Hello Sven,
On 11/15/2013 09:35 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Ah, thanks for the hint, the fixed bugs list is quite long, so I
didn't read everything, I will give this some testing if
it is already in 3.3.1-2 beta (not mentioned in release notes?), but I
think it will work, this release seems very
Hello Sven,
On 11/13/2013 03:39 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Hi,
can someone elaborate on this fix?
Sure. The report it available at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025845
commit c62a6904bff7c2657cf4f184346e32916f90a2c7
Author: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 4
Hi,
can someone elaborate on this fix?
Is something broken with the ballooning-rules in the current
vdsm? If yes, what is it, and can it be circumvented until
a new vdsm stable release hits the ovirt.org repo?
Thanks in advance!
Am 12.11.2013 21:51, schrieb Douglas Schilling Landgraf:
-
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times. One time it required a future
selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much
lower version. Now the rpms have broken
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de
To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM
Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi all,
sorry for this rant
On 12.11.2013 11:07, Assaf Muller wrote:
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8.
Hi,
thanks for the hint, but according to
http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers the latest python-pep8
(python-pep8-1.3.3-3.el6) for el6 is already installed.
And further digging shows that probably
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times.
I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished.
We must improve in the points you have raised.
I now tried
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, dc...@redhat.com
Cc: vdsm-devel vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, oVirt Mailing List
users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Low quality of el6
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
snip
- There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec
requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days?
it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing:
Hi Patrick,
On 11/12/2013 09:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished.
We must
On 12.11.2013 11:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times.
I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask
On 12.11.2013 19:15, Mike Burns wrote:
On 11/12/2013 03:51 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by
others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build.
On 12.11.2013 15:33, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I suspect you are not interested in excuses for each of the failures,
let us look forwards. My conclusions are:
- Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is
not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de
To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM
Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
/usr/bin/pep8 --exclude=config.py
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been
answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build.
We would
On 11/12/2013 04:52 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been
answered by others developers. Anyway, we
17 matches
Mail list logo
