[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt and Netapp question

2019-11-10 Thread Ladislav Humenik
Hi, basically the aggregate free space is relevant, as you mentioned you 
are having thin volumes, right?


On 08.11.19 07:18, Vrgotic, Marko wrote:

Hi Ladislav,

Not sure if you sam my reply, so i give it another shot.

I just want to he clear on understanding what you wrote in your 
recommendation.


Please check my previous reply.

Thank you.

Sent from my iPhone

On 6 Nov 2019, at 11:52, Vrgotic, Marko  
wrote:




Hi Ladislav,

Thank you for the reply.

On the matter of your Recommendation, when you mention free space, 
were you referring to:


  * Space that is free/unallocated on the Aggregate, allowing the
AutoGrow
  * Or all that is allocated to the volume but not actual Data Space

Kindly awaiting your reply.

-

kind regards/met vrindelijke groet

Marko Vrgotic
ActiveVideo

*From: *Ladislav Humenik 
*Date: *Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:45
*To: *"Vrgotic, Marko" 
*Cc: *"users@ovirt.org" 
*Subject: *Re: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt and Netapp question

Hi,

for the NetApp part, here is copy-paste from the netapp kb:

Answer

The volume "Over Provisioned Space" value provided in OnCommand 
System Manager (OCSM) is the "Over Provisioned Size" field provided 
by the |volume show| 
<https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930/volume__show.html> 
at the cluster shell.


This value is determined by the following formula:

(volume size) - (volume used) - (volume space available) - (snapshot used 
space) == storage that can't be provided by the aggregate if written to the 
volume

for the ovirt part:

Ovirt will see the volume size available within thin-volume without 
any knowledge of the aggregate space (available/or not) in behind.


Recommendation:

on netapp side do volume auto-grow and you are safe as long as you 
have free space inside aggregate.


HTH

On 05.11.19 14:54, Vrgotic, Marko wrote:

Second attempt 

*From: *"Vrgotic, Marko" 
<mailto:m.vrgo...@activevideo.com>
*Date: *Monday, 4 November 2019 at 14:01
*To: *"users@ovirt.org" <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
 <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
*Subject: *oVirt and Netapp question

Dear oVirt,

Few months ago our production environment oVirt with main Shared
storage via NFS Netapp is live.

We have been deploying VMs with thin provisioned HDD 40GB based
template, CentOS 7.

The Netapp NFS v4  storage volume is 7TB in size, also Thin
Provisioned.

First attached screenshot shows the space allocation of the
production volume from Netapp side.

Is there anyone in oVirt community who would be able to tell me
the meaning of the 5.31 TB Over Provisioned Space?



Second attached is the info  of the production volume from oVirt
side:



What I want to understand is the way how is oVirt reading the
volume usage and Netapp and where is the difference.

Is the Over Allocated Space something that is just logically
used/reserved and will be intelligently re-allocated/re-used as
the actual Data Space Used grows or am I looking at oVIrt
actually hitting Critical Space Action Blocker and will have to
resize the volume?

If there is anyone from Netapp or with good Netapp experience
that is able to help understanding the data above better, thank
you in advance?

Kindly awaiting your reply.

-

kind regards/met vrindelijke groet

Marko Vrgotic
ActiveVideo



___

Users mailing list --users@ovirt.org  <mailto:users@ovirt.org>

To unsubscribe send an email tousers-le...@ovirt.org  
<mailto:users-le...@ovirt.org>

Privacy Statement:https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/

oVirt Code of 
Conduct:https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/

List 
Archives:https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/BVGZMJHNNM3LO3OIA65KEY64Z5BIHZ7R/


--
Ladislav Humenik

System administrator / VI
IT Operations Hosting Infrastructure

1&1 IONOS SE | Ernst-Frey-Str. 5 | 76135 Karlsruhe | Germany
Phone: +49 721 91374-8361
E-mail: ladislav.hume...@ionos.com | Web: www.ionos.de

Hauptsitz Montabaur, Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 24498

Vorstand: Dr. Christian Böing, Hüseyin Dogan, Hans-Henning Kettler, Matthias 
Steinberg, Achim Weiß
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Markus Kadelke


Member of United Internet

Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder gesetzlich geschützte Informationen 
enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail 
irrtümlich erhalten haben, unterrichten Sie bitte den Absender und vernichten 
Sie diese E-Mail. Anderen als dem bestimmungsgemäßen Adressaten ist untersagt, 
diese E-Mail zu speichern, weiterzuleiten oder ihren Inhalt auf welche Weise 
auch immer zu verwenden.

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipien

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt and Netapp question

2019-11-08 Thread Vrgotic, Marko
Hi Ladislav,

That is correct. Thin Provisioned FlexVolumes.


-
kind regards/met vrindelijke groet

Marko Vrgotic
ActiveVideo


From: Ladislav Humenik 
Date: Friday, 8 November 2019 at 13:44
To: "Vrgotic, Marko" 
Cc: "users@ovirt.org" 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt and Netapp question

Hi, basically the aggregate free space is relevant, as you mentioned you are 
having thin volumes, right?

On 08.11.19 07:18, Vrgotic, Marko wrote:
Hi Ladislav,

Not sure if you sam my reply, so i give it another shot.

I just want to he clear on understanding what you wrote in your recommendation.

Please check my previous reply.

Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone


On 6 Nov 2019, at 11:52, Vrgotic, Marko 
<mailto:m.vrgo...@activevideo.com> wrote:
Hi Ladislav,

Thank you for the reply.

On the matter of your Recommendation, when you mention free space, were you 
referring to:

  *   Space that is free/unallocated on the Aggregate, allowing the AutoGrow
  *   Or all that is allocated to the volume but not actual Data Space

Kindly awaiting your reply.


-
kind regards/met vrindelijke groet

Marko Vrgotic
ActiveVideo


From: Ladislav Humenik 
<mailto:ladislav.hume...@ionos.com>
Date: Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 20:45
To: "Vrgotic, Marko" 
<mailto:m.vrgo...@activevideo.com>
Cc: "users@ovirt.org"<mailto:users@ovirt.org> 
<mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt and Netapp question


Hi,

for the NetApp part, here is copy-paste from the netapp kb:
Answer
The volume "Over Provisioned Space" value provided in OnCommand System Manager 
(OCSM) is the "Over Provisioned Size" field provided by the volume 
show<https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930/volume__show.html>
 at the cluster shell.

This value is determined by the following formula:

(volume size) - (volume used) - (volume space available) - (snapshot used 
space) == storage that can't be provided by the aggregate if written to the 
volume



for the ovirt part:
Ovirt will see the volume size available within thin-volume without any 
knowledge of the aggregate space (available/or not) in behind.


Recommendation:
on netapp side do volume auto-grow and you are safe as long as you have free 
space inside aggregate.

HTH

On 05.11.19 14:54, Vrgotic, Marko wrote:
Second attempt 

From: "Vrgotic, Marko" 
<mailto:m.vrgo...@activevideo.com>
Date: Monday, 4 November 2019 at 14:01
To: "users@ovirt.org"<mailto:users@ovirt.org> 
<mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Subject: oVirt and Netapp question

Dear oVirt,

Few months ago our production environment oVirt with main Shared storage via 
NFS Netapp is live.

We have been deploying VMs with thin provisioned HDD 40GB based template, 
CentOS 7.
The Netapp NFS v4  storage volume is 7TB in size, also Thin Provisioned.

First attached screenshot shows the space allocation of the production volume 
from Netapp side.
Is there anyone in oVirt community who would be able to tell me the meaning of 
the 5.31 TB Over Provisioned Space?


Second attached is the info  of the production volume from oVirt side:


What I want to understand is the way how is oVirt reading the volume usage and 
Netapp and where is the difference.
Is the Over Allocated Space something that is just logically used/reserved and 
will be intelligently re-allocated/re-used as the actual Data Space Used grows 
or am I looking at oVIrt actually hitting Critical Space Action Blocker and 
will have to resize the volume?
If there is anyone from Netapp or with good Netapp experience that is able to 
help understanding the data above better, thank you in advance?

Kindly awaiting your reply.


-
kind regards/met vrindelijke groet

Marko Vrgotic
ActiveVideo





___

Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org>

To unsubscribe send an email to 
users-le...@ovirt.org<mailto:users-le...@ovirt.org>

Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/

oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/

List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/BVGZMJHNNM3LO3OIA65KEY64Z5BIHZ7R/

--

Ladislav Humenik



System administrator / VI

IT Operations Hosting Infrastructure



1&1 IONOS SE | Ernst-Frey-Str. 5 | 76135 Karlsruhe | Germany

Phone: +49 721 91374-8361

E-mail: ladislav.hume...@ionos.com<mailto:ladislav.hume...@ionos.com> | Web: 
www.ionos.de<http://www.ionos.de>



Hauptsitz Montabaur, Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 24498



Vorstand: Dr. Christian Böing, Hüseyin Dogan, Hans-Henning Kettler, Matthias 
Steinberg, Achim Weiß

Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Markus Kadelke





Member of United Internet



Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder gesetzlich geschützte Informationen 
enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Adressat sind