[ovirt-users] Re: Missing snapshot in the engine

2021-11-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
| 4 > image_group_id| 4d79c1da-34f0-44e3-8b92-c4bcb8524d83 > _create_date | 2021-08-31 11:29:31.980191+02 > _update_date | 2021-11-08 10:19:39.477886+01 > active| t > volume_classification | 1 > qcow_compat | 2 > > > > Francesco

[ovirt-users] Re: Missing snapshot in the engine

2021-11-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
can you attach the output of: $ vdsm-tool dump-volume-chains e25db7d0-060a-4046-94b5-235f38097cd8 as well as: $ psql -U engine -d engine -c "\x on" -c "select * from images where image_group_id = '4d79c1da-34f0-44e3-8b92-c4bcb8524d83'" On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:58 AM francesco--- via Users

[ovirt-users] Re: export to export domain concurrency

2021-11-04 Thread Benny Zlotnik
yes, it should work, did you run into issues? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct:

[ovirt-users] Re: is disk reduce command while VM is active after snapshot deletion save?

2021-11-03 Thread Benny Zlotnik
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 2:51 PM wrote: > > When creating a snapshot, the volume gets two lv extents (2GB) . But after > deleting the snapshot, the extents are kept and with every Snapshot creation > the volume size increases. > This is really annoying, especially when using snapshot for nightly

[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to delete snapshot

2021-10-28 Thread Benny Zlotnik
We need full logs (what happened before the snippet you pasted), as well as vdsm logs from the SPM host, and vdsm logs from the host running this VM On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 5:04 PM wrote: > > Hello all. > > We use vprotect to make snapshot backups of our vm's. > This VM, let's call it OVIRTVM,

[ovirt-users] Re: about the Live Storage Migration

2021-09-26 Thread Benny Zlotnik
when you move a disk that's attached to a running VM, live storage migration will be performed On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 2:08 PM Tommy Sway wrote: > > From the document: > > > > Overview of Live Storage Migration > > Virtual disks can be migrated from one storage domain to another while the >

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage and Templates

2021-09-24 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Can you submit a bug for this? On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 3:31 PM Shantur Rathore wrote: > > Hi all, > > Anyone tried using Templates with Managed Block Storage? > I created a VM on MBS and then took a snapshot. > This worked but as soon as I created a Template from snapshot, the > template got

[ovirt-users] Re: about the vm disk type

2021-09-22 Thread Benny Zlotnik
file-based domains use RAW for both settings, thin-provisioned on block domain will use qcow2, otherwise RAW will be used On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM Tommy Sway wrote: > For example : > > > > And I check the file on the storage: > > > > [root@olvms1 51dcbfae-1100-4e43-9e0a-bb8c578623d7]#

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage issues

2021-09-22 Thread Benny Zlotnik
I see the rule is created in the logs: MainProcess|jsonrpc/5::DEBUG::2021-09-22 10:39:37,504::supervdsm_server::95::SuperVdsm.ServerCallback::(wrapper) call add_managed_udev_rule with ('ed1a0e9f-4d30-4896-b965-534861cc0c02', '/dev/mapper/360014054b727813d1bc4d4cefdade7db') {}

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
d install cinder relevant software > 2, when run the engine-setup add -s ManagedBlockDomainSupported = true option > 3. Add ManagedBlockDomain after installation > Do I understand this correctly? > > Thank you very much! > > > > > -----Original Message- > From: Be

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 2:11 PM Tommy Sway wrote: > > Do you mean that I don't need to manually add cider related repo in the new > version, the engine-setup process will automatically add cinder related repo > and install the package? it will add the repo but will not install the package as we

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
y need to configure CINDERLib when > running Ovirt-Engine, and then I can connect to Ceph server directly in the > admin interface? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@ovirt.org On Behalf Of Benny > Zlotnik > Sent: Tuesday, S

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
[ INFO ] Stage: Environment customization > > > > > > > > --== PRODUCT OPTIONS ==-- > > > > > > > > Set up Cinderlib integration > > > > (Currently in tech preview) > > > > (Yes, No) [No]: Yes > > > > [ INF

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
> (Currently in tech preview) > > (Yes, No) [No]: Yes > > [ INFO ] ovirt-provider-ovn already installed, skipping. > > > > > > > > > > From: Benny Zlotnik > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:20 PM > To: Tommy Sway > Cc: users

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
ge by simply linking to > cenderlib files without accessing the actual openstack? > > > > I am very interested in this section, can you send some related guide > documents? > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Benny Zlotnik > *Sent:*

[ovirt-users] Re: Create template from snapshot of vm using MBS disk

2021-09-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
use this link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=ovirt-engine Set the component to BLL.Storage and the oVirt Team to Storage On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:17 AM wrote: > > How can I file the bug? Do you have a guide? > ___ > Users mailing

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
them all under > cinder page ? > > > > > > > > *From:* Benny Zlotnik > *Sent:* Monday, September 13, 2021 6:14 PM > *To:* Tommy Sway > *Cc:* users > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ? > > > > yes, we support c

[ovirt-users] Re: what kind of managed block can oVirt manage ?

2021-09-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
yes, we support ceph via cinderlib, so in theory any vendor with a storage driver for cinder can work, but we only test ceph On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:06 PM Tommy Sway wrote: > On the create disk page, there is option to create disk that is from > managed block, I want wo know what’s kind of it

[ovirt-users] Re: Create template from snapshot of vm using MBS disk

2021-09-10 Thread Benny Zlotnik
I recall a bug was created for this by our QE, but I can't find it. Can you please file a bug so it is tracked and prioritized? On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:42 AM wrote: > > Hi, > > Has this problem been resolved? > ___ > Users mailing list --

[ovirt-users] Re: Cinderlib RBD ceph template issues

2021-09-01 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Hi, Can you please submit a bug[1] with all logs attached? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=ovirt-engine On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 6:04 PM Sketch wrote: > > This is on oVirt 4.4.8, engine on CS8, hosts on C8, cluster and DC are > both set to 4.6. > > With a newly configured

[ovirt-users] Re: Impossible to move disk after a previous disk move failed

2021-08-24 Thread Benny Zlotnik
c23a5bef-48e0-46c7-9d5b-93c97f0240c0 is the target storage domain? if the disk is still on the source storage domain in ovirt-engine, you can remove the LV manually with lvremove, after making sure the source is correct with $ vdsm-client Volume getInfo Do you know why the move failed? When move

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot delete pvc attached to pod using ovirt-csi in kubernetes

2021-08-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
And the full flow, with CSI? I'm trying to determine whether the CSI driver does something wrong, or something went wrong during that specific run On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:34 PM wrote: > > Yes, that's right. > I can attach and detach mbs disk to ovirt vm normally through dashboard. >

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot delete pvc attached to pod using ovirt-csi in kubernetes

2021-08-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
this is a correct run, right? the original flow works with this one? On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:05 PM wrote: > > I attached a mbs disk to the running vm through the dashboard. > > Here is the engine log: > > > 2021-08-23 19:00:54,912+09 INFO >

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot delete pvc attached to pod using ovirt-csi in kubernetes

2021-08-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
yes, it should indeed defer to DetachManagedBlockStorageVolumeVDSCommand which is what does the unmapping, do you have an earlier log that shows the XML (for example, when it was attached)? On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:59 AM wrote: > > There were no error logs in vdsm and supervdsm. > > And I

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot delete pvc attached to pod using ovirt-csi in kubernetes

2021-08-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
It should do this and it's not semantically different from what happens with non-MBS disks. The log I pasted is what unmaps the volume, I am not sure why it returned successfully if the volume wasn't unmapped, if possible please attach vdsm and supervdsm logs from the relevant, perhaps there's

[ovirt-users] Re: Cannot delete pvc attached to pod using ovirt-csi in kubernetes

2021-08-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
pod deletion should invoke unpublish the PVC which detaches it from the node which is seen in the engine log: 2021-08-20 17:40:35,664+09 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.HotUnPlugDiskVDSCommand] (default task-149) [198e2dc9-b908-474e-a395-0fe682c29af0] START,

[ovirt-users] Re: Unable to export VM from data storage domain.

2021-08-22 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Sounds like a bug, can you attach the output of: $ psql -U engine -d engine -c "\x on" -c "select * from disk_profiles" On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 6:47 PM Diggy Mc wrote: > > I'm running oVirt 4.4.4 with two data storage domains. One domain is where > the production VMs run. The second domain is

[ovirt-users] Re: Sparse VMs from Templates - Storage issues

2021-08-11 Thread Benny Zlotnik
> If your vm is temporary and you like to drop the data written while > the vm is running, you > could use a temporary disk based on the template. This is called a > "transient disk" in vdsm. > > Arik, maybe you remember how transient disks are used in engine? > Do we have an API to run a VM once,

[ovirt-users] Re: live merge of snapshots failed

2021-08-06 Thread Benny Zlotnik
2021-08-03 15:50:59,040+0300 ERROR (libvirt/events) [virt.vm] (vmId='1c1d20ed-3167-4be7-bff3-29845142fc57') Block job ACTIVE_COMMIT for drive /rhev/data-center/mnt/blockSD/a5a492a7-f770-4472-baa3-ac7297a581a9/images/2e6e3cd3-f0cb-47a7-8bda-7738bd7c1fb5/b43b7c33-5b53-4332-a2e0-f950debb919b has

[ovirt-users] Re: live merge of snapshots failed

2021-08-03 Thread Benny Zlotnik
2021-08-03 15:51:34,917+03 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.MergeStatusCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-commandCoordinator-Thread-2) [3bf9345d-fab2-490f-ba44-6aa014bbb743] Failed to live merge. Top volume b43b7c33-5b53-4332-a2e0-f950debb919b is still in qemu chain

[ovirt-users] Re: Deploy ovirt-csi in the kubernetes cluster

2021-07-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
We don't test it on kubernetes, but I know some users use it successfully with kubernetes by applying the manifests[1] manually [1] https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver-operator/tree/master/assets On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 4:12 AM wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to deploy ovirt-csi in the

[ovirt-users] Re: Create template from snapshot of vm using MBS disk

2021-07-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Sounds like a bug, can you engine.log and cinderlib.log? On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:14 AM wrote: > Hi, > > If I create a template with a snapshot of the vm that uses the mbs disk, > the template cannot be used to create a new vm. > Is this normal or a bug? >

[ovirt-users] Re: Blog post - Using Ceph only storage for oVirt datacenter

2021-07-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Not currently, we do want to support this using rbd-nbd On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:26 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > It's possible to use librbd instead kernel mount like in OpenStack? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 14 Jul 2021, at 10:41, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > > They are mounted as

[ovirt-users] Re: Blog post - Using Ceph only storage for oVirt datacenter

2021-07-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
as usual. > > >> - How clones works? >> > > Disk copy can be done from the engine storage -> disk tab. > VM cloning failed for me, opened *Bug 1982083* > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982083> - Cloning VM with > managed block storage raise a NP

[ovirt-users] Re: Image import to Managed Block Storage

2021-07-12 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Direct import from glance is not possible yet, a workaround would be to import to a regular storage domain and then copy On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM wrote: > Sorry for the lack of information. > I want to import image from the default glance repository or locally. >

[ovirt-users] Re: Image import to Managed Block Storage

2021-07-12 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Hi, Can you elaborate about the requirement? Import from where? From an existing storage backend? In 4.4.6 we added support to copy disks from regular storage domains to MBS domains On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:01 PM wrote: > Hi, > > Any plans to add the function to import images to MBS? >

[ovirt-users] Re: Attempting to detach a storage domain

2021-04-25 Thread Benny Zlotnik
my research, but all 121 hosts are up and running. > > -Original Message----- > From: Benny Zlotnik > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 1:53 AM > To: Stier, Matthew > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Attempting to detach a storage domain > > Wha

[ovirt-users] Re: Attempting to detach a storage domain

2021-04-25 Thread Benny Zlotnik
What do the logs say? This usually means that not all hosts were able to disconnect from it On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 9:45 AM matthew.st...@fujitsu.com wrote: > > Ovirt: 4.3.10 > > Storage: iSCSI > > > > Problem: Attempting to place storage domain into ‘maintenance’ in preparation > for

[ovirt-users] Re: Destroyed VM blocking hosts/filling logs

2021-04-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
username: vdsm@ovirrt, password: shibboleth On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 5:25 PM David Kerry wrote: > > Hi Shani, > > I actually came across that option and attempted it at one point, > but vdsm has locked me out of using that command it seems. > > Eg: > > [root@ovirt-node217 ~]# virsh undefine vm-s2

[ovirt-users] Re: Cinderlib problem after upgrade from 4.3.10 to 4.4.5

2021-03-29 Thread Benny Zlotnik
1 58 698-120 > Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121 > D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914 > Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer >

[ovirt-users] Re: Cinderlib problem after upgrade from 4.3.10 to 4.4.5

2021-03-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
If the log is empty it usually means cinderlib-client.py failed during startup, probably because the dependencies are missing. python3-cinderlib is required on the engine machine (and ceph-common, since you use ceph), python3-os-brick is required on the hosts (and ceph-common). See the

[ovirt-users] Re: Python SDK rename virtual machine

2021-03-18 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Probably with the update method, like in the DC example[1], it shouldn't be hard to translate this to a VM [1] https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/blob/master/sdk/examples/update_data_center.py#L52 On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:15 AM Gerard Weatherby wrote: > > Is there an API call in the

[ovirt-users] Re: Ovirt - affinity labels names and virtual machines

2021-02-15 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Hi, I suggest sending questions to ovirt-users so others could find answers as well as to allow others who might know better chime in as well As to your question, something like this works for me: vms_service = connection.system_service().vms_service() vm_service =

[ovirt-users] Re: lvm tools doesn't show volumes created by ovirt

2021-02-15 Thread Benny Zlotnik
are you using a filter? try with $ lvs --config 'devices {filter=["a/.*/"]}' On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:36 PM david duchovny wrote: > > after switch to ovirt444, when a vm disk have been created lvs or lvdsplay > doesn't show the logical volumes info on the vdsm host. >

[ovirt-users] Re: OVirt rest api 4.3. How do you get the job id started by the async parameter

2021-02-10 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Sorry, my example URL is messed up, the correct example is: https://engine/ovirt-engine/api/jobs?search=correlation_id%3Dmycorrelationid On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:38 PM Pascal DeMilly wrote: > > Thank you. This is very helpful. I'll give it a try. > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 2:18 AM B

[ovirt-users] Re: OVirt rest api 4.3. How do you get the job id started by the async parameter

2021-02-10 Thread Benny Zlotnik
You could do this by setting a custom correlation_id with a query param when invoking the operation, then filter the jobs using the same correlation id: https://engine/ovirt-engine/api/jobs?search%3Dmycorrelationid (it's not a reported field) We do this in our system tests[1] [1]

[ovirt-users] Re: Cinderlib died after upgrade Cluster Compatibility version 4.4 ->4.5

2021-01-20 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Can you submit a bug? Looks like a problem with `volume_types` is empty, can you run (assuming you use the default DB name/user): $ psql -U ovirt_cinderlib -d ovirt_cinderlib -c "\x on" -c "select * from volume_types" The output on my system is: -[ RECORD 1

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage and more

2021-01-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
>Ceph iSCSI gateway should be supported since 4.1, so I think I can use it for >configuring the master domain and still leveraging the same overall storage >environment provided by Ceph, correct? yes, it shouldn't be a problem ___ Users mailing list

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage and more

2021-01-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
>Thanks for pointing out the requirement for Master domain. In theory, will I >be able to satisfy the requirement with another iSCSI or >maybe Ceph iSCSI as >master domain? It should work as ovirt sees it as a regular domain, cephFS will probably work too >So each node has >- oVirt Node NG /

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage and more

2021-01-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
>Just for clarification: when you say Managed Block Storage you mean cinderlib >integration, >correct? >Is still this one below the correct reference page for 4.4? >https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/storage/cinderlib-integration.html yes >So are the manual steps still

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage and more

2021-01-18 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Ceph support is available via Managed Block Storage (tech preview), it cannot be used instead of gluster for hyperconverged setups. Moreover, it is not possible to use a pure Managed Block Storage setup at all, there has to be at least one regular storage domain in a datacenter On Mon, Jan 18,

[ovirt-users] Re: image upload on Managed Block Storage

2021-01-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
13, 2021 at 10:12 AM Henry lol wrote: > > yeah, I'm using ceph as a backend, > then can oVirt discover/import existing volumes in ceph? > > 2021년 1월 13일 (수) 오후 5:00, Benny Zlotnik 님이 작성: >> >> It's not implemented yet, there are ways to workaround it with either >>

[ovirt-users] Re: image upload on Managed Block Storage

2021-01-13 Thread Benny Zlotnik
It's not implemented yet, there are ways to workaround it with either backend specific tools (like rbd) or by attaching the volume, are you using ceph? On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 4:13 AM Henry lol wrote: > > Hello, > > I've just checked I can't upload an image into the MBS block through either >

[ovirt-users] Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.4.4 is now generally available

2020-12-28 Thread Benny Zlotnik
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:33 PM Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > > Sandro, FYI we are not against cinderlib integration, more than we are > upgrade 4.3 to 4.4 due movement to cinderlib. > > But (!) current Managed Storage Block realization support only krbd (kernel > RBD) driver - it's also not a

[ovirt-users] Re: illegal disk status

2020-12-15 Thread Benny Zlotnik
you can use: $ vdsm-client Volume delete (you can use --help to see the params) After this you'll need to remove the corresponding image manually from the database images table, mark the parent image as active, remove the snapshot from the snapshots table and fix the parent snapshot Be sure to

[ovirt-users] Re: Another illegal disk snapshot problem!

2020-12-10 Thread Benny Zlotnik
gt; > I have taken just a raw copy of the whole image group folder in the hope > if worse came to worse I'd be able to recreate the disk with the actual > files. > > All existing files seem to be referenced in the xmldump. > > On 9/12/2020 11:54 pm, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > &

[ovirt-users] Re: Another illegal disk snapshot problem!

2020-12-09 Thread Benny Zlotnik
ws > pretty much those 2 calls and then XML dump. > > Still a bit lost on the most comfortable way forward unfortunately. > > On 8/12/2020 11:15 pm, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > >> [root@ov-engine ~]# tail -f /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log | grep ERROR > > grepping e

[ovirt-users] Re: Another illegal disk snapshot problem!

2020-12-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
>[root@ov-engine ~]# tail -f /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log | grep ERROR grepping error is ok, but it does not show the reason for the failure, which will probably be on the vdsm host (you can use flow_id 9b2283fe-37cc-436c-89df-37c81abcb2e1 to find the correct file Need to see the underlying

[ovirt-users] Re: Another illegal disk snapshot problem!

2020-12-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Do you know why your snapshot creation failed? Do you have logs with the error? On paper the situation does not look too bad, as the only discrepancy between the database and vdsm is the status of the image, and since it's legal on vdsm, changing it legal in database should work (image status 1)

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt 4.3 - locked image vm - unable to remove a failed deploy of a guest dom

2020-12-02 Thread Benny Zlotnik
It should be in the images table, there is an it_guid column which indicates which templates the image is based on On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:16 PM <3c.moni...@gruppofilippetti.it> wrote: > Hi, > if I can ask some other info, probably I find a "ghost disk" related to > previous problem. > >

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt 4.3 - locked image vm - unable to remove a failed deploy of a guest dom

2020-12-02 Thread Benny Zlotnik
These are the available statuses[1], you can change it to 0, assuming the VM is down [1] https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine/blob/master/backend/manager/modules/common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/common/businessentities/VMStatus.java#L10 On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:57 PM

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt 4.3 - locked image vm - unable to remove a failed deploy of a guest dom

2020-12-02 Thread Benny Zlotnik
I am not sure what is locked? If everything in the images table is 1, then the disks are not locked. If the VM is in status 15, which is "Images Locked" status, then this status is set in the vm_dynamic table On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:43 PM <3c.moni...@gruppofilippetti.it> wrote: > Hi, > in this

[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt 4.3 - locked image vm - unable to remove a failed deploy of a guest dom

2020-12-02 Thread Benny Zlotnik
imagestatus is in the images table, not vms On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:30 AM <3c.moni...@gruppofilippetti.it> wrote: > Hi. > I did a full select on "vms" and field "imagestatus" there isn't! > May be this the reason for which the tool is unable to manage it? > Follows full field list: > > >

[ovirt-users] Re: Check multipath status using API

2020-11-26 Thread Benny Zlotnik
It is implemented, there is no special API for this, using the events endpoint (ovirt-engine/api/events) is the way to access this information On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:00 PM Paulo Silva wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to check the multipath status using the current REST API on > ovirt? > >

[ovirt-users] Re: Backporting of Fixes

2020-11-15 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Hi, 4.3 is no longer maintained. Regardless, this bug was never reproduced and has no fixes attached to it, so there is nothing to backport. The related bugs and their fixes are all related to changes that were introduced in 4.4, so it is unlikely you hit the same issue. If you can share more

[ovirt-users] Re: LiveStorageMigration fail

2020-11-09 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Which version are you using? Did this happen more than once for the same disk? A similar bug was fixed in 4.3.10.1[1] There is another bug with a similar symptom which occurs very rarely and we were unable to reproduce it [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758048 On Mon, Nov 9,

[ovirt-users] Re: locked disk making it impossible to remove vm

2020-11-05 Thread Benny Zlotnik
You mean the disk physically resides on a different storage domain, but engine sees it on another? Which version did this happen on? Do you have the logs from this failure? On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:51 PM wrote: > > > I used it but it didn't work The disk is still in locked status > > when I run

[ovirt-users] Re: locked disk making it impossible to remove vm

2020-11-03 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Do you know why it was stuck? You can use unlock_entity.sh[1] to unlock the disk [1] https://www.ovirt.org/develop/developer-guide/db-issues/helperutilities.html On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:38 PM wrote: > I have a vm that has two disks one active and another disabling when > trying to migrate

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-10-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
sorry, accidentally hit send prematurely, the database table is driver_options, the options are json under driver_options On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:32 PM Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > Did you attempt to start a VM with this disk and it failed, or you > didn't try at all? If it's t

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-10-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
or edit the database table [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881832#c8 On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:40 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 10/14/20 3:30 AM, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > Jeff is right, it's a limitation of kernel rbd, the recommendation is > > to add `rb

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-10-14 Thread Benny Zlotnik
order 22 (4 MiB objects) > snapshot_count: 0 > id: 68a7cd6aeb3924 > block_name_prefix: rbd_data.68a7cd6aeb3924 > format: 2 > features: layering, exclusive-lock, object-map, fast-diff, > deep-flatten > op_features: > fl

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-09-30 Thread Benny Zlotnik
can get engine-setup to use a proxy? > > --Mike > > > On 9/30/20 2:19 AM, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > When you ran `engine-setup` did you enable cinderlib preview (it will > > not be enabled by default)? > > It should handle the creation of the database automatically,

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-09-30 Thread Benny Zlotnik
; lc_ctype 'en_US.UTF-8';\"" > > ...and added the following to the end of /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf: > > hostcinder engine ::0/0 md5 > hostcinder engine 0.0.0.0/0 md5 > > Is there a

[ovirt-users] Re: Latest ManagedBlockDevice documentation

2020-09-29 Thread Benny Zlotnik
The feature is currently in tech preview, but it's being worked on. The feature page is outdated, but I believe this is what most users in the mailing list were using. We held off on updating it because the installation instructions have been a moving target, but it is more stable now and I will

[ovirt-users] Re: Problem with "ceph-common" pkg for oVirt Node 4.4.1

2020-08-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
I think it would be easier to get an answer for this on a ceph mailing list, but why do you need specifically 12.2.7? On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:08 PM wrote: > > Hi! > I have a problem with install ceph-common package(needed for cinderlib > Managed Block Storage) in oVirt Node 4.4.1 - oVirt doc

[ovirt-users] Re: VM Snapshot inconsistent

2020-07-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
> creation_date | 2020-04-23 14:59:20.171+02 > > app_list| > kernel-3.10.0-957.12.2.el7,xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.1.5-4.el7.1,kernel-3.10.0-957.12.1.el7,kernel-3.10.0-957.38.1.el7,ovirt-guest-agent-common-1.0.14-1.el7 > > vm_configuration| > > _

[ovirt-users] Re: New ovirt 4.4.0.3-1.el8 leaves disks in illegal state on all snapshot actions

2020-07-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
it was fixed[1], you need to upgrade to libvirt 6+ and qemu 4.2+ [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785939 On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:59 AM Henri Aanstoot wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > I've got 2 two node setup, image based installs. > When doing ova exports or generic snapshots,

[ovirt-users] Re: VM Snapshot inconsistent

2020-07-21 Thread Benny Zlotnik
.el7 | | 2020-04-23 > 14:59:20.154023+02 | 2020-07-03 17:33:17.483215+02 | > | | f > > (1 row) > > > Thanks, > Arsene > > On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 16:34 +0300, Benny Zlotnik wrote: > > Sorry, I on

[ovirt-users] Re: VM Snapshot inconsistent

2020-07-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
from images where image_group_id = "; As well as $ psql -U engine -d engine -c "SELECT s.* FROM snapshots s, images i where i.vm_snapshot_id = s.snapshot_id and i.image_guid = '6197b30d-0732-4cc7-aef0-12f9f6e9565b';" On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:49 PM Benny Zlotnik wrote: > >

[ovirt-users] Re: VM Snapshot inconsistent

2020-07-19 Thread Benny Zlotnik
It can be done by deleting from the images table: $ psql -U engine -d engine -c "DELETE FROM images WHERE image_guid = '6197b30d-0732-4cc7-aef0-12f9f6e9565b'"; of course the database should be backed up before doing this On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:45 PM Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16,

[ovirt-users] Re: Problem with oVirt 4.4

2020-06-15 Thread Benny Zlotnik
looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785939 On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:37 PM Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:13 PM minnie...@vinchin.com > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried to send the log to you by email, but it fails. So I have sent them > > to

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.3 and cinderlib integration (for ceph) on CentOS 7 - centos-release-openstack-pike

2020-06-08 Thread Benny Zlotnik
yes, that's because cinderlib uses KRBD, so it has less features, I should add this to the documentation. I was told cinderlib has plans to add support for rbd-nbd, this would eventually allow use of newer features On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:40 PM Mathias Schwenke wrote: > > > It looks like a

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.3 and cinderlib integration (for ceph) on CentOS 7 - centos-release-openstack-pike

2020-06-07 Thread Benny Zlotnik
yes, it looks like a configuration issue, you can use plain `rbd` to check connectivity. regarding starting vms and live migration, are there bug reports for these? there is an issue we're aware of with live migration[1], it can be worked around by blacklisting rbd devices in the multipath.conf

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.3 and cinderlib integration (for ceph) on CentOS 7 - centos-release-openstack-pike

2020-06-04 Thread Benny Zlotnik
I've used successfully rocky with 4.3 in the past, the main caveat with 4.3 currently is that cinderlib has to be forced to be 0.9.0 (pip install cinderlib==0.9.0). Let me know if you have any issues. Hopefully during 4.4 we will have the repositories with the RPMs and installation will be much

[ovirt-users] Re: Tasks stuck waiting on another after failed storage migration (yet not visible on SPM)

2020-06-01 Thread Benny Zlotnik
egards, >> Strahil Nikolov >> >> На 27 май 2020 г. 17:39:36 GMT+03:00, Benny Zlotnik >> написа: >> >Sorry, by overloaded I meant in terms of I/O, because this is an >> >active layer merge, the active layer >> >(aabf3788-8e47-4f8b-84

[ovirt-users] Re: Tasks stuck waiting on another after failed storage migration (yet not visible on SPM)

2020-05-27 Thread Benny Zlotnik
M / 1 Tb disk) yet not overloaded. We > have multiple servers with the same specs with no issues. > > Regards, > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:28 PM Benny Zlotnik wrote: >> >> Can you share the VM's xml? >> Can be obtained with `virsh -r dumpxml ` >> Is the VM overload

[ovirt-users] Re: Tasks stuck waiting on another after failed storage migration (yet not visible on SPM)

2020-05-27 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Can you share the VM's xml? Can be obtained with `virsh -r dumpxml ` Is the VM overloaded? I suspect it has trouble converging taskcleaner only cleans up the database, I don't think it will help here ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To

[ovirt-users] Re: Tasks stuck waiting on another after failed storage migration (yet not visible on SPM)

2020-05-27 Thread Benny Zlotnik
You can't see it because it is not a task, tasks only run on SPM, It is a VM job and the data about it is stored in the VM's XML, it's also stored in the vm_jobs table. You can see the status of the job in libvirt with `virsh blockjob sda --info` (if it's still running) On Wed, May 27, 2020

[ovirt-users] Re: Tasks stuck waiting on another after failed storage migration (yet not visible on SPM)

2020-05-27 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Live merge (snapshot removal) is running on the host where the VM is running, you can look for the job id (f694590a-1577-4dce-bf0c-3a8d74adf341) on the relevant host On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:02 AM David Sekne wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running oVirt version 4.3.9.4-1.el7. > > After a failed live

[ovirt-users] Re: New VM disk - failed to create, state locked in UI, nothing in DB

2020-04-20 Thread Benny Zlotnik
> 1. The engine didn't clean it up itself - after all , no mater the reason, > the operation has failed? can't really answer without looking at the logs, engine should cleanup in case of a failure, there can be numerous reasons for cleanup to fail (connectivity issues, bug, etc) > 2. Why the

[ovirt-users] Re: New VM disk - failed to create, state locked in UI, nothing in DB

2020-04-20 Thread Benny Zlotnik
anything in the logs (engine,vdsm)? if there's nothing on the storage, removing from the database should be safe, but it's best to check why it failed On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:39 PM Strahil Nikolov wrote: > > Hello All, > > did anyone observe the following behaviour: > > 1. Create a new disk

[ovirt-users] Re: does SPM still exist?

2020-03-24 Thread Benny Zlotnik
it hasn't disappeared, there has been work done to move operations that used to run only on SPM to run on regular hosts as well (copy/move disk) Currently the main operations performed by SPM are create/delete/extend volume and more[1] [1]

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt behavior with thin provision/deduplicated block storage

2020-02-24 Thread Benny Zlotnik
we use the stats API in the engine, currently only to check if the backend is accessible, we have plans to use it for monitoring and validations but it is not implemented yet On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:35 PM Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:03 PM Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > > > On

[ovirt-users] Re: iSCSI Domain Addition Fails

2020-02-23 Thread Benny Zlotnik
anything in the vdsm or engine logs? On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 4:23 PM Robert Webb wrote: > > Also, I did do the “Login” to connect to the target without issue, from what > I can tell. > > > > From: Robert Webb > Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2020 9:06 AM > To: users@ovirt.org > Subject: iSCSI

[ovirt-users] Re: disk snapshot status is Illegal

2020-02-05 Thread Benny Zlotnik
is the VM with the issue) Changing the snapshot status with unlock_entity will likely work only if the chain is fine on the storage On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:40 PM Crazy Ayansh wrote: > please find the attached the logs. > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:23 PM Benny Zlotnik wrote: > &

[ovirt-users] Re: Recover VM if engine down

2020-02-04 Thread Benny Zlotnik
you need to go to the "import vm" tab on the storage domain and import them On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:30 PM matteo fedeli wrote: > > it does automatically when I attach or should I execute particular operations? > ___ > Users mailing list --

[ovirt-users] Re: disk snapshot status is Illegal

2020-02-04 Thread Benny Zlotnik
e help. > > Thanks > Shashank > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:54 PM Benny Zlotnik wrote: > >> Is the VM running? Can you remove it when the VM is down? >> Can you find the reason for illegal status in the logs? >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at

[ovirt-users] Re: disk snapshot status is Illegal

2020-02-04 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Is the VM running? Can you remove it when the VM is down? Can you find the reason for illegal status in the logs? On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Crazy Ayansh wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Any help on it ? > > Thanks > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:04 PM Crazy Ayansh > wrote: > >> >> Hi Team, >> >> I

[ovirt-users] Re: Recover VM if engine down

2020-02-03 Thread Benny Zlotnik
you can attach the storage domain to another engine and import it On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:45 PM matteo fedeli wrote: > > Hi, It's possibile recover a VM if the engine is damaged? the vm is on a data > storage domain. > ___ > Users mailing list --

[ovirt-users] Re: After NAS crash, one VM will not start up, Cannot prepare illegal volume

2020-01-09 Thread Benny Zlotnik
Did you change the volume metadata to LEGAL on the storage as well? On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:19 PM David Johnson wrote: > We had a drive in our NAS fail, but afterwards one of our VM's will not > start. > > The boot drive on the VM is (so near as I can tell) the only drive > affected. > > I

  1   2   3   >