when it grows? Any other down sides to this?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts and consideration.
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
Date Format PSA http://xkcd.com/1179/
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org
.
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
Date Format PSA http://xkcd.com/1179/
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Igor Lvovsky ilvov...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Alan,
If I understand you correctly, you try to add a new VM-VLANed network
(sandbox)
to interface em1 that already has another VM network (ovirtmgmt).
If so, this operation is not permited. You can't attach
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Alan Johnson a...@datdec.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Igor Lvovsky ilvov...@redhat.com wrote:
To be sure that this is a case, I need to know your vdsm version
and vdsm log will be good as well
There is nothing in the log with that time stamp
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alan Johnson a...@datdec.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Roy Golan rgo...@redhat.com wrote:
logic/flow aside, still the error is on engine side - validating the
VdsNetworkInterface entity which
seems to be missing an interfaces field or method
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Alan Johnson a...@datdec.com wrote:
Be sure to read my other post before running with this as it may be a dead
end, but here is the dump from last night's backup (just the one row):
INSERT INTO vds_interface(addr, bond_name, bond_type, gateway, id,
is_bond
I am trying to add a network for a sandbox environment that only certain
VMs will have access to and those VMs will not have access to the rest of
our network. This is to allow new systems to be tested in a safe
environment where they can't possibly muck with our live systems. I'm
trying to
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jason Brooks jbro...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/05/2012 08:03 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
Hi,
I see some interest on how to change the host name of the machine where
the engine runs (in release 3.1). This is a manual procedure that you
can use to do that:
I
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Noam Slomianko nslom...@redhat.com wrote:
I stand corrected, it seems that this change is supported.
If you go and check the memory optimisation tab you'll find that it is set
to Custom Value
I'm not seeing that. I select my cluster, then click Edit Memory
plausible that
the engine limits VMs on the hosts based on CMO as well as PMG and actual
use, but I just don't know for sure either way.
I would greatly appreciated it if some guru could school me on this point.
___
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Roy Golan rgo...@redhat.com wrote:
since the VM run_on_vds was empty, the confirm host... didn't clear its
status because its not selected from the DB as one of the host VMs.
I'll try to dig in to see at what point this value was cleared - probably
around the
setup (thought we hope to get away from that
soon), so some means of authenticating through the systems local PAM system
would be the next most convenient.
These are just thoughts and I am completely open to suggestions. Thanks in
advance for any input! =)
___
Alan Johnson
that a VM is down so I can
bring it back up again, like with Confirm 'host has been rebooted' on
hosts?
___
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/09/2012 09:23 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
Anyway, is there anyway to convince the engine that a VM is down so I
can bring it back up again, like with Confirm 'host has been rebooted'
on hosts?
which hosts
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alan Johnson a...@datdec.com wrote:
You have me thinking... perhaps oVirt thinks they are running on the host
they were being migrated to. If so, maybe putting that host into
maintenance will clear it up. I'll try that as soon as I get the down host
back up
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com wrote:
However, as I read this email, it occurred that some other things
might not be equal. Specifically, using multiple LUNs could provide
a means of shrinking the storage domain in the future. LVM provides
a simple means
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com wrote:
Sounds really over-complicated for what you're trying to do.
Agreed! That's why I asked. =) To be clear, all that was necessary to end
up where I wanted was to reboot the hosts, which is not terribly
complicated, but time
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Tim Hildred thild...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Alan;
I think the missing piece might be a directory server of some kind (Active
Directory, IPA, RHDS, and I think TivoliDS are the ones that work). You
have to link oVirt engine up with your directory server, and
.
Any nudge in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. I'll even
accept dope slaps at this point if warranted. =)
Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.
___
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
___
Users mailing list
Users
in running the engine on a VM managed by
the same engine, as you were suggesting before. Did you give this a shot?
Itamar, why did you steer Nic away from this?
___
Alan Johnson
a...@datdec.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http
20 matches
Mail list logo
