Re: [Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

2013-01-14 Thread Jiri Belka
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:29:58 -0500 Dave Allan dal...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote: Hi, as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they don't use libvirt

Re: [Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

2013-01-10 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote: Hi, as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they don't use libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux specifics). If vdsm whould interact with qemu-kvm without libvirt it would open a way to have Solaris

Re: [Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

2013-01-10 Thread Dave Allan
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote: Hi, as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they don't use libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux specifics). I'm kind of surprised to

[Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

2013-01-08 Thread Jiri Belka
Hi, as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they don't use libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux specifics). If vdsm whould interact with qemu-kvm without libvirt it would open a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine. libvirt is another abstraction after vdsm