ulate what's happening here to
try and figure out what's going on?
Thanks,
--
Chris Smith
Hosting Systems Administrator
P +61 2 9045 2800
E csm...@squiz.net
Level 1, 435a Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000
www.squiz.net
--
Squiz named leader GigaOm's Digital Experience Platform Rada
rt.org/privacy-policy.html
> > > oVirt Code of Conduct:
> > > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > > List Archives:
> > >
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ZARL6GG5X34VVODRPIXGI6PTHWDMQVZK/
> >
> &g
Hi all,
I'm using ovirt 4.2 so I'm a little behind, but I'm trying to understand
what this error message means.
ERROR [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.ReactorClient] (SSL Stomp
Reactor) [] Connection timeout for host 'x.x.x.x', last response arrived
1549 ms ago.
Is this initiated by the e
Hello,
Here's the general gist of what I've done so far:
graphical install from el8 and el9 iso, using as few modifications as
possible with dhcp networking.
3.6TB of disk space for ovirt install dest.
system comes up, dashboard is online, i try to deploy hosted engine, no
dice.
[image: image
What about using ATA over ethernet (AoE) as an optional storage transport
within ovirt? Is this feasible? It seems that the protocol is fast and
efficient.
On Sep 10, 2013 11:58 AM, "Baptiste AGASSE" <
baptiste.aga...@lyra-network.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> - Mail original -
> > De: "Itam
What about using ATA over ethernet (AoE) as an optional storage transport
within ovirt? Is this feasible? It seems that the protocol is fast
efficient and cleaner than than fcoe.
Thanks for considering it as a possible feature request.
On Sep 10, 2013 11:58 AM, "Baptiste AGASSE" <
baptiste.aga..
Why not use gluster with xfs on the storage bricks?
http://www.gluster.org/
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Piotr Szubiakowski
wrote:
> Hi,
> we are developing an application where would be great if multiple host could
> have access to the same disk. I think that we can use features like shared
Apr 22, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Joop wrote:
> Chris Smith wrote:
>>
>> List,
>>
>> I have lost the ability to manage the hosts or VM's using ovirt engine
>> web interface. The data center is offline, and I
>> can't actually perform any operations with the host
List,
I have lost the ability to manage the hosts or VM's using ovirt engine
web interface. The data center is offline, and I
can't actually perform any operations with the hosts or VM's. I don't
think that there
are any actions I can perform in the web interface at all.
What's odd is that I ca
e?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> engine.log attached
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Need to know precise error, please attach engine.log.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>>> From: "Chri
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Chris Smith"
>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" , Users@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:45:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] Certificates and PKI seem to be broken after yum update
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> I made a backup of the .truststore, and then followed the steps and
> then rebooted both the ovirt-engine and one of the hosts, and
> everything worked properly.
>
> If I run it again, or enter the wrong password it throws an er
's directly from the hosts to a
standard NFS share?
Is there an equivalent xml and image file for the VM?
My storage domain is iscsi and is served out from another server over
4 bonded 1 Gbps copper links.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> I checked the .truststore
remember to keep the engine private key.
>
> However, if you succeed in login, the remaining problem you have is the
> .truststore permissions and/or content.
>
> Regards,
> Alon Bar-Lev.
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Chris Smith"
>>
selinux-policy) changed permissions...
>
> The simplest way to test is to:
> # cp -a /etc/pki/ovirt-engine /etc/pki/ovirt-engine.backup1
> # chown -R ovirt:ovirt /etc/pki/ovirt-engine
>
> But if that file permissions was changed, I can only assume other files were
> also chang
dora.noarch4-2
@/ovirt-release-fedora.noarch
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> How exactly did you upgrade?
>
> Usually yum upgrade will not touch ovirt-engine packages as it is in yum
> version lock.
> From which version to which version have you up
I have lost the ability to manage the hosts or VM's using ovirt
engine web interface after performing yum update on the ovirt-engine
host, and on one Fedora 17 host. The data center is offline, and I
can't place the hosts into maintenance mode. I don't think that there
are any actions I can perfo
17 matches
Mail list logo
