Re: [ovirt-users] disk copy exception
On Jan 26, 2018 2:13 PM, "Donny Davis"wrote: So when I run a copy operation it is successful. Move and export do not work. Can you please file a bug with all details, such as logs and version used? Thanks, Y. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Donny Davis wrote: > When I try to do it via the API I get a more descriptive response > Cannot export Virtual Disk. Disk configuration (${volumeFormat} > ${volumeType}) is incompatible with the storage domain type. > > Makes sense, it was imported from 4.1 > > So now the question is how can I fix this storage domain > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Donny Davis wrote: > >> I am trying to copy a disk that was from a storage domain that was >> imported from 4.1 to a newer storage domain and this exception is thrown in >> the UI >> >> >> Uncaught exception occurred. Please try reloading the page. Details: >> Exception caught: (TypeError) : Cannot read property 'g' of null >> Please have your administrator check the UI logs >> > > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Basic parts for rebuilding ovirt server
Kinda pleased with the way the restore went. Sucks that my backups weren't working like I thought. I did an engine backup, complete about a day before I lost data. Are these the basic steps: 1. Reinstall CentOS (whatever OS you used) 2. Update all packages 3. Install ovirt 4. Engine restore 5. Engine setup That gets you a basic ovirt server with your previous settings. My problem: Storage domains are gone along with the vms. How do I remove the VM's and storage domains that way I can recreate them? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail mobile___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Bad hd? or?
Looks like the HD went bad. I was able to restore from backups which were...20 days old. :-/ Nice. Looks like my backup process hd issues and I never realized it. Got it all sorted out. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. Original Message On January 26, 2018 6:18 PM, Christopher Coxwrote: >checked /etc/mtab ? > > On 01/26/2018 06:10 PM, Alex Bartonek wrote: >>I'm stumped. >>I powercycled my server on accident and I cannot mount my data drive. I >> was getting buffer i/o errors but finally was able to boot up by >> disabling automount in fstab. >>I cannot mount my ext4 drive. Anything else I can check? >>root@blitzen t]# dmesg|grep sdb >> [ 1.714138] sd 2:1:0:1: [sdb] 585871964 512-byte logical blocks: (299 >> GB/279 GiB) >> [ 1.714275] sd 2:1:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off >> [ 1.714279] sd 2:1:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 6b 00 00 08 >> [ 1.714623] sd 2:1:0:1: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: >> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA >> [ 1.750400] sdb: sdb1 >> [ 1.750969] sd 2:1:0:1: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk >> [ 443.936794] sdb: sdb1 >> [ 452.519482] sdb: sdb1 >>sdb 8:16 0 279.4G 0 disk >> ├─sdb1 8:17 0 279.4G 0 part >> └─3600508b10010343132202020202a 253:3 0 279.4G 0 mpath >> └─3600508b10010343132202020202a1 253:4 0 279.4G 0 part >>[root@blitzen t]# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/ovirt_data/ >> mount: /dev/sdb1 is already mounted or /mnt/ovirt_data busy >> [root@blitzen t]# mount|grep sdb >> [root@blitzen t]# >>Thanks in advance. >> >>Users mailing list >>Users@ovirt.org >>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >Users mailing list >Users@ovirt.org >http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Has meltdown impacted glusterFS performance?
On Jan 26, 2018 7:52 PM, "Arman Khalatyan"wrote: I believe about 50% overhead or even more... Where are you getting these numbers from? We've seen much lower numbers. It is processor dependent, so newer are less affected as older CPUs. Also, keep in mimd that additional patches are expected that will bring back some of the performance. Y. Am 26.01.2018 7:40 nachm. schrieb "Christopher Cox" : > Does it matter? This is just one of those required things. IMHO, most > companies know there will be impact, and I would think they would accept > any informational measurement after the fact. > > There are probably only a few cases where timing is so limited to where a > skew would matter. > > Just saying... > > > On 01/26/2018 11:48 AM, Jayme wrote: > >> I've been considering hyperconverged oVirt setup VS san/nas but I wonder >> how the meltdown patches have affected glusterFS performance since it is >> CPU intensive. Has anyone who has applied recent kernel updates noticed a >> performance drop with glusterFS? >> >> >> >> ___ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users