Re: [ovirt-users] How do you oVirt? Here the answers!

2017-04-14 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Hi, On 14.04.2017 11:27, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: - Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS, Gluster and iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also: Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS > EMC ScaleIO There would be interesting to know in which way. I've

Re: [ovirt-users] log out event but not log in?

2017-02-22 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
I have the same issue since oVirt 4.0.x. 21.02.2017 10:28, Gianluca Cecchi пишет: Hello, In oVirt 4.1 web admin gui I see events about users logging out (they have been created on internal domain with ovirt-aaa-jdbc-tool command), but I don't see the corresponding log in event. The same is true

Re: [ovirt-users] Export VM

2017-02-15 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
15.02.2017 10:10, Yaniv Kaul пишет: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Yura Poltoratskiy <yurapolt...@gmail.com <mailto:yurapolt...@gmail.com>> wrote: Export VM one can do only to the EXPORT_DOMAIN. Basically, export domain is (can be) on the public net, which i

Re: [ovirt-users] Export VM

2017-02-15 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
and get the exporting traffic through the Migration network, but this is very specific scenario. 15.02.2017 09:27, Yura Poltoratskiy пишет: Hi. Through the management. I can explain more detail if need. 15.02.2017 09:09, David David пишет: Hi. There are several network roles as Management, VM

Re: [ovirt-users] Export VM

2017-02-14 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Hi. Through the management. I can explain more detail if need. 15.02.2017 09:09, David David пишет: Hi. There are several network roles as Management, VM and Migration. Export VM action through which network role is going on? Thanks. ___ Users

Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to 4.1.0?

2017-02-03 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
I've done an upgrade of ovirt-engine tomorrow. There were two problems. The first - packages from epel repo, solved by disable repo and downgrade package to an existing version in ovirt-release40 repo (yes, there is info in documentation about epel repo). The second (and it is not only for

Re: [ovirt-users] Multipath handling in oVirt

2017-02-01 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Here you are: iSCSI multipathing network setup of a host 01.02.2017 15:31, Nicolas Ecarnot пишет: Hello, Before replying further, may I ask you, Yura,

Re: [ovirt-users] Multipath handling in oVirt

2017-02-01 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Hi, As for me personally I have such a config: compute nodes with 4x1G nics and storages with 2x1G nics and 2 switches (not stackable). All servers runs on CentOS 7.X (7.3 at this monent). On compute nodes I have bonding with two nic1 and nic2 (attached to different switches) for mgmt and

Re: [ovirt-users] New Install Issues

2017-01-30 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Two days ago the same question was asked there with subj "Ovirt FQDN". I took a method from the neighbor thread and it works for me. The method is quite simple - just to create a file with a single line: [root@ovirt ~]# cat /etc/ovirt-engine/engine.conf.d/99-alternate-fqdn.conf

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
26.01.2017 11:11, Nir Soffer пишет: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Yura Poltoratskiy <yurapolt...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is to map rbd volume to all computes and to get the same block device, say /dev/foo/bar, acro

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
r to your question, but hopefully it helps. > > Regards, > Logan > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Yura Poltoratskiy <yurapolt...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is >> to map

[ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-25 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Hi, I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is to map rbd volume to all computes and to get the same block device, say /dev/foo/bar, across all nodes, and then use "POSIX compliant file systems" option to add Storage Domain. Am I crazy? If not, what should I do