[ovirt-users] Re: What is the status of the whole Ovirt Project?

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:35 AM Alex Crow via Users wrote: > > All, > > I'd rather base against either Rocky or Alma in the shorter term, or > Ubuntu/Debian for a longer view. oVirt IMHO is a superior product to > anything else if you know your way around it. Fantastic and informative > GUI, a grea

[ovirt-users] Re: What is the status of the whole Ovirt Project?

If you'd prefer to keep going with CentOS Stream, there are a few options wrt QEMU: - Getting a non-conflicting full build of QEMU in EPEL - Rebuilding QEMU from CentOS Stream with the extra features enabled in the Virt SIG

[ovirt-users] Re: future of oVirt after end of road for CentOS. (porting)

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 3:37 PM rp.neuli--- via Users wrote: > > Hello Masters, > > I am very keen to use oVirt, but I was shocked and shaken to go ahead with > oVirt after I heard about end of road for CentOS. Therefore I looked for some > answers which I could not find online: > > 1. Will/Are

[ovirt-users] Re: Preferred RHEL Based Distro For oVirt

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:58 AM Clint Boggio wrote: > > Good Day All; > > i am inquiring about which RHEL based distros are currently preferred and > which ones are currently supported. I know the oVirt project is a RH entity > and so RHEL and CentOS-Stream are the base offering. Would it, or is

[ovirt-users] Re: Installing oVirt on RHEL vs CentOS Stream, Alma or Rocky Linux

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:00 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm still struggling to get oVirt installed. It absolutely will not > install on RHEL 8, the documentation here is flat out wrong: > > https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/installing_ovirt_as_a_standalone_manager_with_local_databases/in

[ovirt-users] Re: no QXL ?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:48 AM Rik Theys wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12/7/21 16:26, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:21 AM Alex McWhirter wrote: > >> Additionally, should this go forward. I would be interested in > >> maintaining a 3rd party repo wit

[ovirt-users] Re: no QXL ?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:21 AM Alex McWhirter wrote: > > Additionally, should this go forward. I would be interested in > maintaining a 3rd party repo with patched packages to keep SPICE/QXL > support if anyone else would like to join. > The Hyperscale SIG is already looking into shipping custom

[ovirt-users] Re: no QXL ?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:47 AM Rik Theys wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12/7/21 15:15, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 8:49 AM Rik Theys wrote: > >> Will SPICE be deprecated or fully removed in oVirt 4.5? > >> > >> Since spice is still more p

[ovirt-users] Re: no QXL ?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 8:49 AM Rik Theys wrote: > > Hi, > > Will SPICE be deprecated or fully removed in oVirt 4.5? > > Since spice is still more performant than VNC and also has more features such > as USB redirection, why is it being phased out? > > Which connection method should we use to conn

[ovirt-users] Re: upgrading to 4.4.6 with Rocky Linux 8

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:45 AM Jason Keltz wrote: > > > I see the 4.4.6 was released in time with RHEL 8.3. I'd like to use > Rocky Linux 8.4 because I believe RHEL has re-enabled mptsas (though I > know still unsupported) from 8.4+ which will make things easier. > Are you sure that's the case

[ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt and Fedora

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:45 AM Michal Skrivanek wrote: > > > > > On 11 May 2020, at 14:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:32 AM Nir Soffer wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:24 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > >>>

[ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-devel] Re: oVirt and Fedora

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:32 AM Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:24 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > As far as the oVirt software keeping up with Fedora, the main problem here > > has always been that people aren't integrating their software into the &g

[ovirt-users] Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt and Fedora

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:16 AM Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > If you have followed the oVirt project for a few releases you already know > oVirt has struggled to keep the pace with the fast innovation cycles Fedora > Project is following. > > Back in September 2019 CentOS project launched CentOS Stre

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Alpha release refresh is now available for testing

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:12 AM Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > oVirt 4.4.0 Alpha release refresh is now available for testing > > The oVirt Project is excited to announce the availability of the alpha > release refresh of oVirt 4.4.0 for testing, as of March 6th, 2020 > > This release unleashes an alto

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt All-in-One upgrade path and requested improvements

to grow it into a useful cluster. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I recently found out that oVirt "deprecated" the All-in-One >> configuration option in oVirt 3

[ovirt-users] oVirt All-in-One upgrade path and requested improvements

Hello, I recently found out that oVirt "deprecated" the All-in-One configuration option in oVirt 3.6 and removed it in oVirt 4.0. This is a huge problem for me, as it means that my oVirt machines don't have an upgrade path. My experiments with the self-hosted engine have ended in failure for a co

Re: [ovirt-users] 3.5 or 3.6 For Production System?

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Charles Tassell wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one or > two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be using > a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade path from Fedora 20 oVirt 3.5 to Fedora 22 oVirt 3.6

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Blaster wrote: > On 11/10/2015 1:10 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> >> Hi, upgrade from FC20 to FC22 has not been tested and you're welcome to >> help testing it. >> What I would suggest is: >> - make an image of your existing engine (I suggest clonezilla for doing

[ovirt-users] oVirt host installations failing due to missing GPG key (key location no longer valid)

pendencies.repo file. Going to the URL indicated that, sure enough, the key doesn't exist there. Instead, it appears to exist at http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/pub.key Can someone please fix this so that I can install oVirt and Gluster again? Thanks in advance, Neal