[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to hot-plug disk

2018-08-04 Thread Raz Tamir
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Punaatua PK wrote: > Hello Raz, > > yes i saw this bug. But the problem doesn't seem to be the same. I search > on google with qemu + write lock > but didn't find anything. > Take a look at this - https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1740364 > > Do you know the c

[ovirt-users] Re: disk_vm_element ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pk_disk_vm_element"

2018-08-04 Thread Raz Tamir
Adding Tal for further assistance On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Punaatua PK wrote: > Hi Raz, > > yes i saw this bug. But I was focusing on the opération that leads to it > which is not the same as me. I'm not very familiar with bugzilla. > > No solution for the moment for this bug ? >

[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to hot-plug disk

2018-08-04 Thread Punaatua PK
Hello Raz, yes i saw this bug. But the problem doesn't seem to be the same. I search on google with qemu + write lock but didn't find anything. Do you know the command launch by this opération ? qemu-img ? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To u

[ovirt-users] Re: disk_vm_element ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pk_disk_vm_element"

2018-08-04 Thread Punaatua PK
Hi Raz, yes i saw this bug. But I was focusing on the opération that leads to it which is not the same as me. I'm not very familiar with bugzilla. No solution for the moment for this bug ? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send a

[ovirt-users] Re: disk_vm_element ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pk_disk_vm_element"

2018-08-04 Thread Raz Tamir
Hi Punaatua, A simple google search shows you hit this bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562093. Ignore the operation (in the bug) that leads to it, but this is the same issue On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Punaatua PK wrote: > Hello, > > when i tried to attach a snapshot disk

[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to hot-plug disk

2018-08-04 Thread Raz Tamir
Hi Punaatua, This looks like a bug, please submit it. You can have a look at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469235 which is very similar issue with hotplug __ Raz Tamir Manager, RHV QE On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 09:13 Punaatua PK wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem when i

[ovirt-users] disk_vm_element ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pk_disk_vm_element"

2018-08-04 Thread Punaatua PK
Hello, when i tried to attach a snapshot disk into my backupvm. oVirt doesn't want to attach it. In the engine.log I can see this. 2018-08-04 19:20:04,472-10 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.AttachDiskToVmCommand] (default task-33) [646ad7a1-4501-4648-a937-bbee0abaec46] Command '

[ovirt-users] Failed to hot-plug disk

2018-08-04 Thread Punaatua PK
Hello, I have a problem when i tried to hotplug a disk to a VM. Here is the situation. We use a VM (let's call this backupVM) which is responsible of doing our VM backup by : - Making a snapshot of the VM we want to backup - Attach the snapshot disk - Make the copy using DD - Unplug the snapshot

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread Jayme
Yes the volume options can be changed on the fly post creation no problem. Good luck! On Sat, Aug 4, 2018, 11:23 AM William Dossett, wrote: > Hey, thanks! Good catch! Going to have to take a look at that, will be > working on it this weekend.. hopefully we can do this post creation. > > > > Th

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread William Dossett
Interesting… is it doing encryption by default? That could slow it down for sure… From: Jayme Sent: Saturday, August 4, 2018 7:37 AM To: Sahina Bose Cc: users Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance Scratch that, there are actually a couple subtle changes,

[ovirt-users] Re: Datacenter of several Hosts with Local Storage ? (share Logical Network)

2018-08-04 Thread William Dossett
Hi, I'm not sure but this sounds like you want to do Hyper-Converged infrastructure, HCI... so a cluster of hosts with local storage... There are a few of us working on testing this now. If this is what you are looking for I would highly advise looking at https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread William Dossett
Hey, thanks! Good catch! Going to have to take a look at that, will be working on it this weekend.. hopefully we can do this post creation. Thanks again Bill From: Jayme Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 5:56 PM To: William Dossett Cc: users Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Tuning and tes

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread Jayme
Scratch that, there are actually a couple subtle changes, I did a diff to compare: < server.allow-insecure: on 29c27 < network.remote-dio: enable --- > network.remote-dio: off On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Jayme wrote: > One more interesting thing to note. As a test I just re-ran DD on engi

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread Jayme
One more interesting thing to note. As a test I just re-ran DD on engine VM and got around 3-5MB/sec average writes. I had not previous set this volume to optimize for virt store. So I went ahead and set that option and now I'm getting 50MB/sec writes. However, if I compare my gluster engine vo

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread Jayme
One more note on this. I only set optimize for virt on data volumes. I did not and wasn't sure if I should set on engine volume. My DD tests on engine VM are writing at ~8Mb/sec (like my test VM on data volume was before I made the change). Is it recommended to use the optimize for virt on the

[ovirt-users] Re: Tuning and testing GlusterFS performance

2018-08-04 Thread Jayme
Interesting that it should have been set by cockpit but seemingly wasn't (at least it did not appear so in my case, as setting optimize for virt increased performance dramatically). I did indeed use the cockpit to deploy. I was using ovirt node on all three host, recent download/burn of 4.2.5. H