Re: [ovirt-users] 3.5 or 3.6 For Production System?
Charles, If you like thin provisioning, I'd not recommend to move NFS->iSCSI. Thin provisioned disks become Preallocated during migration from a file to block storage. On 06/02/16 20:09, "users-boun...@ovirt.org on behalf of Charles Tassell" wrote: >Hi Folks, > > I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one >or two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be >using a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use >NFS4. I'm wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt >3.6.2, or should I start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is >3.6 generally stable enough for production use? We're not doing >anything very complicated, just running a few Linux webserver VMs. No >high availability or auto-deployment type stuff. >___ >Users mailing list >Users@ovirt.org >http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] 3.5 or 3.6 For Production System?
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Charles Tassell > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one > or > > two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be > using > > a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I'm > > wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt 3.6.2, or should > I > > start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is 3.6 generally stable > > enough for production use? We're not doing anything very complicated, > just > > running a few Linux webserver VMs. No high availability or > auto-deployment > > type stuff. > > By all means, use oVirt 3.6. It works great and is recommended for > production use. I highly recommend you deploy it on RHEL/CentOS 7.2, > for best results. > +2 to both points: - There are no plans to fix issues in 3.5.x - only in 3.6.x releases - 7.2 hosts are preferred as some features are only available there. Y. > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] 3.5 or 3.6 For Production System?
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Charles Tassell wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one or > two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be using > a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I'm > wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt 3.6.2, or should I > start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is 3.6 generally stable > enough for production use? We're not doing anything very complicated, just > running a few Linux webserver VMs. No high availability or auto-deployment > type stuff. By all means, use oVirt 3.6. It works great and is recommended for production use. I highly recommend you deploy it on RHEL/CentOS 7.2, for best results. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] 3.5 or 3.6 For Production System?
Hi Folks, I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one or two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be using a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I'm wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt 3.6.2, or should I start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is 3.6 generally stable enough for production use? We're not doing anything very complicated, just running a few Linux webserver VMs. No high availability or auto-deployment type stuff. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
