Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2017-01-03 Thread Nathanaël Blanchet
Le 02/01/2017 à 11:14, Martin Polednik a écrit : On 23/12/16 10:42 +0100, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote: Le 22/12/2016 à 17:17, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet > wrote: Hi, sebool unconfigured

Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2017-01-02 Thread Martin Polednik
On 23/12/16 10:42 +0100, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote: Le 22/12/2016 à 17:17, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet > wrote: Hi, sebool unconfigured module prevents vdsm from starting: We always run with

Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2016-12-22 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote: > Hi, > sebool unconfigured module prevents vdsm from starting: > We always run with selinux. What's the reason for disabling it? Y. [root@gaua2 network-scripts]# vdsm-tool configure --force > > Checking

Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2016-12-19 Thread Maton, Brett
I'll give that ago this evening, although that might be related to trying to deploy to the host multiple times On 19 December 2016 at 09:54, Simone Tiraboschi wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Maton, Brett > wrote: > >> Log from the

Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2016-12-19 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Maton, Brett wrote: > Log from the last deploy attempt attached. > 2016-12-18 12:52:05 DEBUG otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_mgmt.packages.update update.verbose:94 Yum: There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running

Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2016-12-19 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Maton, Brett wrote: > I had a mac address conflict so reinstalled ( from scratch ) 4.1 this > morning, CPU load issue in UI was still there. > We already have an open bug about this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390675

[ovirt-users] Fwd: [Call for feedback] anybody gave 4.1 beta a try?

2016-12-17 Thread Maton, Brett
I had a mac address conflict so reinstalled ( from scratch ) 4.1 this morning, CPU load issue in UI was still there. I can't deploy additional hosts now though due to SSH errors. Experimenting, I updated the hosted engine this afternoon and the CPU load issue seems be have either been fixed or