on ovirt and Glusterfs hyper-converged environment , can not use iscsi storage
type , UI report error: "Could not retrieve LUNs, please check your storage." ,
vdsm report :"VDSM hosted_engine_3 command failed: Error block device action:
()" .
but this block device alse login on centos 7 host
Hi,
I have installed IPA across 3 nodes. In order to point the ovirt server at
the new IPA/DNS servers and to clean up I ran engine-cleanup aiming to
delte the ovirt setup. However it seems even though I ran this something,
"vdsm?" is still running and controlling the networking.
So down under
That's probably a little bit more brave than I am, so there is no way in
the current release? I don't mind jumping through a few hoops but sitting
for days loading them doesn't fill me joy.
If not it's great that feature is added.
On Monday, 31 October 2016, Amit Aviram wrote:
> Hi Ben. Actua
Hi Ben. Actually exactly today REST API for uploading disks was introduced
to master. It is supposed to get into the next 4.0.Z version, so if you
want you can update your version soon enough and use the API.
When you'll have the right version, you can use examples from "/api/Model"
to upload disk
Chris, which version are you using? I have the same issue running 4.0.4
importing a previously exported vm from export domain.
I have tried:
vdsClient -s 0 getAllTasksStatuses
found the task, did a stopTask and then let the engine clear the db.
no luck. the task is not shown anymore with vdsClient
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a method on the cli/script to mass upload
disks to ovirt. The web loader is great, but also I have 20 disks that I
really just want to upload via shell.
I can't seem to find a tool to do it, I have found ovirt-image-uploader
(but that's for ovf files).
FTW, attaching physical local drives to VMs also works well.
Disks -> New -> Direct LUN -> Storage Type: Fibre Channel -> Use Host…
Your disk doesn't have to be Fibre Channel. Just any direct attached disk works
well.
-Original Message-
From: Yedidyah Bar David
Date: Monday 31 October 20
I think it's all about online VM migration. oVirt doesn't support online VM
migration together with online storage migration. So any storage has to be
accessible from any hosts in a datacenter. That's why local storages are too
restricted.
Converting Local storages to Shared removes the restric
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Pavel Gashev wrote:
> Mike,
>
> As workaround it's not very hard to create a mount command wrapper that
> converts local NFS mounts to bind-mounts. The propper way I think is to patch
> the VDSM service to handle local NFS mounts. In result, a NFS storage will
>
Mike,
As workaround it's not very hard to create a mount command wrapper that
converts local NFS mounts to bind-mounts. The propper way I think is to patch
the VDSM service to handle local NFS mounts. In result, a NFS storage will work
like a local storage if it's local.
-Original Message-
Hi Pavel,
Op 31-10-2016 om 11:22 schreef Pavel Gashev:
Mike,
You can share and use your local storage via NFS. So all your storages are
shared, and can be used in the same datacenter.
I installed a nfs server on the hypervisor and am using it that way at
the moment.
It feels 'wrong' but it se
Op 31-10-2016 om 07:57 schreef Yedidyah Bar David:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Mike wrote:
Op 30-10-2016 om 12:50 schreef Yaniv Kaul:
Perhaps, if there are no HA requirements, those VMs with local
domain
needs can be in their own DC, a local one? If it's just 5%,
Hi,
there's an updated version of scrat14/ovirt-guest-agent available at
https://forge.puppet.com/scrat14/ovirt_guest_agent
Latest version includes support for installing oVirt guest agent on RHEV
hypervisors in addition to oVirt nodes.
Furthermore this module will now use rhevm-guest-agent-c
thanks for the hint !
Let's hope this helps bring some usefull evolutions
cordialement, regards,
Nelson LAMEIRAS
Lyra Network
Service Projets et Processus
Tel : +33 (0) 5 32 09 09 70
109 rue de l’innovation
31670 Labège - France
www.lyra-network.com
From: "Ernest Beinrohr"
To: "Nel
Thanks.
Our thin clients are linux based so this should fit. Also managing power
and having access to a console is enough for us. We will deploy a few of
them and try the desktop client these days.
Amy
2016-10-29 10:23 GMT+01:00 James Michels :
> Hello Amy.
>
> We had the same needs back in Jul
Mike,
You can share and use your local storage via NFS. So all your storages are
shared, and can be used in the same datacenter.
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Mike (maillinglists)"
Date: Sunday 30 October 2016 at 13:02
To: "users@ovirt.org"
Subject: [ovirt-users] Local and S
Thx for the advice Barak!
I was looking for a roadmap to follow, like the "trello" one used for the
openshift project https://trello.com/b/nlLwlKoz/atomicopenshift-roadmap but
I was not able to find one. I love to hear things like the "SPM was planned
to be removed" as it gives me a better underst
On 31 October 2016 at 09:28, Sebastian Greco wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
> points out that customers
Maybe I missread, sorry. I interpreted that by design this was not a
feature and that it was not in any roadmap as current customers don't need
it, or at least I understood that from previous posts.
Happy to know this is planned to be a feature! :)
Again guys, thanks a lot for the help!
Sebasti
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
> points out that custom
Hi all,
Recently, more and more questions are posted to users@ovirt.org in
what seems like a result of a google translation of Chinese to
English. These are usually hard to understand, and I expect the
replies are also hard to understand. A recent example is [1].
Two years ago there was a discuss
On 28/10/16 17:46 +0100, david caughey wrote:
Hi,
I'm building a homeserver to run ovirt and wanted to get opinions on the
best approach.
The server will be used as a test/studybed for
ovirt/kvm/vcloud/openstack/ceph.
The server will be based around a Xeon E5 10 core with 128GB ram.
Option 1:
Bu
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> VMs are not
> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I can't
argue with that,
23 matches
Mail list logo