- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, de...@ovirt.org,
fsimo...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com
Cc: Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de, users users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:21:18 PM
Subject:
On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
You probably missed the first part we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in
the spec file. In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6 before
committing http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214 ?
Il 24/09/2014 09:44, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
You probably missed the first part we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in
the spec file. In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6
On 24.09.2014 10:57, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 24/09/2014 09:44, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
You probably missed the first part we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in
the spec file. In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
Basically the
Since Vdsm was open-sourced, it was built and deployed via
Fedora.
Recently [http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214] vdsm introduced a spec-file
dependency onf qemu-kvm-rhev, and considered to backport it to the
ovirt-3.4 brach.
Requiring qemu-kvm-rhev, which is not part of Fedora's EPEL6 branch,
5 matches
Mail list logo