Am 20.06.2014 15:32, schrieb Vinzenz Feenstra:
> Isn't that section referring to HA VMs?
No.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald
On 06/20/2014 02:52 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 14:19, schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
the host was not fenced, the vms where fenced.
here is a link to the documentation which should explain what I mean:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.3
Am 20.06.2014 14:19, schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
>> the host was not fenced, the vms where fenced.
>>
>> here is a link to the documentation which should explain what I mean:
>>
>> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.3/html/Administration_Guide/Virtu
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:53:24AM +, Sven Kieske wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.06.2014 11:34, schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
> >
> > I do not quite understand the problem you describe.
>
> See below, I hope this clears some things up.
>
> > Does the problem go away if you set your network to "non-required"
Am 20.06.2014 11:34, schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
>
> I do not quite understand the problem you describe.
See below, I hope this clears some things up.
> Does the problem go away if you set your network to "non-required"? If
> your VM's app does not strictly require unintermitant networking, just
>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:41:21AM +, Sven Kieske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please consider this bugreport:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520
>
> it is about the default fencing behaviour of ovirt
> in the special case of a single node cluster when
> a logical network marked as
6 matches
Mail list logo
