[ovirt-users] Re: "POSIX storage based vm live migration failed"

Yes, it used to work for me too.  I didn't investigate much further than tracking it down to selinux.  The cephfs client in the new kernel supports selinux security labels.  Since there were no labels before it probably didn't matter.  Now the problem has been revealed.  It might be possible to

[ovirt-users] Re: The he_fqdn proposed for the engine VM resolves on this host - error?

The hosted engine fqdn and IP address should be separate from the hypervisor host's IP address but on the same network so it can communicate to the host through a bridged interface that the installer creates on the hypervisor host for the hosted engine VM. On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:14 PM lejeczek

[ovirt-users] Re: The he_fqdn proposed for the engine VM resolves on this host - error?

There is some issue with the dns. Check the A/ and PTR records are correct for the Hosted Engine . Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В понеделник, 28 декември 2020 г., 22:15:14 Гринуич+2, lejeczek via Users написа: hi chaps, a newcomer here. I use cockpit to deploy hosted engine a

[ovirt-users] Re: New to oVirt - HE and Metric Store Question

I send it unfinished. Another one from Red Hat's Self-Hosted Engine Recommendations: A storage domain dedicated to the Manager virtual machine is created during self-hosted engine deployment. Do not use this storage domain for any other virtual machines. If it's a fresh deployment , it's easier

[ovirt-users] The he_fqdn proposed for the engine VM resolves on this host - error?

hi chaps, a newcomer here. I use cockpit to deploy hosted engine and I get this error/warning message: "The he_fqdn proposed for the engine VM resolves on this host" I should mention that if I remove the IP to which FQDN resolves off that iface(plain eth no vlans) then I get this: [ ERROR

[ovirt-users] Re: New to oVirt - HE and Metric Store Question

I can't recall the exact issue that was reported in the mailing list, but I remember that the user had to power off the engine and the VMs... the Devs can clearly indicate the risks of running the HostedEngine with other VMs on the same storage domain. Based on Red Hat's RHV documentation the f

[ovirt-users] Cannot run yum, no internet connection on a oVirt node

Hello. I need help setting up the networking on the "self hosted engine" VM. I can't run yum in the self-hosted engine [1], there seems not to be any internet connection. I get the error "couldn't resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org. Same thing when I do cURL google.com for example. Also

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.4.4 is now generally available

Currently integration don't need nbd or krbd. Just qemu process. k Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Dec 2020, at 15:28, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:33 PM Konstantin Shalygin wrote: >> >> Sandro, FYI we are not against cinderlib integration, more than we are >> upgrade 4.

[ovirt-users] Re: "POSIX storage based vm live migration failed"

thanks Jeff it's working after disable SELinux but before 4.4.4 i was running everything perfectly with SELinux On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:03 PM Kushwaha, Tarun Kumar < ta...@synergysystemsindia.com> wrote: > i am using CEPHFS > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:18 PM Jeff Bailey wrote: > >> Try sett

[ovirt-users] Re: New to oVirt - HE and Metric Store Question

What kind of situation is that ? If so, how can I migrate my hosted engine into another storage domain ? Regards, Nur Imam Febrianto From: Strahil Nikolov Sent: 29 December 2020 0:31 To: oVirt Users; Nur Imam Febrianto

[ovirt-users] Re: "POSIX storage based vm live migration failed"

i am using CEPHFS On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:18 PM Jeff Bailey wrote: > Try setting selinux to permissive (setenforce 0) on the hosts and try to > migrate again. What kind of filesystem are you using for the posix mount? > > Original message > From: Tarun Kushwaha > Date: 12/

[ovirt-users] Re: New to oVirt - HE and Metric Store Question

      >    1. Right now we are using one SAN with 4 LUN (each mapped into 1 >specific >volume) and configure the storage domain for each LUn (1 LUN = 1 >Storage >Domain). Is this configuration are good ? One more, about Hosted >Engine, when >we setup the cluster, it provision one storage domain,

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

I'm not sure if the templates are automatically transferred , but it's worth checking before detaching the storage. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В понеделник, 28 декември 2020 г., 18:53:27 Гринуич+2, Diggy Mc написа: Templates?  Aren't the VM's templates automatically copied to the

[ovirt-users] New to oVirt - HE and Metric Store Question

Hi, We’re migrating our 10 physical host with 50 small VM to oVirt from VMware and so happy with its performance. There are two question that we want to ask : 1. Right now we are using one SAN with 4 LUN (each mapped into 1 specific volume) and configure the storage domain for each LUn (1 LUN

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 5:53 PM Diggy Mc wrote: > Templates? Aren't the VM's templates automatically copied to the export > domain when the VM is copied to the export domain as part of the Export > operation? Maybe I'm confused about how the export/import operations work > and the purpose of th

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

Templates? Aren't the VM's templates automatically copied to the export domain when the VM is copied to the export domain as part of the Export operation? Maybe I'm confused about how the export/import operations work and the purpose of the export domain. And noted, I will be sure to only hav

[ovirt-users] Re: "POSIX storage based vm live migration failed"

Try setting selinux to permissive (setenforce 0) on the hosts and try to migrate again.  What kind of filesystem are you using for the posix mount? Original message From: Tarun Kushwaha Date: 12/28/20 7:55 AM (GMT-05:00) To: users@ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] "POSIX stora

[ovirt-users] Re: Shrink iSCSI Domain

Vinius, does your storage provide dedpulication ? If yes, then you can provide a new thin-provisioned LUN and migrate the data from the old LUN to the new one. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В понеделник, 28 декември 2020 г., 18:27:38 Гринуич+2, Vinícius Ferrão via Users написа: Hi

[ovirt-users] Re: Shrink iSCSI Domain

Hi Shani, thank you! It’s only one LUN :( So it may be a best practice to split an SD in multiple LUNs? Thank you. On 28 Dec 2020, at 09:08, Shani Leviim mailto:slev...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, You can reduce LUNs from an iSCSI storage domain once it's in maintenance. [1] On the UI, after putt

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot upgrade cluster to v4.5 (All hosts are CentOS 8.3.2011)

On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 7:41 PM Strahil Nikolov wrote: > Any hints in vdsm logs on the affected host or on the broker.log/agent.log > ? > > Happy Hollidays to everyone! > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > Hello, Sorry for the late reply. One of the nodes suffered a major failure and I'm wait

[ovirt-users] "POSIX storage based vm live migration failed"

After upgrading cluster version to 4.5 VM live migration failed showing error due to storage I/O error and VM status is being changed running to Pause , lower cluster version same is working ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe sen

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.4.4 is now generally available

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:33 PM Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > > Sandro, FYI we are not against cinderlib integration, more than we are > upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 due movement to cinderlib. > > But (!) current Managed Storage Block realization support only krbd (kernel > RBD) driver - it's also not a op

[ovirt-users] Re: Shrink iSCSI Domain

Hi, You can reduce LUNs from an iSCSI storage domain once it's in maintenance. [1] On the UI, after putting the storage domain in maintenance > Manage Domain > select the LUNs to be removed from the storage domain. Note that reducing LUNs is applicable in case the storage domain has more than 1 LU

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:26 PM Strahil Nikolov via Users wrote: > Keep the export domain attached only to 1 environment at a time... it's > way more safer. Usually each engine updates some metafiles on the storage > domain and when both try to do it ... you got a bad situation there. > > Attach

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

Keep the export domain attached only to 1 environment at a time... it's way more safer. Usually each engine updates some metafiles on the storage domain and when both try to do it ... you got a bad situation there. Attach to 4.3 , move VMs, power off them , detach the storage domain - so you ca

[ovirt-users] Re: Moving VMs from 4.3.9 to 4.4.4

Is it safe to attach my new 4.4 environment to an export domain at the same time my 4.3 environment is attached to it? I need to start moving VMs from my current 4.3 to my new 4.4 environment. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe se

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.4.4 is now generally available

I just want to state that we are in the same situation like Konstantin, running a big cluster with Cinder storage (564 disks). This has worked perfectly for us in the past. I didn't upgrade to 4.4 yet, but reading now about Cinder deprecation makes me very sad. Why did you address bugs like htt

[ovirt-users] Re: power management iLO5

I've used ilo_ssh. IT's working now. Thanks ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/communi