Re: [Users] Network issues - Bonding

It's FC 19 with all of the latest updates. On 01/06/2014 05:56 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: Hi, just out of curiosity (I'm also looking at implementing bonding on our ComputeNodes): Which OS version are you running ? ___ Users mailing list

[Users] Another issue - VM Networking

I've run into another issue with Ovirt 3.3.2. We have a 2 node VM cluster with Fibre Channel storage. After upgrade everything to FC 19 and installing Ovirt 3.3 from scratch one of the nodes has network issues. The issue is that when we start a VM on the node, the VM cannot access the network.

[Users] Network issues - Bonding

Hello All, A little bit ago I wrote an email about network issues I was having. I found the problem... On the VM host, I had a bond set up between two network interfaces. The bond mode was set to mode 1 (active/passive). However when I look at the bond on the box, I get this: [root@node02

[Users] Help - Cannot run VM. Invalid time zone for given OS type.

Hi, Has anyone run across this error: Cannot run VM. Invalid time zone for given OS type. The OS type for these VMs is set to Linux Other. They were all exported from an Ovirt 3.2 cluster and are being reimported into an Ovirt 3.3 cluster. None of these VMs will boot. We also can't delete

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

:41 PM, Dan Ferris wrote: So, just an update... I upgraded to Ovirt 3.3.0.1 today and I have the latest libvirt. I *THINK* the issue may be gone, but I will have to do a little more testing. Dan On 10/18/2013 11:15 AM, Dan Ferris wrote: That did work. vdsmd decided it would start again. Dan

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

So, just an update... I upgraded to Ovirt 3.3.0.1 today and I have the latest libvirt. I *THINK* the issue may be gone, but I will have to do a little more testing. Dan On 10/18/2013 11:15 AM, Dan Ferris wrote: That did work. vdsmd decided it would start again. Dan On 10/17/2013 3:15 PM

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

That did work. vdsmd decided it would start again. Dan On 10/17/2013 3:15 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Ferris dfer...@prometheusresearch.com To: users@ovirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:24:44 AM Subject: [Users] vdsmd seg fault I

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

On 10/16/2013 12:27 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:44AM -0600, Dan Ferris wrote: I updated to the latest Fedora 19 on two test servers, and now vdsmd will not start. Systedctl says this: dsmd.service - Virtual Desktop Server Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

On 10/16/2013 8:55 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:33:10AM -0600, Dan Ferris wrote: On 10/16/2013 12:27 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:44AM -0600, Dan Ferris wrote: I updated to the latest Fedora 19 on two test servers, and now vdsmd

Re: [Users] vdsmd seg fault

On 10/16/2013 7:27 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: On 10/16/2013 02:27 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:44AM -0600, Dan Ferris wrote: I updated to the latest Fedora 19 on two test servers, and now vdsmd will not start. Systedctl says this: dsmd.service

[Users] vdsmd seg fault

I updated to the latest Fedora 19 on two test servers, and now vdsmd will not start. Systedctl says this: dsmd.service - Virtual Desktop Server Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/vdsmd.service; enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2013-10-14 12:31:30 EDT;

Re: [Users] Recommended Storage Hardware

A few decent Linux servers and LIO is what we use. LIO works pretty well. Dan On 10/8/2013 11:12 AM, Zachary Musselman wrote: Hello, My company is looking to deploy ovirt. We are looking for recommendations for storage hardware. What vendors or appliances are individuals using with iscsi

Re: [Users] Disk state - Illegal?

again with the URL above https://ovirtengine/disks/disk-id send a DELETE using HTTP/CURL Again, this was a poor mans solution but it worked for me. On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dan Ferris dfer...@prometheusresearch.com mailto:dfer...@prometheusresearch.comwrote: Hi, I have another

Re: [Users] Unable to attach to storage domain (Ovirt 3.2)

*all* of the vdsm.log* files? - Original Message - Hi Dan, it looks like one of the domains is missing: 6cf7e7e9-3ae5-4645-a29c-fb17ecb38a50 Is there any target missing? (disconnected or somehow faulty or unreachable) -- Federico - Original Message - From: Dan Ferris dfer

[Users] Unable to attach to storage domain (Ovirt 3.2)

Hi, This is my first post to the list. I am happy to say that we have been using Ovirt for 6 months with a few bumps, but it's mostly been ok. Until tonight that is... I had to do a maintenance that required rebooting both of our Hypervisor nodes. Both of them run Fedora Core 18 and have