Re: [Users] vdsm/engine do not like Infiniband

2012-09-13 Thread Dead Horse
sue with the mac address length in IB > cards. IIRC there was a hardware vendor who was working on a patch to > extend the length and add the appropriate validation. > > > Dead Horse wrote: > > When attempting to activate/add a host with Infiniband cards present: > > vdsm.l

Re: [Users] HowTo: Spice ActiveX Plugin/Virt Viewer Console on oVirt 3.1

2012-09-12 Thread Dead Horse
the cursor jumps off to >> one of the edges of my *monitor*, and not into the console window- as >> >> you would expect. Maybe virt-viewer mistakenly "thinks" that the edges >> of it´s window really are the edges of the whole monitor? Am I holding >> i

[Users] HowTo: Using EL6 hosts with Ovirt

2012-09-07 Thread Dead Horse
I took the liberty of creating a wiki page on how to use EL6 based hosts with the ovirt-engine. It can be found here: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Using_EL6_hosts_with_Ovirt Feel free to change/edit/contribute or provide feedback. - DHC ___ Users mailing l

Re: [Users] EL 6.3+ nodes and 3.1 compatibility?

2012-08-12 Thread Dead Horse
ing loaded (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832935). Fixed that by building and installing a newer sanlock where this was fixed. - DHC On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 08/10/2012 04:21 PM, Dead Horse wrote: > >> When I try adding an EL 6.3 base

[Users] ovirt 3.1 spice console

2012-08-11 Thread Dead Horse
Any hints on getting the console button/right click context console operation to work on ovirt 3.1? I have installed the remote-viewer package from here: http://spice-space.org/download/gtk/windows/virt-viewer-0.5.3_x64.exe I am Using IE 8 under windows 7 as the browser. My guess here is that the

Re: [Users] EL 6.3+ nodes and 3.1 compatibility?

2012-08-10 Thread Dead Horse
This is a pure RHEL 6.3 node. Given that I gather in order to make this work I need to build the newer vdsm 4.10.x and update/build the other according dependent packages? - DHC On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Andrew Cathrow wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > Fr

Re: [Users] EL 6.3+ nodes and 3.1 compatibility?

2012-08-10 Thread Dead Horse
I am not using the dreyou repo. Rather a pure EL 6.3 and it's associated packages. - DHC On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Robert Middleswarth < rob...@middleswarth.net> wrote: > On 08/10/2012 02:02 AM, Dead Horse wrote: > > With ovirt 3.1 EL 6.3 nodes will only work with

Re: [Users] EL 6.3+ nodes and 3.1 compatibility?

2012-08-10 Thread Dead Horse
64-rhel6,model_kvm32,model_coreduo,model_kvm64,model_core2duo,model_n270,model_Conroe,model_Penryn,model_Nehalem,model_Opteron_G1', 'ISCSIInitiatorName': 'iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:decf7eb6ff3f', 'memSize': '36140', 'reservedMem': '256&#

[Users] EL 6.3+ nodes and 3.1 compatibility?

2012-08-09 Thread Dead Horse
With ovirt 3.1 EL 6.3 nodes will only work with a data center set to 3.0 compatibility mode. Is there any reason(s) why EL 6.3+ nodes would not be allowed in a 3.1 compatibility level cluster? This assumes non use of gluster since adding vdsm-gluster to an EL 6 node requires some work package updat

Re: [Users] ovirt-engine upgrade 3.0 to 3.1 issue

2012-07-20 Thread Dead Horse
Any thoughts here on this, should I file a bug? Per: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release Working upgrade is one of the release criteria. I will help in any way possible to get a 3.0 to 3.1 upgrade path working. - DHC On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote: > If it helps here

Re: [Users] ovirt-engine upgrade 3.0 to 3.1 issue

2012-07-19 Thread Dead Horse
_temp_Upgrade_add_job_table(); ** DROP FUNCTION * QUERY ** insert into schema_version(version,script,checksum,installed_by,started_at,ended_at,state,current,comment) values (trim('03010260'),'upgrade/03_01_0260_add_job_table

Re: [Users] ovirt-engine upgrade 3.0 to 3.1 issue

2012-07-19 Thread Dead Horse
ng to run "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/upgrade.sh". - DHC On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Robert Middleswarth < rob...@middleswarth.net> wrote: > On 07/19/2012 04:10 AM, Eli Mesika wrote: > >> >> - Original Message - >> >>> From: "Dea

[Users] ovirt-engine upgrade 3.0 to 3.1 issue

2012-07-17 Thread Dead Horse
Steps taken: Load up bare metal or a VM with FC16 Install 3.0 from http://www.ovirt.org/releases/stable/fedora/16/ Setup up something minimal (EG: engine-setup then setup a basic datacenter/cluster/etc) Add a FC16 or EL based node for fun as well and some VM's if feeling ambitious. Back up databa

Re: [Users] ovirt and NAT/Internal Networks

2012-04-25 Thread Dead Horse
Did some further refining and testing on this. I found that all that needed to be done to create a NAT or private network for your ovirt guests is (in this example we create a NAT network): 1) Login into your ovirt nodes (all will need to have this created consistently across them. 2) connect to

[Users] ovirt and NAT/Internal Networks

2012-04-23 Thread Dead Horse
I have tried to create a NAT network within ovirt for guests to use via libvirt/virsh as the vdsm@rhevh on an ovirt node. Something like this: virsh # net-info nat Namenat UUIDb09d09a8-ebbd-476d-9045-e66012c9e83d Active: yes Persistent: yes Autostart: yes B

Re: [Users] fedora qemu modern CPU recognition issues cause ovirt manged host to go non-operational

2012-04-22 Thread Dead Horse
Built and verified that both the latest fedora rawhide qemu and the latest QEMU from git do not resolve this. Here: fedora/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/q/qemu-1.0-15.fc18.src.rpm) and Here: http://git.qemu.org/qemu.git I suspect that unless the patches made to RHEL qemu, mentioned by the qemu

[Users] fedora qemu modern CPU recognition issues cause ovirt manged host to go non-operational

2012-04-22 Thread Dead Horse
Seeing an issue wherein ovirt moves a managed host to non-operational state. This occurs with the currently released version of ovirt and the latest development builds. The ovirt host is loaded with Fedora core 16 and equipped with most current development version of the vdsm. *Editorial node* The

<    1   2