On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Marcelo Leandro
wrote:
> Hello,
> I am try update the cluster level but i had this menssage erro:
>
> Erro durante a execução da ação: Update of cluster compatibility version
> failed because there are VMs/Templates [VPS-NAME01, VPS-NAME02, VPS-NAME03]
> with inc
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Sven Achtelik wrote:
> It looks like I can't get a chance to shut down the HA VMs. I check the
> restore log and it did mention that it change the HA-VM entries. Just to make
> sure I looked at the DB and for the vms in question it looks like this.
>
> engine=#
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Adam Chesterton
wrote:
> Hi Sahina and Yedidyah,
>
> Thanks for the information and offers of help. I am pleased to report that
> I've resolved the issue I had, thanks to the prompting your requests gave
> me, and everything is functional. I shall attempt to explai
Hi Alex,
How did you cancel the uploads?
Can you please attach the engine log so we can see what happened there?
Thanks,
Idan
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Alex K wrote:
> After 48 hours it seems the issue has been resolved.
> No disks are shown with status "Transferring via API"
>
> Alex
I have 2 or 3 node clusters with following hardware (all with self-hosted
engine) :
2 node cluster:
RAM: 64 GB per host
CPU: 8 cores per host
Storage: 4x 1TB SAS in RAID10
NIC: 2x Gbit
VMs: 20
The above, although I would like to have had a third NIC for gluster
storage redundancy, it is running s
Hi, Konstantin.What “multipath -ll” command says? Execute on every node that have access to the SAN.Is any zoning on SAN fabrics?--Отправлено из мобильной Яндекс.Почты24.03.2018, 14:38, "Стаценко Константин Юрьевич" :
Anyone ? Any ideas ?
From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun.
On 03/24/2018 01:40 PM, Andy Michielsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I also have done a installation on my host running KVM and I ‘m pretty
> sure my vm’s can only use the 192.168.122.0/24 range if you install
> them with NAT networking when creating them. So that might explain why
> you see that address ap
Hello,
I also have done a installation on my host running KVM and I ‘m pretty sure my
vm’s can only use the 192.168.122.0/24 range if you install them with NAT
networking when creating them. So that might explain why you see that address
appear in your log and also explain why the engine system
Anyone ? Any ideas ?
From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of
Стаценко Константин Юрьевич
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 7:53 PM
To: users
Subject: [ovirt-users] FC LUN
Hello!
Can you, please, help ?
There is a strange error while trying to connect FC LUN from t
Hello Andrei,
Thank you very much for sharing info on your hardware setup. Very informative.
At this moment I have my ovirt engine on our vmware environment which is fine
for good backup and restore.
I have 4 nodes running now all different in make and model with local storage
and it works but
Hi,
I am testing oVirt 4.2, I am using nested KVM for that.
I am using two hypervisors Centos 7 updated and the hosted-Engine
deployment using the ovirt appliance.
For storage I am using iscsi and NFS4
Versions I am using :
ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20180214.1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-hosted-engi
Hi,
HL ProLiant DL380, dual Xeon
120 GB RAID L1 for system
2 TB RAID L10 for VM disks
5 VMs, 3 Linux, 2 Windows
Total CPU load most of the time is low, high level of activity related
to disk.
Host engine under KVM appliance on SuSE, can be easily moved, backed up,
copied, experimented with, etc.
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the place to be asking this but I was wondering which
hardware you all are using and why in order for me to see what I would be
needing.
I would like to set up a HA cluster consisting off 3 hosts to be able to run 30
vm’s.
The engine, I can run on an other server. T
I would go with at least 4 HDDs per host in RAID 10. Then focus on network
performance where bottleneck usualy is for gluster.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018, 00:44 Jayme wrote:
> Do you feel that SSDs are worth the extra cost or am I better off using
> regular HDDs? I'm looking for the best performanc
14 matches
Mail list logo
