Re: [ovirt-users] Q: oVirt Node Update Wiped my Updates

2017-12-18 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Johan Bernhardsson  wrote:

> ovirt node is a small minimal os and will wipe your manually installed
> packages on an upgrade.
>

Now it has also RPM persistence designed as a mechanism by which packages
installed through yum/dnf can be saved and automatically re-applied when
the OS is updated.
https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/node/node-next-persistence/


>
> If you want local packages that are critical for you you should install
> full centos/rhev server and use that as a virtualization node. (This is
> what i did since i wanted more control of the virtulization nodes)
>
>
> /Johan
> On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 01:54 +0200, Andrei V wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > I have updated today oVirt node 4.1 via yum, installed from oVirt
> > DVD.
> > Update was a minor version change.
> > Now all software I had installed, including mc, Samba, etc. have been
> > lost. Looks like oVirt node is being updated with whole system 600MB
> > image, not just with rpms (please correct if I'm wrong here).
> >
> > Keeping my manually installed software is crucial, since it has UPS
> > and
> > hardware RAID monitor.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest if this is normal behavior or a single glitch ?
> >
> > So far I found only this instruction for node installation:
> > https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/install-guide/chap-oVirt_Nodes/
> >
> > And it uses pre-made DVD ISO, not manual install with RHEL/CentOS DVD
> > and RPMs from yum repository.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s).
> > Andrei
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Q: oVirt Node Update Wiped my Updates

2017-12-18 Thread Johan Bernhardsson
The differences are here:
https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/install-guide/chap-Introduction_to_
Hypervisor_Hosts/

And also the different guides on how to install them.

/Johan

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 01:06 +0100, Johan Bernhardsson wrote:
> ovirt node is a small minimal os and will wipe your manually
> installed
> packages on an upgrade.
> 
> If you want local packages that are critical for you you should
> install
> full centos/rhev server and use that as a virtualization node. (This
> is
> what i did since i wanted more control of the virtulization nodes)
> 
> 
> /Johan
> On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 01:54 +0200, Andrei V wrote:
> > 
> > Hi !
> > 
> > I have updated today oVirt node 4.1 via yum, installed from oVirt
> > DVD.
> > Update was a minor version change.
> > Now all software I had installed, including mc, Samba, etc. have
> > been
> > lost. Looks like oVirt node is being updated with whole system
> > 600MB
> > image, not just with rpms (please correct if I'm wrong here).
> > 
> > Keeping my manually installed software is crucial, since it has UPS
> > and
> > hardware RAID monitor.
> > 
> > Can anyone suggest if this is normal behavior or a single glitch ?
> > 
> > So far I found only this instruction for node installation:
> > https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/install-guide/chap-oVirt_Nodes/
> > 
> > And it uses pre-made DVD ISO, not manual install with RHEL/CentOS
> > DVD
> > and RPMs from yum repository.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s).
> > Andrei
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Q: oVirt Node Update Wiped my Updates

2017-12-18 Thread Johan Bernhardsson
ovirt node is a small minimal os and will wipe your manually installed
packages on an upgrade.

If you want local packages that are critical for you you should install
full centos/rhev server and use that as a virtualization node. (This is
what i did since i wanted more control of the virtulization nodes)


/Johan
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 01:54 +0200, Andrei V wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> I have updated today oVirt node 4.1 via yum, installed from oVirt
> DVD.
> Update was a minor version change.
> Now all software I had installed, including mc, Samba, etc. have been
> lost. Looks like oVirt node is being updated with whole system 600MB
> image, not just with rpms (please correct if I'm wrong here).
> 
> Keeping my manually installed software is crucial, since it has UPS
> and
> hardware RAID monitor.
> 
> Can anyone suggest if this is normal behavior or a single glitch ?
> 
> So far I found only this instruction for node installation:
> https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/install-guide/chap-oVirt_Nodes/
> 
> And it uses pre-made DVD ISO, not manual install with RHEL/CentOS DVD
> and RPMs from yum repository.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s).
> Andrei
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[ovirt-users] Q: oVirt Node Update Wiped my Updates

2017-12-18 Thread Andrei V
Hi !

I have updated today oVirt node 4.1 via yum, installed from oVirt DVD.
Update was a minor version change.
Now all software I had installed, including mc, Samba, etc. have been
lost. Looks like oVirt node is being updated with whole system 600MB
image, not just with rpms (please correct if I'm wrong here).

Keeping my manually installed software is crucial, since it has UPS and
hardware RAID monitor.

Can anyone suggest if this is normal behavior or a single glitch ?

So far I found only this instruction for node installation:
https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/install-guide/chap-oVirt_Nodes/

And it uses pre-made DVD ISO, not manual install with RHEL/CentOS DVD
and RPMs from yum repository.

Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s).
Andrei
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Node 4.1 question, writing files to /root and RPMs

2017-12-18 Thread Matt Simonsen

On 12/15/2017 03:06 AM, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Donny Davis > wrote:


have you gotten an image update yet?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Matt Simonsen > wrote:

Hello all,

I read at
https://www.ovirt.org/develop/projects/node/troubleshooting/

that "Changes made from the command line are done at your own
risk. Making changes has the potential to leave your system in
an unusable state." It seems clear that RPMs should not be
installed.


That document mainly refers to vintage node.
In Next Generation Node now we have rpm persistence; please check
https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/node/node-next-persistence/





I'm sure glad we tested!

On one Node image we had images locally stored in /exports and shared 
out via NFS. After an upgrade & reboot, images are gone.


If we "Convert to local storage" will the data persist?  I am planning 
to test, but want to be sure how this is designed.


I assume during a Gluster installation something is also updated in 
oVirt Node to allow for the Gluster partition to persist?


At this point I'm thinking I should manually install via CentOS7 to 
ensure folders and partitions are persistent. Is there any downside to 
installing over CentOS7?


Thanks
Matt
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Self-Hosted engine 4.1.7 unavailable from the outside of the host

2017-12-18 Thread Matteo Capuano
Now it works like a charm !!  Thanks again Simone.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Matteo Capuano  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Matteo Capuano 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
>>> wrote:
>>>


 On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Matteo Capuano 
 wrote:

> Hi everyone, my name’s Matteo and I’m a new oVirt user.
>
> I’m trying to install the gluster hyperconverged solution in a lab
> environment following the How-To wrote by Jason Brooks:
>
> https://ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4.1
> -and-gluster-storage/
>
> Sadly, I cannot understand how to configure the network on the
> self-hosted engine and I’m unable to make it available from outside the
> host.
>
> As written in the HowTo I created three hosts (ovirt-note 4.1.7) each
> one with two nics, one for gluster and one for management, the network is 
> a
> static LAN with FQDN resolvable (also reverse) by a local DNS. Here the
> details:
>
> Gateway: 172.16.1.1
>
> DNS: 172.16.1.12
>
> Host1: 172.16.1.210 (management) – 172.16.2.210 (gluster)
>
> Host2: 172.16.1.220 (management) – 172.16.2.220 (gluster)
>
> Host3: 172.16.1.230 (management) – 172.16.2.230 (gluster)
>
> Engine: 172.16.1.200
>
> When installing the engine I choose to brigde the management’s nic
> (172.16.1.210) of host1 but, once the installation is completed, I'm 
> unable
> to reach the engine from the LAN where the hosts are connected. The engine
> (172.16.1.200) can ping only host1 (172.16.1.210) and only host1 can ping
> the engine.
>
> As far as my network knowledge goes, to make the engine available from
> the outside of host1 I would need to use a third nic or to use some device
> to associate the ip and MAC address of the engine’s nic.
>
 Ciao Matteo,
 no, hosted-engine-setup should create a bridge for you.
 No need to do custom configuration to expose your VMs.

 Are you trying on bare metal or on VMs with the engine VM as a nested
 VM?

>>>
>>> Ciao Simone,
>>>
>>> thank you for your answer.
>>>
>>> My lab is a nested environmet. I installed ovirt on bare metal with the
>>> engine on another machine. On this setup i have 6 VMs:
>>>
>>> - 172.16.1.1  pfSense as firewall/gateway
>>> - 172.16.1.10  a windows 2016 used as network guest
>>> - 172.16.1.12  a nethserver installation as DNS server ( also on
>>> 172.16.2.12 )
>>> - the three ovirt-nodes as i described on my e-mail
>>>
>>> All the machines are pingable, only the engine inside host 1 is
>>> unreachable and can ping only host1.
>>>
>>
>> OK, your issue is caused by vdsm-no-mac-spoofing filter on your L1 VMs.
>> Please create a custom vNic profile on your external oVirt engine setting
>> the "network filter" field to "no network filter".
>> Now you can edit your ovirt-node VMs setting the network profile of the
>> nics you are going to use for the management bridge to the profile with "no
>> network filter".
>> You have to shutdown and restart your ovirt-node VMs and then you could
>> retry the deployment.
>>
>
>
> Thank you for the explanation, I'm going to try it in the evening. I'll
> keep you posted.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Matteo
>>>
>>>

> I’ve looked around over the internet for a solution but every how-to
> I’ve found follows the same steps of Jason’s.  I’ve also already
> asked for help to Jason.
>
> Anyone could help me to solve this issue?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Matteo
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>

>>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Konstantin Shalygin  wrote:

> On 12/18/2017 09:02 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>>
>> We provide the required scripts to install OpenShift with the EFK stack,
>> configure it and the hosts with all relevant details to connect the two.
>> Note that the metrics store also processes the engine and VDSM logs.
>>
>
> Good to know. But if I still want to use netdata instead EFK? Some info
> about how to get blk io metrics from libvirt and/or how to enable cgroups
> metrics. Anyone?
>

Get netdata to query libvirt for the IO parameters directly. It should be
configured with authentication against libvirt (the same password VDSM
uses).
Y.


>
> Thanks.
>
> k
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Option to put host into maintenance after installation of new host

2017-12-18 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Florian Schmid  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> would it be possible for future releases to add an option to the add new
> host tab to put the host in maintenance after installation instead of
> activating it.
> The same would be for reinstall.
>
> I have the problem now, that all hosts after installation will be
> activated, but network is not configured yet. Therefore host will be in non
> operational state and will be rebooted immediately.
>

I can understand why it's non-operational, not sure why it's rebooted?
Y.


> The only solution I have now is to configure power management after the
> host has all networks configured.
>
> I want to have all my networks as required, because otherwise someone will
> forget to add all of them and then you have other issues.
>
> BR Florian
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 4.2.0 Third Candidate Release is now available for testing

2017-12-18 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the Third
Candidate Release of oVirt 4.2.0, as of December 18th, 2017

This is pre-release software. This pre-release should not to be used in
production.
Please take a look at our community page[1] to learn how to ask questions
and interact with developers and users.
All issues or bugs should be reported via oVirt Bugzilla[2].

This release candidate includes fixes to the blocker bugs found while
testing the second release candidate.

This release is available now on x86_64 architecture for:

* Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later

* CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later

This release supports Hypervisor Hosts on x86_64 and ppc64le architectures
for:

* Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later

* CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later

* oVirt Node 4.2 (available for x86_64 only)

See the release notes draft [3] for installation / upgrade instructions and
a list of new features and bugs fixed.

Notes:

- oVirt Appliance is already available.

- oVirt Node is already available [4]

Additional Resources:

* Read more about the oVirt 4.2.0 release highlights:
http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.2.0/

* Get more oVirt project updates on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ovirt

* Check out the latest project news on the oVirt blog:
http://www.ovirt.org/blog/

[1] https://www.ovirt.org/community/

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=oVirt

[3] http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.2.0/
[4] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.2-pre/iso/

-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R

Red Hat EMEA 

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. 
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Option to put host into maintenance after installation of new host

2017-12-18 Thread nicolas

Hi,

I opened this BZ [1] a time ago. Feel free to vote for it if you wish.

Regards,

Nicolás

  [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322137

El 2017-12-18 14:48, Florian Schmid escribió:

Hi,

would it be possible for future releases to add an option to the add
new host tab to put the host in maintenance after installation instead
of activating it.
The same would be for reinstall.

I have the problem now, that all hosts after installation will be
activated, but network is not configured yet. Therefore host will be
in non operational state and will be rebooted immediately.
The only solution I have now is to configure power management after
the host has all networks configured.

I want to have all my networks as required, because otherwise someone
will forget to add all of them and then you have other issues.

BR Florian

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[ovirt-users] Option to put host into maintenance after installation of new host

2017-12-18 Thread Florian Schmid
Hi,

would it be possible for future releases to add an option to the add new host 
tab to put the host in maintenance after installation instead of activating it.
The same would be for reinstall.

I have the problem now, that all hosts after installation will be activated, 
but network is not configured yet. Therefore host will be in non operational 
state and will be rebooted immediately.
The only solution I have now is to configure power management after the host 
has all networks configured.

I want to have all my networks as required, because otherwise someone will 
forget to add all of them and then you have other issues. 

BR Florian

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Konstantin Shalygin

On 12/18/2017 09:02 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:


We provide the required scripts to install OpenShift with the EFK 
stack, configure it and the hosts with all relevant details to connect 
the two.

Note that the metrics store also processes the engine and VDSM logs.


Good to know. But if I still want to use netdata instead EFK? Some info 
about how to get blk io metrics from libvirt and/or how to enable 
cgroups metrics. Anyone?


Thanks.

k
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Dec 18, 2017 3:06 PM, "Konstantin Shalygin"  wrote:

On 12/18/2017 07:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:


Indeed. 4.2 provides a comprehensive solution, with integration via
Collectd -> fluentd -> Elastic -> Kibana.
Y.



E.g. integrated to oVirt or "admin can send metrics to ELK"?


We provide the required scripts to install OpenShift with the EFK stack,
configure it and the hosts with all relevant details to connect the two.
Note that the metrics store also processes the engine and VDSM logs.
Y.

Y.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Dec 18, 2017 3:06 PM, "Konstantin Shalygin"  wrote:

On 12/18/2017 07:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:


Indeed. 4.2 provides a comprehensive solution, with integration via
Collectd -> fluentd -> Elastic -> Kibana.
Y.



E.g. integrated to oVirt or "admin can send metrics to ELK"?


We provide the required scripts to install OpenShift with the EFK stack,
configure it and the hosts with all relevant details to connect the two.
Note that the metrics store also processes the engine and VDSM logs.
Y.

Y.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Reassign ovirtmgmt to a new bond with ansible

2017-12-18 Thread David Jaša
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 16:09 +0100, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Ondra Machacek  > wrote:.
> > 
> > 
> > This is unfortunately a bug, David(CCed) yesterday reported same
> > issue
> > to me. He will (or did) open an issue on github. I will fix it for
> > 2.5,
> > release and hopefully also for 2.4.3.
> 
> What do you suggest to do?
> 
> I think would be nice to make the first setup of a node directly with
> ansible, but if is not possible i can write down some python code for
> some tasks.
> 
> Luca
> 
> 

Hi Luca,

In my case (bond-vlans-bridges), the problem turned out to be missing
interface parameter:
- name: setup host networks:
  ovirt_host_networks:
interface: bond0   # I missed this one
bond:
  name: bond0
  interfaces
  - slave1
  - slave2
networks:
- name: rhevm# untagged, vm_network: no
  boot_protocol: dhcp
- name: vms  # vlan_tag: TAG, vm_network: yes
  boot_protocol: none

If the ansible + ovirt network setup doesn't work for for you (it did
for me), I'd suggest to move the interfaces configuration to a separate
playbook that you have to keep anyway for repositories, NTP or engine
ssh key.

David
(working on Spice, close but not oVirt proper :))
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Konstantin Shalygin

On 12/18/2017 07:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:


Indeed. 4.2 provides a comprehensive solution, with integration via 
Collectd -> fluentd -> Elastic -> Kibana.

Y.


E.g. integrated to oVirt or "admin can send metrics to ELK"?

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host

2017-12-18 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Florian Schmid  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> yes, still the same issues with oVirt 4.1.7 and CentOS 7.4.
> Whole cgroup directory has empty files.
>
> Actually at the moment, we are blind when it comes to disk IO, only our
> NetApp give us IO values, but these are per NFS share and there are a lots
> of VMs on it.
>
> A solution would be great here.
>

Indeed. 4.2 provides a comprehensive solution, with integration via
Collectd -> fluentd -> Elastic -> Kibana.
Y.


>
> BR Florian
>
>
> 
> 
> *UBIMET GmbH* - weather matters
> Ing. Florian Schmid • IT Infrastruktur Austria
>
> A-1220 Wien • Donau-City-Straße 11 • Tel +43 1 263 11 22
> <+43%201%202631122> DW 469 • Fax +43 1 263 11 22 219
> fsch...@ubimet.com • www.ubimet.com • Mobile: +43 664 8323379
> <+43%20664%208323379>
>
> Sitz: Wien • Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien • FN 248415 t
>
> 
> 
>
> The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is
> confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you
> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail
> and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use,
> reproduction, or dissemination of this message is strictly prohibited.
> Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. UBIMET GmbH shall not
> be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information
> contained in this communication, nor shall it be liable for any delay in
> its receipt. UBIMET GmbH accepts no liability for loss or damage caused by
> software viruses and you are advised to carry out a virus check on any
> attachments contained in this message.
>
>
>
> --
> *Von: *"Konstantin Shalygin" 
> *An: *"users" 
> *Gesendet: *Montag, 18. Dezember 2017 07:17:42
> *Betreff: *Re: [ovirt-users] Empty cgroup files on centos 7.3 host
>
> Specifically for IO statistics, VDSM reads the values from libvirt[1].
> cgroup limiting is possible if you define it, but is unrelated.
> Also note that 7.3 is a bit ancient, I'm not sure how supported it is with
> latest 4.1 - which I'm sure will pull new dependencies from 7.4 (for
> example, libvirt!).
>
> We use oVirt 4.1.6 on 7.4 of course.
>
> Where I can see IO stat? I never see this on oVirt manager.
>
> How can I enable cgroup blk metric collection?
> Perhaps this is an outdated way and metrics should be collected in a
> different way and it should be applied in the netdata project?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> k
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Self-Hosted engine 4.1.7 unavailable from the outside of the host

2017-12-18 Thread Matteo Capuano
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Matteo Capuano 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Matteo Capuano 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi everyone, my name’s Matteo and I’m a new oVirt user.

 I’m trying to install the gluster hyperconverged solution in a lab
 environment following the How-To wrote by Jason Brooks:

 https://ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4.1
 -and-gluster-storage/

 Sadly, I cannot understand how to configure the network on the
 self-hosted engine and I’m unable to make it available from outside the
 host.

 As written in the HowTo I created three hosts (ovirt-note 4.1.7) each
 one with two nics, one for gluster and one for management, the network is a
 static LAN with FQDN resolvable (also reverse) by a local DNS. Here the
 details:

 Gateway: 172.16.1.1

 DNS: 172.16.1.12

 Host1: 172.16.1.210 (management) – 172.16.2.210 (gluster)

 Host2: 172.16.1.220 (management) – 172.16.2.220 (gluster)

 Host3: 172.16.1.230 (management) – 172.16.2.230 (gluster)

 Engine: 172.16.1.200

 When installing the engine I choose to brigde the management’s nic
 (172.16.1.210) of host1 but, once the installation is completed, I'm unable
 to reach the engine from the LAN where the hosts are connected. The engine
 (172.16.1.200) can ping only host1 (172.16.1.210) and only host1 can ping
 the engine.

 As far as my network knowledge goes, to make the engine available from
 the outside of host1 I would need to use a third nic or to use some device
 to associate the ip and MAC address of the engine’s nic.

>>> Ciao Matteo,
>>> no, hosted-engine-setup should create a bridge for you.
>>> No need to do custom configuration to expose your VMs.
>>>
>>> Are you trying on bare metal or on VMs with the engine VM as a nested VM?
>>>
>>
>> Ciao Simone,
>>
>> thank you for your answer.
>>
>> My lab is a nested environmet. I installed ovirt on bare metal with the
>> engine on another machine. On this setup i have 6 VMs:
>>
>> - 172.16.1.1  pfSense as firewall/gateway
>> - 172.16.1.10  a windows 2016 used as network guest
>> - 172.16.1.12  a nethserver installation as DNS server ( also on
>> 172.16.2.12 )
>> - the three ovirt-nodes as i described on my e-mail
>>
>> All the machines are pingable, only the engine inside host 1 is
>> unreachable and can ping only host1.
>>
>
> OK, your issue is caused by vdsm-no-mac-spoofing filter on your L1 VMs.
> Please create a custom vNic profile on your external oVirt engine setting
> the "network filter" field to "no network filter".
> Now you can edit your ovirt-node VMs setting the network profile of the
> nics you are going to use for the management bridge to the profile with "no
> network filter".
> You have to shutdown and restart your ovirt-node VMs and then you could
> retry the deployment.
>


Thank you for the explanation, I'm going to try it in the evening. I'll
keep you posted.

Cheers


>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Matteo
>>
>>
>>>
 I’ve looked around over the internet for a solution but every how-to
 I’ve found follows the same steps of Jason’s.  I’ve also already asked
 for help to Jason.

 Anyone could help me to solve this issue?



 Thank you



 Matteo

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


>>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Self-Hosted engine 4.1.7 unavailable from the outside of the host

2017-12-18 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Matteo Capuano  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Matteo Capuano 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone, my name’s Matteo and I’m a new oVirt user.
>>>
>>> I’m trying to install the gluster hyperconverged solution in a lab
>>> environment following the How-To wrote by Jason Brooks:
>>>
>>> https://ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4.1
>>> -and-gluster-storage/
>>>
>>> Sadly, I cannot understand how to configure the network on the
>>> self-hosted engine and I’m unable to make it available from outside the
>>> host.
>>>
>>> As written in the HowTo I created three hosts (ovirt-note 4.1.7) each
>>> one with two nics, one for gluster and one for management, the network is a
>>> static LAN with FQDN resolvable (also reverse) by a local DNS. Here the
>>> details:
>>>
>>> Gateway: 172.16.1.1
>>>
>>> DNS: 172.16.1.12
>>>
>>> Host1: 172.16.1.210 (management) – 172.16.2.210 (gluster)
>>>
>>> Host2: 172.16.1.220 (management) – 172.16.2.220 (gluster)
>>>
>>> Host3: 172.16.1.230 (management) – 172.16.2.230 (gluster)
>>>
>>> Engine: 172.16.1.200
>>>
>>> When installing the engine I choose to brigde the management’s nic
>>> (172.16.1.210) of host1 but, once the installation is completed, I'm unable
>>> to reach the engine from the LAN where the hosts are connected. The engine
>>> (172.16.1.200) can ping only host1 (172.16.1.210) and only host1 can ping
>>> the engine.
>>>
>>> As far as my network knowledge goes, to make the engine available from
>>> the outside of host1 I would need to use a third nic or to use some device
>>> to associate the ip and MAC address of the engine’s nic.
>>>
>> Ciao Matteo,
>> no, hosted-engine-setup should create a bridge for you.
>> No need to do custom configuration to expose your VMs.
>>
>> Are you trying on bare metal or on VMs with the engine VM as a nested VM?
>>
>
> Ciao Simone,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> My lab is a nested environmet. I installed ovirt on bare metal with the
> engine on another machine. On this setup i have 6 VMs:
>
> - 172.16.1.1  pfSense as firewall/gateway
> - 172.16.1.10  a windows 2016 used as network guest
> - 172.16.1.12  a nethserver installation as DNS server ( also on
> 172.16.2.12 )
> - the three ovirt-nodes as i described on my e-mail
>
> All the machines are pingable, only the engine inside host 1 is
> unreachable and can ping only host1.
>

OK, your issue is caused by vdsm-no-mac-spoofing filter on your L1 VMs.
Please create a custom vNic profile on your external oVirt engine setting
the "network filter" field to "no network filter".
Now you can edit your ovirt-node VMs setting the network profile of the
nics you are going to use for the management bridge to the profile with "no
network filter".
You have to shutdown and restart your ovirt-node VMs and then you could
retry the deployment.



>
>
> Cheers
>
> Matteo
>
>
>>
>>> I’ve looked around over the internet for a solution but every how-to
>>> I’ve found follows the same steps of Jason’s.  I’ve also already asked
>>> for help to Jason.
>>>
>>> Anyone could help me to solve this issue?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matteo
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [ovirt-users] Self-Hosted engine 4.1.7 unavailable from the outside of the host

2017-12-18 Thread Matteo Capuano
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Simone Tiraboschi 
wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Matteo Capuano 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone, my name’s Matteo and I’m a new oVirt user.
>>
>> I’m trying to install the gluster hyperconverged solution in a lab
>> environment following the How-To wrote by Jason Brooks:
>>
>> https://ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4.
>> 1-and-gluster-storage/
>>
>> Sadly, I cannot understand how to configure the network on the
>> self-hosted engine and I’m unable to make it available from outside the
>> host.
>>
>> As written in the HowTo I created three hosts (ovirt-note 4.1.7) each one
>> with two nics, one for gluster and one for management, the network is a
>> static LAN with FQDN resolvable (also reverse) by a local DNS. Here the
>> details:
>>
>> Gateway: 172.16.1.1
>>
>> DNS: 172.16.1.12
>>
>> Host1: 172.16.1.210 (management) – 172.16.2.210 (gluster)
>>
>> Host2: 172.16.1.220 (management) – 172.16.2.220 (gluster)
>>
>> Host3: 172.16.1.230 (management) – 172.16.2.230 (gluster)
>>
>> Engine: 172.16.1.200
>>
>> When installing the engine I choose to brigde the management’s nic
>> (172.16.1.210) of host1 but, once the installation is completed, I'm unable
>> to reach the engine from the LAN where the hosts are connected. The engine
>> (172.16.1.200) can ping only host1 (172.16.1.210) and only host1 can ping
>> the engine.
>>
>> As far as my network knowledge goes, to make the engine available from
>> the outside of host1 I would need to use a third nic or to use some device
>> to associate the ip and MAC address of the engine’s nic.
>>
> Ciao Matteo,
> no, hosted-engine-setup should create a bridge for you.
> No need to do custom configuration to expose your VMs.
>
> Are you trying on bare metal or on VMs with the engine VM as a nested VM?
>

Ciao Simone,

thank you for your answer.

My lab is a nested environmet. I installed ovirt on bare metal with the
engine on another machine. On this setup i have 6 VMs:

- 172.16.1.1  pfSense as firewall/gateway
- 172.16.1.10  a windows 2016 used as network guest
- 172.16.1.12  a nethserver installation as DNS server ( also on
172.16.2.12 )
- the three ovirt-nodes as i described on my e-mail

All the machines are pingable, only the engine inside host 1 is unreachable
and can ping only host1.


Cheers

Matteo


>
>> I’ve looked around over the internet for a solution but every how-to I’ve
>> found follows the same steps of Jason’s.  I’ve also already asked for
>> help to Jason.
>>
>> Anyone could help me to solve this issue?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>>
>> Matteo
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users