Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

2016-06-24 Thread Sahina Bose
On 06/24/2016 03:16 PM, Dewey Du wrote: You mean we dont need to add new storage domain for each ovirt-node? Maybe I choose the "Use Host" option wrongly? I thought this is the way to tie the storage of "Host-01" to GlusterFS by selecting "Host-01" on the "Use Host" option. And I should do

Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

2016-06-24 Thread Dewey Du
You mean we dont need to add new storage domain for each ovirt-node? Maybe I choose the "Use Host" option wrongly? I thought this is the way to tie the storage of "Host-01" to GlusterFS by selecting "Host-01" on the "Use Host" option. And I should do the same thing for "Host-02", which adding new

Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

2016-06-24 Thread Sahina Bose
On 06/24/2016 11:25 AM, Dewey Du wrote: I prefer deploying as a hyperconverged setup, but it is still under experiment, right? Hyperconverged deployment with oVirt and Gluster has been tested and is currently offered as a preview feature with guidance on do's/don'ts & recommended gluster

Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

2016-06-23 Thread Dewey Du
I prefer deploying as a hyperconverged setup, but it is still under experiment, right? So I try to separate vm service and storage. I added new storage domain( Domain Type "Data", Storage Type "GlusterFS", Use Host "host-01". But then I can't add another new storage domain( Domain Type "Data",

Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

2016-06-21 Thread Sahina Bose
Make sure that you use replica 3 gluster volumes for storing VM images. Are you planning to deploy as a hyperconverged setup? Either way, try and use the latest ovirt 3.6 and glusterfs 3.7 (3.7.12 that addresses bugs related to sharding and o-direct is due to be released soon) On 06/21/2016