Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

Hi Itamar and list! After reading all the suggestions on this subject, it would be much appreciated if someone(perhaps you, Itamar, since you asked the question) could sum this all up, and get us all on the list a view of all the wishes, and the priority that seems to be among the list people. Then

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

Hi!There are many promising features in oVirt, but still I feel it is just "promising", not for production. The most critical issue for me, that is preventing me from using oVirt in production, is the "single point of failure" of the engine. I wouldn't want the struggle of setting up a new engine,

Re: [Users] fw: Migrating ovirt-engine to new server

Hi there... Can't be possible that this is the procedure that we want to have to do this operation...? This is an operation that many users will want or will need to go through, and this definitely seem t complex. I suppose/hope there is a strategy for developing another more smooth soluti

[Users] problems with thin provisioned LUN's for oVirt node

Hi! I'd like to share a few things regarding installation(and use) of oVirt node on thin provisioned LUN's. I had problems here, perhaps someone else have noticed similarities? I use ZFS and comstar on solaris to provide volume's and LUN`S to the fibre channel SAN. When I create a thin provisi

Re: [Users] ovirt 3.1 engine install fails - fedora 17 with selinux disabled

Hi! That 3.5 kernel issue is, what I have understood, more related to nfs as storage domain, not the problem Davis is refering to. Rgrds Johan -users-boun...@ovirt.org skrev: - Till: David Elliott , oVirt Mailing List Från: Nicholas Kesick Sänt av: users-boun...@ovirt.org Datum: 201

[Users] Ang: ovirt 3.1 engine install fails - fedora 17 with selinux disabled

Hi! I encountered the same problem, and I found this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835100 reported by Ofer Schreiber. So it is not intended. I do have another problem, related to this,though! I can't set my SELinux to permissive...? In the /etc/selinux/conf file, I change

[Users] ovirt 3.1 rpm setup

Hi! Fc17/ovirt 3.1, following the instructions on ovirt site how to install from rpm stable. My engine-setup fails with cannot this create db error: Installing:Configuring oVirt-engine...                              [ DONE ] Creating CA...                                           [ DONE ] E

Re: [Users] sanlock issues

Hi! Since I'm a storage guy, I would like to know more about this! Are these watchdog/SANlock features LVM functionality, or is it a part of oVirt? Since I can't find any info about it in oVirt wiki documentation... Since LUN's are mapped to all the machines in the cluster, I guess it is not on

Re: [Users] Managing Remote Access to Physical Workstations

Hi! You can check out thinlinc, a system developed by Cendio. I've been using that a lot, and they support both H/W and S/W clients. You can download it for free for testing or for up to 10 users. http://www.cendio.com/ Rgrds Johan -Randall Wood skrev: - Till: Johan Kragst

Re: [Users] host raiding two LUN from different external storage.... continuation...

e the NPIV issue still remains... Rgrds Johan -Dan Yasny skrev: ----- Till: Johan Kragsterman Från: Dan Yasny Datum: 2012.07.29 12:55 Kopia: users@ovirt.org Ärende: Re: [Users] host raiding two LUN from different external storage You can use replicated at the SAN level storage between dif

Re: [Users] host raiding two LUN from different external storage

ing or more NPIV LUN's. And this is going to continue, even if the Fc world move to FCoE. So perhaps you can tell me a little bit about the storage strategy that oVirt dev team has? Rgrds Johan -----Dan Yasny skrev: - Till: Johan Kragsterman Från: Dan Yasny Datum: 2012.07.29 12:

[Users] storage...

Hi! I'm just in process of setting up an ovirt environment again. Using ovirt node HV 2.3.0, on fibre channel storage. I'm forced to use Fedora 16, since Fedora 17 doesn't work with fibre channel storage or at least not with Qlogic HBA's. I've allready told the list and Fedora forum that. I as

[Users] Increase storage domain

Hi! Interesting question, I would also be interested in that. LVM would be aware of the expansion, I suppose...Did you run a pvs command for LVM to list the size? It would be nice if LVM automatically would change the LV size...anyone knows how this works...? Filesystem size is another thing.

Re: [Users] host raiding two LUN from different external storage

urself. A drawback might be, though, that the data is on a logical volume on the host level, and not on the LUN, which means that you need backup on the host level. Rgrds Johan -users-boun...@ovirt.org skrev: - Till: Johan Kragsterman Från: Dan Yasny Sänt av: users-boun...@ovirt.org Datum:

[Users] host raiding two LUN from different external storage

Hi! In some setups, like when you got two datacenters that works like failover sites, you would like to have two external raid controllers(storage devices), one in each datacenter. You then send two identical LUN's, from each controller, to a cluster, let's say two hosts, for simplicity. What

[Users] bug in fedora 17? oVirt node 2.5

Hi! I discovered that fedora 17 has problems with discovering fibre channel devices. I don't know why yet, though. This effects the oVirt node 2.5 since it is based on fedora 17. The fibre channel LUN's that is mapped to the server doesn't show up, so there is no way of installing it. I use

Re: [Users] "Error: Cannot attach Storage. Storage Domain doesn't exist."

new LUN of different size again, and check if it has the same device name, and also check what size it reports. I would appreciate if someone with deeper knowledge than me about these things could shed some light here... Rgrds Johan -----Johan Kragsterman/Capvert skrev: - Till: Jakub L

Re: [Users] Managing Remote Access to Physical Workstations

Hi, Randall! What you need is a "broker", and a terminal server is working as a "broker". There are several solutions that will work, but first I would want to know why you need physical machines? Are there demanding graphical applications you're going to run, or...? Rgrds Johan -users-b

[Users] Error: Cannot attach Storage. Storage Domain doesn't exist.

Hi again! Hmm, very strange, the size LVM reports on the LUN is actually 30 Gb...??? So why doesn't it allow me to create on it? PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/mapper/3600144f09aa180004fd87a31p4 HostVG lvm2 a-- 288.00m0 /dev/m

[Users] Error: Cannot attach Storage. Storage Domain doesn't exist.

Ohh, I see that I haven't sent to the list, so I do that now Hi! Ahaa, I can shed some light here... This is a part of the log in engine: 2012-07-15 13:46:51,837 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase] (http--0.0.0.0-8080-3) Vds: node1.hemma.home 2012-07-15 1

[Users] "Error: Cannot attach Storage. Storage Domain doesn't exist."

Hi all! This is my first post to this list. I set up a fedora16 HV, and an oVirt engine on fedora 16, both booted and installed on fibre channel storage. Everything works fine, shows up in web gui on engine, host discovered and active, until that I try to attach storage. Then I get this mess