[ovirt-users] Old mailing list SPAM

Hi, does anyone currently get old mails of 2016 from the mailing list? We are spammed with something like this from teknikservice.nu: ... Received: from mail.ovirt.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ovirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33EA46AD3; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Received:

[ovirt-users] Re: Cleanup illegal snapshot

ve any idea? Markus ____ Von: Ala Hino [ah...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 12:29 An: Markus Stockhausen Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot Indeed, retry live merge. There is no harm in retrying live merge. As mentioned, if the image deleted

[ovirt-users] Re: Cleanup illegal snapshot

Bug with logs attached: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383084 Best regards. Markus Von: Nir Soffer [nsof...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 20:37 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ala Hino; Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup

[ovirt-users] Re: Cleanup illegal snapshot

Hi Ala, > Von: Adam Litke [ali...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 15:54 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Ovirt Users; Ala Hino; Nir Soffer > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot > > On 30/09/16 05:47 +0000, Markus Stockhausen wrote: >

[ovirt-users] Re: Cleanup illegal snapshot

t it right? Markus --- Von: Ala Hino [ah...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 11:21 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ovirt Users; Nir Soffer; Adam Litke Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot Hi Markus, What's the version that you

[ovirt-users] Re: Centos 7.6 and kernel upgrading

> Von: Michal Skrivanek [michal.skriva...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 18:53 > An: Erick Perez > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Re: Centos 7.6 and kernel upgrading > > > On 14 Feb 2019, at 21:41, Erick Perez wrote: > > > > Good day, > > What is the Ovirt

[ovirt-users] High frequency of getVolumeSize()

Grüßen, Markus Stockhausen Head of Software Technology Ubierring 11 · 50678 Köln Telefon: +49 221 33 608 611 Mobil: +49 151 12040606 Mail: markus.stockhau...@collogia.de Web: www.collogia-it-services.de ___ Users mailing

[ovirt-users] Re: Unable to mount CephFS as POSIX Compliant FS

SELinux might block access here. Markus Am 04.10.2018 01:57 schrieb ryan.terps...@gmail.com: I have a ceph filesystem that I can manually mount on my ovirt host. [root@ovirt121 ~]# mount -t ceph ceph01:/ /mnt -o name=admin,secret= [root@ovirt121 ~]# touch /mnt/test works great! Then I umount

Re: [ovirt-users] qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.11.1 now available for testing

Hi Sandro, I'm wondering if BZ1513362 (AIO stuck fixed in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.12) will be worth to give the newer version a try. Best regards. Markus - Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Sandro Bonazzola [sbona...@redhat.com]

[ovirt-users] CentOS 7.4, qemu 2.9 -> Gluster 3.xx?

Hi, given the fact that a current yum update will bring Centos 7.4 and qemu 2.9 to the nodes I wonder if a gluster update thorugh Ovirt repos is already close to release? Not only is 3.8 EOL but also I like to minimize the update steps to a new stable package level. Best regards. Markus

Re: [ovirt-users] VM live migration and NFS 4.2

Jun 25, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Markus Stockhausen <stockhau...@collogia.de<mailto:stockhau...@collogia.de>> wrote: Hi, we are currently evaluating NFS 4.2 based storage for OVirt 4.1.2. Normal operation and discard support work like a charm. For some strange reason we cannot use VM live

[ovirt-users] VM live migration and NFS 4.2

Hi, we are currently evaluating NFS 4.2 based storage for OVirt 4.1.2. Normal operation and discard support work like a charm. For some strange reason we cannot use VM live migration any more. As soon as one NFS 4.2 based VM disk is doing disk I/O during the operation. VM stalls and is

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1.2 sanlock issue with nfs data domain

Maybe NFS Mounts with Version 4.2 and on Server side no SELinux nfs_t rule defined? Sent from mobile... Am 19.06.2017 11:01 vorm. schrieb Moritz Baumann : > Is there a way to "reinitialize" the lockspace so one node can become > SPM again and we can run VMS. errors

Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

> Von: Yaniv Kaul [yk...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 09:58 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Ovirt Users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS > contraproductive On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Markus Stockhausen <st

Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

Thanks for all your feedback. Im trying to collect all the infos in BZ1462504. Von: Fabrice Bacchella [fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr] Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 10:13 An: Idan Shaby Cc: Markus Stockhausen; Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt

[ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

Hi, we just set up a new 4.1.2 OVirt cluster. It is a quite normal HDD/XFS/NFS stack that worked quit well with 4.0 in the past. Inside the VMs we use XFS too. To our surprise we observe abysmal high IO during mkfs.xfs and fstrim inside the VM. A simple example: Step 1: Create 100G Thin disk

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and XFS

Hi Fernando, we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots in OVirt) comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience excessive fragmentation. For more info see unresolved Redhat Info: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663 Even with tuning the XFS allocation

Re: [ovirt-users] Windows Server 2016 client licensing costs

if there might be the possibility to relocate the VM between them online (VMWare 6 and higher). >From a technical perspective OVirt virtualization has the same limits. So setup small dedicated Windows (or Oracle clusters) to keep costs down. Markus Mit freundlichen Grüßen Markus Stockhau

Re: [ovirt-users] mOvirt 1.7 - Engine 4.0.6 - No disks per VM

Hi, works now as expected. Markus Mit freundlichen Grüßen Markus Stockhausen Teamleiter Softwaretechnologie ___ [https://webmail.collogia.de/logo/collogia_logo.jpg] Ubierring 11 · 50678 Köln Telefon: +49 221 336 08-0 Mobil: +49 151 12040 606 E-Mail: stockhau...@collogia.de

Re: [ovirt-users] mOvirt 1.7 - Engine 4.0.6 - No disks per VM

Thanks a lot, I will test and give feedback. Markus Am 29.03.2017 5:13 nachm. schrieb Filip Krepinsky <fkrep...@redhat.com>: On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Filip Krepinsky <fkrep...@redhat.com<mailto:fkrep...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:15 PM,

[ovirt-users] mOvirt 1.7 - Engine 4.0.6 - No disks per VM

Hi there, my smartphone updated mOvirt these days to 1.7. Since then I always get errors when trying to access the disks dialogue of a VM in mOVirt. It boils down to the URL https:///ovirt-engine/api/vms//disks Result is always 404. A simple cross check in the webbrowser returns the same

[ovirt-users] Upgrade 4.1 (with cluster/dc compatibility 3.6)

Hi, just want to know if I can upgrade a 4.0.5 OVirt environment to 4.1 with cluster/dc compatibility currently still set to 3.6? Or do I need to upgrade compatibility level first? IIRC upgrade to 4.0 required at least compatibility 3.6. Best regards. Markus

Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration Centos 7.3 -> Centos 7.2

Hi Yaniv, for better tracking I opened BZ 1413847. Best regards. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail

[ovirt-users] Live migration Centos 7.3 -> Centos 7.2

Hi there, maybe i missed the discussion on the mailing list. Today we installed a new centos host. Of course it has 7.3 and qemu 2.6 after a yum update. It can be attached to our cluster wihtout problems. We are running Ovirt 4.0.6 but the cluster compatibility level is still 3.6. We can

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding Infiniband VM Network Fails

Hi, we are running Infiniband on the NFS storage network only. Did I get it aight that this works or do you already have issues there? Best regards. Markus Web: www.collogia.de Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von

Re: [ovirt-users] Live merge speed

unt point to 1M (xfs_io -c 'extsize 1m' /var/nas/OVirt). If this does not help I will send you some update. Best regards. Markus >>> Von: Maor Lipchuk [mlipc...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. November 2016 16:33 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live

[ovirt-users] Live merge speed

-578f1f3f06ee du -m c8acdbc7-af24-4c5c-94c5-ae7262d98f5c 183222 c8acdbc7-af24-4c5c-94c5-ae7262d98f5c Usually at some point the process is gaining speed and we see >100MByte/sec speed. Can anyone explain what might be going on. Best regards. Markus Stockhau

Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot

Bug with logs attached: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383084 Best regards. Markus Von: Nir Soffer [nsof...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2016 20:37 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ala Hino; Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup

Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot

ve any idea? Markus ____ Von: Ala Hino [ah...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 12:29 An: Markus Stockhausen Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot Indeed, retry live merge. There is no harm in retrying live merge. As mentioned, if the image deleted

Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot

t it right? Markus --- Von: Ala Hino [ah...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 11:21 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ovirt Users; Nir Soffer; Adam Litke Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot Hi Markus, What's the version that you

Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot

Hi Ala, > Von: Adam Litke [ali...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 15:54 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Ovirt Users; Ala Hino; Nir Soffer > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot > > On 30/09/16 05:47 +0000, Markus Stockhausen wrote: >

[ovirt-users] Cleanup illegal snapshot

Hi, if a OVirt snapshot is illegal we might have 2 situations. 1) qemu is still using it - lsof shows qemu access to the base raw and the delta qcow2 file. -> E.g. a previous live merge failed. In the past we successfully solved that situation by setting the status of the delta image in the

[ovirt-users] RHSA-2016-1756 - live migration issues

Hi there. several Redhat BZs are currently targeting a live migration error with current qemu 2.3/2.6 versions. From my understanding BZ1359731 trie to fix a queue overflow issue. With the patch in place qemu might abort randomly during live migration. BZ1372763 provides info about additional

Re: [ovirt-users] Cannot relocate SPM

Thanks for the tips. None of them helped. I opened BZ1376156. Best regards. Markus Von: Nir Soffer [nsof...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 19:56 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cannot relocate SPM

[ovirt-users] Cannot relocate SPM

Hi there, trying to relocate the SPM (OVirt 3.6.7) we get the following error: Error while executing action: Cannot force select SPM. The Storage Pool has running taks. Any idea what is wrong? Ovirt WebGui shows no running tasks. Best regards. Markus

Re: [ovirt-users] VM storage issue after snapshot deletion

image files (on our NFS), merging images on the command line or manipulating the DB. First shot would be: Stop VM & backup images + snapshots for the recovery case. Afterwards try to start the VM and see what happens. Best regards. Markus Stockhausen Von: O

Re: [ovirt-users] VM storage issue after snapshot deletion

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von > Ollie Armstrong >[ol...@fubra.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. August 2016 11:39 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [ovirt-users] VM storage issue after snapshot deletion > > Hi everyone. > > I'm having an issue with a VM after

Re: [ovirt-users] On 3.6.6, tried doing a live VM storage migration... didn't work

I know of at least one live Disk Migration issue with Multi Disk VMs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319400 Might be totally different but I must admit that this feature had several ups and downs the last years. Markus Am 26.05.2016 3:50 vorm. schrieb Christopher Cox

Re: [ovirt-users] Snapshot is "Locked" - Can't do anything with the VM

Hi, we've seen a lot of trouble when deleting snapshots of multidisk VMs. Especially endless running snapshot deletions is one of our culprits. More here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319400 Markus Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org

Re: [ovirt-users] qemu patch in OVirt repos

> Von: Yaniv Kaul [yk...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 10:41 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Sandro Bonazzola [sbona...@redhat.com]; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] qemu patch in OVirt repos > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Markus

[ovirt-users] qemu patch in OVirt repos

Hi Sandro, I don't exactly know the process how qemu 2.3 patches get into the OVirt repos. At least you should be someone who knows better. Will it be possible to get a version with fix for BZ1319400 into the tree? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319400 It's a quite nasty bug

Re: [ovirt-users] Disks Illegal State

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von > Clint Boggio [cl...@theboggios.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 14:16 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Disks Illegal State > > OVirt 3.6, 4 node cluster with dedicated engine. Main storage domain is >

Re: [ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3

works. So we currently have the following situation: Live merge (for all disks) stalls the VM Live merge (for single disks) seems to work but logs give other info. Markus Von: Gianluca Cecchi [gianluca.cec...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 20:59 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Pavel

Re: [ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3

: Pavel Gashev [p...@acronis.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 15:12 An: Markus Stockhausen; users Betreff: Re: AW: [ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3 Markus, So all CPU threads are blocked by the main loop. The main loop is busy draining IO requests from all drives

Re: [ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3

Ok will give it a try... Von: Pavel Gashev [p...@acronis.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 15:12 An: Markus Stockhausen; users Betreff: Re: AW: [ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3 Markus, So all CPU threads are blocked

[ovirt-users] stalls during live Merge Centos 7 / qemu 2.3

Hi there, I'm getting slowly mad about our new Centos 7 cluster. Whenever I start a live merge the machine completely freezes. It seems to be independent of the Guest OS (tried SLES 11 SP3, SLES11 SP4 and SLES12). I already opened BZ1319400 because I'm clueless. Doing the same in our Fedora 20

Re: [ovirt-users] heavy webadmin

> Von: Nicolas Ecarnot [nico...@ecarnot.net] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2016 21:32 > An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: AW: [ovirt-users] heavy webadmin > > Le 03/04/2016 21:25, Markus Stockhausen a écrit : > > switch refresh interval to 60s. &g

Re: [ovirt-users] heavy webadmin

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von > Nicolas Ecarnot [nico...@ecarnot.net] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2016 21:20 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] heavy webadmin > > Le 03/04/2016 17:13, Greg Sheremeta a écrit : > > We have patches in

Re: [ovirt-users] Going crazy with emory hotplug on 3.6

> Von: Francesco Romani [from...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 09:06 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Going crazy with emory hotplug on 3.6 > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Markus Stockhausen" <

Re: [ovirt-users] Going crazy with emory hotplug on 3.6

> Von: Nir Soffer [nsof...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 14:10 > An: Markus Stockhausen; Francesco Romani > Cc: users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Going crazy with emory hotplug on 3.6 > > Adding Francesco. > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Mar

[ovirt-users] Going crazy with emory hotplug on 3.6

Hi there, we upgraded Ovirt to 3.6, added the first Centos 7 host and created a new cluster with compatibility level 3.6 around it. Until now we are running with Fedora nodes. The first Linux VMs are already running in the new cluster. With the first Windows VM migrated over we once again

Re: [ovirt-users] NFS IO timeout configuration

> Von: Vinzenz Feenstra [vfeen...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2016 09:00 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: users@ovirt.org; Mike Hildebrandt > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] NFS IO timeout configuration > > Hi there, > > > > we got a nasty situa

Re: [ovirt-users] NFS IO timeout configuration

>> Von: Yaniv Kaul [yk...@redhat.com] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2016 13:15 >> An: Markus Stockhausen >> Cc: users@ovirt.org; Mike Hildebrandt >> Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] NFS IO timeout configuration >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:32 AM,

[ovirt-users] NFS IO timeout configuration

Hi there, we got a nasty situation yesterday in our OVirt 3.5.6 environment. We ran a LSM that failed during the cleanup operation. To be precise when the process deleted an image on the source NFS storage. Engine log gives: 2016-01-11 20:49:45,120 INFO

[ovirt-users] qemu version in oVirt CentOS 7.1 repos

Hi there, with the advent of oVirt 3.6 and our aging FC20 nodes I'm searching for a replacement. Until today I always matched oVirt on CentOS 7.1 hypervisors to qemu 2.1.2. That would make no difference to our already running Fedora virt-preview 2.1.3 version. Looking at

[ovirt-users] SPICE/VNC shared consoles

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Budur > Nagaraju [nbud...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2015 05:53 > An: users > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Multiple console access > > HI , > > AM using SPICE console to access the vm console ,how to enable

Re: [ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 3.6 Final Release is now available

Nice to hear. Congratulations and thumbs up. Markus P.S. The usual delay of two months seems to have become common courtesy. Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Sandro Bonazzola [sbona...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch,

Re: [ovirt-users] Vm suddenly paused with error "vm has paused due to unknown storage error"

Hi Jasper, from time to time we see a similar behaviour. All of a sudden a VM pauses due to some IO error. But it takes 5 months to occur. Our /var/log/libvirt/qemu/.log gives qemu-system-x86_64: block.c:2806: bdrv_error_action: Assertion `error >= 0' failed. Currently we are waiting to

Re: [ovirt-users] Live Storage Migration

> Von: Greg Padgett [gpadg...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Samstag, 19. September 2015 02:19 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live Storage Migration > > On 09/14/2015 05:20 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > s

Re: [ovirt-users] Some VMs in status "not responding" in oVirt interface

Do you have a chance to install qemu-debug? If yes I would try a backtrace. gdb -p # bt Markus Am 15.09.2015 4:15 nachm. schrieb Daniel Helgenberger : Hello, I do not want to hijack the thread but maybe my issue is related? It might have started with ovirt

Re: [ovirt-users] Some VMs in status "not responding" in oVirt interface

. Markus ** Von: Christian Hailer [christ...@hailer.eu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. September 2015 21:24 An: Markus Stockhausen; 'Daniel Helgenberger' Cc: yd...@redhat.com; users@ovirt.org Betreff: AW: [ovirt-users] Some VMs in status "not responding" in oVirt

Re: [ovirt-users] [HA] Restart guest on other node on network SAN problem

> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von > Lionel Caignec [caig...@cines.fr] > Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2015 15:47 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [ovirt-users] [HA] Restart guest on other node on network SAN > problem > > Hi, > > i've ovirt nodes

[ovirt-users] Live Storage Migration

Hi, somehow I got lost about the possibility to do a live storage migration. We are using OVirt 3.5.4 + FC20 Nodes (virt-preview - qemu 2.1.3) >From the WebUI I have the following possibilites: 1) disk without snapshot: VMs tab -> Disks -> Move: Button is active but it does not allow to do a

Re: [ovirt-users] Question about upgrading ovirt 3.5.3 to 3.5.4

"yum update" on the hosts only. Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Jason Keltz [j...@cse.yorku.ca] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. September 2015 21:08 An: users Betreff: [ovirt-users] Question about upgrading ovirt 3.5.3 to 3.5.4

[ovirt-users] NFS mounts default to UDP?

Hi there, we noticed that a newly created NFS data domain is mounted with UDP protocol. Does anyone know if that is the desired behaviour of current OVirt versions? ovirtnode# mount -a ... 10.10.30.254:/var/nas4/OVirtIB on /rhev/data-center/mnt/10.10.30.254:_var_nas4_OVirtIB type nfs

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt-agent: is it possible to run specific actions when taking snapshots?

From my experience I strongly advise to avoid a drop_caches with option 3. We still see commands hanging for hours if they are issued during high CPU/memory load. Even with matured Ubuntu 3.16 kernels Staying with option 1 should be enough and much more save. Markus

Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration qemu 2.1.2 - 2.1.3: Unknown savevm section

Von: Markus Stockhausen Gesendet: Freitag, 10. April 2015 20:51 An: users@ovirt.org Betreff: Live migration qemu 2.1.2 - 2.1.3: Unknown savevm section Hi, don't know what will be the best place for the following question. So starting with the OVirt mailing list. We are using OVirt

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt-webadmin is too slow

Die you try to increase refresh interval to 60. Seemed to help for me, especially in WAN connect. Markus Am 06.05.2015 3:48 nachm. schrieb lofyer lof...@lofyer.org: I've installed ovirt-engine-3.5.1 and created about 120 VMs. Everytime I did a multi-selection it will take a not-so-short time

[ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found -

Hi, although we already upgraded several hypervisor nodes to Ovirt 3.5.1 the newest upgrade has left the host in a very strang state. We did: - Host was removed from cluster - Ovirt 3.5 repo was activated on host - Host was reinstalled from enging And we got: - A host that is active and looks

Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found -

Von: Paul Heinlein [heinl...@madboa.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. März 2015 18:43 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: Users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found - On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Markus Stockhausen wrote: although we already upgraded several

[ovirt-users] Fedora 21 as Ovirt (hypervisor) host

Hi, back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper knowledge? The reason I'm asking: We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and

[ovirt-users] movirt - ovirt 3.5.1 - server error 500

Hi, just installed movirt on my mobile. Upon connection it breaks with the attached error in the 3.5.1 engine server logs. Something I'm missing? Markus 2015-02-19 12:21:19,757 ERROR [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[default-host].[/ovirt-engine/api]]

Re: [ovirt-users] movirt - ovirt 3.5.1 - server error 500

Von: Juan Hernández [jhern...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 12:53 An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] movirt - ovirt 3.5.1 - server error 500 On 02/19/2015 12:22 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Hi, just installed movirt on my mobile

Re: [ovirt-users] How long do your migrations last?

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Darrell Budic [bu...@onholyground.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Februar 2015 19:03 An: Nicolas Ecarnot Cc: users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] How long do your migrations last? I’m under the impression it depends

Re: [ovirt-users] ksmd high cpu usage from almost a week with just one vm running

Memory usage 80%: ksm kicks in. There it will run at full speed until usage is below 80%. There is an open BZ from me. Bad behaviour is controlled by mom. Markus Am 06.12.2014 15:58 schrieb mad Engineer themadengin...@gmail.com: Hello All, I am using centos6.5 x64 on a server with

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Brian Proffitt [bprof...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 17:01 An: users Cc: board Betreff: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014 ... * 3.6 status Still gathering 3.6 features

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

[users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. November 2014 08:38 An: Gianluca Cecchi Cc: s k; users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster Wow. Very quick test. Thanks for sharing

Re: [ovirt-users] Live Merge Functionality disabled on CentOS 6.6 Node and oVirt 3.5.0

Iirc you simply need libvirt 1.2.9 Am 20.11.2014 16:20 schrieb Bob Doolittle b...@doolittle.us.com: Are there any bugs related to the changes in question that we can track so we know when the changes are reflected in our distros of interest? Thanks, Bob On 11/20/2014 03:51 AM, s k wrote:

[ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 16:49 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: s k; users@ovirt.org; Daniel Helgenberger; Coffee Chou Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live Merge Functionality disabled on CentOS 6.6 Node and oVirt 3.5.0 On 11/20/2014 10:32 AM, Markus Stockhausen

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

everything from virt-preview - Wait for FC21 - Wait for Centos 21 Still a long way to go to get all the beloved features out of the box. Markus Von: Bob Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 19:38 An: Markus Stockhausen

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

Wow. Very quick test. Thanks for sharing the results. I will have a look what qemu 1.6.2 might need. Regarding stability of qemu 2.1.2: You should scan the qemu stable mailing list if some severe fixes have been posted after the release. If you feel comfortable take qemu from the preview

Re: [ovirt-users] disabling generic-receive-offload (gro) and large-receive-offload ?

Hi Ernest, we have similar issues with IPoIB. To fix it we use VDSM hooks: # cat /usr/libexec/vdsm/hooks/before_vdsm_start/network.sh ... ethtool -K ib0 tso off 2/dev/null ethtool -K ib1 tso off 2/dev/null ... Nevertheless this is similar to running self defined init scripts. But at least I

[ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.2 - 3.5.x

Hi, maybe a stupid one. Just want to make sure that nothing goes wrong. We plan to make a rolling upgrade of our landscape going to 3.5.1 in december. So we always need some hypervisor nodes up and running during the process. Looking at older posts I assume that upgrading the engine should be

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.2 - 3.5.x

Hi, sorry I forgot that: NFS, engine is running in a qemu VM outside the cluster. Markus Von: Gabi C [gab...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 12:12 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.2 - 3.5.x Hello

Re: [ovirt-users] Deleting large snapshots blocks the whole cluster

Do you see swapping on the SPM? If yes a regular echo 3 drop_caches could help. Markus Am 27.10.2014 10:57 schrieb Stefan Wendler stefan.wend...@tngtech.com: Hi, we have some really large snapshots left from a migration. Since our store is almost full now we have to delete them now. Some

Re: [ovirt-users] Deleting large snapshots blocks the whole cluster

Von: Stefan Wendler [stefan.wend...@tngtech.com] Gesendet: Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 11:39 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Deleting large snapshots blocks the whole cluster Hi, do you mean during snapshot deletion or in general? In general we do

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 on RHEL 6.6 hyperv enabled breaks Windows VMs

Hi, we are running the hyperv flags since months in our Win7 VMs without any issue. As we are still on OVirt 3.4 FC20 infrastructure we set them with hooks (and really depend on them). Maybe RHEL related? Markus Am 24.10.2014 18:22 schrieb Charles Gruener cgrue...@gruener.us:

Re: [ovirt-users] How to add custom lines in to host interface?

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Trey Dockendorf [treyd...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Oktober 2014 20:43 An: Arman Khalatyan Cc: users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] How to add custom lines in to host interface? I'd be interested in this too. I

Re: [ovirt-users] How to fix wrong speed of the Infiniband Interfaces?

If you are speaking about ib0 and so on this will be fixed with 3.5. The interfaces will then be advertised as 10Gbit. Am 18.10.2014 13:14 schrieb Arman Khalatyan arm2...@gmail.com: Hi, I am using ovirt 3.4.4-1. On the hosts I have 1Gbit(eth),10Gbit(eth) and 40Gbit(QDRInfiniband) interfaces. ib

[ovirt-users] Fwd: Re: Cluster settings: KSM Control not working?

Forgot the CC. -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Von: Markus Stockhausen stockhau...@collogia.de Datum: 09.10.2014 21:42 Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Cluster settings: KSM Control not working? An: Frank Wall f...@moov.de Cc: Have a look at redhat bugzilla #1114226. It should give

Re: [ovirt-users] problems with win 2008_64 vm

Are you running FC20 on the hypervisor host and if yes what kernel? Am 27.09.2014 02:39 schrieb Grant Pasley gr...@xtranet.com.au: good morning guys i have an issue with my 2008 vm going to pause within 5 secs of starting it up. new install of ovirt 3.4.4 on hp dl160, installed the windows vm

Re: [ovirt-users] BSoD in windows servers V.M due the processor Class

Hi, will be fixed in 3.5. In advance you should set hv_relaxed options via hook. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110305 Best regards. Markus Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Carlos Castillo

Re: [ovirt-users] Disk migration eats all CPU, vms running in SPM become unresponsive

users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Federico Alberto Sayd [fs...@uncu.edu.ar] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 18:16 An: users@ovirt.org Betreff: [ovirt-users] Disk migration eats all CPU, vms running in SPM become unresponsive Hello: I

Re: [ovirt-users] Removal of snapshot taking too long

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von André Freitas [afrei...@ubiwhere.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014 15:22 An: users@ovirt.org Betreff: [ovirt-users] Removal of snapshot taking too long Hi, i don't know if its normal but i'm having situations

[ovirt-users] Snapshot deletion performance [was Latency]

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Maurice James [mja...@media-node.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Juni 2014 01:42 An: users Betreff: [ovirt-users] Spam Latency I noticed that the following operations take way, way too long: Any type of import/export (VM,

Re: [ovirt-users] Spam Re: [Video]: New Live Migration Progess Bar for oVirt

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von quot;Maurice James [mja...@media-node.com] Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juni 2014 16:33 An: Brian Proffitt Cc: users Betreff: [ovirt-users] Spam Re: [Video]: New Live Migration Progess Bar for oVirt is that progress

[ovirt-users] Best way to define migration bandwidth

Hello, right now we modify /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf on each host to raise migration bandwidth on our IPoIB network. Is there any place to set it permanently? If not I'll file a RFE. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche

Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

. Markus Von: Douglas Schilling Landgraf [dougsl...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 23:23 An: Dan Kenigsberg; Markus Stockhausen Cc: ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update On 06/24/2014 04:35 AM, Dan

[ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

Hi, after a maintenance of one of our hosts, vdsmd does not start anymore. Error could be narrowed down to the following command: [root ~]# /usr/bin/vdsm-tool is-configured Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/vdsm-tool, line 145, in module sys.exit(main()) File

Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org] im Auftrag von Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 09:53 An: ovirt-users Betreff: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update Hi, after a maintenance of one of our hosts, vdsmd

  1   2   3   >