migration, both
> clusters need to be set up the same (storage, networks, etc))
>
> Note you can do that only one way from el6 to el7, and in cluster levels
> 3.5 or 3.6.
>
> Thanks,
> michal
>
>
>
> Getting the same Error.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek <
> michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:25, Yedidyah Bar David  wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Budur Nagaraju 
>> wrote:
>> >> Can someone help me in the issue ? This is blocking my testing .
>> >
>> > The linked engine.log has:
>> >
>> > Missing CPU features : model_SandyBridge
>> >
>> > Please check/post exact models of servers and their cpus, bios settings
>> > in both, cluster cpu type. Thanks.
>>
>> The log seem to be pretty clear about that, and there are messages even
>> in UI
>>
>> Message: Not possible to mix RHEL 6.x and 7.x hosts in one cluster. Tried
>> adding oVirt Node - 3.6 - 0.999.201510261021.el7.centos host to a cluster
>> with RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3 hosts.
>>
>> and indeed separate problem with CPU mode, your cluster requests
>> sandybridge but your host is older
>>
>> You need to keep same RHEL versions within cluster, and if you want to
>> use older HW you need to lower the cluster requirements
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 6, 2016 1:57 PM, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hosted engine and and oVirt engine both are having Centos6.x version I
>> >>> mean Its (centos6.7) ,while second host am facing that issues.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Oved Ourfali 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  Adding Sandro, as perhaps it is related to hosted engine in any way.
>>  Conceptually, you can't mix centos6 and 7 in the same cluster, in
>> case
>>  that's what you did.
>> 
>>  On Jan 6, 2016 10:08, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
>> >
>> > As of now its showing only one hosts that is Hosted Engine and the
>> > moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
>> > I have installed Cetos 6.7 in the Hosted engine I don't know why its
>> > showing RHEL-6-7 in OS version.
>> >
>> > OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
>> > Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
>> > KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
>> > LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Budur Nagaraju 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As of now its showing only one hosts that is oVirt Engine and the
>> >> moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
>> >>
>> >> OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
>> >> Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
>> >> KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
>> >> LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Oved Ourfali 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> All hosts (not VMs) in your cluster are centos 6.7?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Budur Nagaraju > >
>> >>> wrote:
>> 
>>  Os type is set to "other OS " and the centos 6.7 is installed
>> 
>> 
>>  On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Oved Ourfali <
>> oourf...@redhat.com>
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > Seems like you've mixed different versions in the same cluster,
>> > which is the reason the host is non-operational.
>> > What's the OS type and version of the hosts in your cluster?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Budur Nagaraju <
>> nbud...@gmail.com>
>>

Re: [ovirt-users] R: Re: Network instability after upgrade 3.6.0 -> 3.6.1

2016-01-07 Thread Stefano Danzi 



Il 06/01/2016 7.45, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:54:37PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Stefano Danzi wrote:

I did some tests:

kernel-3.10.0-327.3.1.el7.x86_64 -> bond mode 4 doesn't work (if I detach
one network cable the network is stable)
kernel-3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 -> bond mode 4 works fine

Would you be kind to file a kernel bug in bugzilla.redhat.com?
Summarize the information from this thread (e.g. your ifcfgs and in what
way does mode 4 doesn't work).

To get the bug solved quickly we'd better find paying RHEL7 customer
subscribing to it. But I'll try to push from my direction.

Stefano has been kind to open

 Bug 1295423 - Unstable network link using bond mode = 4
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295423

which we fail to reproduce on our own lab. I'd be pleased if anybody who
experiences it, and their networking config to the bug (if it is
different). Can you also lay out your switch's hardware and
configuration?



I made some tests using kernel  3.10.0-327.4.4.el7.x86_64.
I did a TCP dump on virtual interface "DMZ" (VLAN X on bond0).

When I have two netwok cables connected I can se ARP requests but not ARP 
replyes.
When I detach one network cable I can see ARP requests and ARP replyes (and 
networking on VM works).

Maybe the problem isn't in bonding config but in qemu/kvm/vhost_net


 


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Webadmin UI not reporting # of VMs correctly

2016-01-07 Thread Michal Skrivanek 

> On 06 Jan 2016, at 15:31, Will Dennis  wrote:
> 
> To follow up on this, after the migrations as a result of the 
> troubleshooting, the webadmin UI of the hosts in my datacenter now has each 
> host with “1” VM running…
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B88nnCy4LpFMYklDVDhFUV96Y00/view?usp=sharing
> 
> However, The only VM that is running currently is the hosted engine, which is 
> currently running on host “ovirt-node-03” —
> 
> $ ansible istgroup-ovirt -f 1 -i prod -u root -m shell -a "hosted-engine 
> --vm-status | grep -e '^Hostname' -e '^Engine'"
> ovirt-node-01 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up"}
> 
> ovirt-node-02 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up"}
> 
> ovirt-node-03 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up”}
> 
> Is this a UI bug of some sort?

Might be, but I would doubt it. It merely reflects what hosts are reporting
are there other VMs?
migrations going on?

> 
> 
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:47 PM, Will Dennis 
> > wrote:
> 
> Note that on the screenshot I posted above, that the webadmin hosts screen 
> says that -node-01 has one VM running, and the others 0… You’d think that 
> would be the HE VM running on there, but it’s actually on -node-02:
> 
> $ ansible istgroup-ovirt -f 1 -i prod -u root -m shell -a "hosted-engine 
> --vm-status | grep -e '^Hostname' -e '^Engine'"
> ovirt-node-01 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"reason": "vm not running on this 
> host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"}
> 
> ovirt-node-02 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"reason": "vm not running on this 
> host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"}
> 
> ovirt-node-03 | success | rc=0 >>
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-01
> Engine status  : {"reason": "bad vm status", "health": 
> "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "down"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-02
> Engine status  : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", "detail": 
> "up"}
> Hostname   : ovirt-node-03
> Engine status  : {"reason": "vm not running on this 
> host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown”}
> 
> So it looks like the webadmin UI is wrong as well…
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Nested KVM - vdsm-hook-nestedvt

2016-01-07 Thread Winfried de Heiden 

  
  
Hi all,
  
  Took me some time to find out. The kvm_amd modules was loaded
  correctly, but I had to change one more thing on the virtual
  machine:
  
  Edit Virtual Machine --> Host --> select "Pass-Through Host
  CPU". Afterwards (nested) kvm was available on the virtual
  machine.
  
  winny

Op 04-01-16 om 14:56 schreef Martin
  Polednik:


  - Original Message -

  
From: "Martin Polednik" 
To: w...@dds.nl
Cc: "users" , "Martin Polednik" 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 2:52:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Nested KVM - vdsm-hook-nestedvt

On 04/01/16 14:38 +0100, w...@dds.nl wrote:


  Hi all,

OK, it seems I am confused. Nested KVM is NOT the same as fake KVM

If so, I installed vdsm-hook-nestedvt on the hypervisor (only). Trying
to run ovirt-Node on a VM it complains there 's no virtualization,
despite the kvm_amd module is loaded with nested=1

How to enable nested-kvm for oVirt 3.6?



First, make sure that you're enabling the nested feature for amd (just
noticed that the example used intel). Please show us the output of

# cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested

  
  
and sorry, did the same mistake again - use

# cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/nested


  
on the host (physical machine), lscpu inside the VM and VM XML - use

# virsh -r list
# virsh -r dumpxml {machine_id found in the list}

Thanks,
mpolednik



  Winny


Martin Polednik schreef op 04-01-2016 13:29:

  
On 04/01/16 09:52 +0100, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:


  On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Winfried de Heiden  wrote:


  
Hi all and happy new year!

I'm running oVirt 3.6 on EL7.

In order to test nested-kvm I installed vdsm-hook-nestedvt on the
hypervisor and put "fake_kvm_support = true" in /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf.

  
  



fake_kvm_support is just for developing purposes and it's not
needed as it
prevent guests to run.



Not really true - fake_kvm_support enables QEMU emulation instead of
hardware virtualization (e.g. VT-x) instructions. It is also quite
broken in it's current state and fix is pending in cpuinfo branch at
gerrit.

I don't really understand the reason why fake_kvm would be used in
this case as AMD-v is enabled according to svm flag present -
following instructions should be correct for getting the flag passed
to the VMs.



  Please check to understand if nested support is enabled on your host:
/sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested

if not
 echo "options kvm-intel nested=1" > /etc/modprobe.d/kvm-intel.conf
and reload the module





  Than install vdsm-hook-nestedvt on your hosts.
If you want also to use the network on your L2 guest please
install and
configure also macspoof vdsm hook on your physical hosts otherwise
all the
traffic to/from your L2 guests will be dropped.
https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/tree/master/vdsm_hooks/macspoof





  
However, afterwards the hypervisor host cannot connect to the ovirt
Manager, on ovirt Manager the engine.log will tell:

2016-01-01 15:21:42,105 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
(DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-76) [71d1638c] Correlation ID:
29daf92c,
Call Stack: null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: Host bigvirt moved to
Non-Operational state as host does not meet the cluster's minimum CPU
level. Missing CPU features : model_Opteron_G3

After removing the option all works well again, but I'ḿ lacking
the nested
kvm option :( Is nested kvm only supported on a limited cpu's??

Winny

Information from /proc/cpuinfo:

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 10
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor
stepping: 0
microcode   : 0x1bf
cpu MHz : 2800.000
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 6
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 6
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 6
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep
mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt
pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nopl
nonstop_tsc
extd_apicid aperfmperf pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm
extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs
skinit wdt
cpb hw_pstate npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save pausefilter
bogomips: 5625.54
TLB size: 1024 4K pages
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate cpb

Re: [ovirt-users] Error migrating VM with direct LUN disk

2016-01-07 Thread Chris Adams 
Once upon a time, Chris Adams  said:
> I have a VM with a virtio-scsi disk that is a direct-mapped iSCSI LUN.
> I'm trying to migrate it from one node to another (in the process of
> updating my system from 3.5.3 to 3.5.5), and it fails migration with:
> 
> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 
> 10:31:17,657::migration::161::vm.Vm::(_recover) 
> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::unsupported configuration: 
> scsi-block 'lun' devices do not support the serial property
> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 10:31:17,693::migration::260::vm.Vm::(run) 
> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::Failed to migrate
>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 246, in run
> self._startUnderlyingMigration(time.time())
>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 335, in 
> _startUnderlyingMigration
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1701, in 
> migrateToURI2
> if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainMigrateToURI2() failed', 
> dom=self)
> Thread-1886279::DEBUG::2016-01-06 
> 10:31:18,539::__init__::481::jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer::(_serveRequest) Calling 
> 'VM.getMigrationStatus' in bridge with {u'vmID': 
> u'606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43'}
> 
> Is this a known bug (maybe fixed in a newer version), something
> unexpected, etc.?  Is there a way around it (other than shutting down
> the VM)?

So, this isn't just a bug with migration; I powered off the VM and then
tried to start it on a host that had been updated to 3.5.5 and it would
not start (same error).

This is a pretty significant regression IMHO - I can't start this VM on
any 3.5.5 host.
-- 
Chris Adams 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Guest won't start after upgrade to 3.6

2016-01-07 Thread Michal Skrivanek 

> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:08, Lionel Caignec  wrote:
> 
> I anwser myself, did not understand why but now my guest start.

Just checking your earlier failure….
Did you perhaps try suspend/resume earlier? Or was it a snapshot?
you also could have had wrong qemu-kvm installed on centos 7.2 if for any 
reason you didn’t pick up the one supplied by ovirt repo

Thanks,
michal
> 
> 
> - Mail original -
> De: "Lionel Caignec" 
> À: "users" 
> Envoyé: Mardi 5 Janvier 2016 13:36:59
> Objet: [ovirt-users] Guest won't start after upgrade to 3.6
> 
> i just upgraded my cluster from ovirt 3.5 to 3.6. My ovirt nodes run centos 
> 7.2.
> I've got a problem about some guest (centos 6.x), when i try to run them i 
> get this error:
> 
> "org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] 
> (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-41) [] Correlation ID: null, Call Stack: null, 
> Custom Event ID: -1, Message: VM X is down with error. Exit message: 
> internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 
> 2016-01-05T12:02:56.879292Z qemu-kvm: warning: CPU(s) not present in any NUMA 
> nodes: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15"
> 
> Looking forward in the log i find this : 
> "2016-01-05T12:02:56.879615Z qemu-kvm: warning: All CPU(s) up to maxcpus 
> should be described in NUMA config
> 2016-01-05T12:02:56.897747Z qemu-kvm: "-memory 'slots|maxmem'" is not 
> supported by: rhel6.5.0"
> 
> In RHEL KB i found this bug which seems to be the same that mine :  
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275268
> 
> 
> So my question:
> - is it really problem of "memory hotplug" if yes how can i disable it?
> - My guests seems to inherit of parameter "Custom Emulated Machine" with 
> value rhel6.5.0 from cluster config but i did not see how to modify it?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Lionel Caignec 
> 
> Centre Informatique National de l' Enseignement Supérieur 
> 950 rue de Saint Priest 
> 34097 MONTPELLIER Cedex 5 
> Tel : (33) 04 67 14 14 14
> Fax : (33)04 67 52 37 63 
> http://www.cines.fr
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Cluster

2016-01-07 Thread Michal Skrivanek 

> On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:25, Yedidyah Bar David  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Budur Nagaraju  wrote:
>> Can someone help me in the issue ? This is blocking my testing .
> 
> The linked engine.log has:
> 
> Missing CPU features : model_SandyBridge
> 
> Please check/post exact models of servers and their cpus, bios settings
> in both, cluster cpu type. Thanks.

The log seem to be pretty clear about that, and there are messages even in UI

Message: Not possible to mix RHEL 6.x and 7.x hosts in one cluster. Tried 
adding oVirt Node - 3.6 - 0.999.201510261021.el7.centos host to a cluster with 
RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3 hosts.

and indeed separate problem with CPU mode, your cluster requests sandybridge 
but your host is older

You need to keep same RHEL versions within cluster, and if you want to use 
older HW you need to lower the cluster requirements 

> 
>> 
>> On Jan 6, 2016 1:57 PM, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hosted engine and and oVirt engine both are having Centos6.x version I
>>> mean Its (centos6.7) ,while second host am facing that issues.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Oved Ourfali  wrote:
 
 Adding Sandro, as perhaps it is related to hosted engine in any way.
 Conceptually, you can't mix centos6 and 7 in the same cluster, in case
 that's what you did.
 
 On Jan 6, 2016 10:08, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
> 
> As of now its showing only one hosts that is Hosted Engine and the
> moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
> I have installed Cetos 6.7 in the Hosted engine I don't know why its
> showing RHEL-6-7 in OS version.
> 
> OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
> Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
> KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
> LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
> 
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Budur Nagaraju 
> wrote:
>> 
>> As of now its showing only one hosts that is oVirt Engine and the
>> moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
>> 
>> OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
>> Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
>> KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
>> LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Oved Ourfali 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> All hosts (not VMs) in your cluster are centos 6.7?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Budur Nagaraju 
>>> wrote:
 
 Os type is set to "other OS " and the centos 6.7 is installed
 
 
 On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Oved Ourfali 
 wrote:
> 
> Seems like you've mixed different versions in the same cluster,
> which is the reason the host is non-operational.
> What's the OS type and version of the hosts in your cluster?
> 
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Budur Nagaraju 
> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://pastebin.com/jQiuHhZz
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Budur Nagaraju 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> HI
>>> 
>>> Getting the below error while adding node to the OE which is
>>> created from Hosted eghine.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2016-01-06 10:50:49,404 INFO
>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo]
>>> (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-83) [7ce02003] Host
>>> 3577e25f-e25e-425d-82ac-f6c3502a281e : infraesx2 is already in
>>> NonOperational status for reason MIXING_RHEL_VERSIONS_IN_CLUSTER.
>>> SetNonOperationalVds command is skipped.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any way to fix the issue ? Engine version is 3.5.6.2-1.el6
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nagaraju
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Didi
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Cluster

2016-01-07 Thread Michal Skrivanek 

> On 07 Jan 2016, at 10:06, Budur Nagaraju  wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the update .
> 
> Is there a way to migrate the oVirt Engine  to the oVirt node ? as My setup 
> has two hosted engine when I try to migrate Engine  to the ovirt node  which 
> is  in different cluster am not able to succeed.

for normal VMs - as long as the cluster compatibility is the same you can 
migrate a VM from your el6-only cluster to a new el7-only cluster - from el6 
host to el7 host (using the special cross-cluster migration, both clusters need 
to be set up the same (storage, networks, etc))

Note you can do that only one way from el6 to el7, and in cluster levels 3.5 or 
3.6.

Thanks,
michal

> 
> 
> Getting the same Error.
> 
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek  > wrote:
> 
> > On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:25, Yedidyah Bar David  > > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Budur Nagaraju  > > wrote:
> >> Can someone help me in the issue ? This is blocking my testing .
> >
> > The linked engine.log has:
> >
> > Missing CPU features : model_SandyBridge
> >
> > Please check/post exact models of servers and their cpus, bios settings
> > in both, cluster cpu type. Thanks.
> 
> The log seem to be pretty clear about that, and there are messages even in UI
> 
> Message: Not possible to mix RHEL 6.x and 7.x hosts in one cluster. Tried 
> adding oVirt Node - 3.6 - 0.999.201510261021.el7.centos host to a cluster 
> with RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3 hosts.
> 
> and indeed separate problem with CPU mode, your cluster requests sandybridge 
> but your host is older
> 
> You need to keep same RHEL versions within cluster, and if you want to use 
> older HW you need to lower the cluster requirements
> 
> >
> >>
> >> On Jan 6, 2016 1:57 PM, "Budur Nagaraju"  >> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hosted engine and and oVirt engine both are having Centos6.x version I
> >>> mean Its (centos6.7) ,while second host am facing that issues.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Oved Ourfali  >>> > wrote:
> 
>  Adding Sandro, as perhaps it is related to hosted engine in any way.
>  Conceptually, you can't mix centos6 and 7 in the same cluster, in case
>  that's what you did.
> 
>  On Jan 6, 2016 10:08, "Budur Nagaraju"   > wrote:
> >
> > As of now its showing only one hosts that is Hosted Engine and the
> > moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
> > I have installed Cetos 6.7 in the Hosted engine I don't know why its
> > showing RHEL-6-7 in OS version.
> >
> > OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
> > Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
> > KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
> > LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Budur Nagaraju  > >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> As of now its showing only one hosts that is oVirt Engine and the
> >> moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
> >>
> >> OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
> >> Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
> >> KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
> >> LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Oved Ourfali  >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All hosts (not VMs) in your cluster are centos 6.7?
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Budur Nagaraju  >>> >
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Os type is set to "other OS " and the centos 6.7 is installed
> 
> 
>  On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Oved Ourfali   >
>  wrote:
> >
> > Seems like you've mixed different versions in the same cluster,
> > which is the reason the host is non-operational.
> > What's the OS type and version of the hosts in your cluster?
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Budur Nagaraju  > >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://pastebin.com/jQiuHhZz 
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Budur Nagaraju  >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> HI
> >>>
> >>> Getting the below error while adding node to the OE which is
> >>> created from Hosted eghine.
> >>>
> >>>
>

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 3.6 and gluster arbiter volumes?

2016-01-07 Thread Joop 
On 25-12-2015 5:26, Arik Mitschang wrote:
> Hi ovirt-users,
>
> I have been working on a new install of ovirt 3.6 hosted-engine and ran
> into difficulty adding a gluster data storage domain to host my VMs. I
> have 4 servers for gluster (separate from vm hosts) and would like to
> have the quorum enforcement of replica 3 without sacrificing space. I
> created a gluster using
>
>  replica 3 arbiter 1
>
> That looks like this:
>
>  Volume Name: arbtest
>  Type: Distributed-Replicate
>  Volume ID: 01b36368-1f37-435c-9f48-0442e0c34160
>  Status: Stopped
>  Number of Bricks: 2 x 3 = 6
>  Transport-type: tcp
>  Bricks:
>  Brick1: t2-gluster01b:/gluster/00/arbtest
>  Brick2: t2-gluster02b:/gluster/00/arbtest
>  Brick3: t2-gluster03b:/gluster/00/arbtest.arb
>  Brick4: t2-gluster03b:/gluster/00/arbtest
>  Brick5: t2-gluster04b:/gluster/00/arbtest
>  Brick6: t2-gluster01b:/gluster/00/arbtest.arb
>  Options Reconfigured:
>  nfs.disable: true
>  network.ping-timeout: 10
>  storage.owner-uid: 36
>  storage.owner-gid: 36
>  cluster.server-quorum-type: server
>  cluster.quorum-type: auto
>  network.remote-dio: enable
>  cluster.eager-lock: enable
>  performance.stat-prefetch: off
>  performance.io-cache: off
>  performance.read-ahead: off
>  performance.quick-read: off
>  performance.readdir-ahead: on
>
> But adding to gluster I get the following error:
>
>  "Error while executing action AddGlusterFsStorageDomain: Error creating
>  a storage domain's metadata"
>
>
Anything in engine.log (/var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log) around that time?
Anything in vdsm.log on your 2 hypervisors around that time?
(Guessing that you'll see an error about replication unsupported by
vdsm, if so, have a look at /etc/vdsmd.conf.rpmnew)

Regards,

Joop

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Documents for java-sdk ovirt and restapi

2016-01-07 Thread Maor Lipchuk 
Hi shailendra,

You can take a look at the following wiki:
http://www.ovirt.org/CLI

Hope it helps,
Maor



- Original Message -
> From: "shailendra saxena" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 8:58:33 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Documents for java-sdk ovirt and restapi
> 
> hi,
> I am using java sdk ovirt and rest api. Could you tell where i can find the
> documents for the same ?
> 
> --
> Thanx & regards,
> 
> Shailendra Kr. Saxena
> IIIT Allahabad
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Error migrating VM with direct LUN disk

2016-01-07 Thread Chris Adams 
Once upon a time, Yedidyah Bar David  said:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Chris Adams  wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Chris Adams  said:
> >> I have a VM with a virtio-scsi disk that is a direct-mapped iSCSI LUN.
> >> I'm trying to migrate it from one node to another (in the process of
> >> updating my system from 3.5.3 to 3.5.5), and it fails migration with:
> >>
> >> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 
> >> 10:31:17,657::migration::161::vm.Vm::(_recover) 
> >> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::unsupported configuration: 
> >> scsi-block 'lun' devices do not support the serial property
> >> Thread-1886273::ERROR::2016-01-06 
> >> 10:31:17,693::migration::260::vm.Vm::(run) 
> >> vmId=`606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43`::Failed to migrate
> >>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 246, in run
> >> self._startUnderlyingMigration(time.time())
> >>   File "/usr/share/vdsm/virt/migration.py", line 335, in 
> >> _startUnderlyingMigration
> >>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1701, in 
> >> migrateToURI2
> >> if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainMigrateToURI2() failed', 
> >> dom=self)
> >> Thread-1886279::DEBUG::2016-01-06 
> >> 10:31:18,539::__init__::481::jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer::(_serveRequest) 
> >> Calling 'VM.getMigrationStatus' in bridge with {u'vmID': 
> >> u'606ae10e-bcac-4bf8-8ad0-e9d76f0c6f43'}
> >>
> >> Is this a known bug (maybe fixed in a newer version), something
> >> unexpected, etc.?  Is there a way around it (other than shutting down
> >> the VM)?
> >
> > So, this isn't just a bug with migration; I powered off the VM and then
> > tried to start it on a host that had been updated to 3.5.5 and it would
> > not start (same error).
> >
> > This is a pretty significant regression IMHO - I can't start this VM on
> > any 3.5.5 host.
> 
> Seems like a result of the fix for [1].
> 
> Please check/post vdsm/libvirt/qemu versions and logs.

Old node (that is working) is CentOS 7.1, oVirt 3.5.3:
  vdsm-4.16.20-0.el7.centos.x86_64
  libvirt-client-1.2.8-16.el7_1.3.x86_64
  qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.x86_64

New nodes (that won't work) are CentOS 7.2, oVirt 3.5.6 (I said 3.5.5
earlier but they are updated as of yesterday):
  vdsm-4.16.30-0.el7.centos.x86_64
  libvirt-client-1.2.17-13.el7_2.2.x86_64
  qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-29.1.el7.x86_64

Please let me know which logs - the above snip is from vdsm.log when
trying to migrate the VM (got the same error when just trying to start
it).  All that is in the libvirt/qemu/.log when I tried to start the
VM on an upgraded node is "shutting down" (no errors or other messages).

> Do you have any vdsm hooks installed?

No.  I did wonder if I could work around this with a hook to strip out
the  in the XML (but haven't written a hook before so
haven't tried that yet).

> Was this system upgraded from a previous version? Please
> state the upgrade history.

It started with either 3.5 or 3.5.1 (can't remember for sure now), then
upgraded to 3.5.2, 3.5.3, and 3.5.6.

> Thanks.

Thank you.
-- 
Chris Adams 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt goes to FOSDEM 2016 - the full scoop!

2016-01-07 Thread René Koch 

Hi,

Thanks for the information.
For sure I'll help out at the booth...


Regards,
René


On 01/06/2016 07:36 PM, Mikey Ariel wrote:
FOSDEM 2016 is just a few short weeks away, and I'm happy to share 
with you the full details about our community presence at the conference.


===
Virt & IaaS Devroom
===

Just a reminder that the full schedule is published on the FOSDEM 
website[1], and we have some great presentations from our community 
members for you to learn from.


===
oVirt/Foreman Stand
===

This year we will share a stand with our friends from the Foreman 
project. Stop by to say hello, grab swag, and enjoy some cool demos!


**STAND VOLUNTEERS WANTED**

If you're attending FOSDEM and would like to help us out, we'd love to 
have you there! This is a great opportunity to chat about oVirt with 
FOSDEM attendees and meet other community members from all over the 
world.


Special surprise swag is reserved for booth volunteers! Please sign up 
for booth shifts in the etherpad[2] (lines 11-33). One of our core 
contributors will also be at the booth to support and co-pilot each 
shift.


===
Social Event on Saturday
===

In previous years, we had informal social gatherings for our community 
members on Saturday evening. These evenings are yet another excellent 
opportunity to meet and chat with the oVirt community outside the 
hectic FOSDEM venue.


This year we'd like to hold an event again if there is enough demand, 
so please write your name/IRCnick/Twitter/G+/email in the etherpad[2] 
(line 86 and down) **by January 15**.


If there is enough interest, we will reserve a nice pub in the center 
of Brussels and buy the first round :)


See you in Brussels!

[1] https://fosdem.org/2016/schedule/track/virtualisation_and_iaas/
[2] http://etherpad.ovirt.org/p/ovirt-fosdem-2016



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] Cluster

2016-01-07 Thread Yedidyah Bar David 
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek
 wrote:
>
> On 07 Jan 2016, at 10:56, Budur Nagaraju  wrote:
>
> My Setup looks like this ,
>
> Hosted Engine1 : Installed with  centos 6.7 64Bit CPU sandy Bridge and
> Default  cluster is  in oVirt engine Belongs to  sandy bridge.
> Hosted Engine2 : Installed with  centos 6.7 64Bit CPU sandy Bridge and
> Default  cluster is  in oVirt engine Belongs to  sandy bridge.
>
> oVirt Engine : Installed with Centos 6.7 64 Bit , its hosted in the hosted
> engine1 or 2.
>
> oVirt node: Installed with the version oVirt Node Hypervisor release 3.5
> (0.999.201509102313.el7.centos) belongs to  Intel Nehalem Family
>
>
> assuming that the “Default” cluster with those 2 HE hosts above is 3.6 then
> no
> Or are you talking about a 3.5 setup altogether? and everything is at
> 3.5…then yes. However there might be some caveats due to the special hosted
> engine VM. Didi or someone from integration would need to comment on that

AFAIK you can't migrate the engine vm to a hypervisor (host or node) that is
not a hosted-engine host. you'd need to deploy the node as a hosted-engine
host. ovirt-node allows this too in 3.5+, see e.g.:
http://dougsland.livejournal.com/124084.html

>
>
> so as per your update we can't migrate the oVirt Engine to the node which
> has the version installed 3.5 (0.999.201509102313.el7.centos ?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Michal Skrivanek
>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07 Jan 2016, at 10:06, Budur Nagaraju  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the update .
>>
>> Is there a way to migrate the oVirt Engine  to the oVirt node ? as My
>> setup has two hosted engine when I try to migrate Engine  to the ovirt node
>> which is  in different cluster am not able to succeed.
>>
>>
>> for normal VMs - as long as the cluster compatibility is the same you can
>> migrate a VM from your el6-only cluster to a new el7-only cluster - from el6
>> host to el7 host (using the special cross-cluster migration, both clusters
>> need to be set up the same (storage, networks, etc))
>>
>> Note you can do that only one way from el6 to el7, and in cluster levels
>> 3.5 or 3.6.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> michal
>>
>>
>>
>> Getting the same Error.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:25, Yedidyah Bar David  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Budur Nagaraju 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Can someone help me in the issue ? This is blocking my testing .
>>> >
>>> > The linked engine.log has:
>>> >
>>> > Missing CPU features : model_SandyBridge
>>> >
>>> > Please check/post exact models of servers and their cpus, bios settings
>>> > in both, cluster cpu type. Thanks.
>>>
>>> The log seem to be pretty clear about that, and there are messages even
>>> in UI
>>>
>>> Message: Not possible to mix RHEL 6.x and 7.x hosts in one cluster. Tried
>>> adding oVirt Node - 3.6 - 0.999.201510261021.el7.centos host to a cluster
>>> with RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3 hosts.
>>>
>>> and indeed separate problem with CPU mode, your cluster requests
>>> sandybridge but your host is older
>>>
>>> You need to keep same RHEL versions within cluster, and if you want to
>>> use older HW you need to lower the cluster requirements
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On Jan 6, 2016 1:57 PM, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hosted engine and and oVirt engine both are having Centos6.x version
>>> >>> I
>>> >>> mean Its (centos6.7) ,while second host am facing that issues.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Oved Ourfali 
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Adding Sandro, as perhaps it is related to hosted engine in any way.
>>>  Conceptually, you can't mix centos6 and 7 in the same cluster, in
>>>  case
>>>  that's what you did.
>>> 
>>>  On Jan 6, 2016 10:08, "Budur Nagaraju"  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > As of now its showing only one hosts that is Hosted Engine and the
>>> > moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
>>> > I have installed Cetos 6.7 in the Hosted engine I don't know why
>>> > its
>>> > showing RHEL-6-7 in OS version.
>>> >
>>> > OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
>>> > Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
>>> > KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
>>> > LIBVIRT Version: libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.3
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Budur Nagaraju 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> As of now its showing only one hosts that is oVirt Engine and the
>>> >> moment I add second host its failing ,below are the OS version.
>>> >>
>>> >> OS Version:RHEL - 6 - 7.el6.centos.12.3
>>> >> Kernel Version:2.6.32 - 573.12.1.el6.x86_64
>>> >> KVM Version: 0.12.1.2 - 2.479.el6_7.2
>>> >> LIBVIRT

Re: [ovirt-users] upgrade 3.6 to 3.6.1

2016-01-07 Thread Yedidyah Bar David 
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Sebastien Philippot
 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have ovirt 3.6 on CentOS 7.1 on engine + hosts.
> We would like to upgrade to 3.6.1.
> I'm looking  for the best procedure.
> For the moment, we have 2 hosts in a cluster "prod" with only one default
> network.
>
> * We must upgrade OS on CentOS 7.2 before ?
> 1/ upgrade engine to centos 7.2 first ? => yum update , reboot and
> engine-setup ?
> 2/ first host to maintenance, look for migation of VMs on the second host
> and upgrade between the web interface or "yum update and reboot" for centos
> 7.2 ?
> 3/ up the first host and maintenance for the second, etc ..

Is this a hosted-engine setup? Where does the engine run?

Best,
-- 
Didi
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] Documents for java-sdk ovirt and restapi

2016-01-07 Thread shailendra saxena 
hi,
I am using java sdk ovirt and rest api. Could you tell where i can find the
documents for the same ?

-- 
Thanx & regards,

Shailendra Kr. Saxena
IIIT Allahabad
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] upgrade 3.6 to 3.6.1

2016-01-07 Thread Sebastien Philippot 
Hello, 

We have ovirt 3.6 on CentOS 7.1 on engine + hosts. 
We would like to upgrade to 3.6.1. 
I'm looking for the best procedure. 
For the moment, we have 2 hosts in a cluster "prod" with only one default 
network. 

* We must upgrade OS on CentOS 7.2 before ? 
1/ upgrade engine to centos 7.2 first ? => yum update , reboot and engine-setup 
? 
2/ first host to maintenance, look for migation of VMs on the second host and 
upgrade between the web interface or "yum update and reboot" for centos 7.2 ? 
3/ up the first host and maintenance for the second, etc .. 

Thanks, 

Sébastien 

-- 
-- 
-- 
Sébastien PHILIPPOT - Plate-forme GenOuest 
IRISA-INRIA, Campus de Beaulieu 
35042 Rennes cedex, France 
Tél: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 58 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] doubts about oVirt

2016-01-07 Thread Maor Lipchuk 
Hi Fauéz,

I'm not sure I follow, you are saying you have a Host which has iSCSI Storage 
server installed on it? Do you want to change the Host ip?
Is there any chance you can remove the the Host from the setup, and try to add 
it once again to the setup, so the Host can be installed again?

Regards,
Maor


- Original Message -
> From: "Fauéz Passos" 
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 6:34:11 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] doubts about oVirt
> 
> Good morning,
> I own the oVirt 3.5 installed together with storages iscsi, by the biggest
> reasons I needed to change the virtual IP of the storages. Now my host is
> displaying the following message:
> The error message for connection 192.168.200.14
> iqn.2003-10.com.lefthandnetworks: mg-climate-space: 469: vms (LUN
> 36000eb3b1aeb895a01d5) returned by VDSM was: Failed to setup
> iSCSI subsystem
> and
> Failed to connect to Host OP10 Storage Servers
> 
> But everything is working properly, only this message is displayed every five
> minutes, leaving the log very confusing ... is there any place where I
> change the default virtual IP data network?
> 
> OBS: old virtual IP: 192.168.200.14
> new virtual IP: 192.168.200.20
> 
> thank you
> 
> --
> Untitled Document
>   Fauéz A. O. Passos
> Analista de Sistemas - Embrace/INPE
> +55 12 3208-7878
> fauez.pas...@inpe.br
> www.centralit.com.br
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] import ovirt vms to esx

2016-01-07 Thread alireza sadeh seighalan 
hi friends

is there any solution for  import  ovirt vms to  vmware  esx?  thanks
inadvance
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] import ovirt vms to esx

2016-01-07 Thread Patrick Russell 
You could try vmware converter, but that’s probably a better question for 
vmware.

-Patrick

From: > on behalf of 
alireza sadeh seighalan >
Date: Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 2:37 PM
To: "users@ovirt.org" 
>
Subject: [ovirt-users] import ovirt vms to esx

hi friends

is there any solution for  import  ovirt vms to  vmware  esx?  thanks inadvance
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users