On 09/11/2012 04:59 PM, Joey Boggs wrote:
On 09/11/2012 10:44 AM, Jorick Astrego wrote:
- Original Message -
- We have Intel Xenon E5520 Nehalem based cpu's in these local storage
nodes.
These are still recognized as the Conroe family. Even though
BZ#737104 was suppose
On 09/11/2012 10:44 AM, Jorick Astrego wrote:
- Original Message -
- We have Intel Xenon E5520 Nehalem based cpu's in these local storage
nodes.
These are still recognized as the Conroe family. Even though
BZ#737104 was supposed to have been fixed.
(http://gerr
- Original Message -
- We have Intel Xenon E5520 Nehalem based cpu's in these local storage
nodes.
These are still recognized as the Conroe family. Even though
BZ#737104 was supposed to have been fixed.
(http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/5035/ )
Not ovirt-node direct
- Original Message -
>
> Hi,
>
> Due to some issues we had with the latest stable, I started testing
> the latest nightly build of the ovirt node iso.
>
> The problems I run into now:
>
> - After node installation the network interfaces are both disabled. I
> had to login the node wit
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jorick Astrego wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to some issues we had with the latest stable, I started testing
> the latest nightly build of the ovirt node iso.
>
> The problems I run into now:
>
> - After node installation the network interfaces are both disabled. I
> ha
Hi,
Due to some issues we had with the latest stable, I started testing the
latest nightly build of the ovirt node iso.
The problems I run into now:
- After node installation the network interfaces are both disabled. I
had to login the node with the admin login and enable my network interfac
6 matches
Mail list logo
