Hi,
Just a reminder that next week we're going to have a Test Day on May 27
(postponed 1 day due to collision with 3.5.3 RC2 release).
Maintainers: please update the test day page[1]
Testers: be sure to get your systems ready!
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Test_Day
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Bett
Hi,
In oVirt test day I tested the vdsm-tool,
I found a runtime error when running with service-* parameter - open a bug
#1115452.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
> To: "Moti Asayag" , "users@oVirt.org"
> Cc: "Doron Fediuck"
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 9:15:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt test day 3] Documentation - man pages result
>
> Il 06/03/2014 23:32, Moti Asayag ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
- Original Message -
> From: "Einav Cohen"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 1:24:08 AM
> Subject: [Users] [oVirt Test Day 3] oVirt live
>
> based on [1]:
>
> I took the latest (actually, only) ovirt live iso from:
> http://jenki
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:49:06AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 07/03/2014 11:04, dan...@redhat.com ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tested all-in-one, and it went much smoother than I've
> > expected! I must admit that it was a rather shallow test.
> >
> > - Installed a fresh CentOS 6.5 m
Il 07/03/2014 11:04, dan...@redhat.com ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I've tested all-in-one, and it went much smoother than I've
> expected! I must admit that it was a rather shallow test.
>
> - Installed a fresh CentOS 6.5 minimal installation
> - Followed http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_Test_Day#Install
Hi,
I've tested all-in-one, and it went much smoother than I've
expected! I must admit that it was a rather shallow test.
- Installed a fresh CentOS 6.5 minimal installation
- Followed http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_Test_Day#Installation_notes
- Followed http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/AllInOne#Inst
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
> To: Users@ovirt.org, "Brian Proffitt" , "Dave Neary"
> , "Einav Cohen"
> , "Yaniv Dary" , "Alon Bar-Lev"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 9:55:23 AM
> Subject: [ovirt test day 3] DWH installation
>
> I wasn't able to test it on Gent
For test day 3 I've tested DWH installation.
first step, getting info on how to install it:
gone to ovirt.org, followed "Start using oVirt now", there's no clue about
DWH or reports there or a link to what's next basic oVirt engine setup.
gone to http://www.ovirt.org/File:OVirt-3.0-Instal
Il 06/03/2014 23:32, Moti Asayag ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> In the third ovirt test day I reviewed the manuals of a various
> ovirt tools and commands:
>
> Here are my findings (haven't reported any bugs for them):
Please do, add keywords Documentation and ManPageChange for them
>
> The engine-bac
Hi,
In the third ovirt test day I reviewed the manuals of a various
ovirt tools and commands:
Here are my findings (haven't reported any bugs for them):
The engine-backup and engine-upgrade-check has no man pages,
however help is available by providing the --help argument:
No manual entry for e
I installed the engine development environment from scratch on:
Fedora 19:
Followed the instructions and in about 30 minutes I was compiling a new engine
which failed the first compile due to a java perm space error, I restarted the
compile and it finished successfully. The box only had 4G of me
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:20:25AM -0500, Eli Mesika wrote:
> I had to test the upgrade from 3.3.4 to 3.4
> I had installed and tested for sanity 3.3.4 but failed to upgrade it to 3.4
> on CentOS
> Opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073487
FWIW, I've updated an All-in-one host f
I tried ovirt-guest-agent over fedora 19 and 20,
- installed a vm with f19
- yum install ovirt-guest-agent
- started the service
- the information about machine name, ip address, os, ram, user all
appeared after installation
- notification for power off also appears
same for f20
looks ok on bot
Hello,
I tested all-in-one and here is what I did.
I installed fresh f19 on a vm running on my f20 (nested virt). During
the installation of ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone rpm I noticed
that yum verification step for vdsm run forever but the second attempt
succeeded. During engine setup iso d
Hi,
I tried to install oVirt Reports during test day 3 with these results:
1) Centos 6.5
- epel and jpackage6 repositories needs to be enabled
- installation and setup worked fine (set everything at default)
- after creating dc and cluster and adding host to engine, reports were able
Hi
I had to test the upgrade from 3.3.4 to 3.4
I had installed and tested for sanity 3.3.4 but failed to upgrade it to 3.4 on
CentOS
Opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073487
Eli
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.o
- Original Message -
> From: "Shahar Havivi"
> To: "Vojtech Szocs"
> Cc: "users" , "Einav Cohen"
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:28:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-test-day-2] Possible bug while testing vm-init-persistent
> feature
>
> On 13.02.14 12:35, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> > Th
On 13.02.14 12:35, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> Thank you, Shahar.
>
> I suspected that NPE would be due to empty domain :P (I forgot to mention
> that in my email)
>
> However, for me, even Run Once without Sysprep didn't work, I got an
> exception that seems to come from VDS broker backend componen
Thank you, Shahar.
I suspected that NPE would be due to empty domain :P (I forgot to mention that
in my email)
However, for me, even Run Once without Sysprep didn't work, I got an exception
that seems to come from VDS broker backend component.
Now I realize that I might have been using bad lib
Il 13/02/2014 02:44, Yair Zaslavsky ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
> I tested the following:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1053646easily collapsible left-pane - was
> not included in test day 1 (I was supposed to test it back then) - works fine.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1054209 - read onl
Hi,
I tested the following:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1053646easily collapsible left-pane - was
not included in test day 1 (I was supposed to test it back then) - works fine.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1054209 - read only disks - works fine.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1054219 - Onl
Hi
I had tested the following items :
***
infra 1038222 Read Only Admin role in AP
Test results : Working as expected, user can only view everything but can not
perform any action
*
Hi,
I tested $subject,
I have to say i don't know much about networks / neutron,
so maybe some of the issues i encountered are just my fault..
i used pre-configured neutron server (thanks Mike!)
and the beta2 for ovirt-engine, i used the wiki to configure it:
http://www.ovirt.org/Overlay_Networks_
Thanks Vojtech,
There is a bug (and a fix) here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1063883
Shahar.
On 11.02.14 18:20, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a possible bug while testing Shahar's vm-init-persistent
> feature, not sure if related to vm-init-persistent or Engine vs. vdsm RPC
>
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 06:09 -0500, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> > To: d...@redhat.com
> > Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:34:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [U
- Original Message -
> From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> To: d...@redhat.com
> Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:34:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-day-2] Testing all-in-one feature on f19
>
> On Wed, 2014-02-
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 05:09 -0500, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> > To: d...@redhat.com
> > Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:52:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: [U
- Original Message -
> From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> To: d...@redhat.com
> Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:52:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-day-2] Testing all-in-one feature on f19
> > > > >
>
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 03:35 -0500, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> > To: d...@redhat.com
> > Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:56:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: [U
- Original Message -
> From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> To: d...@redhat.com
> Cc: ih...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:56:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-day-2] Testing all-in-one feature on f19
>
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at
Thank you very much Vojtech
I will look to this very soon
Shahar Havivi.
On 11.02.14 18:20, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a possible bug while testing Shahar's vm-init-persistent
> feature, not sure if related to vm-init-persistent or Engine vs. vdsm RPC
> issue.
>
> Followed
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 02:51 -0500, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> > To: ih...@redhat.com
> > Cc: users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:37:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-te
- Original Message -
> From: "Karli Sjöberg"
> To: ih...@redhat.com
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:37:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-day-2] Testing all-in-one feature on f19
>
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 18:40 +0200,
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: aw...@redhat.com, users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:40:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-day-2] Testing all-in-one feature on f19
>
> On 02/11/2014 06:19 PM, Alexander Wels wrote:
&g
tdated test page -- and I work these steps in
some combination hoping it'll work, and it usually doesn't :(
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Wels"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:40:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] [ovirt-test-
On 02/11/2014 06:19 PM, Alexander Wels wrote:
Same issue for me, I did a minimum fedora 19 install added the appropriate
repositories. Completed almost successfully, host didn't come up with vdsm
compatibility error message.
The vdsm on the host is: vdsm-4.13.3-3.fc19.x86_64
I tried the same 3.
To reply to myself, I forgot to add the correct repo to my host, once I fixed
that updated the host, it came up fine in the default 3.4 dc.
The correct vdsm version is: vdsm-4.14.2-0.fc19.x86_64
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:19:35 AM Alexander Wels wrote:
> Same issue for me, I did a minimum
Same issue for me, I did a minimum fedora 19 install added the appropriate
repositories. Completed almost successfully, host didn't come up with vdsm
compatibility error message.
The vdsm on the host is: vdsm-4.13.3-3.fc19.x86_64
I tried the same 3.3 dc/cluster and the host came up immediately
Hi,
In the 3.4 ovirt-test-day-2 I've tested the all-in-one feature.
I installed the all-in-one setup on a vm.
The installation ended almost successfully, except of the vdsm service,
where the the host didn't become operational due to lack of support
in clusterLevel >= 3.4:
Feb 11 15:51:52 localh
Just a reminder that tomorrow we plan to have oVirt 3.4 2nd test day.
More details coming soon.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
- Original Message -
> From: "Moti Asayag"
> To: "Doron Fediuck"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 1:17:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
>
>
>
> - Origin
- Original Message -
> From: "Doron Fediuck"
> To: "Moti Asayag"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 1:07:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
>
>
>
> - Origi
- Original Message -
> From: "Moti Asayag"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:54:22 PM
> Subject: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
>
> Hi All,
>
> In the latest ovirt-test-day i've t
Hi All,
In the latest ovirt-test-day i've tested the HA VM resource reservation
feature [1] according to the basic scenarios as described on [2].
The new feature notifies the admin via an event log about his cluster
inability to preserve resources for HA VMs. I've reported 2 bugs based
on the beh
On 01/15/2012 09:36 AM, Moran Goldboim wrote:
Due to a late re-base we have decided to defer the testday in 2 days to
Wednesday Jan 18th.
Sorry for the late notice, hope to see you all there.
Not that I mind the test day being moved, but how was it decided to move the
test day? I don't see an
Hi Andre,
On 01/18/2012 03:36 PM, André Felício wrote:
Problem #3: Add oVirt node from Webadmin engine.
# cat /tmp/vds_installer.455167.log
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:25:37 DEBUG Start VDS Installation
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:25:37 DEBUGget_id_line: read line oVirt Node
Hypervisor release
On 01/18/2012 10:36 PM, André Felício wrote:
Hi all,
I found some problems installing the oVirt. Engine on F16 e using ovirt-node
I did the installation of a engine in Fedora 16 minimum.
Problem #1: No suporte on ovirt-node to UEFI machine. You must run in
legacy mode
Problem #2: I run the e
> Problem #1: No suporte on ovirt-node to UEFI machine. You must run in
> legacy mode
Yes, we're all aware of this. It's been discussed at length on no less
than 10 threads on node-devel list :)
Please see/track:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761540
Hi all,
I found some problems installing the oVirt. Engine on F16 e using ovirt-node
I did the installation of a engine in Fedora 16 minimum.
Problem #1: No suporte on ovirt-node to UEFI machine. You must run in
legacy mode
Problem #2: I run the engine-setup and I get the following error in th
All are invited to join and share your ideas, tests, and results.
all details available at http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Testing/OvirtTestDay
IRC - #ovirt at irc.oftc.net
hope to see you there.
Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ov
- Original Message -
> From: "Moran Goldboim"
> To: "Anthony Liguori"
> Cc: annou...@ovirt.org, a...@ovirt.org, users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:20:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt test day is coming - Jan 16th - Deferred to Jan
On 01/16/2012 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/15/2012 09:36 AM, Moran Goldboim wrote:
Due to a late re-base we have decided to defer the testday in 2 days to
Wednesday Jan 18th.
Sorry for the late notice, hope to see you all there.
Not that I mind the test day being moved, but how was i
53 matches
Mail list logo
