Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-26 Thread Federico Simoncelli
- Original Message - From: Sven Kieske svenkie...@gmail.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 6:42:11 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please consider: https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-23 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 22/10/2014 13:12, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 22/10/14 08:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Hi, now that oVirt 3.5.0 has been released is time to start planning for 3.5.1. Release management for 3.5.z has been created [1] Suggested schedule for 3.5.1, following the 1 month schedule we had in

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-23 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 22/10/2014 13:51, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 22/10/14 13:12, Sven Kieske wrote: As it's a regression from 3.4 I'd sugest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145241 as a blocker. To be a little more specific on this topic: This bug got introduced because of incomplete release

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-23 Thread Sven Kieske
On 23/10/14 08:49, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 22/10/2014 13:51, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 22/10/14 13:12, Sven Kieske wrote: As it's a regression from 3.4 I'd sugest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145241 as a blocker. To be a little more specific on this topic: This bug

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-23 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 23/10/2014 15:07, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 23/10/14 08:49, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 22/10/2014 13:51, Sven Kieske ha scritto: On 22/10/14 13:12, Sven Kieske wrote: As it's a regression from 3.4 I'd sugest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145241 as a blocker. To be a

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-23 Thread Sven Kieske
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please consider: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156115 as a backport to 3.5.1 I don't know if you plan to release a new vdsm version though and I also don't know if this patch is already matured enough, if I can test or help make

[ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-22 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, now that oVirt 3.5.0 has been released is time to start planning for 3.5.1. Release management for 3.5.z has been created [1] Suggested schedule for 3.5.1, following the 1 month schedule we had in 3.4.z, are: General availability: 2014-12-02 RC Build: 2014-11-25 A tracker bug for 3.5.1 has

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-22 Thread Sven Kieske
On 22/10/14 08:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Hi, now that oVirt 3.5.0 has been released is time to start planning for 3.5.1. Release management for 3.5.z has been created [1] Suggested schedule for 3.5.1, following the 1 month schedule we had in 3.4.z, are: General availability:

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-22 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de wrote: On 22/10/14 08:32, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Hi, now that oVirt 3.5.0 has been released is time to start planning for 3.5.1. Release management for 3.5.z has been created [1] Suggested schedule for 3.5.1,

Re: [ovirt-users] [QE] oVirt 3.5.1 status

2014-10-22 Thread Sven Kieske
On 22/10/14 13:12, Sven Kieske wrote: As it's a regression from 3.4 I'd sugest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145241 as a blocker. To be a little more specific on this topic: This bug got introduced because of incomplete release criteria: MUST: Fully operational flow (define DC