ok i will try that. ive been using ovirt since 3.4 and we are using san
storage, and we have hosted engine with nfs. this is my first time using
gluster.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, 12:42 Parth Dhanjal, wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Storage connection: 10.33.50.33/VOL1
> Do check if this mount point is correct. Yo
Hey!
Storage connection: 10.33.50.33/VOL1
Do check if this mount point is correct. You can look for mount points
through your server terminal
Mount Option:backup-volfile-servers=<>
In case you don't have a 3rd host, I'll recommend adding one to the
cluster. Having a replica 2 volume can cause a sp
nope i didnt since i dont know what parameters i will input.. could you
help me
so i have this gluster with replica 2 configuration
10.33.50.33:/VOL1VOL1
10.33.50.34:/VOL1/VOL1
thanks
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:09 PM Parth Dhanjal wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Did you input a mount point?
> It seems from
Hey!
Did you input a mount point?
It seems from the error message that either the mount point was missing or
was wrong.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:07 AM Ariez Ahito
wrote:
> HI guys, i have installed ovirt 4.4 hosted engine and a separate glusterfs
> storage.
> now during hosted engine deploym
HI guys, i have installed ovirt 4.4 hosted engine and a separate glusterfs
storage.
now during hosted engine deployment when i try do choose
STORAGE TYPE: gluster
Storage connection: 10.33.50.33/VOL1
Mount Option:
when i try to connect
this gives me an error:
[ ERROR ] ovirtsdk4.Error: Fault re
Ok it's done bugzilla 1907973, i found this message
"Guest CPU doesn't match specification: missing features: tsx-ctrl
(migration:294)" it's seems you're theory is good.
De: "Arik Hadas"
À: "Lionel Caignec"
Cc: "users"
Envoyé: Mardi 15 Décembre 2020 15:50:26
Objet: Re: [ovirt-users] Re
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 4:41 PM Lionel Caignec wrote:
> Hi Arik,
>
> Yes, my problem about cpu type, seems linked to the fact i've upgraded a
> host in 8.3 before ugprade ovirt in 4.3...
>
> I've done another test, for my problem of vm migration.
> I start a guest directly on the 8.3 nodes then i
Hi Arik,
Yes, my problem about cpu type, seems linked to the fact i've upgraded a host
in 8.3 before ugprade ovirt in 4.3...
I've done another test, for my problem of vm migration.
I start a guest directly on the 8.3 nodes then it can be migrate from/to
8.2/83.
I've also tried to force it t
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 3:29 PM Lionel Caignec wrote:
> Hi
>
> thank you it's work now. All my host 8.2/8.3 are up and running. During
> reactivation of 8.2 host i saw the log line "updating cluster CPU..."
>
Good to see that it works for you now (the credit to Lucia).
So the cluster configurati
Hi
thank you it's work now. All my host 8.2/8.3 are up and running. During
reactivation of 8.2 host i saw the log line "updating cluster CPU..."
I tried to move guest from 8.2 host to 8.3 one but it failed.
Engine.log :
ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.monitoring.VmAnalyzer]
(ForkJo
Hi Lionel,
if you managed to remove the host (or move it to a different cluster) so
that all hosts in your cluster are UP - you could try to put one of your
running hosts to the maintenance and then back to active - the cluster
settings should be updated on the host activation. You can look for th
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:59 PM Alex K wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:43 PM emesika wrote:
>
>> The problem is that the custom fencing configuration is not defined well
>>
>> Please follow [1] and retry
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/engine/custom-fencing.htm
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:43 PM emesika wrote:
> The problem is that the custom fencing configuration is not defined well
>
> Please follow [1] and retry
>
> [1]
> https://www.ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/engine/custom-fencing.html
>
Yes, I followed that.
I cannot see what I am missing:
[ro
Thank you i understand now.
I double checked all my 8.2 host about cababilities and they seems ok.
I think i foudn the source of this "bug".
For this time i've updated one host in 8.3 (the non operative one), and then i
update engine and run engine-setup (with all host up and activated excep
The problem is that the custom fencing configuration is not defined well
Please follow [1] and retry
[1] https://www.ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/engine/custom-fencing.html
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM Alex K wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:34 PM Martin Perina wrote:
>
>>
>>
Unlocked the snapshot, deleted the VM... done!
That was easiser than I thought.
Thanks for your help in any case!
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/pri
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:34 PM Martin Perina wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:18 AM Alex K wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Perina
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> could you please provide engine.log? And also vdsm.log from a host which
>>> was acting as a fence pr
And I should have guessed, that this is only how trouble starts =:-O
I immediately removed the locked snapshot image (actually they pretty much
seemed to disappear by themselves as delete operations might have been pending)
but the VM that was doing the snapshot, is still there, even if the disk
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:18 AM Alex K wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Perina wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> could you please provide engine.log? And also vdsm.log from a host which
>> was acting as a fence proxy?
>>
>
> At proxy host (kvm1) I see the following vdsm.log:
>
> 2020-12
Hi Lionel,
in oVirt 4.4.2 the Secure Intel Cascadelake Server Family was configured to
use the Cascadelake-Server libvirt/qemu CPU. In oVirt 4.4.3, this has been
changed to Cascadelake-Server-noTSX libvirt/qemu CPU (since the TSX was
dropped in 8.3).
The problem you're facing is caused by this tr
Thanks Shani,
I had just found that myself and even managed to unlock and remove the images.
Somehow the reference to https://ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/ seems to
not be available from the ovirt site navigation but now I have discovered it
via another post here and found a treasure trove
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Perina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please provide engine.log? And also vdsm.log from a host which
> was acting as a fence proxy?
>
At proxy host (kvm1) I see the following vdsm.log:
2020-12-15 10:13:03,933+ INFO (jsonrpc/0) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC
Hi All,
and thanks for helping me
So if i does not mistakte, we cannot use anymore cascadelake Server in centos
8.3?
Cluster configuration is Secure CascadeLake Server Family
Here is output of the sql query :
name | cpu_name | cpu_flags | cpu_verb
+--
Hi,
could you please provide engine.log? And also vdsm.log from a host which
was acting as a fence proxy?
Thanks,
Martin
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:23 AM Alex K wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:07 AM Alex K wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:59 PM Strahil Nikolov
>> wrote:
>
you can use:
$ vdsm-client Volume delete (you can use --help to see the params)
After this you'll need to remove the corresponding image manually from
the database images table, mark the parent image as active, remove the
snapshot from the snapshots table and fix the parent snapshot
Be sure to ba
Hi Thomas,
You can use unlock_entity.sh[1] to list the unlock entities and remove them.
[1]
https://www.ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/db-issues/helperutilities.html
*Regards,*
*Shani Leviim*
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:45 AM wrote:
> On one oVirt 4.3 farm I have three locked images I'd li
Il giorno mar 15 dic 2020 alle ore 10:16 jb ha scritto:
>
> Am 15.12.20 um 09:06 schrieb Dana Elfassy:
>
> Yes, I'll edit the title.
>
> Jonathan, you can see in the log you pasted:
> *'task': 'Install Python3 for CentOS/RHEL8 hosts'*, 'task_uuid':
> '00163e33-f845-ee64-acee-0013', 'task_
Hi Lionel,
Thank you for the output from the virsh command. The interesting part is
this:
Cascadelake-Server-noTSX
Cascadelake-Server
The Cascadelake-Server is not usable any more in 8.3 [1] yet that is
what the cluster is probably configured with.
Could you please run the following query for y
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:07 AM Alex K wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:59 PM Strahil Nikolov
> wrote:
>
>> Fence_xvm requires a key is deployed on both the Host and the VMs in
>> order to succeed. What is happening when you use the cli on any of the VMs ?
>> Also, the VMs require an open
Am 15.12.20 um 09:06 schrieb Dana Elfassy:
Yes, I'll edit the title.
Jonathan, you can see in the log you pasted:
*'task': 'Install Python3 for CentOS/RHEL8 hosts'*, 'task_uuid':
'00163e33-f845-ee64-acee-0013', 'task_action': 'yum',
'task_args': '', 'task_path':
'/usr/share/ovirt-eng
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:59 PM Strahil Nikolov
wrote:
> Fence_xvm requires a key is deployed on both the Host and the VMs in order
> to succeed. What is happening when you use the cli on any of the VMs ?
> Also, the VMs require an open tcp port to receive the necessary output of
> each request.I
On one oVirt 4.3 farm I have three locked images I'd like to clear out.
One is an ISO image, that somehow never completed the transfer due to a slow
network. It's occupying little space, except in the GUI where it sticks out and
irritates. I guess it would just be an update somewhere on the Post
I am glad you think so and it works for you. But I'd also guess that you put
more than a partial FTE to the project.
I got attracted via the HCI angle they started pushing as a result of Nutanix
creating a bit of a stir. The ability to use discarded production boxes for a
lab with the flexibili
Also we have begun using OLVM based on tests we conducted with ovirt a while
ago.
Only issue is olvm is currently stuck on 4.3.6 and waiting for oracle to
release updates is a slow process.
Personally I would have liked to use ovirt but apparently using oracle is
better for the Databases.
__
Yes, I'll edit the title.
Jonathan, you can see in the log you pasted:
*'task': 'Install Python3 for CentOS/RHEL8 hosts'*, 'task_uuid':
'00163e33-f845-ee64-acee-0013', 'task_action': 'yum', 'task_args':
'', 'task_path':
'/usr/share/ovirt-engine/ansible-runner-service-project/project/roles/
Hi Strahil,
OpenVZ is winding down, unfortunately. They haven't gone near CentOS8 yet any I
don't see that happen either. It's very unfortunate, because I really loved
that project and I always preferred its container abstraction as well as the
resource management tools, because scale-in is rea
This is what we are planning to do. We made a decision a while ago to start
using oracle Linux as we are already an oracle db house.
We have centos machines and are slowly ditching Ubuntu and Debian.
Moving to OEL is the logical choice.
___
Users mailin
37 matches
Mail list logo
