[ovirt-users] Re: task was finished but not cleared

2018-10-15 Thread Simone Tiraboschi 
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:55 AM Marcelo Leandro 
wrote:

> Hello,
> In my spm I have some tasks list, but i dont have any task run now:
>
> vdsm-client Host getAllTasks
> {
> "97a40174-f443-4953-ae3c-f2662aa3f915": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "97a40174-f443-4953-ae3c-f2662aa3f915"
> },
> "2b7e9a47-6fed-4491-b2d7-a91b44d8b1c5": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "2b7e9a47-6fed-4491-b2d7-a91b44d8b1c5"
> },
> "45ec3b64-f972-4a22-ae2e-0d66b98022fd": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 201,
> "state": "recovered",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "Volume does not exist:
> (u'006acce5-a6f5-4cd8-af3f-6584339a9021',)",
> "id": "45ec3b64-f972-4a22-ae2e-0d66b98022fd"
> },
> "d6189787-d0b0-49ac-b31c-2bac6af87fff": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "d6189787-d0b0-49ac-b31c-2bac6af87fff"
> },
> "4cc71cd0-3b5f-4014-97fd-e1b6e7d6b859": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "4cc71cd0-3b5f-4014-97fd-e1b6e7d6b859"
> },
> "0afbc6ca-9ebf-4106-8d09-e73dd6d53e06": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 201,
> "state": "recovered",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "Volume does not exist:
> (u'86391e6a-6932-483a-af24-a29bf1430ac1',)",
> "id": "0afbc6ca-9ebf-4106-8d09-e73dd6d53e06"
> },
> "b097af0d-b6fc-45c1-8e0a-ebef1c127025": {
> "verb": "sdm_merge",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "sdm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "b097af0d-b6fc-45c1-8e0a-ebef1c127025"
> },
> "ea9cf7c0-6f8c-4479-ae7e-2ef2b43b5a8e": {
> "verb": "sdm_update_volume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "sdm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "ea9cf7c0-6f8c-4479-ae7e-2ef2b43b5a8e"
> },
> "dd8aa378-04a7-4f89-9e06-10e50e995d55": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "dd8aa378-04a7-4f89-9e06-10e50e995d55"
> },
> "f4ae1499-8188-4ce9-ae81-a1bc54041a1e": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "f4ae1499-8188-4ce9-ae81-a1bc54041a1e"
> },
> "e7922e32-62f0-474e-b4ba-894a3fcf1aed": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "e7922e32-62f0-474e-b4ba-894a3fcf1aed"
> },
> "a379a1d1-1c03-40ce-af81-c501ee9ab7f4": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "a379a1d1-1c03-40ce-af81-c501ee9ab7f4"
> },
> "dc18f21a-5b03-4265-8a76-ce2f4241cda9": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "dc18f21a-5b03-4265-8a76-ce2f4241cda9"
> },
> "116a32e9-0183-44f0-81fc-170389a32145": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "116a32e9-0183-44f0-81fc-170389a32145"
> },
> "f7c94903-e88c-4f39-930f-e3c73b8dd611": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
> "id": "f7c94903-e88c-4f39-930f-e3c73b8dd611"
> },
> "b7a54f89-474b-4084-8183-10647fdbc621": {
> "verb": "deleteVolume",
> "code": 0,
> "state": "finished",
> "tag": "spm",
> "result": "",
> "message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
>

[ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt

2018-10-15 Thread Hari Prasanth Loganathan 
Hi Team,

Affinity rule is not working as expected, I created a affinity group and
added two VMs and one host (say TestHost2) (NOTE : two hosts available)
with following configuration

   "enforcing": "true",
"hosts_rule": {
"enabled": "true",
"enforcing": "true",
"positive": "false"
},
"positive": "true",
"vms_rule": {
"enabled": "true",
"enforcing": "true",
"positive": "true"
},

But both the VMs are coming up in TestHost1, Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Hari









On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:05 PM Martin Sivak  wrote:

> > I have found that migration doesn't  work when using
> vms_rule Enforcing Hard.
> > Scenario vms in an affinity group with Enforcing Hard no host members
> when trying to migrate vms it comes back with no host to migrate to even
> when selecting all vms in the affinity group.
>
> Yes you are right, the engine checks one by one. We do not support
> group migration in the scheduler. It was never considered important
> enough to offset the development costs (the internal architecture
> would have to change significantly). The workaround is to relax the
> affinity rule a bit first, do the migration and restore the affinity
> rule.
>
> Martin Sivak
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Staniforth, Paul
>  wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have found that migration doesn't  work when using
> vms_rule Enforcing Hard.
> > Scenario vms in an affinity group with Enforcing Hard no host members
> when trying to migrate vms it comes back with no host to migrate to even
> when selecting all vms in the affinity group.
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Paul S.
> > 
> > From: Martin Sivak 
> > Sent: 15 October 2018 09:43
> > To: Darrell Budic
> > Cc: Ovirt Users
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host
> affinity?
> >
> > - VM - VM rule expresses the relationship of all running VMs from the
> > specified list to each other.
> > - VM - Host rule describes the relationship of all running VMs from
> > the list to the selected hosts
> >
> >> Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in case of failure of host running
> the VMs?
> >
> > VMs that are not up are not considered by scheduler. So it will
> > (assuming those are highly available VMs) start the first VM somewhere
> > and then the second VM will be started at the same host where the
> > first one is running.
> >
> >> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet
> those
> >> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running
> where if
> >> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on
> different
> >> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> It also won’t make
> >> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from
> what
> >> I can tel.
> >
> > It will try that too, but rather less aggressively.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Martin Sivak
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Darrell Budic 
> wrote:
> >> VM to VM affinity will try and run the VMs on the same host if
> positive, and
> >> different hosts if negative.
> >>
> >> VM to Host affinity will try and run the VM on a specific set of Hosts
> if
> >> positive, and not on those hosts if negative.
> >>
> >> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet
> those
> >> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running
> where if
> >> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on
> different
> >> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM. It also won’t make
> >> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from
> what
> >> I can tel.
> >>
> >> On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Team,
> >>
> >> I tried to follow up the affinity rules using this tutorial :
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs_5BSqacWE but I have few
> clarifications in
> >> it.,
> >>
> >> 1) I understand the VM to VM affinity, It means both the individual VMs
> >> needs to run on a single common host, Say I have 2 hosts, so what
> happens in
> >> case of failure of host running the VMs?
> >> 2)  If I create a affinity group and I get the following data,
> >> i) What is host rule / vms rule - enabled, enforcing and
> >> positive ?
> >>
> >>   "enforcing": "true",
> >> "hosts_rule": {
> >> "enabled": "true",
> >> "enforcing": "true",
> >> "positive": "false"
> >> },
> >> "vms_rule": {
> >> "enabled": "false",
> >> "enforcing": "true",
> >> "positive": "false"
> >> }
> >>
> >> 3) What is the differ

[ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt

2018-10-15 Thread Staniforth, Paul 
Hello,
I have found that migration doesn't  work when using vms_rule 
Enforcing Hard.
Scenario vms in an affinity group with Enforcing Hard no host members when 
trying to migrate vms it comes back with no host to migrate to even when 
selecting all vms in the affinity group.

Regards,
  Paul S.

From: Martin Sivak 
Sent: 15 October 2018 09:43
To: Darrell Budic
Cc: Ovirt Users
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt

Hi,

> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?

- VM - VM rule expresses the relationship of all running VMs from the
specified list to each other.
- VM - Host rule describes the relationship of all running VMs from
the list to the selected hosts

> Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in case of failure of host running the 
> VMs?

VMs that are not up are not considered by scheduler. So it will
(assuming those are highly available VMs) start the first VM somewhere
and then the second VM will be started at the same host where the
first one is running.

> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM.

Correct.

> It also won’t make
> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
> I can tel.

It will try that too, but rather less aggressively.


Best regards

Martin Sivak

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Darrell Budic  wrote:
> VM to VM affinity will try and run the VMs on the same host if positive, and
> different hosts if negative.
>
> VM to Host affinity will try and run the VM on a specific set of Hosts if
> positive, and not on those hosts if negative.
>
> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM. It also won’t make
> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
> I can tel.
>
> On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I tried to follow up the affinity rules using this tutorial :
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs_5BSqacWE but I have few clarifications in
> it.,
>
> 1) I understand the VM to VM affinity, It means both the individual VMs
> needs to run on a single common host, Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in
> case of failure of host running the VMs?
> 2)  If I create a affinity group and I get the following data,
> i) What is host rule / vms rule - enabled, enforcing and
> positive ?
>
>   "enforcing": "true",
> "hosts_rule": {
> "enabled": "true",
> "enforcing": "true",
> "positive": "false"
> },
> "vms_rule": {
> "enabled": "false",
> "enforcing": "true",
> "positive": "false"
> }
>
> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?
>
> Doc's are not very clear, so please any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER - MSysTechnologies LLC
>
>
> This email message, contents and its attachments may contain confidential,
> proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is actually intended. If you have
> erroneously received this message, please permanently delete it immediately
> and notify the sender. If you are not the intended recipient of the email
> message,you are notified strictly not to disseminate,distribute or copy this
> e-mail.E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, incomplete
> or contain viruses and MSysTechnologies LLC accepts no liability for the
> contents and integrity of this mail or for any damage caused by the
> limitations of the e-mail transmission.
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ST35SIO45EO647BJKUVCUZQBRSAHAUSA/
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt

[ovirt-users] How do you install oVirt Hyperconverged with six or nine nodes instead of the default three nodes?

2018-10-15 Thread Ravi Chalasani 
Already have working three node 4.2.5 HA cluster in the lab using this guide: 
https://ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4.1-and-gluster-storage/.

Now I would like to test a six or nine node cluster mentioned in the RHHI 1.1 
guide. Is there some doc I am missing?

Thanks
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/HJKCQVJGI3M3Y6QKBW75AGUVRBRRBHR3/

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt - in docker

2018-10-15 Thread Staniforth, Paul 
Thanks Greg,

  I'll see if I can try it sometime today.


Regards,

  Paul S.


From: Greg Sheremeta 
Sent: 13 October 2018 16:33
To: Staniforth, Paul
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: ovirt - in docker

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM Greg Sheremeta 
mailto:gsher...@redhat.com>> wrote:
I'm in the process of updating that. (It's not related to OP's question.)

Done.
Note the new location, ovirtwebui
docker run --rm -it -e ENGINE_URL=https://[ENGINE.FQDN]/ovirt-engine -p 
3000:3000 ovirtwebui/ovirt-web-ui


On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:40 AM Staniforth, Paul 
mailto:p.stanifo...@leedsbeckett.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hello,

  do you know the situation with ovirt-web-ui and docker  
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-web-ui the last time I tried the docker 
instructions in the quick run section the latest released version was an old 
version and the most recent image was even older.


Thanks,

Paul S.


From: Sandro Bonazzola mailto:sbona...@redhat.com>>
Sent: 12 October 2018 09:18
To: Roman Mohr; Martin Perina
Cc: re.search.it@gmail.com; users
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: ovirt - in docker



Il giorno ven 12 ott 2018 alle ore 09:06 Roman Mohr 
mailto:rm...@redhat.com>> ha scritto:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM ReSearchIT Eng
mailto:re.search.it@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I am interested to run ovirt in docker container.
> It was noticed that there is an official repo for it:
> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-container-engine

Yaniv Bronheim mostly worked on it when the repo was moved to oVirt.

Sandro,  Simone, since he is now working on other things, do you guys
know anything about plans for updating the repo?

No. Martin?



Best Regards,

Roman

> Unfortunately it did not get an update for 2 years (4.1).
>
> Can anyone help with the required answers/entrypoint/patch files for
> the new 4.2 ?
>
> Thanks!
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 
> users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: 
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/C66CSW7CY7RCTC56V5YNSZ6KQKHLADIS/


--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA

sbona...@redhat.com

[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]
[http://images.engage.redhat.com/EloquaImages/clients/RedHat/%7B98cb2f7e-01c6-4d72-b84d-99545fa13c39%7D_RH_OSD_ITALY_Banner_350x50_esign.png]
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to:-
http://disclaimer.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.html

___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/OXJUNLHVCEU4S7NAU2HCRMPUKYOBBS62/


--

GREG SHEREMETA

SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX

Red Hat NA



gsher...@redhat.comIRC: gshereme

[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]


--

GREG SHEREMETA

SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX

Red Hat NA



gsher...@redhat.comIRC: gshereme

[https://www.redhat.com/files/brand/email/sig-redhat.png]
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to:-
http://disclaimer.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.html
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4WNXTY5ARK3U2BNLGQYCBYCWGUCHXEPT/

[ovirt-users] task was finished but not cleared

2018-10-15 Thread Marcelo Leandro 
Hello,
In my spm I have some tasks list, but i dont have any task run now:

vdsm-client Host getAllTasks
{
"97a40174-f443-4953-ae3c-f2662aa3f915": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "97a40174-f443-4953-ae3c-f2662aa3f915"
},
"2b7e9a47-6fed-4491-b2d7-a91b44d8b1c5": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "2b7e9a47-6fed-4491-b2d7-a91b44d8b1c5"
},
"45ec3b64-f972-4a22-ae2e-0d66b98022fd": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 201,
"state": "recovered",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "Volume does not exist:
(u'006acce5-a6f5-4cd8-af3f-6584339a9021',)",
"id": "45ec3b64-f972-4a22-ae2e-0d66b98022fd"
},
"d6189787-d0b0-49ac-b31c-2bac6af87fff": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "d6189787-d0b0-49ac-b31c-2bac6af87fff"
},
"4cc71cd0-3b5f-4014-97fd-e1b6e7d6b859": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "4cc71cd0-3b5f-4014-97fd-e1b6e7d6b859"
},
"0afbc6ca-9ebf-4106-8d09-e73dd6d53e06": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 201,
"state": "recovered",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "Volume does not exist:
(u'86391e6a-6932-483a-af24-a29bf1430ac1',)",
"id": "0afbc6ca-9ebf-4106-8d09-e73dd6d53e06"
},
"b097af0d-b6fc-45c1-8e0a-ebef1c127025": {
"verb": "sdm_merge",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "sdm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "b097af0d-b6fc-45c1-8e0a-ebef1c127025"
},
"ea9cf7c0-6f8c-4479-ae7e-2ef2b43b5a8e": {
"verb": "sdm_update_volume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "sdm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "ea9cf7c0-6f8c-4479-ae7e-2ef2b43b5a8e"
},
"dd8aa378-04a7-4f89-9e06-10e50e995d55": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "dd8aa378-04a7-4f89-9e06-10e50e995d55"
},
"f4ae1499-8188-4ce9-ae81-a1bc54041a1e": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "f4ae1499-8188-4ce9-ae81-a1bc54041a1e"
},
"e7922e32-62f0-474e-b4ba-894a3fcf1aed": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "e7922e32-62f0-474e-b4ba-894a3fcf1aed"
},
"a379a1d1-1c03-40ce-af81-c501ee9ab7f4": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "a379a1d1-1c03-40ce-af81-c501ee9ab7f4"
},
"dc18f21a-5b03-4265-8a76-ce2f4241cda9": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "dc18f21a-5b03-4265-8a76-ce2f4241cda9"
},
"116a32e9-0183-44f0-81fc-170389a32145": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "116a32e9-0183-44f0-81fc-170389a32145"
},
"f7c94903-e88c-4f39-930f-e3c73b8dd611": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "f7c94903-e88c-4f39-930f-e3c73b8dd611"
},
"b7a54f89-474b-4084-8183-10647fdbc621": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "b7a54f89-474b-4084-8183-10647fdbc621"
},
"b8cb5b2f-a1cf-475d-9c29-00cf3f836830": {
"verb": "deleteVolume",
"code": 0,
"state": "finished",
"tag": "spm",
"result": "",
"message": "1 jobs completed successfully",
"id": "b8cb5b2f-a1cf-475d-9c29-00cf3f836830"
},
"2978fc77-15e8

[ovirt-users] JIra upgraded, all other Atlassian apps now broken

2018-10-15 Thread Soujanya Bargavi 
I got a notice that our Atlassian Jira 7.1 introduce was EOL, and I should 
refresh. I read the particular refresh rules, (for example, making a 
reinforcement of the database). In any case, the procedure was a total fiasco 
which required two server reboots to get it settled - the overhaul notes 
neglected to say that the Postgres database ought to be refreshed past 9.1, 
while Debian 8 stays on 9.1. 

I think I recuperated the framework. Jira discovers its introduce dir once 
more, it discovers its home catalog once more, it discovers its database once 
more (counting our issues and essentially, our usernames and passwords). 
Regardless I have to physically begin it, as the init content doesn't work. In 
any case, I don't surmise that is the issue. 

Presently while we can sign in to Jira once more, there's a little issue. We 
had connected FishEye, Crucible, Bamboo and Confluence to Jira. In Jira I can 
see that I am as yet an individual from bamboo-administrator and intersection 
heads. With the goal that bit looks half OK, FishEye/Crucible is absent. 

Be that as it may, the "Application Links" for all connected applications are 
broken, and I can't sign in to any of those. There appear to be 2 related 
issues: 

On account of FishEye/Crubile, there are 5 clients characterized, out of the 10 
we have in Jira. Those simply happen to be non-administrator accounts. Most are 
from representatives that left, and those records are obviously crippled in 
Jira. Subsequently, I can't sign in any longer. Also, I can't include myself 
(Starter Edition restrain). 

On account of Bamboo and Crucible, I can't sign in either. The Starter Edition 
restrict is the 10 clients, same as Jira https://goo.gl/bwWJRi, so this can't 
be indistinguishable issue from FishEye/Crucible. Bu I can't see which clients 
are known to Bamboo promotion Crucible without signing in. 

Bamboo shows that are robotized fabricates are as yet running, so it too 
approaches its database. A snappy psql to be sure demonstrates all databases to 
be available. Also, Bamboo's USERS table contains ONLY bamboo-administrator, 
while Jira demonstrates me as an individual from bamboo-administrator. 

My doubt, yet that is just a hunch, is this is identified with some "OAuth" 
setting for application connecting. There is an "Investigate" interface on the 
connected application page, however it just gives "OAuth investigating guide - 
Page Not Found" 

I do have root access to the Linux have, so I can settle things from the order 
line. What do I have to do to re-empower logins to the connected applications 
given that I can't login to them specifically?
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LPEOKJKZ7F2JYCW6EVHDU7GAK2GUU7V2/

[ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt

2018-10-15 Thread Martin Sivak 
> I have found that migration doesn't  work when using vms_rule 
> Enforcing Hard.
> Scenario vms in an affinity group with Enforcing Hard no host members when 
> trying to migrate vms it comes back with no host to migrate to even when 
> selecting all vms in the affinity group.

Yes you are right, the engine checks one by one. We do not support
group migration in the scheduler. It was never considered important
enough to offset the development costs (the internal architecture
would have to change significantly). The workaround is to relax the
affinity rule a bit first, do the migration and restore the affinity
rule.

Martin Sivak

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Staniforth, Paul
 wrote:
> Hello,
> I have found that migration doesn't  work when using vms_rule 
> Enforcing Hard.
> Scenario vms in an affinity group with Enforcing Hard no host members when 
> trying to migrate vms it comes back with no host to migrate to even when 
> selecting all vms in the affinity group.
>
> Regards,
>   Paul S.
> 
> From: Martin Sivak 
> Sent: 15 October 2018 09:43
> To: Darrell Budic
> Cc: Ovirt Users
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt
>
> Hi,
>
>> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?
>
> - VM - VM rule expresses the relationship of all running VMs from the
> specified list to each other.
> - VM - Host rule describes the relationship of all running VMs from
> the list to the selected hosts
>
>> Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in case of failure of host running the 
>> VMs?
>
> VMs that are not up are not considered by scheduler. So it will
> (assuming those are highly available VMs) start the first VM somewhere
> and then the second VM will be started at the same host where the
> first one is running.
>
>> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
>> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
>> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
>> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM.
>
> Correct.
>
>> It also won’t make
>> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
>> I can tel.
>
> It will try that too, but rather less aggressively.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Martin Sivak
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Darrell Budic  wrote:
>> VM to VM affinity will try and run the VMs on the same host if positive, and
>> different hosts if negative.
>>
>> VM to Host affinity will try and run the VM on a specific set of Hosts if
>> positive, and not on those hosts if negative.
>>
>> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
>> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
>> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
>> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM. It also won’t make
>> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
>> I can tel.
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I tried to follow up the affinity rules using this tutorial :
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs_5BSqacWE but I have few clarifications in
>> it.,
>>
>> 1) I understand the VM to VM affinity, It means both the individual VMs
>> needs to run on a single common host, Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in
>> case of failure of host running the VMs?
>> 2)  If I create a affinity group and I get the following data,
>> i) What is host rule / vms rule - enabled, enforcing and
>> positive ?
>>
>>   "enforcing": "true",
>> "hosts_rule": {
>> "enabled": "true",
>> "enforcing": "true",
>> "positive": "false"
>> },
>> "vms_rule": {
>> "enabled": "false",
>> "enforcing": "true",
>> "positive": "false"
>> }
>>
>> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?
>>
>> Doc's are not very clear, so please any help is appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER - MSysTechnologies LLC
>>
>>
>> This email message, contents and its attachments may contain confidential,
>> proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the
>> use of the individual or entity to whom it is actually intended. If you have
>> erroneously received this message, please permanently delete it immediately
>> and notify the sender. If you are not the intended recipient of the email
>> message,you are notified strictly not to disseminate,distribute or copy this
>> e-mail.E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
>> as Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, incomplete
>> or contain viruses and MSysTechnologies LLC accepts no liability for the
>> contents and

[ovirt-users] Monkey script for copying VM/Host IP address

2018-10-15 Thread rhrazdil 
Hello guys,

I created a simple [Grease, Tamper, Violent, ...]Monkey script that copies IP 
address from clicked element on a page [0].

I believe it may be useful for anyone who often needs to copy IP addresses of 
Hosts/VMs from Ovirt and SSH to them. To use it, just copy-paste
the script to your favourite *Monkey extension or create a new script and use:
// @require 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rhrazdil/MonkeyScripts/master/cfme.js 
to get any future updates.

At this point, it doesn't do more than just copying an IPv4 address, but if you 
have some more ideas, don't hesitate to let me know :).

[0] https://github.com/rhrazdil/MonkeyScripts/blob/master/ipcopy.js

Have a great day,
Radim.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/3YYVQNMCQFUNUKMKTRWOXZ7LJ2DXJ7HG/

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt HE 4.2.6 - Cannot upload a QCOW2 disk image via oVirt Administration Portal

2018-10-15 Thread Aleksey Maksimov 
Hello, Nir

Thank you, we will wait for the release of version 4.2.7.
And special thanks for the workaround.

PS: I was able to load the disk image after I converted it to RAW format
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/EWXXF2MODQOTEDW5WTJS6HGZUP23XUSA/

[ovirt-users] Re: Affinity rules in ovirt

2018-10-15 Thread Martin Sivak 
Hi,

> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?

- VM - VM rule expresses the relationship of all running VMs from the
specified list to each other.
- VM - Host rule describes the relationship of all running VMs from
the list to the selected hosts

> Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in case of failure of host running the 
> VMs?

VMs that are not up are not considered by scheduler. So it will
(assuming those are highly available VMs) start the first VM somewhere
and then the second VM will be started at the same host where the
first one is running.

> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM.

Correct.

> It also won’t make
> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
> I can tel.

It will try that too, but rather less aggressively.


Best regards

Martin Sivak

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Darrell Budic  wrote:
> VM to VM affinity will try and run the VMs on the same host if positive, and
> different hosts if negative.
>
> VM to Host affinity will try and run the VM on a specific set of Hosts if
> positive, and not on those hosts if negative.
>
> Enforcing will keep the scheduler from launching a VM if it can’t meet those
> criteria, and will try and make changes to which hosts are running where if
> it can. If you don’t set it, it will still try and launch VMs on different
> hosts, but if it can’t, it will still launch the VM. It also won’t make
> changes to bring all VMs into compliance with the Affinity rules, from what
> I can tel.
>
> On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I tried to follow up the affinity rules using this tutorial :
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs_5BSqacWE but I have few clarifications in
> it.,
>
> 1) I understand the VM to VM affinity, It means both the individual VMs
> needs to run on a single common host, Say I have 2 hosts, so what happens in
> case of failure of host running the VMs?
> 2)  If I create a affinity group and I get the following data,
> i) What is host rule / vms rule - enabled, enforcing and
> positive ?
>
>   "enforcing": "true",
> "hosts_rule": {
> "enabled": "true",
> "enforcing": "true",
> "positive": "false"
> },
> "vms_rule": {
> "enabled": "false",
> "enforcing": "true",
> "positive": "false"
> }
>
> 3) What is the difference between VM to VM affinity and VM to Host affinity?
>
> Doc's are not very clear, so please any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER - MSysTechnologies LLC
>
>
> This email message, contents and its attachments may contain confidential,
> proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is actually intended. If you have
> erroneously received this message, please permanently delete it immediately
> and notify the sender. If you are not the intended recipient of the email
> message,you are notified strictly not to disseminate,distribute or copy this
> e-mail.E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, incomplete
> or contain viruses and MSysTechnologies LLC accepts no liability for the
> contents and integrity of this mail or for any damage caused by the
> limitations of the e-mail transmission.
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ST35SIO45EO647BJKUVCUZQBRSAHAUSA/
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/GXWG7ICW2YN7HZKWVVMRLO53YAIA5DCI/
>
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/7R6KZVHKVGGTMRLMYKF4PO2GR32QMIXC/

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt - in docker

2018-10-15 Thread Vojtech Juranek 
On neděle 14. října 2018 0:44:22 CEST Vojtech Juranek wrote:
> On pátek 12. října 2018 12:49:03 CEST ReSearchIT Eng wrote:
> > We mainly need a good answers file, while entrypoint might be kept from
> > 4.1, right?
> 
> I looked on it and there are some smaller changes needed. I'll send an
> update soon

patch for oVirt 4.2 for ovirt-container-engine is in gerrit [1]. It works with 
published rmohr/ovirt-postgres (postgres 9.2), but as recommended DB for oVirt 
4.2 is postgres 9.5, you may download patch for 9.5 [2] and build it locally 
(from previous answers it looks like project is not maintained, so review may 
take some time:-)
Let ma know if you spot any issues.
Thanks
Vojta

[1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/94916
[2] https://github.com/rmohr/docker-ovirt-postgres/pull/3

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/SZSNCPHX5DPMLQ247SVY4EMJFP7EUQTV/